Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 3363–3374 | Cite as

Evaluation of coarse and fine particles in diverse Indian environments

  • K.V. George
  • Dinakar D. Patil
  • Mulukutla N.V. Anil
  • Neel Kamal
  • Babu J. Alappat
  • Prashant Kumar
Research Article

Abstract

The estimates of airborne fine particle (PM2.5) concentrations are possible through rigorous empirical correlations based on the monitored PM10 data. However, such correlations change depending on the nature of sources in diverse ambient environments and, therefore, have to be environment specific. Studies presenting such correlations are limited but needed, especially for those areas, where PM2.5 is not routinely monitored. Moreover, there are a number of studies focusing on urban environments but very limited for coal mines and coastal areas. The aim of this study is to comprehensively analyze the concentrations of both PM10 and PM2.5 and develop empirical correlations between them. Data from 26 different sites spread over three distinct environments, which are a relatively clean coastal area, two coal mining areas, and a highly urbanized area in Delhi were used for the study. Distributions of PM in the 0.43–10-μm size range were measured using eight-stage cascade impactors. Regression analysis was used to estimate the percentage of PM2.5 in PM10 across distinct environments for source identification. Relatively low percentage of PM2.5 concentrations (21, 28, and 32%) in PM10 were found in clean coastal and two mining areas, respectively. Percentage of PM2.5 concentrations in PM10 in the highly urbanized area of Delhi was 51%, indicating a presence of a much higher percentage of fine particles due to vehicular combustion in Delhi. The findings of this work are important in estimating concentrations of much harmful fine particles from coarse particles across distinct environments. The results are also useful in source identification of particulates as differences in the percentage of PM2.5 concentrations in PM10 can be attributed to characteristics of sources in the diverse ambient environments.

Keywords

PM10 PM2.5 Cascade impactor Coal mining Urban areas Exposure risks 

Supplementary material

11356_2016_8049_MOESM1_ESM.docx (20 kb)
Table S1(DOCX 20.0 KB)

References

  1. ACGIH (2005) TLVs and BEIs: based on the documentation of the threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents and biological exposure indices. ACGIH, Cincinnati, OHGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson, R. W., Kang, S., Anderson, H. R., Mills, I. C., & Walton, H. A. (2014). Epidemiological time series studies of PM2. 5 and daily mortality and hospital admissions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thorax, thoraxjnl-2013Google Scholar
  3. ATS (1996) American thoracic society. State of the art: health effects of outdoor air pollution. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 153:3–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Auto Fuel Vision & Policy 2025, (2014) Report of the expert committee, government of IndiaGoogle Scholar
  5. Azarmi, F., & Kumar, P. (2016). Ambient exposure to coarse and fine particle emissions from building demolition. Atmospheric Environment.Google Scholar
  6. Begum BA, Biswas SK, Markwitz A, Hopke PK (2010) Identification of sources of fine and coarse particulate matter in Dhaka. Bangladesh Aerosol Air Qual Res 10:345–353Google Scholar
  7. Beig G, Chate DM, Ghude SD, Mahajan AS, Srinivas R, Ali K, Trimbake HR (2013) Quantifying the effect of air quality control measures during the (2010) Commonwealth Games at Delhi. India Atmos Environ 80:455–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bell ML, Son JY, Peng RD, Wang Y, Dominici F (2015) Brief report: Ambient PM2.5 and risk of hospital admissions: do risks differ for men and women? Epidemiology 26(4):575–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bešlic, I., Šega, K., Klaic, Z.K., (2004) PM10 and PM2.5 levels in urban part of Zagreb, Croatia: self-constructed vs. reference samplers. EURASAP Newsletter. http://eurasap.gfz.hr/53/paper2.html.
  10. Birmili W, Tomsche L, Sonntag A, Opelt C, Weinhold K, Nordmann S, Schmidt W (2013) Variability of aerosol particles in the urban atmosphere of Dresden (Germany): effects of spatial scale and particle size. Meteorol Z 22(2):195–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bisht DS, Tiwari S, Srivastava AK, Srivastava MK (2013) Assessment of air quality during 19th Common Wealth Games at Delhi. India Nat Hazards 66(2):141–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brook JR, Dann TF, Burnett RT (1997) The relationship among TSP, PM10, PM2.5, and inorganic constituents of atmospheric participate matter at multiple Canadian locations. J. Air. Waste. Manag. Assoc 47(1):2–19Google Scholar
  13. Cancio JL, Castellano AV, Hernández MC, Bethencourt RG, Ortega EM (2008) Metallic species in atmospheric particulate matter in Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. J Hazard Mater 160:521–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Castillejos VH, Borja-Aburto, Dockery DW, Gold DR, Dana LM (2000) Airborne coarse particles and mortality. Inhal Toxicol 12(sup1):61–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. CEN, (1993). Workplace atmospheres-size fraction definitions for measurement of airborne particles (Report No. BS EN 481:1993). London, England: CEN, British Standards Institute; ISBN 0–580-221407Google Scholar
  16. Chelani AB, Gajghate DG, Chalapati Rao CV, Devotta S (2010) Particle size distribution in ambient air of Delhi and its statistical analysis. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 85(1):22–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chung Y, Dominici F, Wang Y, Coull BA, Bell ML (2015) Associations between long-term exposure to chemical constituents of fine particulate matter (PM2. 5) and mortality in Medicare enrollees in the eastern United States. Environ Health Perspect 123(5):467Google Scholar
  18. Cowherd C., Jr., Donaldson J., Hegarty R., Ono D. (2010) Proposed revisions to fine fraction ratios used for AP-42 fugitive dust emission factors. https://www3.epa.gov/ttnchie1/conference/ei15/session14/cowherd.pdf
  19. CPCB, (1995). National Ambient Air Quality Statistics of India-1992. NAAQMS/6/1994–95, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  20. CPCB (2008a). Epidemiological study on effect of air pollution on human health (Adults) in India. Environmental health series: EHS/1/2008Google Scholar
  21. CPCB (2008b). Study on ambient air quality, respiratory symptoms and lung function of children in DelhiGoogle Scholar
  22. Crouse DL, Peters PA, Hystad P, Brook JR, van Donkelaar A, Martin RV et al (2015) Ambient PM2. 5, O3, and NO2 exposures and associations with mortality over 16 years of follow-up in the Canadian Census Health and Environment Cohort (Can CHEC). Environ Health Perspect 123(11):1180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dockery DW, Pope CA (1994) Acute respiratory effects of particulate air pollution. Annu Rev Publ Health 15:107–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dockery DW, Pope CA, Xu X, Spengler JD, Ware JH, Fay ME, Benjamin GF, Speizer FE (1993) An association between air pollution and mortality in six US cities. N Engl J Med 329(24):1753–1759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Donaldson K, MacNee W (1999) The mechanism of lung injury caused by PM10. In Air pollution and health. In: Hester RE, Harrison RM (eds) Issue in Environmental Science and Technology. Royal Society of Chemistry, Reedwood Books Ltd., Trowbridge, Wiltshire, UKGoogle Scholar
  26. Espinosa AJF, Rodríguez MT, Barragán de la Rosa FJ, Jiménez Sánchez JC (2001) Size distribution of metals in urban aerosols in Seville (Spain). Atmos Environ 35:2595–2601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. EU-Commission (1999) Council directive 1999/30/EC of 22 April 1999 relating to limit values for Sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter and lead in ambient air. Official Journal L 163(29/06/1999):41–60Google Scholar
  28. Gautam, S., Kumar, P. and Patra, A.K. (2014) Occupational exposure to particulate matter in three Indian opencast mines. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, pp.1–16Google Scholar
  29. Gehrig, R. (2007) Mass and Number Concentrations of Fine Particles in Switzerland: Annual and Seasonal Trends, Spatial Variability and Chemical Composition. In Particles and Photo oxidants in Europe, Prague, Czech Republic, Sep. p.25–26. http://rscaamg.org/Documents/Papers/Prague/RobertGehrig.pdf.
  30. Gehrig R, Buchmann B (2003) Characterising seasonal variations and spatial distribution of ambient PM10 and PM25 concentrations based on long-term Swiss monitoring data. Atmos Environ 37(19):2571–2580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. George KV, Patil DD, Alappat BJ (2010) PM10 in the ambient air of Chandrapur coal mine and its comparison with other environments. Environ Monit Assess. doi:10.1007/s10661-012-2619-8 Google Scholar
  32. George KV, Patil DD, Kumar P, Alappat BJ (2012) Field comparison of cyclonic separator and mass inertial impactor for PM 10 monitoring. Atmos Environ 60:247–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Green, R., Broadwin, R., Malig, B., Basu, R., Gold, E. B., Qi, L., & Tomey, K. (2015). Long-and short-term exposure to air pollution and inflammatory/Hemostatic markers in midlife Women. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)Google Scholar
  34. Guttikunda SK, Calori G (2013) A GIS based emissions inventory at 1 km × 1 km spatial resolution for air pollution analysis in Delhi, India. Atmos Environ 67:101–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hao, Y., Strosnider, H., Balluz, L., & Qualters, J. R. (2015) Geographic variation in the association between ambient fine particulate matter (PM2. 5) and term low birth weight in the United States. Environ. Health Perspect, 1–28Google Scholar
  36. Harrison RM, Deacon AR, Jones MR, Appleby RS (1997) Sources and processes affecting concentrations of PM10 and PM2.5 particulate matter in Birmingham (UK). Atmos Environ 31:4103–4117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hart JE, Liao X, Hong B, Puett RC, Yanosky JD, Suh H, Laden F (2015) The association of long-term exposure to PM2. 5 on all-cause mortality in the Nurses’ Health Study and the impact of measurement-error correction. Environ Health 14:38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Heal MR, Kumar P, Harrison RM (2012) Particles, air quality, policy and health. Chem Soc Rev 41:6606–6630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hofman J, Staelens J, Cordell R, Stroobants C, Zikova N, Hama SML, Weijers EP (2016) Ultrafine particles in four European urban environments: results from a new continuous long-term monitoring network. Atmos Environ 136:68–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Huang, W., Cao, J., Tao, Y., Dai, L., Lu, S. E., Hou, B., & Zhu, T. (2012) Seasonal variation of chemical species associated with short-term mortality effects of PM2.5 in Xi’an, a central city in China. Am J Epidemiol 175(6)Google Scholar
  41. Huang C, Moran AE, Yang X, Cao J, Chen K, Wang M, Kinney PL (2015) Cardiovascular health impact of air pollution control in Beijing and urban China: projections from the Cardiovascular Disease Policy Model-China. Circulation 132(Suppl. 3):A13699–A13699Google Scholar
  42. Kaushar A, Chate D, Beig G, Srinivas R, Parkhi N, Satpute T, Trivedi DK et al (2013) Spatio-temporal variation and deposition of fine and coarse particles during the commonwealth games in Delhi. Aerosol & Air Quality Research 13:748–755Google Scholar
  43. Kelsall JE, Samet JM, Zeger SL, Xu J (1997) Air pollution and mortality in Philadelphia, 1974–1988. Am J Epidemiol 146(9):750–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Keuken MP, Moerman M, Voogt M, Blom M, Weijers EP, Röckmann T, Dusek U (2013) Source contributions to PM2.5 and PM10 at an urban background and a street location. Atmos Environ 71:26–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kikas Ü, Tamm E (1996) Frequency distributions of aerosol particle concentrations. J. Aerosol Sci 27:S89–S90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kioumourtzoglou MA, Schwartz JD, Weisskopf MG, Melly SJ, Wang Y, Dominici F, Zanobetti A (2016) Long-term PM2. 5 exposure and neurological hospital admissions in the northeastern United States. Environ Health Perspect 124(1):23Google Scholar
  47. Kumar P, Khare M, Harrison RM, Bloss WJ, Lewis A, Coe H, Morawska L (2015) New directions: air pollution challenges for developing megacities like Delhi. Atmos Environ 122:657–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Laden F, Neas LM, Dockery DW, Schwartz J (2000) Association of fine particulate matter from different sources with daily mortality in six U.S. cities. Environ Health Perspect 108(10):941–947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lee BK, Hieu NT (2011) Seasonal variation and sources of heavy metals in atmospheric aerosols in a residential area of Ulsan, Korea. Aerosol Air Qual. Res 11(6):679–688Google Scholar
  50. Leili M, Naddafi K, Nabizadeh R, Yunesian M (2008) The study of TSP and PM10 concentration and their heavy metal content in central area of Tehran. Iran. Air Qual Atmos Health 1:159–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lim SS et al (2010) A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 38098592224–2260:22602012. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8 Google Scholar
  52. Lipfert FW, Wyzga RE (1995) Air pollution and mortality: issues and uncertainties. J. Air. Waste. Manag. Assoc. 45:949–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Marcazzan GM, Vaccaro S, Valli G, Vecchi R (2001) Characterisation of PM10 and PM2.5 particulate matter in the ambient air of Milan (Italy). Atmos. Environment 35(27):4639–4650Google Scholar
  54. Marrapu P, Cheng Y, Beig G, Sahu S, Srinivas R, Carmichael GR (2014) Air quality in Delhi during the Commonwealth Games. Atmos Chem Phys 14:10619–10630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nguyen TH, Byeong-Kyu L (2010) Characteristics of particulate matter and metals in the ambient air from a residential area in the largest industrial city in Korea. Atmos Res 98:526–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pace, T.G. (2005). “Examination of multiplier used to estimate PM2.5 fugitive dust emissions from PM10,” presented at the EPA Emission Inventory Conference, Las Vegas, NV. Summarizes other field studies that can be used to develop PM2.5/PM10 ratios for fugitive dust emissionsGoogle Scholar
  57. Pagano P, de Zaiacomo T, Scarcella E, Bruni S, Calamosca M (1998) Mutagenic activity of total and particle-sized fraction of urban particulate matter. Environ Sci Technol 30:3512–3516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pande JN, Bhatta N, Biswas D, Pandey RM, Ahluwalia G, Siddaramaiah NH, Khilnani GC (2002) Outdoor air pollution and emergency room visit at a hospital in Delhi. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci 44:13–19Google Scholar
  59. Patra, A.K., Gautam, S., Majumdar, S. and Kumar, P., 2015 Prediction of particulate matter concentration profile in an opencast copper mine in India using an artificial neural network model. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, pp.1–15Google Scholar
  60. Peng JF, Hu M, Wang ZB, Huang XF, Kumar P, Wu ZJ et al (2014) Submicron aerosols at thirteen diversified sites in China: size distribution, new particle formation and corresponding contribution to cloud condensation nuclei production. Atmos Chem Phys 14(18):10249–10265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Querol X, Alastuey A, Rodriguez S, Plana F, Mantilla E, Ruiz CR (2001a) Monitoring of PM10 and PM2.5 around primary particulate anthropogenic emission sources. Atmos. Environment 35(5):845–858Google Scholar
  62. Querol X, Alastuey A, Rodriguez S, Plana F, Ruiz CR, Cots N, Puig O et al (2001b) PM10 and PM2.5 source apportionment in the Barcelona metropolitan area, Catalonia, Spain. Atmos. Environment 35(36):6407–6419Google Scholar
  63. R Development Core Team (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org
  64. Schneider T, Sundell J, Bischof W, Bohgard M, Cherrie JW, Clausen PA, Dreborg S, Kildes J, Kjærgaard SK, Lvik M, Pasanen P, Skyberg K (2003) Euro part. Airborne particles in the indoor environment. A European interdisciplinary review of scientific evidence on associations between exposure to particles in buildings and health effects. Indoor Air 13:38–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schwartz J (1994) What are people dying on high air pollution days? Environ Res 64:26–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Schwartz J, Dockery DW, Neas LM (1996) Is daily mortality associated specifically with fine particles? J Air Waste Manag Assoc 46:927–939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Shah MH, Shaheen N, Jaffar M (2006a) Characterization, source identification and apportionment of selected metals in TSP in an urban atmosphere. Environ Monit Assess 114:573–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Transport Department (2015) Government of NCT of Delhi, New Delhi, available at http://transport.delhi.gov.in
  69. USEPA (1997) National ambient air quality standards for particulate matter; final rule. Fed Regist 62 :38652–38752July 18Google Scholar
  70. USEPA (1999 Air quality criteria for particulate matter. Vol. II. EPA 600/P-99/002bB. 1–3-2001. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NCGoogle Scholar
  71. USEPA (2005) Compilation of air pollutant emission factors, AP-42, 6th Edition. Research Triangle Park, NC. EPA’s emission factor handbookGoogle Scholar
  72. Vedal S (1997) Ambient particles and health: lines that divide. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 47:551–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Venkataraman C, Habib G, Eiguren-Fernandez A, Miguel AH, Friedlander SK (2005) Residential biofuels in South Asia: carbonaceous aerosol emissions and climate impacts. Science 307(5714):1454–1456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. WHO (2000). Air Quality Guidelines for Europe, Second Edition. WHO Regional Publications, European Series No.91:1–273Google Scholar
  75. Wilson WE, Chow JC, Claiborn C, Fusheng W, Engelbrecht J, Watson JG (2002) Monitoring of particulate matter outdoors. Chemosphere 49(9):1009–1043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Yorifuji T, Bae S, Kashima S, Tsuda T, Honda Y, Kim H, Hong YC (2015) Health impact assessment of PM10 and PM2.5 in 27 southeast and east Asian cities. J Occup Environ Med 57(7):751–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zanobetti A, Austin E, Bind MAC, Schwartz J (2015) Estimating causal effects of PM2.5 on daily deaths in Boston. American Journal Respir Crit Care Med 191:A3198Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Air Pollution Control DivisionNational Environmental Engineering Research InstituteNagpurIndia
  2. 2.Environmental Manager, Aditya Birla Group, JafarabadGujaratIndia
  3. 3.Department of Civil EngineeringIndian Institute of TechnologyDelhiIndia
  4. 4.Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Physical SciencesUniversity of SurreyGuildfordU.K.
  5. 5.Environmental Flow (EnFlo) Research Centre, Faculty of Engineering and Physical SciencesUniversity of SurreyGuildfordU.K.

Personalised recommendations