Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 22, Issue 11, pp 8031–8043 | Cite as

Influence of the natural growth environment on the sensitivity of phototrophic biofilm to herbicide

  • A. PauleEmail author
  • A. Lamy
  • V. Roubeix
  • F. Delmas
  • J. L. Rols
Crop protection: environment, human health, and biodiversity
  • 1.5k Downloads

Abstract

Ecotoxicological experiments were performed in laboratory-scale microcosms to investigate community-level structural responses of river phototrophic biofilms from different environments to herbicide exposure. Biofilms were initially cultivated on artificial supports placed in situ for 4 weeks at two sites, site M, located in an agricultural watershed basin and site S, located in a forested watershed basin. The biofilms were subsequently transferred to microcosms and, after an acclimatisation phase of 7 days were exposed to alachlor at 10 and 30 μg L−1 for 23 days. Alachlor effects were assessed by a combination of structural parameters, including biomass (ash-free dry mass and chlorophyll a), molecular fingerprinting of the bacterial community (polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE)) and diatom species composition. Alachlor impacted the chlorophyll a and ash-free dry mass levels of phototrophic biofilms previously cultivated at site S. The structural responses of bacterial and diatom communities were difficult to distinguish from changes linked to the microcosm incubation period. Phototrophic biofilms from site S exposed at 30 μg L−1 alachlor were characterised by an increase of Achnanthidium minutissimum (K-z.) Czarnecki abundance, as well as a higher proportion of abnormal frustules. Thus, phototrophic biofilms with different histories, exhibited different responses to alachlor exposure demonstrating the importance of growth environment. These observations also confirm the problem of distinguishing changes induced by the stress of pesticide toxicity from temporal evolution of the community in the microcosm.

Keywords

Alachlor Phototrophic biofilms Bacterial community Diatoms Growth environment Biological succession Microbial ecotoxicology 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the French National Programme EC2CO-Environmental Microbiology—and by the Midi-Pyrénées Council Programme of the Pyrenean working community. We thank J. Ferriol and D. Dalger for assistance with the DGGE and water chemistry analysis, respectively. We also thank the ‘Association des Agriculteurs d’Auradé’ for the access to site M.

Supplementary material

11356_2014_3429_MOESM1_ESM.doc (1 mb)
Fig. S1 Photographs of the two study sites M and S chosen for in situ production of natural phototrophic biofilm. (DOC 4929 kb)
11356_2014_3429_MOESM2_ESM.doc (3.6 mb)
Fig. S2 Different views of artificial substrates (polyethylene plates, 50 × 100 × 5 mm) used for in situ production and collection of natural phototrophic biofilms (site M on the photography). (DOC 3864 kb)
11356_2014_3429_MOESM3_ESM.doc (104 kb)
Fig. S3 Schema of one microcosm subdivided into three compartments by vertically glass slides. Water recirculation is realised with a submerged pump. Seven polyethylene plates are positioned in the main compartment. (DOC 103 kb)
11356_2014_3429_MOESM4_ESM.doc (167 kb)
Fig. S4 A normal diatom frustule (left) versus an abnormal form (right) of Achnanthidium minutissimum observed in the 30 μg L−1 alachlor-contaminated microcosms at 23 days of incubation during the experiment S. Scale bar, 10 μm. (DOC 167 kb)
11356_2014_3429_MOESM5_ESM.doc (40 kb)
Table S1 Values of the pesticides levels obtained from the previous studies (Debenest 2007, Paule et al. 2009) of the two study sites M and S during the springs of the years 2005, 2006 and 2007. (DOC 3883 kb)
11356_2014_3429_MOESM6_ESM.doc (30 kb)
Table S2 Values of the nitrate (NO3 ) levels obtained from the previous studies (Debenest 2007, Paule et al. 2009) of the two study sites M and S during the springs of the years 2005 and 2007. (DOC 3870 kb)

References

  1. Antić N, Radišić M, Radović T, Vasiljević T, Grujić S, Petković A, Dimkić M, Laušević M (2014) Pesticide residues in the Danube River Basin in Serbia—a survey during 2009–2011. Clean Soil Air Water. doi: 10.1002/clen.201200360 Google Scholar
  2. Battin TJ, Kaplan LA, Newbold JD, Hansen CME (2003) Contributions of microbial biofilms to ecosystem processes in stream mesocosms. Nature 426:439–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bérard A (1996) Effect of four organic solvents on natural phytoplankton assemblages: consequences for ecotoxicological experiments on herbicides. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 57:183–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biggs BJF (1996) Patterns in benthic algae of streams. In: Stevenson RJ, Bothwell ML, Lowe RL (eds) Algal ecology: freshwater benthic ecosystems. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 31–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Böger P, Matthes B, Schmalfu BJ (2000) Towards the primary target of chloroacetamides—new findings pave the way. Pest Manag Sci 56:497–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonnet JL, Bonnemoy F, Dusser M, Bohatier J (2007) Assessment of the potential toxicity of herbicides and their degradation products to nontarget cells using two microorganisms, the Bacteria Vibrio fishcheri and the Ciliate Tetrahymena pyriformis. Environ Toxicol 22:78–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carder JP, Hoagland KD (1998) Combined effects of alachlor and atrazine on benthic algal communities in artificial streams. Environ Toxicol Chem 17:1415–1420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caron DA (1994) Inorganic nutrients, bacteria, and the microbial loop. Microb Ecol 28:295–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chesters G, Simsiman GV, Levy J, Alhajjar BJ, Fathulla RN, Harkin JM (1989) Environmental fate of alachlor and metolachlor. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 110:1–74Google Scholar
  10. Chiron S, Abian J, Ferrer M, Sanchezbaeza F, Messeguer A, Barcelo D (1995) Comparative photodegradation rates of alachlor and bentazone in natural water and determination of breakdown products. Environ Toxicol Chem 14:1287–1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cho CW, Thuy Pham TP, Kim S, Kim YR, Jeon YC, Yun YS (2009) Toxicity assessment of common organic solvents using a biosensor based on algal photosynthetic activity measurement. J Appl Phycol 21:683–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clarke KR (1993) Nonparametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust J Ecol 18:117–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clements WH, Newman MC (2002) Community ecotoxicology. John Wiley and Sons, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Compo J, Masiá A, Blasco C, Picó Y (2013) Occurrence and removal efficiency of pesticides in sewage treatment plants of four Mediterranean River Basins. J Hazard Mater 263:146–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Coste M, Boutry S, Tison-Rosebery J, Delmas F (2009) Improvements of the Biological Diatom Index (BDI): description and efficiency of the new version (BDI-2006). Ecol Indic 9:621–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Debenest T (2007) Characteristics of impact of agricultural pollutions on the benthic diatoms. PhD thesis, Université de Bordeaux 1, Bordeaux (in French)Google Scholar
  17. Debenest T, Pinelli E, Coste M, Silvestre J, Mazzella N, Madigou C, Delmas F (2009) Sensitivity of freshwater periphytic diatoms to agricultural herbicides. Aquat Toxicol 93:11–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Debenest T, Silvestre J, Coste M, Pinelli E (2010) Effects of pesticides on freshwater diatoms. Whitacre DM (ed) Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology, 87. Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology 203Google Scholar
  19. DeLorenzo ME, Scott GI, Ross PE (2001) Toxicity of pesticides to aquatic micro-organisms: a review. Environ Toxicol Chem 20:84–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dorigo U, Leboulanger C, Berard A, Bouchez A, Humbert JF, Montuelle B (2007) Lotic biofilm community structure and pesticide tolerance along a contamination gradient in a vineyard area. Aquat Microb Ecol 50:91–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Duong TT, Morin S, Coste M, Herlory O, Feurtet-Mazel A, Boudou A (2010) Experimental toxicity and bioaccumulation of cadmium in freshwater periphytic diatoms in relation with biofilm maturity. Sci Total Environ 408:552–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. El Jay A (1996) Toxic effects of organic solvents on the growth of Chlorella vulgaris and Selenastrum capricornutum. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 57:191–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ensz AP, Knapp CW, Graham DW (2003) Influence of autochthonous dissolved organic carbon and nutrient limitation on alachlor biotransformation in aerobic aquatic systems. Environ Sci Technol 37:4157–4162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fairchild JF, Ruessler DS, Haverland PS, Carlson AR (1997) Comparative sensitivity of Selenastrum capricornutum and Lemna minor to sixteen herbicides. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 32:353–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Feminella JW, Hawkins CP (1995) Interactions between stream herbivores and periphyton: a quantitative analysis of past experiments. J N Am Benthol Soc 14:465–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Foley ME, Sigler V, Gruden CL (2008) A multiphasic characterization of the impact of the herbicide acetochlor on freshwater bacterial communities. ISME J 2:56–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Geiszinger A, Bonnineau C, Faggiano L, Guasch H, Lopez-Doval JC, Proia L, Ricart M, Ricciardi F, Romani A, Rotter S, Munoz I, Schmitt-Jansen M, Sabater S (2009) The relevance of the community approach linking chemical and biological analyses in pollution assessment. Trends Anal Chem 28:619–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Graham DW, Miley MK, Denoyelles F, Smith VH, Thurman EM, Carter R (2000) Alachlor transformation patterns in aquatic field mesocosms under variable oxygen and nutrient conditions. Water Res 34:4054–4062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Guasch H, Sabater S (1998) Light history influences the sensitivity to atrazine in periphytic algae. J Phycol 34:233–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jackson CR (2003) Changes in community properties during microbial succession. Oikos 101:444–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Junghans M, Backhaus T, Faust M, Scholze M, Grimme LH (2003) Predictability of combined effects of eight chloroacetanilide herbicides on algal reproduction. Pest Manag Sci 59:1101–1110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jurgensen TA, Hoagland KD (1990) Effects of short-term pulses of atrazine on attached algal communities in a small stream. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 19:617–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kasai F (1999) Shifts in herbicide tolerance in paddy field periphyton following herbicide application. Chemosphere 38:919–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Knapp CW, Graham DW, Berardescoa G, deNoyelles JF, Cutakd BJ, Larive CK (2003) Nutrient level, microbial activity, and alachlor transformation in aerobic aquatic systems. Water Res 37:4761–4769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lawrence JR, Kopf G, Headley JV, Neu TR (2001) Sorption and metabolism of selected herbicides in river biofilm communities. Can J Microbiol 47:634–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lyautey E, Lacoste B, Ten-Hage L, Rols JL, Garabetian F (2005) Analysis of bacterial diversity in river biofilms using 16S rDNA PCR-DGGE: methodological settings and fingerprints interpretation. Water Res 39:380–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lynch TR, Johnson HE, Adams WJ (1985) Impact of atrazine and hexachlorobiphenyl on the structure and function of model stream ecosystems. Environ Toxicol Chem 4:399–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ma J, Chen J (2005) How to accurately assay the algal toxicity of pesticides with low water solubility. Environ Pollut 136:267–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Morin S, Pesce S, Tlili A, Coste M, Montuelle B (2010) Recovery potential of periphytic communities in a river impacted by a vineyard watershed. Ecol Indic 10:419–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Muyzer G, Brinkhoff T, Nubel U, Santegoeds C, Schafer H, Wawer C (1997) Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) in microbial ecology. In: Kowalchuk GA, De Bruijn FJ, Head IM, Akkermans D, Van Elsa JD (eds). Kluwer Academic Dordrecht, pp 1–27Google Scholar
  41. Niederlehner BR, Cairns J (1992) Community response to cumulative toxic impact—effects of acclimation on zinc tolerance of Aufwuchs. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 49:2155–2163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Okumura Y, Koyama J, Takaku H, Satoh H (2001) Influence of organic solvents on the growth of marine microalgae. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 41:123–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Paule A, Lyautey E, Garabetian F, Rols JL (2009) Autogenic versus environmental control during development of river biofilm. Ann Limnol Int J Limnol 45:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Paule A, Lauga B, Ten-Hage L, Morchain J, Duran R, Paul E, Rols JL (2011) A photosynthetic rotating annular bioreactor (Taylor-Couette type flow) for phototrophic biofilms cultures. Water Res 45(18):6107–6118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Paule A, Roubeix V, Lauga B, Duran R, Delmas F, Paul E, Rols JL (2013) Changes in tolerance to herbicide toxicity throughout development stages of phototrophic biofilms cultivated in rotating annular bioreactor. Aquat Toxicol 144–145:310–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Payraudeau S, Junker P, Imfeld G, Gregoire C (2009) Characterizing hydrological connectivity to identify critical source areas for pesticides losses. In: 18thWorld IMACS/MODSIM Congress: Interfacing modelling and simulation with mathematical and computational sciences, Cairns, Australia, 1879–1885Google Scholar
  47. Pérès F, Coste M, Ribeyre F, Ricard M, Boudou A (1997) Effects of methylmercury and inorganic mercury on periphytic diatom communities in freshwater indoor microcoms. J Appl Phycol 9:215–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pesce S, Fajon C, Bardot C, Bonnemoy F, Portelli C, Bohatier J (2006) Effects of the phenylurea herbicide diuron on natural riverine microbial communities in an experimental study. Aquat Toxicol 78:303–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pesce S, Batisson I, Bardot C, Fajon C, Portelli C, Montuelle B, Bohatier J (2009) Response of spring and summer riverine microbial communities following glyphosate exposure. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 72:1905–1912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pesce S, Martin-Laurent F, Rouard N, Robin A, Montuelle B (2010) Evidence for adaptation of riverine sediment microbial communities to diuron mineralization: incidence of runoff and soil erosion. J Soil Sediment 10:698–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Robles-Molina J, Gilbert-López B, García-Reyes JF, Molina-Díaz A (2014) Monitoring of selected priority and emerging contaminants in the Guadalquivir River and other related surface waters in the province of Jaén, South East Spain. Sci Total Environ 479–480:247–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Roubeix V, Mazzella N, Mechin B, Coste M, Delmas F (2011) Impact of the herbicide metolachlor on river periphytic diatoms: experimental comparison of descriptors at different biological organization levels. Ann Limnol Int J Limnol 47:239–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sabater S, Guasch H, Ricart M, Romani A, Vidal G, Klunder C, Schmitt-Jansen M (2007) Monitoring the effect of chemicals on biological communities. The biofilm as an interface. Anal Bioanal Chem 387:1425–1434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Singh S, Datta P (2005) Growth and survival potentials of immobilized diazotrophic cyanobacterial isolates exposed to common ricefield herbicides. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 21:441–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Spawn RL, Hoagland KD, Siegfried BD (1997) Effects of alachlor on an algal community from a midwestern agricultural stream. Environ Toxicol Chem 16:785–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stevenson RJ, Bothwell ML, Lowe RL (1996) Algal ecology: freshwater benthic ecosystems. Academic Press, San Diego, 753 ppGoogle Scholar
  57. Stratton GW, Corke CT (1981) Effect of acetone on the toxicity of atrazine towards photosynthesis in Anabaena. J Environ Health B16:21–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Taghavi L, Probst JL, Merlina G, Marchand AL, Durbe G, Probst A (2010) Flood event impact on pesticide transfer in a small agricultural catchment (Montousse at Aurade, south west France). Int J Environ Anal Chem 90:390–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tiam SK, Morin S, Pesce S, Feurtet-Mazel A, Moreira A, Gonzalez P, Mazzella N (2014) Environmental effects of realistic pesticide mixtures on natural biofilm communities with different exposure histories. Sci Total Environ 473–474:496–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tlili A, Dorigo U, Montuelle B, Margoum C, Carluer N, Gouy V, Bouchez A, Berard A (2008) Responses of chronically contaminated biofilms to short pulses of diuron—an experimental study simulating flooding events in a small river. Aquat Toxicol 87:252–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tlili A, Montuelle B, Berard A, Bouchez A (2011) Impact of chronic and acute pesticide exposures on periphyton communities. Sci Total Environ 409:2102–2113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Valloton N, Moser D, Eggen RIL, Junghans M, Chèvre N (2008) S-metolachlor pulse exposure on the alga Scenedesmus vacuolatus: effects during exposure and the subsequent recovery. Chemosphere 73:395–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vercraene-Eairmal M, Lauga B, Saint Laurent S, Mazzella N, Boutry S, Simon M, Karama S, Delmas F, Duran R (2010) Diuron biotransformation and its effects on biofilm bacterial community structure. Chemosphere 81:837–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wendt-Rasch L, Van den Brink PJ, Crum SJH, Woin P (2004) The effects of a pesticide mixture on aquatic ecosystems differing in trophic status: responses of the macrophyte Myriophyllum spicatum and the periphytic algal community. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 57:383–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wetzel RG (1983) Opening remarks. In: Wetzel RG (ed) Periphyton of freshwater ecosystems. Junk, BostonCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Paule
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • A. Lamy
    • 1
    • 2
  • V. Roubeix
    • 3
  • F. Delmas
    • 3
  • J. L. Rols
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.University de Toulouse, UPS, INP, EcoLab (Laboratoire d’écologie fonctionnelle et environnement)ToulouseFrance
  2. 2.CNRS, EcoLabToulouseFrance
  3. 3.IRSTEA, UR Ecosystèmes Aquatiques et Changements Globaux (EABX)CestasFrance

Personalised recommendations