Skip to main content
Log in

Enrofloxacin degradation in broiler chicken manure under various laboratory conditions

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rate of degradation of enrofloxacin in broiler chicken manure has been characterized in the laboratory according to the CVMP guideline on determining the fate of veterinary medicinal products in manure. Degradation was followed in a flow-through system under aerobic and anaerobic conditions, in the dark and in the presence of light. The rate of degradation of enrofloxacin and the formation of its degradation products are dependent on laboratory conditions. A rapid degradation of enrofloxacin in the dark was noticed, where a shorter degradation half-life under aerobic (DT50 = 59.1 days), comparing to anaerobic conditions (DT50 = 88.9 days), was determined. The presence of light slowed down the enrofloxacin degradation half-life, which was significantly shorter under aerobic (DT50 = 115.0 days), comparing to anaerobic conditions (DT50 = 190.8 days). Desethylene-enrofoxacin was the only degradation product formed, its concentrations ranged from 2.5 to 14.9 %. The concentration of the degradation product was approximately 2.5-fold higher under aerobic conditions. Enrofloxacin degradation in sterile manure incubated under sterile conditions was marginal comparing to non-sterile conditions; after 120 days of incubation, approximately 80 % of enrofloxacin was still present in manure and only 1 % of desethylene-enrofloxacin was formed. The present work demonstrates that enrofloxacin degradation in chicken manure is relatively fast when incubated in the dark under aerobic conditions which is the recommended incubation system for chicken manure according to CVMP guideline.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anon 1 (2000). Residues: guidance for generating and reporting methods of analysis in support of pre-registration data requirements for Annex II (part A, Section 4) and Annex III (part A, Section 5) of Directive 91/414. European Commission SANCO/3029/99 rev.4. pp 1–26

  • Anon 2 (2002). OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals No. 307, “Aerobic and Anaerobic Transformation in Soil” pp 1–17

  • Anon 3 (2006). FOCUS Guidance Document on Estimating Persistence and Degradation Kinetics from Environmental Fate Studies on Pesticides in EU Registration. The Final Report of the Work Group on Degradation Kinetics of FOCUS.Sanco/10058/2005, version 2.0 pp 1–434

  • Anon 4 (2007). Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed on the development of an approach for the environmental risk assessment of additives, products and substances used in animal feed (Question No EFSA-Q-2004-078). The EFSA Journal 2007, 529, 1–73

  • Anon 5 (2009). Revised Guideline on Environmental Impact Assessment for Veterinary Medicinal Products in support of the VICH guidelines GL6 and GL 38. Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use (CVMP). Doc.Ref.EMEA/CVMP/ERA/418282/ 2005-Rev.1 pp 1–65

  • Anon 6 (2010). Guidance document on pesticide residue analytical methods. European Commission SANCO/825/00 rev. 8.1 pp 1–28

  • Anon 7 (2011). Guideline on bioanalytical method validation. European Medicines Agency EMEA/CHMP/EWP/192217/2009 pp 1–22

  • Anon 8 (2011) Guideline on determining the fate of veterinary medicinal products in manure. Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use (CVMP). EMA/CVMP/ERA/430327/2009 pp 1–11

  • Boxall ABA, Fogg L, Blackwell PA, Kay P, Pemberton EJ (2002) Review of veterinary medicines in the environment. R&D Technical Report P6-012/8/TR. pp 1–251

  • Boxall ABA, Fogg LA, Baird DJ, Lewis C, Telfer TC, Kolpin D, Gravell A, Pemberton E, Boucard T (2004) Targeted monitoring study for veterinary medicines in the environment. Environment Agency, Bristol, pp 1–120

  • Chambers B, Nicholson N, Smith K, Pain B, Cumby T, Scotford I (2001) Managing livestock manures. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 2nd edition. pp 1–14

  • De Liguoro M, Cibin V, Capolongo F, Halling-Sørensen B, Montesissa C. (2003) Use of oxytetracycline and tylosin in intensive calf farming: evaluation of transfer to manure and soil. Chemosphere 52:203–212

  • Environmental assessment for Aquaflor (florfenicol) 50% type A medicated article for catfish (2004). Schering-Plough animal health. In: INAD: Investigational new animal drug (INAD 8519) FDA: Center for veterinary medicine; Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AnimalVeterinary/.../ucm072391.pdf. p. 1--73

  • Gagliano GG, McNamara FT (1996) Environmental Assessment for Enrofloxacin BAYTRIL 3.23% Concentrate Antimicrobial Solution. pp 1–119

  • Huijsmans J, Verwijs B, Rodhe L, Smith K (2004) Costs of emission-reducing manure application. Bioresource Technol 93:11–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kreuzig R, Blumlein K, Holtge S (2007a) Fate of the benzimidazole antiparasitics flubendazole and fenbendazole in manure and manured soils. Clean: Soil, Air, Water 35(5):488–94

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kreuzig R, Höltge S, Heise J, Schmanteck I, Stein F, Batarseh M (2007b) Veterinary medicinal products in manure and manured soils: development of a technical protocol for laboratory tests—the manure project. Umwelt Bundes Amt. UBA-FB 001086:1–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Niu J, Wang W (2011) Photolysis of enrofloxacin in aqueous systems under simulated sunlight irradiation: kinetics, mechanism and toxicity of photolysis products. Chemosphere 85(5):892–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin JS, Pan HY, Liu SM, Lai HT (2010) Effects of light and microbial activity on the degradation of two fluoroquinolone antibiotics in pond water and sediment. J Environ Sci Health Part B 45(5):456–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martens R, Wetzstein HG, Zadrazil F, Capelari M, Hoffmann P, Schmeer N (1996) Degradation of the fluoroquinolone enrofloxacin by wood-rotting fungi. App and Environ Microb 62(11):4206–09

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moraru R, Pourcher AM, Jadas-Hecart A, Kempf I, Ziebal C, Kervarrec M, Comunal PY, Mares M, Dabert P (2012) Changes in concentrations of fluoroquinolones and of ciprofloxacin-resistant enterobacteriaceae in chicken feces and manure stored in a heap. J Environ Qual 41(3):754–63

  • Parshikov IA, Freeman JP, Lay JO Jr, Beger RD, Williams AJ, Sutherland JB (2000) Microbiological Transformation of enrofloxacin by the fungus Mucor ramannianus. Appl Environ Microb 66(6):2664–7

  • Pierini E, Famiglini G, Mangani F, Cappiello A (2004) Fate of enrofloxacin in swine sewage. J Agric Food Chem 52(11):3473–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Randhawa GK, Kullar JS (2011) Bioremedation of pharmaceuticals, pesticides, and petrochemicals with Gomeya/Cow Dung. ISRN Pharmacology 1–7

  • Schmitt-Kopplin P, Burhene J, Freitag D, Spiteller M, Keltrup A (1999) Development of capillary electrophoresis method for the analysis of fluoroquinolones and application to the study of the influence of humic substances on their photodegradation in aqueous phase. J Chromatogr 837:253–65

  • Schlüsener MP, von Arb MA, Bester K (2006) Elimination of macrolides, tiamulin, and salinomycin during manure storage. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 51:21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetzstein HG, Stadler M, Tichy HV, Dalhoff A, Karl W (1999) Degradation of ciprofloxacin by basidiomycetes and identification of metabolites generated by the brown rot fungus Gloeophyllum striatum. Appl Environ Microbiol 65(4):1556–63

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slana M, Sollner-Dolenc M (2013) Environmental risk assessment of antimicrobials applied in veterinary medicine—a field study and laboratory approach. Environ Toxicol Phar 35:131–141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slana M, Pahor V, Cvitkovič Maričič L, Sollner-Dolenc M (2014) Excretion pattern of enrofloxacin after oral treatment of chicken broilers. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 37:611–614

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Szatmari I, Laczay P, Borbely Z (2011) Degradation of doxycycline in aged pig manure. Acta Vet Hung 59(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Yates SR (2008) Laboratory study of oxytetracycline degradation kinetics in animal manure and soil. J Agric Food Chem 56:1683–1688

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wetzstein HG, Schneider S, Karl W (2002) Kinetics of the biotransformation of enrofloxacin in aging cattle dung, 102nd General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology. Poster, Salt Lake City, UT

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu X, Wei Y, Zheng J, Zhao X, Zhong W (2011) The behavior of tetracyclines and their degradation products during swine manure composting. Bioresour Technol 102(10):5924–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Teeter JS, Meyerhoff RD (2003) Aerobic degradation of tylosin in cattle, chicken, and swine excreta. Environ Res 93:45–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNISOL 2.5% oral solution for calves. Summary of Product Characteristics. Revised: January 2011.AN: 01275/2010. pp 1–6

  • Zhou X, Chen C, Yue L, Sun Y, Ding H, Liu Y (2008) Excretion of enrofloxacin in pigs and its effect on ecological environment. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 26(3):272–277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marija Sollner-Dolenc.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Slana, M., Sollner-Dolenc, M. Enrofloxacin degradation in broiler chicken manure under various laboratory conditions. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23, 4422–4429 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5624-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5624-y

Keywords

Navigation