Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Exploring factors influencing farmers’ willingness to pay (WTP) for a planned adaptation programme to address climatic issues in agricultural sectors

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study empirically estimates farmers’ willingness to pay (WTP) for a planned adaptation programme for addressing climate issues in Pakistan’s agricultural sectors. The contingent valuation method (CVM) was employed to determine a monetary valuation of farmers’ preferences for a planned adaptation programme by ascertaining the value attached to address climatic issues. The survey was conducted by distributing structured questionnaires among Pakistani farmers. The study found that 67 % of respondents were willing to pay for a planned adaptation programme. However, several socioeconomic and motivational factors exert greater influence on their willingness to pay (WTP). This paper specifies the steps needed for all institutional bodies to better address issues in climate change. The outcomes of this paper will support attempts by policy makers to design an efficient adaptation framework for mitigating and adapting to the adverse impacts of climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Alam MM, bin Toriman ME, Siwar C, Molla RI, & Talib B (2011) The Impacts of Agricultural Supports for Climate Change Adaptation: Farm Level Assessment Study on Paddy Farmers. American Journal of Environmental Sciences, 7(2)

  • Andersson H, Hole AR, & Svensson M (2014) Valuation of small and multiple health risks: A critical analysis of SP data applied to food and water safety

  • Bain PG, Hornsey MJ, Bongiorno R, Jeffries C (2012) Promoting pro-environmental action in climate change deniers. Nat Clim Chang 2(8):600–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen J, Hers S, Van der Zwaan B (2010) An integrated assessment of climate change, air pollution, and energy security policy. Energy Policy 38(8):4021–4030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle KJ (2003) Contingent Valuation in Practice. in A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation, ed. By Patricia A. Champ, Kevin J. Boyle, and Thomas C. Brown, London: Kluwer

  • Canadell JG, Raupach MR (2008) Managing forests for climate change mitigation. Science 320(5882):1456–1457

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carson R (2012) Contingent valuation: a comprehensive bibliography and history. Edward Elgar Publishing

  • Carson RT, Louviere JJ, Wei E (2010) Alternative Australian climate change plans: the public’s views. Energy Policy 38(2):902–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho A, Flannigan MD, Logan KA, Gowman LM, Miranda AI, Borrego C (2010) The impact of spatial resolution on area burned and fire occurrence projections in Portugal under climate change. Clim Change 98(1–2):177–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Challinor AJ, Simelton ES, Fraser ED, Hemming D, Collins M (2010) Increased crop failure due to climate change: assessing adaptation options using models and socio-economic data for wheat in China. Environ Res Lett 5(3):034012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis LA (2012) Unit costs of health and social care 2012. Personal Social Services Research Unit

  • Dai A, Lamb PJ, Trenberth KE, Hulme M, Jones PD, Xie P (2004) The recent Sahel drought is real. Int J Climatol 24(11):1323–1331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damigos D, Tourkolias C, Diakoulaki D (2009) Households’ willingness to pay for safeguarding security of natural gas supply in electricity generation. Energy Policy 37(5):2008–2017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bekker‐Grob EW, Ryan M, Gerard K (2012) Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. Health economics 21(2):145–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Borghi A, Strazza C, Gallo M, Messineo S, Naso M (2013) Water supply and sustainability: life cycle assessment of water collection, treatment and distribution service. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(5):1158–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everard M, Pontin B, Appleby T, Staddon C, Hayes ET, Barnes JH, Longhurst JWS (2013) Air as a common good. Environ Sci Pol 33:354–368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gelo D, Koch SF (2012) Does one size fit all? Heterogeneity in the valuation of community forestry programs. Ecol Econ 74:85–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu M, Lobell DB, Field CB (2011) Direct climate effects of perennial bioenergy crops in the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(11):4307–4312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Georgiou S, & Turner RK (2012) Valuing ecosystem services: the case of multi-functional wetlands. Routledge

  • GoP (2013) Economic survey of Pakistan. Islamabad, Pakistan: Published by Ministry of Finance

  • Hess S, Orr S, Sheldon R (2012) Consistency and fungibility of monetary valuations in transport: an empirical analysis of framing and mental accounting effects. Transp Res A Policy Pract 46(10):1507–1516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard G, Charles K, Pond K, Brookshaw A, Hossain R, Bartram J (2010) Securing 2020 vision for 2030: climate change and ensuring resilience in water and sanitation services. J Water Clim Chang 1(1):2–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howden SM, Soussana JF, Tubiello FN, Chhetri N, Dunlop M, Meinke H (2007) Adapting agriculture to climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(50):19691–19696

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R.K and Reisinger, A. (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland

  • IPCC (2011) Mitigation of climate change, IPCC special report on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation

  • Kaffashi S, Shamsudin MN, Radam A, Rahim KA, Yacob MR (2013) We are willing to pay to support wetland conservation: local users’ perspective. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 20(4):325–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellens W, Terpstra T, De Maeyer P (2013) Perception and communication of flood risks: a systematic review of empirical research. Risk Anal 33(1):24–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein Tank AMG, Peterson TC, Quadir DA, Dorji S, Zou X, Tang H, & Spektorman T (2006) Changes in daily temperature and precipitation extremes in central and south Asia. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984–2012), 111(D16)

  • Kristiansen S (2013) Maritime transportation: safety management and risk analysis. Routledge

  • Kurukulasuriya P, & Rosenthal S (2013) Climate change and agriculture: a review of impacts and adaptations

  • Lantz V, Trenholm R, Wilson J, Richards W (2012) Assessing market and non-market costs of freshwater flooding due to climate change in the community of Fredericton, eastern Canada. Clim Change 110(1–2):347–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindner M, Maroschek M, Netherer S, Kremer A, Barbati A, Garcia-Gonzalo J, Marchetti M (2010) Climate change impacts, adaptive capacity, and vulnerability of European forest ecosystems. For Ecol Manage 259(4):698–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason EG, Manley BR, & Sands R (2013) Forestry and climate change. Forestry in a global context, (Ed. 2), 149–157

  • Moss RH, Edmonds JA, Hibbard KA, Manning MR, Rose SK, Van Vuuren DP, Wilbanks TJ (2010) The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463(7282):747–756

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ojeda MI, Mayer AS, Solomon BD (2008) Economic valuation of environmental services sustained by water flows in the Yaqui River Delta. Ecol Econ 65(1):155–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orgill J, Shaheed A, Brown J, Jeuland M (2013) Water quality perceptions and willingness to pay for clean water in peri-urban Cambodian communities. J Water Health 11(3):489–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park M, Hagishima A, Tanimoto J, Chun C (2013) Willingness to pay for improvements in environmental performance of residential buildings. Build Environ 60:225–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rounsevell MDA, Reginster I, Araújo MB, Carter TR, Dendoncker N, Ewert F, Tuck G (2006) A coherent set of future land use change scenarios for Europe. Agr Ecosyst Environ 114(1):57–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe RD, Schulze WD, Breffle WS (1996) A test for payment card biases. J Environ Econ Manag 31(2):178–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shove E (2010) Beyond the ABC: climate change policy and theories of social change. Environ Plan A 42(6):1273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siwar C, Alam MM, Murad MW, Al-Amin AQ (2009) A review of the linkages between climate change, agricultural sustainability and poverty in Malaysia. Int Rev Bus Res Pap 5(6):309–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Sovacool BK (2011) Evaluating energy security in the Asia pacific: towards a more comprehensive approach. Energy Policy 39(11):7472–7479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern (2006) The economics of climate change. Vol. 30. London: HM treasury

  • Sultana H, Ali N, Iqbal MM, Khan AM (2009) Vulnerability and adaptability of wheat production in different climatic zones of Pakistan under climate change scenarios. Clim Change 94(1–2):123–142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tonglet M, Phillips PS, Read AD (2004) Using the theory of planned behaviour to investigate the determinants of recycling behaviour: a case study from Brixworth, UK. Resour Conserv Recycl 41(3):191–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trenberth KE (2011) Changes in precipitation with climate change. Climate Res 47(1):123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tubiello FN, Amthor JS, Boote KJ, Donatelli M, Easterling W, Fischer G, & Rosenzweig C (2007) Crop response to elevated CO < sub > 2</sub > and world food supply: A comment on “Food for Thought…” by Long et al., Science 312: 1918–1921, 2006. European Journal of Agronomy, 26(3), 215–223

  • Turner K (2013) Sustainable wetlands: an economic perspective. Wetl Mark Int Failures Four Case Stud 10:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Vo QT, Kuenzer C, Vo QM, Moder F, Oppelt N (2012) Review of valuation methods for mangrove ecosystem services. Ecol Indic 23:431–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vörösmarty CJ, McIntyre PB, Gessner MO, Dudgeon D, Prusevich A, Green P, Davies PM (2010) Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467(7315):555–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YM, Elhag T (2007) A comparison of neural network, evidential reasoning and multiple regression analysis in modelling bridge risks. Expert Syst Appl 32(2):336–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman ML (2009) On modeling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change. Rev Econ Stat 91(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wicker P, Hallmann K, Breuer C, Feiler S (2012) The value of Olympic success and the intangible effects of sport events—a contingent valuation approach in Germany. Eur sport Manag Q 12(4):337–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Meteorological Organization (1979) Proceedings of the world climate conference. WMO, Geneva

  • Yoo SH, Kwak SY (2009) Willingness to pay for green electricity in Korea: a contingent valuation study. Energy Policy 37(12):5408–5416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon CG (2009) Wise use of paddy rice fields to partially compensate for the loss of natural wetlands. Paddy Water Environ 7(4):357–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adeel Ahmed.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmed, A., Masud, M.M., Al-Amin, A.Q. et al. Exploring factors influencing farmers’ willingness to pay (WTP) for a planned adaptation programme to address climatic issues in agricultural sectors. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22, 9494–9504 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4110-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4110-x

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Adeel Ahmed
  2. Muhammad Mehedi Masud
  3. Abul Quasem Al-Amin