Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 23, Issue 11, pp 10990–11001 | Cite as

Evaluation of the treatment performance and microbial communities of a combined constructed wetland used to treat industrial park wastewater

  • Ming Xu
  • Weijing Liu
  • Chao Li
  • Chun Xiao
  • Lili Ding
  • Ke Xu
  • Jinju Geng
  • Hongqiang RenEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

Constructed wetlands are ecosystems that use plants and microorganisms to remediate pollution in soil and water. In this study, two parallel pilot-scale vertical flow wetland and horizontal flow wetland (VF-HF) systems were implemented to investigate the treatment performance and microorganism community structure in the secondary effluent of an industrial park wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) with a loading rate of 100 mm/day near the Yangtze River in Suzhou City, East China. Removal efficiencies of 82.3, 69.8, 77.8, and 32.3 were achieved by the VF-HF systems for ammonium nitrogen (NH4 +-N), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), and chemical oxygen demand (COD), respectively. The VF system specialized in COD and NH4 +-N removal (73.6 and 79.2 %), whereas the HF system mainly contributed to TN removal (63.5 %). The effluents in all seasons are capable of achieving the “surface water environmental quality standard” (GB3838-2002) grade IV. In the VF system, the 16S gene and nirK gene were significantly correlated with depth, with the 16S gene showing significant correlations with the dissolved oxygen (DO) level (r = 0.954, p < 0.05), which was determined by real-time PCR and high-throughput sequencing. Many types of bacteria capable of biodegradation, including nitrifiers, denitrifiers, and polyaromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) degraders (improvement of the BOD5/COD ratio), were observed, and they contributed to approximately 90 % of the nitrogen removal in the VF-HF system.

Keywords

Constructed wetlands VF-HF systems Removal efficiency Microbial community Industrial wastewater Nitrogen 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Environmental Engineering (Grant No.ZX2014001) and the Advanced Treatment and Reclamation of Eutrophic Pollutants in Park Industrial Wastewater Technology and Demonstration (2012ZX07101-003).

Supplementary material

11356_2016_6181_MOESM1_ESM.doc (1.9 mb)
ESM 1 (DOC 1911 kb)

References

  1. Abira MA, van Bruggen JJA, Denny P (2005) Potential of a tropical subsurface constructed wetland to remove phenol from pre-treated pulp and paper mill wastewater. Water Sci Technol 51:173–176Google Scholar
  2. Adrados B, Sánchez O, Arias CA, Becares E, Garrido L, Mas J, Brix H, Morató J (2014) Microbial communities from different types of natural wastewater treatment systems: vertical and horizontal flow constructed wetlands and biofilters. Water Res 55:304–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anastasiou N, Monou M, Mantzavinos D, Kassinos D (2009) Monitoring of the quality of winery influents/effluents and polishing of partially treated winery flows by homogenous Fe(II) photo-oxidation. Desalination 248:836–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. APHA (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  5. Arroyo P, de Miera LES, Ansola G (2015) Influence of environmental variables on the structure and composition of soil bacterial communities in natural and constructed wetlands. Sci Total Environ 506:380–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aryal A, Sathasivan A, Heitz A, Zheng G, Nikraz H, Ginige MP (2015) Combined BAC and MIEX pre-treatment of secondary wastewater effluent to reduce fouling of nanofiltration membranes. Water Res 70:214–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bai L, Qiao Q, Yao Y, Guo J, Xie MH (2014) Insights on the development progress of National Demonstration eco-industrial parks in China. J Clean Prod 70:4–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Breitbart M, Hoare A, Nitti A, Siefert J, Haynes M, Dinsdale E, Edwards R, Souza V, Rohwer F, Hollander D (2009) Metagenomic and stable isotopic analyses of modern freshwater microbialites in cuatro CiEnegas, Mexico. Environ Microbiol 11(1):16–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brix H (1994a) Use of constructed wetlands in water pollution control: historical development, present status, and future perspectives. Water Sci Technol 30:209–223Google Scholar
  10. Brix H (1994b) Functions of macrophytes in constructed wetlands. Water Sci Technol 29:71–78Google Scholar
  11. Bulc TG, Ojstršek A, Vrhovšek D (2006) The use of constructed wetland for textile wastewater treatment. MAOTDR 2006, LisbonGoogle Scholar
  12. Calheiros CSC, Quitério PVB, Silva G, Crispim LFC, Brix H, Moura SC, Castro PML (2012) Use of constructed wetland systems with Arundo and Sarcocornia for polishing high salinity tannery wastewater. J Environ Manag 95:66–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Caselles-Osorio A, García J (2006) Performance of experimental horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands fed with dissolved or particulate organic matter. Water Res 40(19):3603–3611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chapple M, Cooper P, Cooper D, Revitt M (2002) Pilot trials of a constructed wetland system for reducing the dissolved hydrocarbon in the runoff from a decommissioned refinery. University of Dar-es-Salaam, TanzaniaGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen TY, Kao CM, Yeh TY, Chien HY, Chao AC (2006) Application of a constructed wetland for industrial wastewater treatment: a pilot study. Chemosphere 64:497–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chen Y, Wen Y, Zhou Q, Vymazal J (2014) Effects of plant biomass on denitrifying genes in subsurface-flow constructed wetlands. Bioresour Technol 157:341–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Choudhary AK, Kumar S, Sharma C (2010) Removal of chlorinated resin and fatty acids from paper mill wastewater through constructed wetland. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 80:67–71Google Scholar
  18. Comino E, Riggio V, Rosso M (2011) Mountain cheese factory wastewater treatment with the use of a hybrid constructed wetland. Ecol Eng 37:1673–1680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cooper PF (1999) A review of the design and performance of vertical-flow and hybrid reed bed treatment systems. Water Sci Technol 40(3):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Davies LC, Carias CC, Novais JM, Martins-Dias S (2005) Phytoremediation of textile effluents containing azo dye by using Phragmites australis in a vertical flow intermittent feeding constructed wetland. Ecol Eng 25:594–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. De Jong J (1976) In: Tourbier J, Pierson RW (eds) Biological control of water pollution. Pennsylvania University Press, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  22. DeLong EF, Preston CM, Mincer T, Rich V, Hallam SJ, Frigaard NU, Martinez A, Sullivan MB, Edwards R, Brito BR, Chisholm SW, Karl DM (2006) Community genomics among stratified microbial assemblages in the ocean’s interior. Science 311(5760):496–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dos Santos AB, Cervantes FJ, van Lier JB (2007) Review paper on current technologies for decolourisation of textile wastewater: perspectives for anaerobic biotechnology. Bioresour Technol 98:2369–2385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gasiunas V, Strusevicius Z, Struseviciene MS (2005) Pollutant removal by horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands in Lithuania. J Environ Sci Health 40A:1467–1478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Greenway M (1997) Nutrient content of wetland plants in constructed wetlands receiving municipal effluent in tropical australia. Water Sci Technol 35(5):135–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hadad HR, Maine MA, Bonetto CA (2006) Macrophyte growth in a pilot scale constructed wetland for industrial wastewater treatment. Chemosphere 63:1744–1753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hamouri BE, Nazih J, Lahjouj J (2007) Subsurface-horizontal flow constructed wetland for sewage treatment under Moroccan climate conditions. Desalination 215(13):153–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Henry S, Baudoin E, Lopez-Gutierre JC (2004) Quantification of denitrifying bacteria in soils by nirK gene targeted real-time PCR. J Microbiol Methods 59:327–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Höfferle Š, Nicol GW, Pal L, Hacin J, Prosser JI (2010) Mandić-Mulec I. Ammonium supply rate influences archaeal and bacterial ammonia oxidizers in a wetland soil vertical profile. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 74:302–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. James CP, Germain E, Judd S (2014) Micropollutant removal by advanced oxidation of microfiltered secondary effluent for water reuse. Sep Purif Technol 127:77–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kadlec RH, Wallace SD (2009) Treatment wetlands, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  32. Liang W, Wu ZB, Cheng SP, Zhou QH, Hu HY (2003) Roles of substrate microorganisms and urease activities in wastewater purification in a constructed wetland system. Ecol Eng 21:191–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Meng M, Pellizzari F, Boukari SO, Leitner NKV, Teychene B (2014) Impact of e-beam irradiation of municipal secondary effluent on MF and RO membranes performances. J Membr Sci 471:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Merlin G, Pajean JL, Lissolo T (2002) Performances of constructed wetlands for municipal wastewater treatment in rural mountainous area. Hydrobiologia 469(1/3):87–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ong SA, Uchiyama K, Inadama D (2009) Simultaneous removal of color, organic compounds and nutrients in azo dye-containing wastewater using up-flow constructed wetland. J Hazard Mater 165:696–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Peralta AL, Matthews JW, Kent AD (2010) Microbial community structure and denitrification in a wetland mitigation bank. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:4207–4215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Petitjean A, Forquet N, Wanko A, Laurent J, Molle P, Mosé R (2012) Modelling aerobic biodegradation in vertical flow sand filters: impact of operational considerations on oxygen transfer and bacterial activity. Water Res 46(7):2270–2280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pramanik BK, Roddick FA, Fan L (2014) Effect of biological activated carbon pre-treatment to control organic fouling in the microfiltration of biologically treated secondary effluent. Water Res 63:147–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pramanik BK, Roddick FA, Fan L, Jeong S, Vigneswaran S (2015) Assessment of biological activated carbon treatment to control membrane fouling in reverse osmosis of secondary effluent for reuse in irrigation. Desalination 364:90–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ramond JB, Welz PJ, Cowan DA, Burton SG (2012) Microbial community structure stability, a key parameter in monitoring the development of constructed wetland mesocosms during start-up. Res Microbiol 163:28–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rochard J, Ferrier VM, Kaiser A, Salomon N (2002) The application of constructed wetlands in the viticultural sector: experimentation on a winery effluent treatment device. University of Dar-es-Salaam, TanzaniaGoogle Scholar
  42. Saeed T, Sun GZ (2011) A comparative study on the removal of nutrients and organic matter in wetland reactors employing organic media. Chem Eng J 171:439–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Saeed T, Sun GZ (2012) A review on nitrogen and organics removal mechanisms in subsurface flow constructed wetlands: dependency on environmental parameters, operating conditions and supporting media. J Environ Manag 112:429–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Seviour RJ, Nielsen PH (2010) Microbial communities in activated sludge plants. Microbial Ecology of Activated Sludge. IWA Publishing, London, pp 95–126Google Scholar
  45. Sharma KP, Sharma S, Sharma S, Singh PK, Kumar S, Grover R, Sharma PK (2007) A comparative study on characterization of textile wastewaters (untreated and treated) toxicity by chemical and biological tests. Chemosphere 69:48–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shi L, Yu B (2014) Eco-industrial parks from strategic niches to development mainstream: the cases of China. Sustain Sci 6:6325–6331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sims A, Horton J, Gajaraj S, McIntosh S, Miles RJ, Mueller R, Hu Z (2012) Temporal and spatial distributions of ammonia-oxidizing archaea and bacteria and their ratio as an indicator of oligotrophic conditions in natural wetlands. Water Res 46:4121–4129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Trang NTD, Konnerup D, Schierup HH, Chiem NH, Tuan LA, Brix H (2010) Kinetics of pollutant removal from domestic wastewater in a tropical horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland system: effects of hydraulic loading rate. Ecol Eng 36(4):527–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Urtiaga AM, Pérez G, Ibáñez R, Ortiz I (2013) Removal of pharmaceuticals from a WWTP secondary effluent by ultrafiltration/reverse osmosis followed by electrochemical oxidation of the RO concentrate. Desalination 331:26–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vymazal J (2001) In: Vymazal J (ed) Transformations on nutrients in natural and constructed wetlands. Leiden, Netherlands, Backhuys PublishersGoogle Scholar
  51. Vymazal J (2005a) Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Ecol Eng 25:475–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vymazal J (2005b) Horizontal sub-surface flow and hybrid constructed wetlands systems for wastewater treatment. Ecol Eng 25:478–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vymazal J (2009) Horizontal sub-surface flow constructed wetlands Ondřejov and Spálené Poříčí in the Czech Republic—15 years of operation. Desalination 246:226–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vymazal J (2013) The use of hybrid constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment with special attention to nitrogen removal: a review of a recent development. Water Res 47:4795–4811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vymazal J (2014) Constructed wetlands for treatment of industrial wastewaters: a review. Ecol Eng 73:724–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wang Y, Sheng HF, He Y (2012) Comparison of the levels of bacterial diversity in freshwater, intertidal wetland, and marine sediments by using millions of illumina tags. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:8264–8271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yang C, Li L, Shi J, Long C, Li A (2015) Advanced treatment of textile dyeing secondary effluent using magnetic anion exchange resin and its effect on organic fouling in subsequent RO membrane. J Hazard Mater 84:50–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhai J, Xiao HW, Kujawa-Roeleveld K, He Q, Kerstens SM (2011) Experimental study of a novel hybrid constructed wetland for water reuse and its application in Southern China. Water Sci Technol 64:2177–2184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhang T, Xu D, He F, Zhang Y, Wu ZB (2012) Application of constructed wetland for water pollution control in China during 1990-2010. Ecol Eng 47:189–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhao X, Hu HY, Yu T, Su C, Jiang H, Liu S (2014) Effect of different molecular weight organic components on the increase of microbial growth potential of secondary effluent by ozonation. J Environ Sci 26:2190–2197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zhao YJ, Hui Z, Chao X, Nie E, Li HJ, He J, Zheng Z (2011) Efficiency of two-stage combinations of subsurface vertical down-flow and up-flow constructed wetland systems for treating variation in influent C/N ratios of domestic wastewater. Ecol Eng 37:1546–1554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zupančič Justin M, Vrhovšek D, Stuhlbacher A, Griessler Bulc T (2009) Treatment of wastewater in hybrid constructed wetland from the production of vinegar and packaging detergents. Desalination 246:100–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ming Xu
    • 1
  • Weijing Liu
    • 1
  • Chao Li
    • 1
  • Chun Xiao
    • 1
  • Lili Ding
    • 1
  • Ke Xu
    • 1
  • Jinju Geng
    • 1
  • Hongqiang Ren
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of the EnvironmentNanjing UniversityNanjingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations