Skip to main content
Log in

Concentration addition-based approach for aquatic risk assessment of realistic pesticide mixtures in Portuguese river basins

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A two-tiered outline for the predictive environmental risk assessment of chemical mixtures with effect assessments based on concentration addition (CA) approaches as first tier and consideration of independent action (IA) as the second tier was applied based on realistic pesticide mixtures measured in surface waters from 2002 to 2008 within three important Portuguese river basins (‘Mondego’, ‘Sado’ and ‘Tejo’). The CA-based risk quotients, based on acute data and an assessment factor of 100, exceeded 1 in more than 39 % of the 281 samples, indicating a potential risk for the aquatic environment, namely to algae. Seven herbicide compounds and three insecticides were the most toxic compounds in the pesticide mixtures and provided at least 50 % of the mixture’s toxicity in almost 100 % of the samples with risk quotients based on the sum of toxic units (RQSTU) above 1. In eight samples, the maximum cumulative ratio (MCR) and the Junghan’s ratio values indicated that a chemical-by-chemical approach underestimated the toxicity of the pesticide mixtures, and CA predicted higher mixture toxicity than that of IA. From a risk management perspective, the results pointed out that, by deriving appropriate programmes of measures to a limited number of pesticides with the highest contribution to the total mixture toxicity, relevant benefits also on mixture impact could be produced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altenburger R, Arrhenius A, Backhaus T, Coors A, Faust M, Zitzkat D (2014) Ecotoxicological combined effects from chemical mixtures. Part 1: relevance and adequate consideration in environmental risk assessment of plant protection products and biocides. Report No. (UBA-FB) 001789/1. Umweltbundesamt, Dessau-Roßlau, Germany

  • APA (2014) Planos de Gestão de Região Hidrográfica. http://www.apambiente.pt/?ref=16&subref=7&sub2ref=9&sub3ref=834. Accessed 01 Aug 2014

  • Backhaus T, Faust M (2012) Predictive environmental risk assessment of chemical mixtures: a conceptual framework. Environ Sci Technol 46(5):2564–2573. doi:10.1021/es2034125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Batista S (2003) Groundwater exposure to pesticides and nitrates in agricultural ecosystems of “Ribatejo e Oeste” and “Beira Litoral” (Portugal). Dissertation, Technical University of Lisbon: Portugal

  • Batista S, Silva E, Cerejeira MJ, Silva-Fernandes AM (2001) Exposure of ground water to alachlor, atrazine and metolachlor in maize areas of Ribatejo and Oeste (Portugal). Toxicol Environ Chem 79(3–4):223–232. doi:10.1080/02772240109358990

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Batista S, Silva E, Galhardo S, Viana P, Cerejeira MJ (2002) Evaluation of pesticide contamination of ground water in two agricultural areas of Portugal. Int J Environ Anal Chem 82(8–9):601–609. doi:10.1080/03067310290009488

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bundschuh M, Goedkoop W, Kreuger J (2014) Evaluation of pesticide monitoring strategies in agricultural streams based on the toxic-unit concept-experiences from long-term measurements. Sci Total Environ 484:84–91. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.03.015

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cerejeira MJ, Silva E, Batista S, Trancoso A, Centeno MSL, Silva-Fernandes A (2000) Simazine, metribuzine and nitrates in ground water of agricultural areas of Portugal. Toxicol Environ Chem 75(3–4):245–253. doi:10.1080/02772240009358908

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cerejeira MJ, Viana P, Batista S, Pereira T, Silva E, Valério MJ, Silva A, Ferreira M, Silva-Fernandes AM (2003) Pesticides in Portuguese surface and ground waters. Water Res 37(5):1055–1063. doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00462-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DGAV (2014) Informação sobre Vendas. http://www.dgv.min-agricultura.pt/portal/page/portal/DGV/genericos?generico=4218634&cboui=4218634. Accessed 01 Aug 2014

  • EC (2009) Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC. Official Journal of the European Union L 309 of 24.11.2009, pp 1-50

  • EC (2011) Technical Guidance for deriving Environmental Quality Standards. Guidance Document No. 27. Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). European Commission, Technical Report - 2011–055

  • EC (2013) Directive 2013/39/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 August 2013 amending Directives 2000/60/EC and 2008/105/EC as regards priority substances in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Union L 226 of 24.08.2013. p. 1–17

  • FOOTPRINT (2014) The FOOTPRINT pesticide properties database. http://sitem.herts.ac.uk/aeru/iupac/index.htm. Accessed 01 Aug 2014

  • Jaskulké E, Patty L, Bruchet A (1999) Evaluations of pesticide residues in water. In: Brooks GT, Roberts TR (eds) Pesticide chemistry and bioscience. The food-environmental challenge. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, pp 369–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Junghans M, Backhaus T, Faust M, Scholze M, Grimme LH (2006) Application and validation of approaches for the predictive hazard assessment of realistic mixtures. Aquat Toxicol 76(2):93–110. doi:10.1016/j.aquatox.2005.10.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kortenkamp A, Backhaus T, Faust M (2009) State of the art report on mixture toxicity-final report, executive summary. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/effects/pdf/report_mixture_toxicity.pdf. Accessed 01 Aug 2014

  • Lepper P (2005) Manual on the methodological framework to derive environmental quality standards for priority substances in accordance with Article 16 of the water framework directive (2000/60/EC). Fraunhofer-Institute Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology, Schmallenberg

    Google Scholar 

  • McBean C (2012) A world compendium. The pesticide manual, sixteenth edition. British Crop Protection Council, Alton

    Google Scholar 

  • Moschet C, Wittmer I, Simovic J, Junghans M, Piazzoli A, Singer H, Stamm C, Leu C, Hollender J (2014) How a complete pesticide screening changes the assessment of surface water quality. Environ Sci Technol 48(10):5423–5432. doi:10.1021/es500371t

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira T (2003) Impact of pesticide use in rice ecosystems on the surface water quality. Dissertation, Technical University of Lisbon: Portugal

  • Posthuma L, Richards SM, De Zwart D, Dyer SD, Sibley PK, Hickey CH, Altenburger R (2008) Mixture extrapolation approaches. In: Solomon KR, Brock TCM, De Zwart D, Dyer SD, Posthuma L, Richards SM, Sanderson H, Sibley PK, Van den Brink PJ (eds) Extrapolation practice for ecotoxicological effect characterization of chemicals. SETAC Europe Press and CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 135–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Price PS, Han X (2011) Maximum cumulative ratio (MCR) as a tool for assessing the value of performing a cumulative risk assessment. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 8(6):2212–2225. doi:10.3390/ijerph8062212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RGA (2001a) Recenseamento Geral da Agricultura 1999. Ribatejo e Oeste. Instituto Nacional de Estatística, Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  • RGA (2001b) Recenseamento Geral da Agricultura 1999. Beira Litoral. Instituto Nacional de Estatística, Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  • RGA (2001c) Recenseamento Geral da Agricultura 1999. Alentejo. Instituto Nacional de Estatística, Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodney SI, Teed RS, Moore DRJ (2013) Estimating the toxicity of pesticide mixtures to aquatic organisms: a review. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 19(6):1557–1575. doi:10.1080/10807039.2012.723180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silva E, Batista S, Viana P, Antunes P, Serôdio L, Cardoso AT, Cerejeira MJ (2006) Pesticides and nitrates in groundwater from oriziculture areas of the ‘Baixo Sado’ region (Portugal). Int J Environ Anal Chem 86(13):955–972. doi:10.1080/03067310600833336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silva E, Batista S, Caetano L, Cerejeira MJ, Chaves M, Jacobsen S-E (2011) Integrated approach for the quality assessment of freshwater resources in a vineyard area (South Portugal). Environ Monit Assess 176(1–4):331–341. doi:10.1007/s10661-010-1586-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silva E, Mendes MP, Ribeiro L, Cerejeira MJ (2012a) Exposure assessment of pesticides in a shallow groundwater of the Tagus vulnerable zone (Portugal): a multivariate statistical approach (JCA). Environ Sci Pollut Res 19(7):2667–2680. doi:10.1007/s11356-012-0761-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silva E, Pereira AC, Estalagem SP, Moreira-Santos M, Ribeiro R, Cerejeira MJ (2012b) Assessing the quality of freshwaters in a protected area within the Tagus river basin district (central Portugal). J Environ Qual 41(5):1413–1426. doi:10.2134/jeq2012.0010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emília Silva.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Laura McConnell

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Table S1

(DOCX 47 kb)

Table S2

(DOCX 27 kb)

Table S3

(DOCX 45 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Silva, E., Cerejeira, M.J. Concentration addition-based approach for aquatic risk assessment of realistic pesticide mixtures in Portuguese river basins. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22, 6756–6765 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3857-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3857-9

Keywords

Navigation