Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Spontaneous revegetation vs. forestry reclamation in post-mining sand pits

  • How can we restore the biodiversity and ecosystem services in mining and industrial sites?
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vegetation development of sites restored by two different methods, spontaneous revegetation and forestry reclamation, was compared in four sand pit mining complexes located in the southern part of the Czech Republic, central Europe. The space-for-time substitution method was applied to collect vegetation records in 13 differently aged and sufficiently large sites with known history. The restoration method, age (time since site abandonment/reclamation), groundwater table, slope, and aspect in all sampled plots were recorded in addition to the visual estimation of percentage cover of all present vascular plant species. Multivariate methods and GLM were used for the data elaboration. Restoration method was the major factor influencing species pattern. Both spontaneously revegetated and forestry reclaimed sites developed towards forest on a comparable timescale. Although the sites did not significantly differ in species richness (160 species in spontaneously revegetated vs. 111 in forestry reclaimed sites), spontaneously revegetated sites tended to be more diverse with more species of conservation potential (10 Red List species in spontaneous sites vs. 4 Red List species in forestry reclaimed sites). These results support the use of spontaneous revegetation as an effective and low-cost method of sand pit restoration and may contribute to implementation of this method in practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albrecht J (2003) Českobudějovicko. In: Mackovčin P, Sedláček M (eds) Protected areas of the Czech Republic, vol VIII. Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic and EkoCentrum Brno, Czech

  • Alday JG, Marrs RH, Martínez-Ruiz C (2012) Soil and vegetation development during early succession on restored coal wastes: a six-year permanent plot study. Plant Soil 353:305–320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borgegård S (1990) Vegetation development in abandoned gravel pits: effects of surrounding vegetation, substrate and regionality. J Veg Sci 1:675–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady CJ, Noske RA (2010) Succession in bird and plant communities over a 24-year chronosequence of mine rehabilitation in the Australian monsoon tropics. Restor Ecol 18:855–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chytrý M, Tichý L (2003) Diagnostic, constant and dominant species of vegetation classes and alliances of the Czech Republic: a statistical revision. Folia Fac Sci Nat Univ 108:1–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Chytrý M, Kučera T, Kočí M, Grulich V, Lustyk P (2010) Habitat catalogue of the Czech Republic, 2nd edn. Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic, Prague

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg H (1988) Vegetation ecology of central Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg H, Weber HE, Düll R, Wirth V, Werner W, Paulißen D (1991) Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. Scr Geobot 18:1–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans DM, Zipper CE, Burger JA, Strahm BD, Villamagna AM (2013) Reforestation practice for enhancement of ecosystem services on compacted surface mine: path towards ecosystem recovery. Ecol Eng 51:16–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grulich V (2012) Red List of vascular plants of the Czech Republic (3rd edition). Preslia 84:631–645

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodačová D, Prach K (2003) Spoil heaps from brown coal mining: technical reclamation versus spontaneous revegetation. Restor Ecol 11:385–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holl KD (2002) Long-term vegetation recovery on reclaimed coal surface mines in the eastern USA. J Appl Ecol 39:960–970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holl KD, Aide TM (2011) When and where to actively restore ecosystems? For Ecol Manag 261:1558–1563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kent M, Coker P (1992) Vegetation description: a practical approach. Belhaven Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kompała-Bąba A, Bąba W (2013) The spontaneous succession in a sand-pit—the role of life history traits and species habitat preferences. Pol J Ecol 61:13–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Luken JO (1990) Directing ecological succession. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudrák O, Frouz J, Velichová V (2010) Understory vegetation in reclaimed and unreclaimed post-mining forest stands. Ecol Eng 36:783–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novák J, Prach K (2003) Vegetation succession in basalt quarries: pattern on a landscape scale. Appl Veg Sci 6:111–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett STA (1989) Space-for-time substitution as an alternative to long-term studies. In: Likens GE (ed) Long-term studies in ecology: approaches and alternatives. Springer, New York, pp 110–135

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pietrzykowski M (2008) Soil and plant communities development and ecological effectiveness of reclamation on a sand mine cast. J For Sci 54:554–565

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pietrzykowski M, Socha J (2011) An estimation of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) ecosystem productivity on reclaimed post-mining sites in Poland (central Europe) using of allometric equations. Ecol Eng 37:381–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prach K, Lencová K, Řehounková K, Dvořáková H, Jírová A, Konvalinková P, Mudrák O, Novák J, Trnková R (2013) Spontaneous vegetation succession at different central European mining sites: a comparison across seres. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:7680–7685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P, Danihelka J, Sádlo J, Chrtek J Jr, Chytrý M, Jarošík V, Kaplan Z, Krahulec F, Moravcová L, Pergl J, Štajerová K, Tichý L (2012) Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic (2nd edition): checklist update, taxonomic diversity and invasion patterns. Preslia 84:155–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Řehounková K, Řehounek J, Čížek L, Lencová K, Šebelíková L, Bogusch P, Tropek R, Marhoul P (2015) Additional disturbances as a tool of restoration and conservation benefits in post-mining sites: an interdisciplinary approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res XX: XX–XX, this issue

  • Řehounková K, Prach K (2006) Spontaneous vegetation succession in disused gravel-sand pits: role of local site and landscape factors. J Veg Sci 17:583–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Řehounková K, Prach K (2008) Spontaneous vegetation succession in gravel-sand pits: a potential for restoration. Restor Ecol 16:305–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Řehounková K, Řehounek J, Prach K (2011) Near-natural restoration vs. technical reclamation of mining sites in the Czech Republic. Faculty of Science USB, České Budějovice. Available from http://www.restoration-ecology.eu/main-menu/for-public/. Accessed 5 Aug 2015

  • SER (Society for Ecological Restoration International Science & Policy Working Group) (2004) The SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration. Society for Ecological Restoration International, Tuscon

    Google Scholar 

  • Šmilauer P, Lepš J (2014) Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO 5. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • StatSoft, Inc. (2010) STATISTICA (Data Analysis Software System), version 10. http://www.statsoft.com. Accessed 4 Feb 2015

  • ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P (2012) Canoco 5, trial version. http://www.canoco5.com. Accessed 4 Feb 2015

  • Tischew S, Kirmer A (2007) Implementation of basic studies in the ecological restoration of surface-mined land. Restor Ecol 15:321–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trnková R, Řehounková K, Prach K (2010) Spontaneous succession of vegetation on acidic bedrock in quarries in the Czech Republic. Preslia 82:333–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Tropek R, Kadlec T, Karešová P, Spitzer L, Kočárek P, Malenovský I, Baňař P, Tuf IH, Hejda M, Konvička M (2010) Spontaneous succession in limestone quarries as an effective restoration tool for endangered arthropod and plants. J Appl Ecol 47:139–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tropek R, Kadlec T, Hejda M, Kočárek P, Skuhrovec J, Malenovský I, Vodka Š, Spitzer L, Baňař P, Konvička M (2012) Technical reclamations are wasting the conservation potential of post-mining sites. A case study of black coal spoil dumps. Ecol Eng 43:13–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker LR (1999) Ecosystems of disturbed land. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Woziwoda B, Kopeć D (2014) Afforestation or natural succession? Looking for the best way to manage abandoned cut-over peatlands for biodiversity conservation. Ecol Eng 63:143–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahawi RA, Holl KD, Reid JL (2014) Hidden costs of passive restoration. Restor Ecol 22:284–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by the grants GAČR P505/11/0256 and RVO 67985939. The authors thank Keith R. Edwards for doing the language revision of our manuscript and two anonymous reviewers for their comments.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lenka Šebelíková.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Hailong Wang

Appendix

Appendix

List of full species names used in Fig. 1: Acer platanoides L., Agrostis capillaris L., Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn., Avenella flexuosa (L.) Drejer, Betula pendula Roth, Betula pubescens Ehrh., Calamagrostis epigejos (L.) Roth, Calamagrostis villosa (Chaix) J. F. Gmel., Calluna vulgaris (L.) Hull, Carex brizoides L., Carex hirta L., Carex leporina L., Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronquist, Cytisus scoparius (L.) Link, Deschampsia cespitosa (L.) P. Beauv., Digitaria ischaemum (Schreb.) Muhl., Epilobium angustifolium L., Filago minima (Sm.) Pers., Frangula alnus Mill., Hypochaeris radicata L., Juncus effusus L., Lysimachia vulgaris L., Melampyrum pratense L., Molinia caerulea (L.) Moench, Phalaris arundinacea L., Picea abies (L.) H. Karst., Pilosella officinarum Vaill., Pinus sylvestris L., Populus tremula L., Quercus robur L., Quercus rubra L., Rubus fruticosus agg., Salix caprea L., Salix cinerea L., Sorbus aucuparia L., Tanacetum vulgare L., Tussilago farfara L., Vaccinium myrtillus L., Vaccinium vitis-idaea L., Veronica officinalis L.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Šebelíková, L., Řehounková, K. & Prach, K. Spontaneous revegetation vs. forestry reclamation in post-mining sand pits. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23, 13598–13605 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5330-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5330-9

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Klára Řehounková