Skip to main content

Cosmet’eau—Changes in the personal care product consumption practices: from whistle-blowers to impacts on aquatic environments

Abstract

The Cosmet’eau project (2015–2018) investigates the “changes in the personal care product (PCP) consumption practices: from whistle-blowers to impacts on aquatic environments.” In this project, the example of PCPs will be used to understand how public health concerns related to micropollutants can be addressed by public authorities—including local authorities, industries, and consumers. The project aims to characterize the possible changes in PCP consumption practices and to evaluate the impact of their implementation on aquatic contamination. Our goals are to study the whistle-blowers, the risk perception of consumers linked with their practices, and the contamination in parabens and their substitutes, triclosan, and triclocarban from wastewater to surface water. The project investigates the following potential solutions: modifications of industrial formulation or changes in consumption practices. The final purpose is to provide policy instruments for local authorities aiming at building effective strategies to fight against micropollutants in receiving waters.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Bedoux G, Roig B, Thomas O et al (2012) Occurrence and toxicity of antimicrobial triclosan and by-products in the environment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 19:1044–1065

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Botta F, Alliot F, Dulio V, et al (2014) Parabens in water and sediment: occurrence in river and lakes in different rural and urban environments. 24th annual Meeting of SETAC Europe, Basel, Switzerland, 11–15 May 2014

  3. Brausch JM, Rand GM (2011) A review of personal care products in the aquatic environment: environmental concentrations and toxicity. Chemosphere 82:1518–1532. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.11.018

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bressy A, Gromaire MC, Lorgeoux C et al (2012) Towards the determination of an optimal scale for stormwater quality management: micropollutants in a small residential catchment. Water Res 46:6799–6810. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2011.12.017

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bressy A, Lorgeoux C, Mirande-Bret C et al (2013) Ability of polymeric membranes to take into account pollution peaks: exposure to continuous and discontinuous PAH pollution in pilot river

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carey DE, McNamara PJ (2015) The impact of triclosan on the spread of antibiotic resistance in the environment. Front Microbiol. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00780

  7. Chateauraynaud F (2013) Lanceur d’alerte. In: Casillo I, avec Barbier R, Blondiaux L, Chateauraynaud F, Fourniau J-M, Lefebvre R, Neveu C, et Salles D (eds) Dictionnaire critique et interdisciplinaire de la participation, Paris, GIS Démocratie et Participation

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cladiere M, Gasperi J, Gilbert S et al (2010) Alkylphenol ethoxylates and bisphenol A in surface water within a heavily urbanized area, such as Paris. In: Marinov AM, Brebbia CA (eds) Water pollution X. Wit Press, Southampton, pp 131–142

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Dardre PD, Aljarrah A, Miller WR, et al (2004) Concentrations of parabens in human breast tumours. J Appl Toxicol 24:5–13. doi:10.1002/jat.958

  10. DeLeo PC, Sedlak RI (2014) Comment on “On the Need and Speed of Regulating Triclosan and Triclocarban in the United States.”. Environ Sci Technol 48:11021–11022. doi:10.1021/es503494j

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Eriksson E, Andersen HR, Madsen TS, Ledin A (2009) Greywater pollution variability and loadings. Ecological Engineering 35:661–669. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.10.015

  12. Ficheux AS, Wesolek N, Chevillotte G, Roudot AC (2015) Consumption of cosmetic products by the French population. First part: frequency data. Food Chem Toxicol 78:159–169. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2015.01.016

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gasperi J, Geara D, Lorgeoux C, et al (2014) First assessment of triclosan, triclocarban and paraben mass loads at a very large regional scale: Case of Paris conurbation (France). Science of The Total Environment 493:854–861. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.079

  14. Gomez E, Pillon A, Fenet H et al (2005) Estrogenic activity of cosmetic components in reporter cell lines: parabens, UV screens, and musks. J Toxicol Environ Health A 68:239–251. doi:10.1080/15287390590895054

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gourlay-Francé C, Bressy A, Uher E, Lorgeoux C (2011) Labile, dissolved and particulate PAHs and trace metals in wastewater: passive sampling, occurrence, partitioning in treatment plants. Water Sci Technol 63:1327–1333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Halden RU (2014a) On the need and speed of regulating triclosan and triclocarban in the United States. Environ Sci Technol 48:3603–3611. doi:10.1021/es500495p

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Halden RU (2014b) Response to Comment on “On the Need and Speed of Regulating Triclosan and Triclocarban in the United States.” Environ Sci Technol. doi: 10.1021/es5041333

  18. Haman C, Dauchy X, Rosin C, Munoz J-F (2015) Occurrence, fate and behavior of parabens in aquatic environments: a review. Water Res 68:1–11. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2014.09.030

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu J-L, Wong M-H (2013) Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs): a review on environmental contamination in China. Environ Int 59:208–224. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2013.06.012

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Luo Y, Guo W, Ngo HH et al (2014) A review on the occurrence of micropollutants in the aquatic environment and their fate and removal during wastewater treatment. Sci Total Environ 473–474:619–641. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mailler R, Gasperi J, Coquet Y et al (2015) Study of a large scale powdered activated carbon pilot: removals of a wide range of emerging and priority micropollutants from wastewater treatment plant effluents. Water Res 72:315–330. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2014.10.047

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Margot J, Rossi L, Barry DA, Holliger C (2015) A review of the fate of micropollutants in wastewater treatment plants. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Water 2:457–487

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mintel database (2015) Global market research and market insight. http://www.mintel.com. Accessed 29 May 2015

  24. Moilleron R (2015) Personal communication at the Cosmet'eau kick-off meeting, 26 January 2015, Paris, France

  25. SCCS (2010) SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety), Opinion on triclosan (antimicrobial resistance), 22 June 2010

  26. Schwarzenbach RP, Escher BI, Fenner K et al (2006) The challenge of micropollutants in aquatic systems. Science 313:1072–1077. doi:10.1126/science.1127291

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tusseau-Vuillemin M-H, Gourlay C, Lorgeoux C et al (2007) Dissolved and bioavailable contaminants in the Seine river basin. Sci Total Environ 375:244–256

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yamamoto H, Tamura I, Hirata Y et al (2011) Aquatic toxicity and ecological risk assessment of seven parabens: individual and additive approach. Sci Total Environ 410–411:102–111. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.09.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yu Y, Huang Q, Wang Z et al (2011) Occurrence and behavior of pharmaceuticals, steroid hormones, and endocrine-disrupting personal care products in wastewater and the recipient river water of the Pearl River Delta, South China. J Environ Monit 13:871–878. doi:10.1039/C0EM00602E

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Cosmet’eau project is funded within the framework of a French call for project about “Micropollutants: innovation and changes of practices” launched by the French Ministry of Environment, The French National Agency for Water and Aquatic Environments (Onema), and a French water agency (Agence de l’Eau Seine-Normandie).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Adèle Bressy or Régis Moilleron.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bressy, A., Carré, C., Caupos, É. et al. Cosmet’eau—Changes in the personal care product consumption practices: from whistle-blowers to impacts on aquatic environments. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23, 13581–13584 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6794-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Consumption practices
  • Endocrine disruptors
  • Micropollutants
  • Parabens
  • Personal care products
  • Source reduction
  • Urban water cycle
  • Whistle-blowers