Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 22, Issue 9, pp 6440–6451 | Cite as

Microbial aerobic and anaerobic degradation of acrylamide in sludge and water under environmental conditions—case study in a sand and gravel quarry

  • A. G. GuezennecEmail author
  • C. Michel
  • S. Ozturk
  • A. Togola
  • J. Guzzo
  • N. Desroche
Degradation and transfer of polyacrylamide based floculents in sludges and industrial and natural waters

Abstract

Polyacrylamides (PAMs) are used in sand and gravel quarries as water purification flocculants for recycling process water in a recycling loop system where the flocculants remove fine particles in the form of sludge. The PAM-based flocculants, however, contain residual amounts of acrylamide (AMD) that did not react during the polymerization process. This acrylamide is released into the environment when the sludge is discharged into a settling basin. Here, we explore the microbial diversity and the potential for AMD biodegradation in water and sludge samples collected in a quarry site submitted to low AMD concentrations. The microbial diversity, analyzed by culture-dependent methods and the denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis approach, reveals the presence of Proteobacteria, Cyanobacteria, and Actinobacteria, among which some species are known to have an AMD biodegradation activity. Results also show that the two main parts of the water recycling loop—the washing process and the settling basin—display significantly different bacterial profiles. The exposure time with residual AMD could, thus, be one of the parameters that lead to a selection of specific bacterial species. AMD degradation experiments with 0.5 g L−1 AMD showed a high potential for biodegradation in all parts of the washing process, except the make-up water. The AMD biodegradation potential in samples collected from the washing process and settling basin was also analyzed taking into account on-site conditions: low (12 °C) and high (25 °C) temperatures reflecting the winter and summer seasons, and AMD concentrations of 50 μg L−1. Batch tests showed rapid (as little as 18 h) AMD biodegradation under aerobic and anaerobic conditions at both the winter and summer temperatures, although there was a greater lag time before activity started with the AMD biodegradation at 12 °C. This study, thus, demonstrates that bacteria present in sludge and water samples exert an in situ and rapid biodegradation of AMD at low concentration, whatever the season, and in both the aerobic and anaerobic parts of the water recycling system.

Keywords

Acrylamide biodegradation Microbial diversity Proteobacteria Actinobacteria Polyacrylamide Flocculant 

References

  1. Bell PE, Herlihy AT, Mills AL (1990) Establishment of anaerobic, reducing conditions in lake sediment after storm deposition of acidic, aerobic sediments by a major storm. Biogeochemistry 9:99–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown L, Rhead M, Brancroft K, Allen N (1980) Model studies of the degradation of acrylamide monomer. Water Res 14:775–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buranasilp K, Charoenpanich J (2011) Biodegradation of acrylamide by Enterobacter aerogenes isolated from wastewater in Thailand. J Environ Sci (China) 23:396–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cavins JF, Friedman M (1968) Specific modification of protein sulfhydryl groups with alpha, beta-unsaturated compounds. J Biol Chem 243:3357–3360Google Scholar
  5. Croll BT, Arkell GM, Hodge RPJ (1974) Residues of acrylamide in water. Water Res 8:989–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. European Parliament (1999) Directive 1999/45/EC concerning the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous preparations. Official Journal of the European Union L200/1. European Union, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  7. European Parliament (2006a) Directive 2006/21/EC on the management of waste from extractive industries. Official Journal of the European Union L 102. European Union, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  8. European Parliament (2006b) Regulation 1907/2006/EC concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH). Official Journal of the European Union L396/1. European Union, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  9. Fuentes S, Méndez V, Aguila P, Seeger M (2014) Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons: catabolic genes, microbial communities, and applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:4781–4794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Glass MB, Beesley CA, Wilkins PP, Hoffmaster AR (2009) Comparison of four selective media for the isolation of Burkholderia mallei and Burkholderia pseudomallei. Am J Trop Med Hyg 80:1023–1028Google Scholar
  11. Guézennec AG, Michel C, Bru K, Touzé S, Desroche N, Mnif I, Motelica-Heino M (2014) Transfer and degradation of polyacrylamide based flocculants in hydrosystems: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res. doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-3556-6 Google Scholar
  12. Haritash AK, Kaushik CP (2009) Biodegradation aspects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs): a review. J Hazard Mater 169:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haveroen ME, MacKinnon MD, Fedorak PM (2005) Polyacrylamide added as a nitrogen source stimulates methanogenesis in consortia from various wastewaters. Water Res 39:3333–3341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Howard K, Inglis TJ (2003) Novel selective medium for isolation of Burkholderia pseudomallei. J Clin Microbiol 41:3312–3316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. ISO (1987) International Standard 5667–4: Water quality, sampling, part 4: guidance on sampling from lakes, natural and man-made. International Standards OrganisationGoogle Scholar
  16. ISO (1995) International Standard 5667–12: Water quality, sampling, part 12: guidance on sampling of bottom sediments. International Standards OrganisationGoogle Scholar
  17. Kay-Shoemake JL, Watwood ME, Lentz RD, Sojka RE (1998a) Polyacrylamide as an organic nitrogen source for soil microorganisms with potential effects on inorganic soil nitrogen in agricultural soil. Soil Biol Biochem 30:1045–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kay-Shoemake JL, Watwood ME, Sojka RE, Lentz RD (1998b) Polyacrylamide as a substrate for microbial amidase in culture and soil. Soil Biol Biochem 30:1647–1654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Labahn SK, Fisher JC, Robleto EA, Young MH, Moser DP (2010) Microbially mediated aerobic and anaerobic degradation of acrylamide in a western United States irrigation canal. J Environ Qual 39:1563–1569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee YA, Sung AN, Liu TF, Lee YS (2009) Combination of chromogenic differential medium and estA-specific PCR for isolation and detection of phytopathogenic Xanthomonas spp. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:6831–6838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Miller SC, LiPuma JJ, Parke JL (2002) Culture-based and non-growth-dependent detection of the Burkholderia cepacia complex in soil environments. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:3750–3758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mnif I, Hurel C, Marmier N (2014) Direct injection method for HPLC/MS/MS analysis of acrylamide in aqueous solutions-applications to adsorption experiments. Environ Sci Pollut Res (SI AQUAPOL)Google Scholar
  23. Molak V (1991) Acrylamide: a review of the literature in NIOH and NIOSH basis for an occupational health standard. US Department of Health and Human ServicesGoogle Scholar
  24. Navel S, Mermillod-Blondin F, Montuelle B, Chauvet E, Simon L, Marmonier P (2011) Water-sediment exchanges control microbial processes associated with leaf litter degradation in the hyporheic zone: a microcosm study. Microb Ecol 61:968–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nawaz MS, Franklin W, Cerniglia CE (1993) Degradation of acrylamide by immobilized cells of a Pseudomonas sp. and Xanthomonas maltophilia. Can J Microbiol 39:207–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nawaz MS, Khan AA, Seng JE, Leakey JE, Siitonen PH, Cerniglia CE (1994) Purification and characterization of an amidase from an acrylamide-degrading Rhodococcus sp. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:3343–3348Google Scholar
  27. Nawaz MS, Billedeau SM, Cerniglia CE (1998) Influence of selected physical parameters on the biodegradation of acrylamide by immobilized cells of Rhodococcus sp. Biodegradation 9:381–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Perez-Pantoja D, Donoso R, Agullo L, Cordova M, Seeger M, Pieper DH, Gonzalez B (2012) Genomic analysis of the potential for aromatic compounds biodegradation in Burkholderiales. Environ Microbiol 14:1091–1117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rousseaux S, Hartmann A, Soulas G (2001) Isolation and characterisation of new gram-negative and gram-positive atrazine degrading bacteria from different French soils. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 36:211–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Santoshkumar M, Nayak AS, Anjaneya O, Karegoudar TB (2010) A plate method for screening of bacteria capable of degrading aliphatic nitriles. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 37:111–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sathesh Prabu C, Thatheyus AJ (2007) Biodegradation of acrylamide employing free and immobilized cells of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 60:69–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schloter M, Dilly O, Muncha JC (2003) Indicators for evaluating soil quality. Agric Ecosyst Environ 98:255–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Seo JS, Keum YS, Li QX (2009) Bacterial degradation of aromatic compounds. Int J Environ Res Public Health 6:278–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shanker R, Ramakrishna C, Seth PK (1990) Microbial degradation of acrylamide monomer. Arch Microbiol 154:192–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sharma M, Sharma N, Bhalla T (2009) Amidases: versatile enzymes in nature. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 8:343–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shukor MY, Gusmanizar N, Azmi NA, Hamid M, Ramli J, Shamaan NA, Syed MA (2009) Isolation and characterization of an acrylamide-degrading Bacillus cereus. J Environ Biol 30:57–64Google Scholar
  37. Sojka RE, Entry JA, Fuhrmann JJ (2006) The influence of high application rates of polyacrylamide on microbial metabolic potential in an agricultural soil. Appl Soil Ecol 32:243–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Togola A, Coureau C, Guezennec AG, Touzé S (2014) A sensitive analytical procedure for acrylamide in environmental water samples by offline SPE-UPLC/MS/MS. Environ Sci Pollut Res (SI AQUAPOL)Google Scholar
  39. Touzé S, Guerin V, Guezennec AG, Binet S, Togola A (2014) Dissemination of acrylamide monomer from polyacrylamide based flocculant use - sand and gravel quarry case study. Environ Sci Pollut Res. doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-3177-0 Google Scholar
  40. UNPG (2013) Polyacrylamide based flocculant used in quarries (in French). Union National des Producteurs de Granulats UNPGGoogle Scholar
  41. Vanbroekhoven K, Ryngaert A, Bastiaens L, Wattiau P, Vancanneyt M, Swings J, De Mot R, Springael D (2004) Streptomycin as a selective agent to facilitate recovery and isolation of introduced and indigenous Sphingomonas from environmental samples. Environ Microbiol 6:1123–1136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ver Vers LM (1999) Determination of acrylamide monomer in polyacrylamide degradation studies by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr Sci 37:486–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. World Health Organization (1985) Environmental Health Criteria 1985, 49, 1. International programme on chemical safety Web. http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc49.htm

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. G. Guezennec
    • 1
    Email author
  • C. Michel
    • 1
  • S. Ozturk
    • 2
  • A. Togola
    • 1
  • J. Guzzo
    • 3
  • N. Desroche
    • 2
  1. 1.Département Eau Environnement EcotechnologiesBRGMOrleans Cedex 1France
  2. 2.Nexidia SASDijonFrance
  3. 3.UMR A « Procédés Alimentaires et Microbiologiques », Equipe VALMISUniversité de Bourgogne, IUVVDijonFrance

Personalised recommendations