Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 24, Issue 30, pp 23803–23814 | Cite as

Composting plant leachate treatment by a pilot-scale, three-stage, horizontal flow constructed wetland in central Iran

Research Article

Abstract

Handling and treatment of composting leachate is difficult and poses major burdens on composting facilities. The main goal of this study was to evaluate usage of a three-stage, constructed wetland to treat leachate produced in Isfahan composting facility. A pilot-scale, three-stage, subsurface, horizontal flow constructed wetland, planted with vetiver with a flow rate of 24 L/day and a 15-day hydraulic retention time, was used. Removal of organic matter, ammonia, nitrate, total nitrogen, suspended solids, and several heavy metals from Isfahan composting facility leachate was monitored over a 3-month period. Constructed wetland system was capable of efficiently removing BOD5 (87.3%), COD (74.5%), ammonia (91.5%), nitrate (87.9%), total nitrogen (87.8%), total suspended solids (85.5%), and heavy metals (ranging from 70 to 90%) from the composting leachate. High contaminant removal efficiencies were achieved, but effluent still failed to meet Iranian standards for treated wastewater. This study shows that although a three-stage horizontal flow constructed wetland planted with vetiver cannot be used alone to treat Isfahan composting facility leachate, but it has the potential to be used as a leachate pre-treatment step, along with another complementary method.

Keywords

Composting leachate Horizontal flow constructed wetland Leachate treatment Multi-stage constructed wetland High-strength leachate 

References

  1. APHA A (2012) WEF (2012), Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Ávila C, Matamoros V, Reyes-Contreras C, Piña B, Casado M, Mita L, Rivetti C, Barata C, García J, Bayona JM (2014) Attenuation of emerging organic contaminants in a hybrid constructed wetland system under different hydraulic loading rates and their associated toxicological effects in wastewater. Sci Total Environ 470–471:1272–1280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayaz SÇ, Aktaş Ö, Akça L, Fındık N (2015) Effluent quality and reuse potential of domestic wastewater treated in a pilot-scale hybrid constructed wetland system. J Environ Manag 156:115–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Babaei AA, Azadi R, Jaafarzadeh N, Alavi N (2013) Application and kinetic evaluation of upflow anaerobic biofilm reactor for nitrogen removal from wastewater by Anammox process. Iran J Environ Health Sci Eng 10:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bachand PA, Horne AJ (1999) Denitrification in constructed free-water surface wetlands: II. Effects of vegetation and temperature. Ecol Eng 14:17–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bakhshoodeh R, Alavi N, Mohammadi AS, Ghanavati H (2017a) Erratum to: removing heavy metals from Isfahan composting leachate by horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:4221–4221Google Scholar
  7. Bakhshoodeh R, Alavi N, Majlesi M, Paydary P (2017b) Compost leachate treatment by a pilot-scale subsurface horizontal flow constructed wetland. Ecol Eng 105:7–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bang J, Kamala-Kannan S, Lee K-J, Cho M, Kim C-H, Kim Y-J, Bae J-H, Kim K-H, Myung H, Oh B-T (2015) Phytoremediation of heavy metals in contaminated water and soil using Miscanthus sp. Goedae-Uksae 1. Int J Phytoremediation 17:515–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Białowiec A, Albuquerque A, Randerson PF (2014) The influence of evapotranspiration on vertical flow subsurface constructed wetland performance. Ecol Eng 67:89–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brix H, Schierup H-H (1990) Soil oxygenation in constructed reed beds: the role of macrophyte and soil atmosphere interface oxygen transport. In: Cooper PF, Findlater BC (eds) Constructed wetlands in water pollution control. Pergamon Press, London, pp 53–66Google Scholar
  11. Brown K, Ghoshdastidar AJ, Hanmore J, Frazee J, Tong AZ (2013) Membrane bioreactor technology: a novel approach to the treatment of compost leachate. Waste Manag 33:2188–2194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chian ES, DeWalle FB (1977) Characterization of soluble organic matter in leachate. Environ Sci Technol 11:158–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Choi J, Geronimo FKF, Maniquiz-Redillas MC, Kang M-J, Kim L-H (2015) Evaluation of a hybrid constructed wetland system for treating urban stormwater runoff. Desalin Water Treat 53:3104–3110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ciria MP, Solano ML, Soriano P (2005) Role of macrophyte Typha latifolia in a constructed wetland for wastewater treatment and assessment of its potential as a biomass fuel. Biosyst Eng 92:535–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cooper PF, Job G, Green M, Shutes R (1996) Reed beds and constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Water Research Centre, SwindonGoogle Scholar
  16. del Bubba M, Checchini L, Pifferi C, Zanieri L, Lepri L (2004) Olive mill wastewater treatment by a pilot-scale subsurface horizontal flow (SSF-h) constructed wetland. Ann Chim 94:875–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dong Z, Sun T (2007) A potential new process for improving nitrogen removal in constructed wetlands—promoting coexistence of partial-nitrification and ANAMMOX. Ecol Eng 31:69–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. El-Fadel M, Bou-Zeid E, Chahine W, Alayli B (2002) Temporal variation of leachate quality from pre-sorted and baled municipal solid waste with high organic and moisture content. Waste Manag 22:269–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Esfandiari S, Khosrokhavar R, Sekhavat M (2010) A waste-to-energy plant for municipal solid waste management at the composting plant in Isfahan, Iran, 2nd International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology IPCBEE. IACSIT Press, Singapore, pp 449–452Google Scholar
  20. Golabi M, Kirk J, Takeshi F, Eri I (2014) Transforming municipal waste into a valuable soil conditioner through knowledge-based resource-recovery management. Int J Waste Resour 4:140Google Scholar
  21. Headley TR, Davison L, Huett DO, Müller R (2012) Evapotranspiration from subsurface horizontal flow wetlands planted with Phragmites australis in sub-tropical Australia. Water Res 46:345–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hu Y, He F, Ma L, Zhang Y, Wu Z (2016) Microbial nitrogen removal pathways in integrated vertical-flow constructed wetland systems. Bioresour Technol 207:339–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. ISIRI (1994) Treated wastewater standards. Institute of Standards & Industrial Research of Iran, IranGoogle Scholar
  24. Kadlec R, Knight R (1996) Treatment wetlands. CRC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  25. Kadlec R, Wallace S (2009) Treatment wetlands, 2nd edn. CRCPress, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  26. Kadlec R, Knight R, Vymazal J, Brix H, Cooper P, Haberl R (2000) Constructed wetlands for pollution control. In: Processes, performance, design, and operation. IWA Specialist Group on the Use of Macrophytes in Water Pollution Control, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Kato K, Inoue T, Ietsugu H, Koba T, Sasaki H, Miyaji N, Kitagawa K, Sharma PK, Nagasawa T (2013) Performance of six multi-stage hybrid wetland systems for treating high-content wastewater in the cold climate of Hokkaido, Japan. Ecol Eng 51:256–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Korzun EA, Heck HH (1990) Sources and fates of lead and cadmium in municipal solid waste. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 40:1220–1226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kouki S, M’hiri F, Saidi N, Belaïd S, Hassen A (2009) Performances of a constructed wetland treating domestic wastewaters during a macrophytes life cycle. Desalination 246:452–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee C-Y, Lee C-C, Lee F-Y, Tseng S-K, Liao C-J (2004) Performance of subsurface flow constructed wetland taking pretreated swine effluent under heavy loads. Bioresour Technol 92:173–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lin Y-F, Jing S-R, Wang T-W, Lee D-Y (2002) Effects of macrophytes and external carbon sources on nitrate removal from groundwater in constructed wetlands. Environ Pollut 119:413–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liu C-H, Lo KV (2001) Ammonia removal from composting leachate using zeolite. I. Characterization of the zeolite. J Environ Sci Health A 36:1671–1688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Maleki A, Zazouli MA, Izanloo H, Rezaee R (2009) Composting plant leachate treatment by coagulation-flocculation process. Am Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci 5:638–643Google Scholar
  34. Masi F, Martinuzzi N (2007) Constructed wetlands for the Mediterranean countries: hybrid systems for water reuse and sustainable sanitation. Desalination 215:44–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Matheson FE, Sukias JP (2010) Nitrate removal processes in a constructed wetland treating drainage from dairy pasture. Ecol Eng 36:1260–1265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Midhun G, Divya L, George J, Jayakumar P, Suriyanarayanan S (2016) Wastewater treatment studies on free water surface constructed wetland system. In: Prashanthi M, Sundaram R (eds) Integrated waste management in India. Environmental Science and Engineering. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  37. Misiti TM, Hajaya MG, Pavlostathis SG (2011) Nitrate reduction in a simulated free-water surface wetland system. Water Res 45:5587–5598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mojiri A, Ziyang L, Tajuddin RM, Farraji H, Alifar N (2016) Co-treatment of landfill leachate and municipal wastewater using the ZELIAC/zeolite constructed wetland system. J Environ Manag 166:124–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Narváez L, Cunill C, Cáceres R, Marfà O (2011) Design and monitoring of horizontal subsurface-flow constructed wetlands for treating nursery leachates. Bioresour Technol 102:6414–6420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. O’luanaigh N, Goodhue R, Gill L (2010) Nutrient removal from on-site domestic wastewater in horizontal subsurface flow reed beds in Ireland. Ecol Eng 36:1266–1276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Paul EA (2014) Soil microbiology, ecology and biochemistry. Academic press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  42. Platzer C (1999) Design recommendations for subsurface flow constructed wetlands for nitrification and denitrification. Water Sci Technol 40:257–263Google Scholar
  43. Rotkittikhun P, Chaiyarat R, Kruatrachue M, Pokethitiyook P, Baker A (2007) Growth and lead accumulation by the grasses Vetiveria zizanioides and Thysanolaena maxima in lead-contaminated soil amended with pig manure and fertilizer: a glasshouse study. Chemosphere 66:45–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Saeed T, Sun G (2012) A review on nitrogen and organics removal mechanisms in subsurface flow constructed wetlands: dependency on environmental parameters, operating conditions and supporting media. J Environ Manag 112:429–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Saeed T, Sun G (2013) A lab-scale study of constructed wetlands with sugarcane bagasse and sand media for the treatment of textile wastewater. Bioresour Technol 128:438–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Saeed T, Sun G (2017) A comprehensive review on nutrients and organics removal from different wastewaters employing subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 47:203–288Google Scholar
  47. Shanker AK, Djanaguiraman M, Sudhagar R, Chandrashekar C, Pathmanabhan G (2004) Differential antioxidative response of ascorbate glutathione pathway enzymes and metabolites to chromium speciation stress in green gram (Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek. cv CO 4) roots. Plant Sci 166:1035–1043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sheoran AS, Sheoran V (2006) Heavy metal removal mechanism of acid mine drainage in wetlands: a critical review. Miner Eng 19:105–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Singh S, Haberl R, Moog O, Shrestha RR, Shrestha P, Shrestha R (2009) Performance of an anaerobic baffled reactor and hybrid constructed wetland treating high-strength wastewater in Nepal—a model for DEWATS. Ecol Eng 35:654–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Spieles DJ, Mitsch WJ (1999) The effects of season and hydrologic and chemical loading on nitrate retention in constructed wetlands: a comparison of low-and high-nutrient riverine systems. Ecol Eng 14:77–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stottmeister U, Wießner A, Kuschk P, Kappelmeyer U, Kästner M, Bederski O, Müller R, Moormann H (2003) Effects of plants and microorganisms in constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Biotechnol Adv 22:93–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tanner C, Kadlec R (2003) Oxygen flux implications of observed nitrogen removal rates in subsurface-flow treatment wetlands. Water Sci Technol 48:191–198Google Scholar
  53. Taylor CR, Hook PB, Stein OR, Zabinski CA (2011) Seasonal effects of 19 plant species on COD removal in subsurface treatment wetland microcosms. Ecol Eng 37:703–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Trujillo D, Font X, Sánchez A (2006) Use of Fenton reaction for the treatment of leachate from composting of different wastes. J Hazard Mater 138:201–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Valipour A, Ahn Y-H (2016) Constructed wetlands as sustainable ecotechnologies in decentralization practices: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:180–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Vázquez M, De la Varga D, Plana R, Soto M (2013) Vertical flow constructed wetland treating high strength wastewater from swine slurry composting. Ecol Eng 50:37–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vergeles Y, Vystavna Y, Ishchenko A, Rybalka I, Marchand L, Stolberg F (2015) Assessment of treatment efficiency of constructed wetlands in East Ukraine. Ecol Eng 83:159–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Visvanathan C, Tränkler J, Gongming Z, Nair L, Sankaran S, Kuruparan P, Norbu T, Shapkota P (2004) State of the art review: landfill leachate treatment. En: Technology, A. I. & University, T. (eds.), ShanghaiGoogle Scholar
  59. Vymazal J (1999) Nitrogen removal in constructed wetlands with horizontal sub-surface flow - can we determine the key process? In: Vymazal J (ed) Nutrient cycling and retention in natural and constructed wetlands. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp 1–17Google Scholar
  60. Vymazal J (2002) The use of sub-surface constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in the Czech Republic: 10 years experience. Ecol Eng 18:633–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Vymazal J (2007) Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands. Sci Total Environ 380:48–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Vymazal J (2014) Constructed wetlands for treatment of industrial wastewaters: a review. Ecol Eng 73:724–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wu S, Austin D, Liu L, Dong R (2011) Performance of integrated household constructed wetland for domestic wastewater treatment in rural areas. Ecol Eng 37:948–954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Xia H, Liu S, Ao H (2000) A study on purification and uptake of garbage leachate by vetiver grass. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Vetiver. Thailand, pp 18–22Google Scholar
  65. Yalcuk A, Ugurlu A (2009) Comparison of horizontal and vertical constructed wetland systems for landfill leachate treatment. Bioresour Technol 100:2521–2526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zayed A, Gowthaman S, Terry N (1998) Phytoaccumulation of trace elements by wetland plants: I. Duckweed. J Environ Qual 27:715–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zazouli M, Yousefi Z (2008) Removal of heavy metals from solid wastes leachates coagulation-flocculation process. J Appl Sci 8:2142–2147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zhang L-y, Zhang L, Y-d L, Shen Y-w, Liu H, Xiong Y (2010) Effect of limited artificial aeration on constructed wetland treatment of domestic wastewater. Desalination 250:915–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zhang X, Inoue T, Kato K, Izumoto H, Harada J, Wu D, Sakuragi H, Ietsugu H, Sugawara Y (2017) Multi-stage hybrid subsurface flow constructed wetlands for treating piggery and dairy wastewater in cold climate. Environ Technol 38:183–191Google Scholar
  70. Zhao Y, Collum S, Phelan M, Goodbody T, Doherty L, Hu Y (2013) Preliminary investigation of constructed wetland incorporating microbial fuel cell: batch and continuous flow trials. Chem Eng J 229:364–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Reza Bakhshoodeh
    • 1
  • Nadali Alavi
    • 2
    • 3
  • Pooya Paydary
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Water Science Engineering, School of Environmental EngineeringAhvaz Chamran UniversityAhvazIran
  2. 2.Environmental and Occupational Hazards Control Research CenterShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  3. 3.Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public HealthShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  4. 4.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringNortheastern UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations