Distribution characteristics of heavy metal(loid)s in aggregates of different size fractions along contaminated paddy soil profile
- 197 Downloads
Soil aggregates exert a significant influence on the retention and availability of heavy metal(loid)s in soil. In this study, the concentration distribution and chemical forms of heavy metals (Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb, and Hg) and a metalloid (As) in different aggregate-sized fractions (2–0.25, 0.25–0.05, 0.05–0.002, and < 0.002 mm) along the profile (0–1, 1–5, 5–15, and 15–25 cm) of a contaminated paddy field were investigated. The results showed that the values of pH, free Fe oxides (Fed), bulk density, and catalase activity gradually increased, whereas the soil organic matter (SOM), cation exchange capacity (CEC), electrical conductivity (EC), microbial biomass carbon (MBC), and urease activity decreased with depth. Long-term heavy metal pollution might impact the catalase activity but showed no obvious influence on the urease activity. Additionally, there was a notable difference in physicochemical properties among the soil aggregates of various particle sizes. The 2–0.25-mm fraction aggregates contained more organic matter, whereas the highest values of CEC and Fed were observed in the < 0.002-mm fraction. The concentrations of all six heavy metals/metalloid decreased with depth. In different layers, Cu and Cd showed the highest concentrations in the 2–0.25 mm-fraction, followed by the < 0.002-mm fraction, whereas the highest concentrations of Zn, Pb, and As appeared in the < 0.002-mm fraction. No obvious distribution regularity was observed for Hg among the aggregates. All of the metal(loid)s had lower activity in the deeper soil layers, except for Hg. Furthermore, Cu and Cd displayed more stable forms in the < 0.002-mm fraction aggregates.
KeywordsPaddy soil profile Heavy metal(loid)s Aggregates BCR method Soil enzyme Smelting plant
This work was supported by the GDAS’ Special Project of Science and Technology Development (2017GDASCX-0830), the Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41701320, 41501298 and 51521006), the High-level Leading Talent Introduction Program (2060599), the SPICC Program (The Scientific Platform and Innovation Capability Construction Program of GDAS, 2016GDASPT-0105 and 0304), the Construction of Innovative Talents for Pollution Control and Management of Heavy Metals in Farmland (2016B070701015), and Key Research Items in Science and Technology Program from China Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Department (No. 2015SK2004). We would like to thank Ninglin Luo, Qiu Zhang, Mei Huang, and Xiuqing Zhai of Hunan University for the sampling and laboratory analysis.
Compliance with ethical standards
The manuscript has not been submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration and has not been published previously (partly or in full).
A single study is not split up into several parts to increase the quantity of submissions and submitted to various journals or to one journal over time.
No data have been fabricated or manipulated (including images) to support the conclusions.
No data, text, or theories by others are presented as if they were our own. Proper acknowledgements have been given, quotation marks are used for verbatim copying of material, and permissions are secured for material that is copyrighted.
Consent to submit has been received explicitly from all co-authors.
Authors whose names appear on the submission have contributed sufficiently to the scientific work and therefore share collective responsibility and accountability for the results.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Belic M, Nesic L, Dimitrijevic M, Petrovic S, Ciric V, Pekec S, Vasin J (2012) Impact of reclamation practices on the content and qualitative composition of exchangeable base cations of the solonetz soil. Aust J Crop Sci 6:1471Google Scholar
- GB 15618 (1995) Environmental quality standard for soils. Ministry of Environmental Protection of China. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Guan S, Zhang D, Zhang Z (1986) Soil enzyme and its research methods. Agricultural, Beijing. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Hendershot WH, Lalande H, Duquette M (1993) Soil reaction and exchangeable acidity. In: Carter MR (ed) Soil sampling and method of analysis. Lewis publisher, Boca Raton, pp 141–145Google Scholar
- Huq SMI, Joardar JC, Parvin S, Correll R, Naidu R (2006) Arsenic contamination in food-chain: transfer of arsenic into food materials through groundwater irrigation. J Health Popul Nutr 24:305–316Google Scholar
- Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1982) Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeny DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis. American Society of Agronomy, Wisconsin, pp 539–579Google Scholar
- Nemati K, Bakar NKA, Abas MR, Sobhanzadeh E (2011) Speciation of heavy metals by modified BCR sequential extraction procedure in different depths of sediments from Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia. J Hazard Mater 192:402–410Google Scholar
- Okkenhaug G, Zhu Y, He J, Li X, Luo L, Mulder J (2012) Antimony (Sb) and arsenic (As) in Sb mining impacted paddy soil from Xikuangshan, China: differences in mechanisms controlling soil sequestration and uptake in rice. Environ Sci Technol 463:155–3162Google Scholar
- Su C, Jiang L, Zhang W (2014) A review on heavy metal contamination in the soil worldwide: situation, impact and remediation techniques. Environ Skep Crit 3:24–38Google Scholar
- The Ministry of Environmental Protection (2014) The Ministry of Land and Resources report on the national soil contamination survey http://www.mep.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/qt/201404/t20140417_270670.htm. Accessed 27 Aug 2014
- Zhang L, Li L, Pan G, Cui L, Li H, Wu X, Shao J (2009) Effect of heavy metals pollution on paddy soil aggregates composition and heavy metals distribution. Chin J Appl Ecol 20:2806–2812 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Zheng X, Xia B, Lin X (2010) Variation of total organic carbon and particulate and organic carbon in paddy soils contaminated by heavy metals. China Environ Sci 30:369–373 (in Chinese)Google Scholar