Abstract
In developing optimal groundwater remediation strategies, limited effort has been exerted to solve the uncertainty in environmental quality standards. When such uncertainty is not considered, either over optimistic or over pessimistic optimization strategies may be developed, probably leading to the formulation of rigid remediation strategies. This study advances a mathematical programming modeling approach for optimizing groundwater remediation design. This approach not only prevents the formulation of over optimistic and over pessimistic optimization strategies but also provides a satisfaction level that indicates the degree to which the environmental quality standard is satisfied. Therefore the approach may be expected to be significantly more acknowledged by the decision maker than those who do not consider standard uncertainty. The proposed approach is applied to a petroleum-contaminated site in western Canada. Results from the case study show that (1) the peak benzene concentrations can always satisfy the environmental standard under the optimal strategy, (2) the pumping rates of all wells decrease under a relaxed standard or long-term remediation approach, (3) the pumping rates are less affected by environmental quality constraints under short-term remediation, and (4) increased flexible environmental standards have a reduced effect on the optimal remediation strategy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baú D, Mayer A (2007) Data-worth analysis for multiobjective optimal design of pump-and-treat remediation systems. Adv Water Resour 30:1815–1830
Bear J (1979) Hydraulics of Ground Water. McGraw-Hill, New York
Brown CL (1993) Simulation of surfactant enhanced remediation of aquifers contaminated with dense non-aqueous phase liquids. PhD Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, Texas
Chang LC, Chu HJ, Hsiao CT (2007) Optimal planning of a dynamic pump-treat-inject groundwater remediation system. J Hydrol 342:295–304
Chen Z (2000) Integrated environmental modeling and risk assessment under uncertainty. Ph.D Dissertation, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan
Chen YC, Ma HW (2006) Model comparison for risk assessment: a case study of contaminated groundwater. Chemosphere 63:751–761
Cocos A, Cocos O, Sarbu I (2012) Coping with water scarcity: the case of the Calnistea catchment (Romania). Environ Earth Sci 67:641–652
Delshad CL, Pope GA, Sepehrnoori K (1996) A compositional simulator for modeling surfactant enhanced aquifer remediation, 1 formulation. J Contam Hydrol 23:303–327
Dhar A, Patil RS (2012) Multiobjective design of groundwater monitoring network under epistemic uncertainty. Water Resour Manag 26:1890–1825
He L, Huang GH, Zeng GM, Lu HW (2008a) An integrated simulation, inference, and optimization method for identifying groundwater remediation strategies at petroleum-contaminated aquifers in western Canada. Water Res 42:2629–2639
He L, Huang GH, Lu HW (2008b) A simulation-based fuzzy chance-constrained programming model for optimal groundwater remediation under uncertainty. Adv Water Resour 31:1622–1635
He L, Huang GH, Lu HW (2009) A coupled simulation-optimization approach for groundwater remediation design under uncertainty: an application to a petroleum-contaminated site. Environ Pollut 157:2485–2492
He L, Huang GH, Lu HW (2010) A stochastic optimization model under modeling uncertainty and parameter certainty for groundwater remediation design: Part II. Model application. J Hazard Mater 176:527–534
Kaoa CM, Jason P (2001) Evaluation of natural attenuation rate at a gasoline spill site. J Hazard Mater 82:275–289
Lefkoff L, Gorelick S (1986) Design and cost analysis of rapid aquifer restoration systems using flow simulation and quadratic programming. Ground Water 24:777–790
Li J (2003) Development of an inexact environmental modeling system for the management of petroleum-contaminated sites. PhD dissertation, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan
Liu SJ, Li XG, Wang HX (2011) Hydraulics analysis for groundwater flow through permeable reactive barriers. Environ Model Assess 16:591–598
Lu HW, Huang GH, Zeng GM, Maqsood I, He L (2008) An inexact two-stage fuzzy-stochastic programming model for water resources management. Water Resour Manag 22:991–1016
Lu HW, Huang GH, He L (2010) Development of an interval-valued fuzzy linear-programming method based on infinite α-cuts for water resources management. Environ Model Softw 25:354–361
Lu HW, Cao MF, Wang X, Fan X, He L (2014) Numerical solutions comparison for interval linear programming problems based on coverage and validity rates. Appl Math Model 38:1092–1100
Maqsood I, Li JB, Huang GH (2003) Inexact multiphase modeling system for the management of uncertainty in subsurface contamination. Pract Period Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste Manag 7:86–94
Mategaonkar M, Eldho TI (2012) Groundwater remediation optimization using a point collocation method and particle swarm optimization. Environ Model Softw 32:37–48
Minsker BS, Shoemaker CA (1998) Dynamic optimal control of in-situ bioremediation of ground water. J Water Res Pl-ASCE 124:149–161
NRTEE (1997) Contaminated site issues in Canada: backgrounder, http://www.nrtee-trnee.ca/Publications/HTML/BK_Contaminated-Site-Issues_E.htm
SERM (2002) Risk-based corrective actions for petroleum contaminated sites. In P. o. Saskatchewan (Ed.). Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Singh RM, Datta B (2006) Identification of groundwater pollution sources using GA-based linked simulation optimization model. J Hydrol Eng 11:101–109
Tartakovsky DM (2013) Assessment and management of risk in subsurface hydrology: a review and perspective. Adv Water Resour 51:247–260
Uddameri V, Hernandez EA, Estrada F (2014) A fuzzy simulation-optimization approach for optimal estimation of groundwater availability under decision maker uncertainty. Environ Earth Sci 71:2559–2572
Zheng C, Wang P (2002) A field demonstration of the simulation–optimization approach for remediation system design. Ground Water 40:258–266
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the editor and the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions. This research was supported by the China National Funds for Excellent Young Scientists (51222906), National Natural Science Foundation of China (41271540), Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University of China (NCET-13-0791), and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Michael Matthies
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fan, X., He, L., Lu, HW. et al. Design of optimal groundwater remediation systems under flexible environmental-standard constraints. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22, 1008–1019 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3407-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3407-5