Skip to main content
Log in

Greenhouse wastewater treatment by baffled subsurface-flow constructed wetlands supplemented with flower straws as carbon source in different modes

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Four laboratory-scale baffled subsurface-flow constructed wetlands (BSCWs) were established for the treatment of greenhouse wastewater containing high levels of nitrate and sulfate in the present study. Each BSCW microcosm involved a treatment zone and another post-treatment zone with a surface area ratio of 2:1. Evenly mixed straws of carnation and rose (w/w: 1/1), two common ornamental flowers, were supplemented as an organic carbon source into the treatment zone through a hydrolysis zone (CW 1), decentralized vertically installed perforated pipes (CW 2), and centralized pipes (CW 3 in the figures), except the blank system. Removals and transformations of nitrogen and sulfate as well as carbon release in the BSCWs were investigated and comparatively assessed. Results showed that the supplements of flower straws could greatly enhance both the nitrate and sulfate removals, and good performance was achieved during the beginning operation period of 30 days, followed by decline due to insufficient organic carbon supply. Nitrate removal efficiency was significantly higher and more stable compared to sulfate. The highest removal rates of nitrate and sulfate were achieved in the CW 3, with a mean value of 4.33 g NO3 -N·m−2 d−1 and 2.74 g SO4 2−-S·m−2 d−1, respectively, although the differences among the experimental microcosms were not statistically significant. However, almost the same TN removal rate (3.40–3.47 g N·m−2 d−1) was obtained due to the productions of NO2 -N and NH4 +-N and leaching of organic N from the straws. High contents of organic carbon and colored substance were leached from the straws during the initial 10 days, but dropped rapidly to low levels, and could hardly determined after 30 days operation. The post-treatment zone could further eliminate various contaminants, but the capability was limited. Inorganic carbon (IC) concentration was detected to be a highly good indicator for the estimation of nitrate and sulfate removal efficiencies of the BSCWs, particularly for nitrate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chang JJ, Liang K, Wu SQ, Zhang SH, Liang W (2015) Comparative evaluations of organic matters and nitrogen removal capacities of integrated vertical-flow constructed wetlands: domestic and nitrified wastewater treatment. J Environ Sci Heal A 50(7):757–766

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chang J, Lu Y, Chen J, Wang X, Luo T, Liu H (2016) Simultaneous removals of nitrate and sulfate and the adverse effects of gravel-based biofilters with flower straws added as exogenous carbon source. Ecol Eng 95:189–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Wen Y, Zhou J, Tang Z, Li L, Zhou Q, Vymazal J (2014) Effects of cattail biomass on sulfate removal and carbon sources competition in subsurface-flow constructed wetlands treating secondary effluent. Water Res 59:1–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon V, Maltais-Landry G, Puigagut J, Chazarenc F, Brisson J (2010) Treatmentof hydroponics wastewater using constructed wetlands in winter conditions. Water Air Soil Pollut 212:483–490

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giblin AE, Tobias CR, Song B, Weston N, Banta GT, Rivera-Monroy VH (2013) The importance of dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA) in the nitrogen cycle of coastal ecosystems. Oceanography 26(3):124–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez MA, González-López J, Hontoria-Garcı́a E (2000) Influence of carbon source on nitrate removal of contaminated groundwater in a denitrifying submerged filter. J Hazard Mater 80(1):69–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruyer N, Dorais M, Alsanius BW, Zagury GJ (2013) Simultaneous removal of nitrate and sulfate from greenhouse wastewater by constructed wetlands. J Environ Qual 42(4):1256–1266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez-Wing MT, Malone RF, Rusch KA (2012) Evaluation of polyhydroxybutyrate as a carbon source for recirculating aquaculture water denitrification. Aquac Eng 51:36–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hang Q, Wang H, Chu Z, Ye B, Li C, Hou Z (2016) Application of plant carbon source for denitrification by constructed wetland and bioreactor: review of recent development. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(9):8260–8274

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He Q, Feng C, Peng T, Chen N, Hu Q, Hao C (2016) Denitrification of synthetic nitrate-contaminated groundwater combined with rice washing drainage treatment. Ecol Eng 95:152–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huett DO, Morris SG, Smith G, Hunt N (2005) Nitrogen and phosphorus removal from plant nursery runoff in vegetated and unvegetated subsurface flow wetlands. Water Res 39:3259–3272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll TL, Baker LA (1998) Nitrate removal in wetland microcosms. Water Res 32(3):677–684

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kadlec RH, Wallace SD (2009) Treatment wetlands, second edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpuzcu ME, Stringfellow WT (2012) Kinetics of nitrate removal in wetlands receiving agricultural drainage. Ecol Eng 42:295–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leverenz HL, Haunschild K, Hopes G, Tchobanoglous G, Darby JL (2010) Anoxic treatment wetlands for denitrification. Ecol Eng 36(11):1544–1551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li R, Feng C, Chen N, Zhang B, Hao C, Peng T, Zhu X (2014) A bench-scale denitrification wall for simulating the in-situ treatment of nitrate-contaminated groundwater. Ecol Eng 73:536–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu S, Hu H, Sun Y, Yang J (2009) Effect of carbon source on the denitrification in constructed wetlands. J Environ Sci-China 21(8):1036–1043

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ong SA, Uchiyama K, Inadama D, Yamagiwa K (2009) Simultaneous removal of color, organic compounds and nutrients in azo dye-containing wastewater using up-flow constructed wetland. J Hazard Mater 165(1):696–703

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park JBK, Craggs RJ, Sukias JPS (2009) Removal of nitrate and phosphorus from hydroponic wastewater using a hybrid denitrification filter (HDF). Bioresour Technol 100(13):3175–3179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shen Z, Zhou Y, Wang J (2013) Comparison of denitrification performance and microbial diversity using starch/polylactic acid blends and ethanol as electron donor for nitrate removal. Bioresour Technol 131:33–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Song H, Yim GJ, Ji SW, Nam IH, Neculita CM, Lee G (2012) Performance of mixed organic substrates during treatment of acidic and moderate mine drainage in column bioreactors. J Environ Eng 138(10):1077–1084

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • State Environmental Protection Administration of China (2002) Standard methods for water and wastewater monitoring and analysis, 4th edn. China Environmental Science Press, Beijing (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tee HC, Lim PE, Seng CE, Nawi MAM (2012) Newly developed baffled subsurface-flow constructed wetland for the enhancement of nitrogen removal. Bioresour Technol 104:235–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vymazal J (2007) Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands. Sci Total Environ 380:48–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wen Y, Chen Y, Zheng N, Yang D, Zhou Q (2010) Effects of plant biomass on nitrate removal and transformation of carbon sources in subsurface-flow constructed wetlands. Bioresour Technol 101(19):7286–7292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whitmire SL, Hamilton SK (2005) Rapid removal of nitrate and sulfate in freshwater wetland sediments. J Environ Qual 34(6):2062–2071

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu H, Zhang J, Wei R, Liang S, Li C, Xie H (2013a) Nitrogen transformations and balance in constructed wetlands for slightly polluted river water treatment using different macrophytes. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20(1):443–451

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu S, Kuschk P, Wiessner A, Müller J, Saad RAB, Dong R (2013b) Sulphur transformations in constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: a review. Ecol Eng 52:278–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu H, Zhang J, Ngo HH, Guo W, Hu Z, Liang S, Fan J, Liu H (2015) A review on the sustainability of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: design and operation. Bioresour Technol 175:594–601

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yamashita T, Yamamoto-Ikemoto R, Zhu J (2011) Sulfate reducing bacteria in a denitrification reactor packed with wood as a carbon source. Bioresour Technol 102(3):2235–2241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Wang S, Zhou L (2012) Effect of carbon source, C/N ratio, nitrate and dissolved oxygen concentration on nitrite and ammonium production from denitrification process by pseudomonas stutzeri D6. Bioresour Technol 104:65–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhai X, Piwpuan N, Arias CA, Headley T, Brix H (2013) Can root exudates from emergent wetland plants fuel denitrification in subsurface flow constructed wetland systems? Ecol Eng 61:555–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M, Zhao L, Mei C, Yi L, Hua G (2014) Effects of plant material as carbon sources on TN removal efficiency and N2O flux in vertical-flow-constructed wetlands. Water Air Soil Poll 225(11):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Yin Q, Wen Y, Guo W, Liu C, Zhou Q (2016) Enhanced nitrate removal in self-supplying carbon source constructed wetlands treating secondary effluent: the roles of plants and plant fermentation broth. Ecol Eng 91:310–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao J, Zhao Y, Xu Z, Doherty L, Liu R (2016) Highway runoff treatment by hybrid adsorptive media-baffled subsurface flow constructed wetland. Ecol Eng 91:231–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful for the grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51408531, 51668067) and the Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment (2012ZX07302-002-10) for supporting this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yifeng Lu.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, J., Ma, L., Chen, J. et al. Greenhouse wastewater treatment by baffled subsurface-flow constructed wetlands supplemented with flower straws as carbon source in different modes. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24, 1578–1587 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7922-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7922-4

Keyword

Navigation