Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of translocation methods to conserve metallophyte communities in the Southeastern D.R. Congo

  • How can we restore the biodiversity and ecosystem services in mining and industrial sites?
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In southeastern Democratic Republic of Congo, unique metallophyte communities supporting numerous endemic species occurred on the highly mineralized copper cobalt (Cu–Co) hills throughout the province. These hills are economically valuable mineral reserves; mining activities represent therefore a threat to the long-term persistence of these communities. Ex situ conservation program was set up by a mining company to rescue and conserve the diversity of Cu–Co communities until restoration activities are initiated. Two kinds of Cu–Co communities: the steppe and the steppic savanna, were translocated using topsoil spreading and whole-turf translocation. In this study, we assessed the effectiveness of these two techniques in conserving Cu–Co communities and their potential use in future restoration programs. More than 2 years after the translocation, whole-turf translocation appeared to be the better technique for ex situ conservation of endemic Cu–Co species. Not only did whole-turf successfully translocate numerous target species that were not present in the topsoil areas, but it also resulted in fewer ruderal and non-target species compared to topsoil spreading. Topsoil spreading recorded low seedling emergence from seed bank due to large proportions of dormant seeds or the absence of a seed bank, especially for the steppic savanna. Restoration of the steppe is currently more successful than for steppic savanna where the lack of dominant and structuring species likely contributed to divergence in species composition compared to reference ecosystem. Our study stresses the fact that tropical old-growth grasslands, which require probably several centuries to assemble, are difficult to restore or translocate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ash HJ, Gremmell RP, Bradshaw AD (1994) The introduction of native plant species on industrial waste heaps: a test of immigration and other factors affecting succession primary. J Appl Ecol 31:74–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker JP, Bakker ES, Rosén E et al (1996) Soil seed bank composition along a gradient from dry alvar grassland to Juniperus shrubland. J Veg Sci 7:165–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker JP, Berendse F (1999) Constraints in the restoration of ecological diversity in grassland and heathland communities. Tree 14:63–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Bay RF, Ebersole JJ (2006) Success of turf transplants in restoring Alpine Trails, Colorado, U.S.A. Arctic. Antarct Alp Res 38:173–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bischoff A (2002) Dispersal and establishment of floodplain grassland species as limiting factors in restoration. Biol Conserv 104:25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond WJ, Parr CL (2010) Beyond the forest edge: ecology, diversity and conservation of the grassy biomes. Biol Conserv 143:2395–2404. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.12.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossuyt B, Honnay O (2008) Can the seed bank be used for ecological restoration? An overview of seed bank characteristics in European communities. Can the seed bank be used for ecological restoration ? Seed Bank Characteristics Eur Communities 19:875–884. doi:10.3170/2008-8-18462

    Google Scholar 

  • Box J (2003) Critical factors and evaluation criteria for habitat translocation. J Environ Plan Manag 46:839–856. doi:10.1080/0964056032000157624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box J, Brown M, Coppin N et al (2011) Experimental wet heath translocation in Dorset, England. Ecol Eng 37:158–171. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw A (1997) Restoration of mined lands—using natural processes. Ecol Eng 8:255–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruelheide H (2003) Translocation of a montane meadow to simulate the potential impact of climate change. Appl Veg Sci 6:23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruelheide H, Flintrop T (2000) Evaluating the transplantation of a meadow in the Harz Mountains, Germany. Biol Conserv 92:109–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullock JM (1998) Community translocation in Britain: setting objectives and measuring consequences. Biol Conserv 84:199–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butt KR, Lowe CN, Walmsley T (2003) Development of earthworm communities in translocated grasslands at Manchester Airport, UK. Pedobiologia (Jena) 47:788–791

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobbaert D, Rochefort L, Price JS (2004) Experimental restoration of a fen plant community after peat mining. Appl Veg Sci 7:209–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conlin DB, Ebersole JJ (2001) Restoration of an alpine differential disturbance: success of species in Turf transplants, Colorado, U.S.A. Arctic. Antarct Alp Res 33:340–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copperflora.org (2012) Copper flora. In: Biodivers. Landsc. Unit. www.copperflora.org. Accessed 1 Apr 2015

  • Duvigneaud P, Denaeyer-de-Smet S (1963) Cuivre et végétation au Katanga. Bull la Soc R Bot Belg 96:92–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahselt D (2007) Is transplanting an effective means of preserving vegetation? Can J Bot 85:1007–1017. doi:10.1139/B07-087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faucon M, Tshilong BM, Van Rossum F et al (2012) Ecology and hybridization potential of two sympatric metallophytes, the narrow endemic Crepidorhopalon perennis (Linderniaceae) and its more widespread congener. Biotropica 44:454–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faucon M-P, Meersseman A, Shutcha MN et al (2010) Copper endemism in the Congolese flora: a database of copper affinity and conservational value of cuprophytes. Plant Ecol Evol 143:5–18. doi:10.5091/plecevo.2010.411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faucon M-P, Parmentier I, Colinet G et al (2011) May rare metallophytes benefit from disturbed soils following mining activity? The case of the Crepidorhopalon tenuis in Katanga (D. R. Congo). Restor Ecol 19:333–343. doi:10.1111/j.1526-100X.2009.00585.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faucon M-P, Shutcha MN, Meerts P (2007) Revisiting copper and cobalt concentrations in supposed hyperaccumulators from SC Africa : influence of washing and metal concentrations in soil. 29–36. doi: 10.1007/s11104-007-9405-3

  • Fidelis A, Müller SC, Pillar VD, Pfadenhauer J (2010) Population biology and regeneration of forbs and shrubs after fire in Brazilian Campos grasslands. Plant Ecol 211:107–117. doi:10.1007/s11258-010-9776-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Good JEG, Wallace HL, Stevens PA, Radford GL (1999) Translocation of herb-rich grassland from a site in wales prior to opencast coal extraction. Restor Ecol 7:336–347. doi:10.1046/j.1526-100X.1999.72028.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings MJ, Booth KD (1996) Studies on the feasibility of re-creating chalk grassland on ex-arable land. I. The potential roles of the vegetation seed bank and the seed rain. J Appl Ecol 33:1171–1181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilunga E, Séleck M, Colinet G et al (2013) Small-scale diversity of plant communities and distribution of species niches on a copper rock outcrop in Upper Katanga. D R Congo 146:173–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobi CM, Carmo FF, Vincent RC, Stehmann JR (2007) Plant communities on ironstone outcrops: a diverse and endangered Brazilian ecosystem. Biodivers Conserv 1–17

  • Jaunatre R, Buisson E, Dutoit T (2012) First-year results of a multi-treatment steppe restoration experiment in La Crau (Provence, France). Plant Ecol Evol 145:13–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaunatre R, Buisson E, Muller I et al (2013) New synthetic indicators to assess community resilience and restoration success. Ecol Indic 29:468–477. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.01.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiehl K (2010) Plant species introduction in ecological restoration: possibilities and limitation. Basic Appl Ecol 11:1–4. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2010.02.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiehl K, Kirmer A, Donath TW et al (2010) Species introduction in restoration projects—evaluation of different techniques for the establishment of semi-natural grasslands in Central and Northwestern Europe. Basic Appl Ecol 11:285–299. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2009.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirmer A, Mann S, Stolle M et al (2009) Near-natural restoration methods for high nature value areas. SALVERE - Reg. Work. Pol. Poznań University of, Life Sciences, pp 21–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimes L, Jongepierova I, Klimesova J (2010) Restoration of a species-rich meadow on arable land by transferring meadow blocks. Appl Veg Sci 13:403–411. doi:10.1111/j.1654-109X.2010.01084.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch JM (2007) Restoring a Jarrah Forest Understorey vegetation after Bauxite Mining in Western Australia. Restor Ecol 15:26–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köppen W (1900) Versuch einer Klassifikation der Klimate, vorzugsweise nach ihren Beziehungen zur Pflanzenwelt. Geogr Z 6:593–611

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamont BB, Enright NJ, He T (2011) Fitness and evolution of resprouters in relation to fire. Plant Ecol 212:1945–1957. doi:10.1007/s11258-011-9982-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont BB, Wiens D (2003) Are seed set and speciation rates always low among species that resprout after fire, and why ? Evol Ecol 17:277–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Stradic S (2012) Composition, phenology and restoration of campo rupestre mountain grasslands - Brazil. Université d’Avignon et des Pays de Vaucluse, France & Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Stradic S, Buisson E, Fernandes GW (2014) Restoration of Neotropical grasslands degraded by quarrying using hay transfer. Appl Veg Sci 17:482–492. doi:10.1111/avsc.12074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann CER, Archibald SA, Hoffmann WA, Bond WJ (2011) Deciphering the distribution of the savanna biome. 197–209.

  • Medina MBO, Fernandes GW (2007) The potential of natural regeneration of rocky outcrop vegetation on rupestrian field soils in “Serra do Cipó”, Brazil. Rev Bras Bot 30:665–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milton SJ, Bond WJ, Du Plessis MA et al (1999) A protocol for plant conservation by translocation in threatened lowland Fynbos. Conserv Biol 13:735–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overbeck GE, Pfadenhauer J (2007a) Adaptive strategies in burned subtropical grassland in southern Brazil. Flora - Morphol Distrib Funct Ecol Plants 202:27–49. doi:10.1016/j.flora.2005.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overbeck GE, Pfadenhauer J (2007b) Adaptive strategies in burned subtropical grassland in southern Brazil. Flora 202:27–49. doi:10.1016/j.flora.2005.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parr CL, Lehmann CER, Bond WJ et al (2014) Tropical grassy biomes: misunderstood, neglected, and under threat. Trends Ecol Evol 29:205–213. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2014.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pywell RF, Meek WR, Webb NR et al (2011) Long-term heathland restoration on former grassland: the results of a 17-year experiment. Biol Conserv 144:1602–1609. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2011.02.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera D, Jáuregui BM, Peco B (2012) The fate of herbaceous seeds during topsoil stockpiling: restoration potential of seed banks. Ecol Eng 44:94–101. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochefort L, Quinty F, Campeau S et al (2003) North American approach to the restoration of Sphagnum dominated peatlands. Wetl Ecol Manag 11:3–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rokich DP, Dixon KW, Meney KA (2000) Topsoil handling and storage effects on woodland restoration in Western Australia. 8:196–208

  • Saad L, Parmentier I, Colinet G et al (2012) Investigating the vegetation-soil relationships on the copper-cobalt rock outcrops of Katanga (D. R. Congo), an essential step in a biodiversity conservation plan. Restor Ecol 20:405–415. doi:10.1111/j.1526-100X.2011.00786.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Séleck M, Bizoux J-P, Colinet G et al (2013) Chemical soil factors influencing plant assemblages along copper-cobalt gradients: implications for conservation and restoration. Plant Soil 373:455–469. doi:10.1007/s11104-013-1819-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SER (2004) The SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration. www.ser.org

  • Shu WS, Ye ZH, Zhang ZQ et al (2005) Natural colonization of plants on five lead/zinc mine tailings in Southern China. Restor Ecol 13:49–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shutcha MN, Mubemba MM, Faucon M-P et al (2010) Phytostabilisation of copper-contaminated soil in Katanga: an experiment with three native grasses and two amendments. Int J Phytoremediation 12:616–632. doi:10.1080/15226510903390411

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tischew S, Baasch A, Grunert H, Kirmer A (2014) How to develop native plant communities in heavily altered ecosystems: examples from large-scale surface mining in Germany. Appl Veg Sci 17:288–301. doi:10.1111/avsc.12078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Török P, Vida E, Deák B et al (2011) Grassland restoration on former croplands in Europe: an assessment of applicability of techniques and costs. Biodivers Conserv. doi:10.1007/s10531-011-9992-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Trueman I, Mitchell D, Besenyei L (2007) The effects of turf translocation and other environmental variables on the vegetation of a large species-rich mesotrophic grassland. Ecol Eng 31:79–91. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2007.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vécrin MP, Muller S (2003) Top-soil translocation as a technique in the re-creation of species-rich meadows. Appl Veg Sci 6:271–278. doi:10.1111/j.1654-109X.2003.tb00588.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veldman JW, Buisson E, Durigan G et al (2015) Toward an old-growth concept for grasslands, savannas, and woodlands. Front Ecol Environ 13:154–162. doi:10.1890/140270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiting SN, Reeves RD, Richards D et al (2004) Research priorities for conservation of metallophyte biodiversity and their potential for restoration and site remediation. Restor Ecol 12:106–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson SD (2002) Chapter 19. Prairies. In: Perrow MR, Davy JA (eds) Handb. Ecol. restoration. Vol. 2. Restor. Pract., Cambridge . New York, pp 443–465

  • Wong MH (2003) Ecological restoration of mine degraded soils, with emphasis on metal contaminated soils. Ecol Restor 50:775–780

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan J, Fang W, Fan L et al (2006) Soil Formation and Vegetation Establishment on the Cliff Face of Abandoned Quarries in the Early Stages of Natural Colonization. Restor Ecol 14:349–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaloumis NP, Bond WJ (2011) Grassland restoration after afforestation: no direction home? Aust Ecol 36:357–366. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2010.02158.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the company Tenke Fungurume Mining (TFM) for all the logistic and financial support to conduct this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soizig Le Stradic.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Appendix 1

a) Global view of the original Kavifwafwaulu Cu-Co outcrop with details on b) the steppe and c) the steppic savanna. (PDF 513 kb)

Appendix 2

Design of topsoil spreading experimentation. On top, depths of subsoil and topsoil layers are represented on a transversal section schema. At the bottom, aerial view of the two topsoil stripes spread on the waste dump. (PDF 21 kb)

Appendix 3

Pictures of the different steps of the topsoil spreading experimentation, a) delimitation of the area where topsoil was collected; b) the first 20cm of topsoil layer was stripped with a bulldozer and c) stored at the edge of the area for a short time, d) around 50 cm of subsoil was also stripped with a bulldozer; e) topsoil and subsoil were loaded and transferred to the waste dump and spread (first the subsoil and then the topsoil); f) topsoils from the steppe and the steppic savanna were spread on strips of 10m x 75m and 13m x 75m respectively in August 2011, g) topsoil spreading in February 2012 and h) topsoil spreading in May 2014. (PDF 810 kb)

Appendix 4

Design of whole-turf translocation experimentation. On top, depth of subsoil and topsoil layers are represented on a transversal section scheme. At the bottom, aerial view of the area where whole vegetation turves were established. (PDF 20 kb)

Appendix 5

Pictures of the different steps of the whole-turf translocation, a) delimitation of the area where vegetation mats were collected; b) the receptor site consisted in a fallow where the local upper soil layer was excavated and a layer of subsoil from the donor site, Kavifwafwaulu, was spread; c) and d) vegetation turfs were extracted at the donor site using a backhoe; e) vegetation turfs were brought to the receptor site by truck, f) unloaded and set in place manually; g) vegetation mats from steppe were set in a strip of 40m x 6m and a strip of 40m x 34m for the steppic savanna vegetation mats between September 2010 to January 2011, h) whole-turf translocation in March 2013. (PDF 1193 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Le Stradic, S., Séleck, M., Lebrun, J. et al. Comparison of translocation methods to conserve metallophyte communities in the Southeastern D.R. Congo. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23, 13681–13692 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5548-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5548-6

Keywords

Navigation