Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 23, Issue 11, pp 10841–10854 | Cite as

Selected Fe and Mn (nano)oxides as perspective amendments for the stabilization of As in contaminated soils

  • Zuzana Michálková
  • Michael KomárekEmail author
  • Veronika Veselská
  • Sylva Číhalová
Research Article

Abstract

An amorphous Mn oxide (AMO), nanomaghemite, and nanomagnetite were used as potential amendments reducing the mobility of As in three contrasting contaminated soils differing in origin of As contamination. Adsorption experiments and XPS analyses combined with incubation batch experiments and pH-static leaching tests were used. The AMO showed excellent adsorption capacity for As(V) reaching a maximum of 1.79 mmol g−1 at pH 7 and 8. Interestingly, the adsorption capacity in this case decreases with decreasing pH, probably as a result of AMO dissolution at lower pH values. Chemical sorption of As(V) onto AMO was further confirmed with XPS. Both Fe nano-oxides proved the highest adsorption capacity at pH 4 reaching 11 mg g−1 of adsorbed As(V). The AMO was also the most efficient amendment for decreasing As concentrations in soil solutions during 8 weeks of incubation. Additionally, pH-static leaching tests were performed at pH 4, 5, 6, 7, and natural pH (not adjusted) and AMO again proved the highest ability to decrease As content in leachate. On the other hand, strong dissolution of this amendment at lower pH values (especially pH 4) was observed. For that reason, AMO appears as a promising stabilizing agent for As, especially in neutral, alkaline, or slightly acidic soils, where As(V) species are expected to be more mobile.

Keywords

Adsorption Arsenic Immobilization Nanomaghemite Nanomagnetite Mn oxide 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This project has been supported by the Czech Science Foundation (project 15-07117S). Zuzana Michálková is thankful for the support from the Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (project CIGA 20154202).

References

  1. Ajith N, Dalvi AA, Swain KK, Devi PSR, Kalekar BB, Verma R, Reddy AVR (2013) Sorption of As(III) and As(V) on chemically synthesized manganese dioxide. J Environ Sci Health 48:422–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali NA, Ater M, Sunahara GI, Robidoux PY (2004) Phytotoxicity and bioaccumulation of copper and chromium using barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in spiked artificial and natural forest soils. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 57:363–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. An B, Zhao D (2012) Immobilization of As(III) in soil and groundwater using a new class of polysaccharide stabilized Fe-Mn oxide nanoparticles. J Hazard Mater 211–212:332–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Auffan M, Shipley HJ, Yean S, Kan AT, Tomson M, Rose J, Bottero JY (2007) Nanomaterials as adsorbants. In: Wiesner MR, Bottero JY (eds) Environmental nanotechnology: applications and impacts of nanomaterials. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Bagherifam S, Lakzian A, Fotovat A, Khorasani R, Komarneni S (2014) In situ stabilization of As and Sb with naturally occurring Mn, Al and Fe oxides in calcareous soil: Bioaccessibility, bioavailability and speciation studies. J Hazard Mater 273:247–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolster CH, Hornberger GM (2007) On the use of linearized Langmuir equations. Soil Sci Soc Am J 71:1796–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bujňáková Z, Baláž P, Zorkovská A, Sayagués MJ, Kováč J, Timko M (2013) Arsenic sorption by nanocrystalline magnetite: an example of environmentally promising interface with geosphere. J Hazard Mater 262:1204–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cancès B, Juillot F, Morin G, Laperche V, Polya D, Vaughan DJ, Hazemann J-L, Proux O, Brown GE Jr, Calas G (2008) Changes in arsenic speciation through a contaminated soil profile: A XAS based study. Sci Total Environ 397:178–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cappuyns V, Van Herreweghe S, Swennen R, Ottenburgs R, Deckers J (2002) Arsenic pollution at the industrial site of Reppel-Bocholt (north Belgium). Sci Total Environ 295:217–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carter MR, Gregorich EG (2008) Soil sampling and methods of analysis, 2nd edn. Canadian Society of Soil Science, CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  11. Cerqueira B, Covelo EF, Andrade ML, Vega FA (2011) Retention and mobility of copper and lead in soils as influenced by soil horizon properties. Pedosphere 21(5):603–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Charlet L, Morin G, Rose J, Wang Y, Auffan M, Burnol A, Fernandez-Martinez A (2011) Reactivity at (nano)particle-water interfaces, redox processes, and arsenic transport in the environment. Comptes Rendus Geosci 343:123–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dalvi AA, Ajith N, Swain KK, Verma R (2015) Sorption of arsenic on manganese dioxide synthesized by solid state reaction. J Environ Sci Health 50:866–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Della Puppa L, Komárek M, Bordas F, Bollinger JC, Joussein E (2013) Adsorption of copper, cadmium, lead and zinc onto a synthetic manganese oxide. J Colloid Interface Sci 399:99–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dixit S, Hering JG (2003) Comparison of arsenic(V) and arsenic(III) sorption onto iron oxide minerals: Implications for arsenic mobility. Environ Sci Technol 37:4182–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Drahota P, Rohovec J, Filippi M, Mihaljevič M, Rychlovský P, Červený V, Pertold Z (2009) Mineralogical and geochemical controls of arsenic speciation and mobility under different redox conditions in soil, sediment and water at the Mokrsko-West gold deposit, Czech Republic. Sci Total Environ 407:3372–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Duker AA, Carranza EJM, Hale M (2005) Arsenic geochemistry and health. Environ Int 31:631–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ettler V, Knytl V, Komárek M, Della Puppa L, Bordas F, Mihaljevič M, Klementová M, Šebek O (2014) Stability of a novel synthetic amorphous manganese oxide in contrasting soils. Geoderma 214–215:2–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ettler V, Tomášová Z, Komárek M, Mihaljevič M, Šebek O, Michálková Z (2015) The pH-dependent long-term stability of an amorphous manganese oxide in smelter-polluted soils: Implication for chemical stabilization of metals and metalloids. J Hazard Mater 286:386–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Farrow EM, Wang J, Burken JG, Shi H, Yan W, Yang J, Hua B, Deng B (2015) Reducing arsenic accumulation in rice grain through iron oxide amendment. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 118:55–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Feng XH, Zhai LM, TanWF ZW, Liu F, He JZ (2006) The controlling effect of pH on oxidation of Cr(III) by manganese oxide minerals. J Colloid Interface Sci 298:258–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fiol N, Villaescusa I (2009) Determination of sorbent zero charge: usefulness in sorption studies. Environ Chem Lett 7:79–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Foster AL, Brown GE Jr, Parks GA (2003) X-ray absorption fine structure study of As(V) and Se(IV) sorption complexes on hydrous Mn oxides. Geochi Cosmochim Acta 67:1937–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gee GW, Or D (2002) Particle size analysis. In: Dane JH, Topp GG (eds) Methods of soil analysis, Part 4, physical methods. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
  25. Giménez J, Martínez M, de Pablo J, Rovira M, Duro L (2007) Arsenic adsorption onto natural hematite, magnetite and goethite. J Hazard Mater 141:575–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Giral M, Zagury GJ, Deschênes L, Blouin J-P (2010) Comparison of four extraction procedures to assess arsenate and arsenite species in contaminated soils. Environ Pollut 158:1890–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gray CW, Dunham SJ, Dennis PG, Zhao FJ, McGrath SP (2006) Field evaluation of in situ remediation of a heavy metal contaminated soil using lime and red mud. Environ Pollut 142:530–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hartley W, Edwards R, Lepp NW (2004) Arsenic and heavy metal mobility in iron oxide-amended contaminated soils as evaluated by short- and long-term leaching tests. Environ Pollut 131:495–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hartley W, Lepp NW (2008) Remediation of arsenic contaminated soils by iron-oxide application, evaluated in terms of plant productivity, arsenic and phytotoxic metal uptake. Sci Total Environ 390:35–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Houben D, Evrard L, Sonnet P (2013) Mobility, bioavailability and pH-dependent leaching of cadmium, zinc and lead in a contaminated soil amended with biochar. Chemosphere 92:1450–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jönsson J, Sherman DK (2008) Sorption of As(III) and As(V) to siderite, green rust (fougerite) and magnetite: Implications for arsenic release in anoxic groundwaters. Chem Geol 255:173–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kalantari K, Ahmad MB, Masoumi HRF, Shameli K, Basri M, Khandalou R (2015) Rapid and high capacity adsorption of heavy metals by Fe3O4/montmorillonite nanocomposite using response surface methodology: preparation, characterization, optimization, equilibrium isotherms, and adsorption kinetics study. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 49:192–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Karami H (2013) Heavy metal removal from water by magnetite nanorods. Chem Eng J 219:209–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kim K-R, Lee B-T, Kim K-W (2012) Arsenic stabilization in mine tailings using nano-sized magnetite and zero valent iron with the enhancement of mobility by surface coating. J Geochem Explor 113:124–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ko MS, Kim JY, Park HS, Kim KW (2015) Field assessment of arsenic immobilization in soil amended with iron rich acid mine drainage sludge. J Clean Prod. In press. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.076
  36. Komárek M, Vaněk A, Ettler V (2013) Chemical stabilization of metals and arsenic in contaminated soils using oxides—a review. Environ Pollut 172:9–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kosmulski M (2004) pH-dependant surface charging and points of zero charge. II. Update. J Colloid Interface Sci 275:214–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kumpiene J, Lagerkvist A, Maurice C (2008) Stabilization of As, Cr, Cu, Pb and Zn in soil using amendments—a review. Waste Manag 28:215–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kumpiene J, Ore S, Renella G, Mench M, Lagerkvist A, Maurice C (2006) Assessment of zerovalent iron for stabilization of chromium, copper, and arsenic in soil. Environ Pollut 144:62–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lee JC, Kim EJ, Kim HW, Baek K (2015) Oxalate-based remediation of arsenic bound to amorphous Fe and Al hydrous oxides in soil. Geoderma. In press. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.09.015
  41. Lenoble V, Laclautre C, Serpaud B, Deluchat V, Bollinger J-C (2004) As(V) retention and As(III) simultaneous oxidation and removal on a MnO2-loaded polystyrene resin. Sci Total Environ 326:197–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Liang S, Guan DX, Ren JH, Zhang M, Luo J, Ma LQ (2014) Effect of aging on arsenic and lead fractionation and availability in soils: coupling sequential extractions with diffusive gradients in thin-films technique. J Hazard Mater 273:272–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Liang Q, Zhao D (2014) Immobilization of arsenate in a sandy loam soil using starch-stabilized magnetite nanoparticles. J Hazard Mater 271:16–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Liu CH, Chuang YH, Chen TY, Tian Y, Li H, Wang MK, Zhang W (2015) Mechanism of arsenic adsorption on magnetite nanoparticles from water: Thermodynamic and spectroscopic studies. Environ Sci Technol 49:7726–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mamindy-Pajany Y, Hurel C, Marmier N, Roméo M (2011) Arsenic (V) adsorption from aqueous solution onto goethite, hematite, magnetite and zero-valent iron: Effects of pH, concentration and reversibility. Desalination 281:93–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mandal BK, Suzuki KT (2002) Arsenic round the world: a review. Talanta 58:201–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Manning BA, Fendorf SE, Bostick B, Suarez DL (2002) Arsenic(III) oxidation and arsenic(V) adsorption reactions on synthetic birnessite. Environ Sci Technol 36:976–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Markovski JS, Marković DD, Đokić VR, Mitrić M, Ristić MĐ, Onjia AE, Marinković AD (2014) Arsenate adsorption on waste eggshell modified by goethite, α-MnO2 and goethite/α-MnO2. Chem Eng J 237:430–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McCann CM, Gray ND, Tourney J, Davenport RJ, Wade M, Finlay N, Hudson-Edwards KA, Johnson KL (2015) Remediation of a historically Pb contaminated soil using a model natural Mn oxide waste. Chemosphere 138:211–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Meharg AA, Sun G, Williams PN, Adomako E, Deacon C, Zhu YG, Feldmann J, Raab A (2008) Inorganic arsenic levels in baby rice are of concern. Environ Pollut 152:746–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Michálková Z, Komárek M, Šillerová H, Della Puppa L, Joussein E, Bordas F, Vaněk A, Vaněk O, Ettler V (2014) Evaluating the potential of three Fe- and Mn-(nano)oxides for the stabilization of Cd, Cu and Pb in contaminated soils. J Environ Manag 146:226–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mohan D, Rajput S, Singh VK, Steele PH, Pittman CU Jr (2011) Modeling and evaluation of chromium remediation from water using low cost bio-char, a green adsorbent. J Hazard Mater 188:319–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Morin G, Ona-Guema G, Wang Y, Menguy N, Juillot F, Proux O, Guyot F, Calas G, Brown GE Jr (2008) Extended X-ray absorption fine structure analysis of arsenite and arsenate adsorption on maghemite. Environ Sci Technol 42:2361–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nagar R, Sarkar D, Makris KC, Datta R (2014) Arsenic bioaccessibility and speciation in the soils amended with organoarsenicals and drinking-water treatment residuals based on a long-term greenhouse study. J Hydrol 518C:477–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ng JC (2005) Environmental contamination of arsenic and its toxicological impact on humans. Environ Chem 2:146–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pantsar-Kallio M, Reinikainen SP, Oksanen M (2001) Interactions of soil components and their effects on speciation of chromium in soils. Anal Chim Acta 439:9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Prélot B, Poinsignon C, Thomas F, Schouller E, Villiéras F (2003) Structural–chemical disorder of manganese dioxides 1. Influence on surface properties at the solid–electrolyte interface. J Colloid Interface Sci 257:77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rahman MA, Hasegawa H (2011) High levels of inorganic arsenic in rice in areas where arsenic-contaminated water is used for irrigation and cooking. Sci Total Environ 409:4645–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rauret G, Lopez-Sanchez JF, Sahuquillo A, Barahona E, Lachica M, Ure AM, Davidson CM, Gomez A, Luck D, Bacon J, Yli-Halla M, Muntau H, Quevauviller P (2000) Application of a modified BCR sequential extraction (three-step) procedure for the determination of extractable trace metal contents in a sewage sludge amended soil reference material (CRM 483), complemented by a three-year stability study of acetic acid and EDTA extractable metal content. J Environ Monit 2:228–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sadiq M (1997) Arsenic chemistry in soils: An overview of thermodynamic predictions and field observations. Water Air Soil Pollut 93:117–36Google Scholar
  61. Scott MJ, Morgan JJ (1995) Reactions at oxides surfaces. 1. Oxidation of As(III) by synthetic birnessite. Environ Sci Technol 29:1898–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sharma VK, Sohn M (2009) Aquatic arsenic: Toxicity, speciation, transformations, and remediation. Environ Int 35:743–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Shi J, Tang Z, Jin Z, Chi Q, He B, Jiang G (2003) Determination of As(III) and As(V) in soils using sequential extraction combined with flow injection hydride generation atomic fluorescence detection. Anal Chim Acta 477:139–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Singh R, Singh S, Parihar P, Singh VP, Prasad SM (2015) Arsenic contamination, consequences and remediation techniques: A review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 112:247–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Singh M, Thanh DN, Ulbrich P, Strnadová N, Štěpánek F (2010) Synthesis, characterization and study of arsenate adsorption from aqueous solution by α- and δ-phase manganese dioxide nanoadsorbents. J Solid State Chem 183:2979–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Smith AH, Hopenhayn-Rich C, Bates MN, Goeden HM, Hertz-Picciotto IH, Duggan HM, Wood R, Kosnett MJ, Smith MT (1992) Cancer risks from arsenic in drinking water. Environ Health Perspect 97:259–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Smolders E, Oorts K, Peeters S, Lanno R, Cheyns K (2015) Toxicity in lead salt spiked soils to plants, invertebrates and microbial processes: Unraveling effects of acidification, salt stress and ageing reactions. Sci Total Environ 536:223–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sposito G (2008) The Chemistry of Soils. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  69. Tuutijärvi T, Lu J, Sillanpää M, Chen G (2009) As(V) adsorption on maghemite nanoparticles. J Hazard Mater 166:1415–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Van Herreweghe S, Swenne R, Cappuyns V, Vandecasteele C (2002) Chemical associations of heavy metals and metalloids in contaminated soils near former ore treatment plants: a differentiated approach with emphasis on pHstat-leaching. J Geochem Explor 76:113–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Villaescusa I, Bollinger J-C (2008) Arsenic in drinking water: sources, occurrence and health effects (a review). Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 7:307–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Villalobos M, Escobar-Quiroz IN, Salazar-Camacho C (2014) The influence of particle size and structure on the sorption and oxidation behavior of birnessite: I. Adsorption of As(V) and oxidation of As(III). Geochim Cosmochim Acta 125:564–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wagner CD, Riggs WM, Davis IE, Moulder JF, Muilenberg GE (eds) (1979) Handbook of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Perkin-Elmer Corporation, Minnesota, USAGoogle Scholar
  74. Wang P, Du M, Zhu H, Bao S, Yang T, Zou M (2015) Structure regulation of silica nanotubes and their adsorption behaviors for heavy metal ions: pH effect, kinetics, isotherms and mechanism. J Hazard Mater 286:533–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wang Y, Morin G, Ona-Nguema G, Juillot F, Calas G, Brown GE Jr (2011) Distinctive arsenic(V) trapping modes by magnetite nanoparticles induced by different sorption processes. Environ Sci Technol 45:7258–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wang S, Mulligan CN (2006) Natural attenuation processes for remediation of arsenic contaminated soils and groundwater. J Hazard Mater B138:459–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wang S, Mulligan CN (2008) Speciation and surface structure of inorganic arsenic in solid phases: a review. Environ Int 34:867–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Warren GP, Alloway BJ, Lepp NW, Singh B, Bochereau FJM, Penny C (2003) Field trials to assess the uptake of arsenic by vegetables from contaminated soils and soil remediation with iron oxides. Sci Total Environ 311:19–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wenzel WW, Kirchbaumer N, Prohaska T, Stingeder G, Lombi E, Adriano DC (2001) Arsenic fractionation in soils using an improved sequential extraction procedure. Anal Chim Acta 436:309–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wu P-Y, Jia Y, Jiang Y-P, Zhang Q-Y, Zhou S-S, Fang F, Peng D-Y (2014) Enhanced arsenate removal performance of nanostructured goethite with high content of surface hydroxyl groups. J Environ Chem Eng 2:2312–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Yari M, Rajabi M, Moradi O, Yari A, Asif M, Agarwal S, Gupta VK (2015) Kinetics of the adsorption of Pb(II) ions from aqueous solutions by graphene oxide and thiol functionalized graphene oxide. J Mol Liq 209:50–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Yean S, Cong L, Yavuz CT, Mayo JT, Yu WW, Kan AT, Colvin VL, Tomson MB (2005) Effect of magnetite particle size on adsorption and desorption of arsenite and arsenate. J Mater Res 20:3255–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Zhang G, Qu J, Liu H, Liu R, Qu J (2009) Adsorption behavior and mechanism of arsenate at Fe–Mn binary oxide/water interface. J Hazard Mater 168:820–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zhang G, Qu J, Liu H, Liu R, Wu R (2007) Preparation and evaluation of a novel Fe–Mn binary oxide adsorbent for effective arsenite removal. Water Res 41:1921–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zhang G, Qu J, Liu H, Qu J, Jefferson W (2012) Arsenate uptake and arsenite simultaneous sorption and oxidation by Fe–Mn binary oxides: Influence of Mn/Fe ratio, pH, Ca2+, and humic acid. J Colloid Interface Sci 366:141–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental Geosciences, Faculty of Environmental SciencesCzech University of Life Sciences PraguePrague 6-SuchdolCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations