Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 24, Issue 13, pp 12026–12037

Scenario-based analysis of traffic-related PM2.5 concentration: Lisbon case study

  • Marta V. Faria
  • Gonçalo O. Duarte
  • Patrícia C. Baptista
  • Tiago L. Farias
Biomonitoring of atmospheric pollution: possibilities and future challenges
  • 208 Downloads

Abstract

Air quality in urban centers constitutes a challenge ahead for most cities. For this reason, the objective of this research work was to evaluate the impacts of changing traffic-related parameters on particulate matter (PM) concentration for several hierarchical street levels using real-world data for the city of Lisbon, Portugal. For that purpose, 2014 data regarding meteorological conditions, traffic volumes, typical vehicle speed, and a vehicle representative of the fleet was used in an air quality dispersion model (CALINE4). The available data allowed building a baseline case for several streets that are representative of the traffic circulation conditions in Lisbon, which was compared with different scenarios: hypothetical introduction of a cordon toll (S1.1 to S1.4) and the implementation of a low emission zone (S2.1 and 2.2). The results indicate that reductions on PM2.5 concentrations from 5 to 42 % may be obtained from the implementation of the scenarios. Overall, this study demonstrates that modeling tools based on real-world data can provide a good approach to study urban policies regarding traffic-related PM exposure. Additionally, implementation of such measures requires an integrated strategy that enables proper enforcement and monitoring, as well as an adequate management of traffic flows between the implementation boundaries.

Keywords

PM2.5 concentration Scenarios Urban policies Modeling LEZ Cordon toll 

References

  1. Almeida SM, Pio CA, Freitas MC, Reis MA, Trancoso MA (2005) Source apportionment of fine and coarse particulate matter in a sub-urban area at the Western European Coast. Atmos Environ 39:3127–3138. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.01.048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agência Portuguesa do Ambiente (2015) QualAr - Base de dados on-line sobre qualidade do ar. LisboaGoogle Scholar
  3. Autoinforma and ACAP (2000 to 2013) Statistics of the transport sector (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  4. Benson PE (1989) CALINE 4 - A dispersion model for predicting air pollutant concentrations near roadways. Final Report prepared by the Caltrans Division of New Technology and Research (Report No. FHWA/CA/TL-84/15)Google Scholar
  5. Boogaard H, Janssen NAH, Fischer PH, Kos GPA, Weijers EP, Cassee FR, van der Zee SC, de Hartog JJ, Meliefste K, Wang M, Brunekreef B, Hoek G (2012) Impact of low emission zones and local traffic policies on ambient air pollution concentrations. Sci Total Environ 435–436:132–140. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.06.089 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brás HSA (2012) Evaluation of the benefits of the implementation of Low Emission Zones in Lisbon. Master Thesis, Universidade Nova de Lisboa (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  7. Brunekreef B, Holgate ST (2002) Air pollution and health. Lancet 360:1233–1242. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11274-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cesaroni G, Boogaard H, Jonkers S, Porta D, Badaloni C, Cattani G, Forastiere F, Hoek G (2012) Health benefits of traffic-related air pollution reduction in different socioeconomic groups: the effect of low-emission zoning in Rome. Occup Environ Med 69:133–139. doi:10.1136/oem.2010.063750 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen H, Bai S, Eisinger D, Niemeier D, Claggett M (2009) Predicting near-road PM2.5 concentrations: comparative assessment of CALINE4, CAL3QHC and AERMOD. Transp Res Rec 2123:26–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen AJ, Ross Anderson H, Ostro B, Pandey KD, Krzyzanowski M, Künzli N, Gutschmidt K, Pope A, Romieu I, Samet JM, Smith K (2005) The global burden of disease due to outdoor air pollution. J Toxic Environ Health A 68:1301–1307. doi:10.1080/15287390590936166 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Council of the European Union (1996) Council Directive 96/62/EC of 27 September 1996 on ambient air quality assessment and managementGoogle Scholar
  12. Council of the European Union (1999) Council Directive 1999/30/EC of 22 April 1999 relating to limit values for sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter and lead in ambient airGoogle Scholar
  13. Council of the European Union (1999) Council Directive 1999/30/EC of 22 April 1999 relating to limit values for sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter and lead in ambient air. J Eur Communities 41–60Google Scholar
  14. Câmara Municipal de Lisboa (2005) Lisbon: the mobility challenge. Urban studies collection – Lisbon XXI – 7. pp 291 (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  15. Câmara Municipal de Lisboa (2014) Deliberation n.° 642/CM/2014 - Approval of the third stage of the Low emission zone implementation (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  16. Câmara Municipal de Lisboa (2015) LisBOA - A good city to breathe, http://www.cm-lisboa.pt/fileadmin/VIVER/Mobilidade/ZER/ZERLisboa_3fase_01.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2015 (in Portuguese)
  17. Dieselnet (2015) European Union Emission Standards, http://www.dieselnet.com/standards/eu/ld.php. Accessed 26 May 2015
  18. Dockery DW, Pope CA, Xu X, Spengler JD, Ware JH, Fay ME, Ferris BG, Speizer FE (1993) An association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities. N Engl J Med 329:1753–1759. doi:10.1056/NEJM199312093292401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. EC (2007) Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2007 on type approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  20. Ellison RB, Greaves SP, Hensher DA (2013) Five years of London’s low emission zone: effects on vehicle fleet composition and air quality. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 23:25–33. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2013.03.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Enerdata (2012) Energy efficiency trends in the transport sector in the EU - Lessons from the ODYSSEE MURE project. ADEMEGoogle Scholar
  22. European Parliament and the Council of the European Union (2009) Directive 2009/33/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of clean and energy-efficient road transport vehiclesGoogle Scholar
  23. Ferreira F, Tente H, Torres P, Cardoso S, Palma-Oliveira JM (2000) Air quality monitoring and management in Lisbon. Environ Monit Assess 65:443–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ferreira F, Tente H, Torres P (2002) Air quality in major Portuguese urban agglomerations. Water Air Soil Pollut 2:103–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ferreira F, Gomes P, Pereira P, Nogueira L, Santos F (2006) Avenida da Liberdade campaign - evaluation of the impacts of inhalable particulate matter levels from washing processes in Av Liberdade. CCDR-LVT, CML, UNL, Lisbon (in Portuguese) Google Scholar
  26. Gkatzoflias D, Kouridis C, Ntziachristos L and Samaras Z (2007) COPERT 4: computer programme to calculate emissions from road transport – User Manual (Version 5.0). European Environment AgencyGoogle Scholar
  27. INE (2014) Mode of transport used on commuting by Place of residence and Main mode of transport, https://www.ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpid=INE&xpgid=ine_indicadores&indOcorrCod=0007904&contexto=bd&selTab=tab2&xlang=en. Accessed 09 June 2015
  28. ITDS and IDMEC-IST (2011) i2d - intelligence to drive, Driving efficiency (I&D project)Google Scholar
  29. Jerrett M, Finkelstein MM, Brook JR, Arain MA, Kanaroglou P, Stieb DM, Gilbert NL, Verma D, Finkelstein N, Chapman KR, Sears MR (2009) A cohort study of traffic-related Air pollution and mortality in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Environ Health Perspect 117:772–777. doi:10.1289/ehp.11533 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Johansson C, Burman L, Forsberg B (2009) The effects of congestions tax on air quality and health. Atmos Environ 43:4843–4854. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Majumdar B, Dutta A, Chakrabarty S, Ray S (2010) Assessment of vehicular pollution in Kolkata, India, using CALINE 4 model. Environ Monit Assess 170:33–43. doi:10.1007/s10661-009-1212-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Miller KA, Siscovick DS, Sheppard L, Shepherd K, Sullivan JH, Anderson GL, Kaufman JD (2007) Long-term exposure to air pollution and incidence of cardiovascular events in women. N Engl J Med 356:447–458. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa054409 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. OECD (2012) OECD Environmental Outlook to 2050 - the consequences of inactionGoogle Scholar
  34. Pandya RJ, Solomon G, Kinner A, Balmes JR (2002) Diesel exhaust and asthma: hypotheses and molecular mechanisms of action. Environ Health Perspect 110:103–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pope CA, Dockery DW (2006) Health effects of fine particulate air pollution: lines that connect. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 56:709–742. doi:10.1080/10473289.2006.10464485 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Qadir RM, Abbaszade G, Schnelle-Kreis J, Chow JC, Zimmermann R (2013) Concentrations and source contributions of particulate organic matter before and after implementation of a low emission zone in Munich, Germany. Environ Pollut 175:158–167. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2013.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sørensen M, Autrup H, Møller P, Hertel O, Jensen SS, Vinzents P, Knudsen LE, Loft S (2003) Linking exposure to environmental pollutants with biological effects. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res 544:255–271. doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2003.06.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. UN (2009) World urbanization prospects: the 2009 revision—highlights. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. van Erp A, Kelly F, Demerjian K, Pope CA III, Cohen A (2012) Progress in research to assess the effectiveness of air quality interventions towards improving public health. Air Qual Atmos Health 5:217–230. doi:10.1007/s11869-010-0127-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. WHO (2005) Health effects of travel-related air pollution: summary for policy makers. In: Krzyzanowski M, Kuna-Dibbert B, J Schneider (eds)Google Scholar
  41. WHO (2008) Air quality and health - Fact sheet N°313, Geneva, Switzerland, http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs313/en/index.html. Accessed 19 July 2013
  42. Wolff H, Perry L (2010) Trends in clean air legislation in Europe: particulate matter and low emission zones. REEP 4:293–308Google Scholar
  43. Zuurbier M, Hoek G, Oldenwening M, Meliefste K, Krop E, van den Hazel P, Brunekreef B (2011) In-traffic air pollution exposure and CC16, blood coagulation, and inflammation markers in healthy adults. Environ Health Perspect 119:1384–1389. doi:10.1289/ehp.1003151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marta V. Faria
    • 1
  • Gonçalo O. Duarte
    • 1
  • Patrícia C. Baptista
    • 1
  • Tiago L. Farias
    • 1
  1. 1.LAETA, IDMEC, Instituto Superior TécnicoUniversidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations