Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 21, Issue 14, pp 8730–8739 | Cite as

DNA and chromosomal damage induced in fish (Anguilla anguilla L.) by aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA)—the major environmental breakdown product of glyphosate

  • S. Guilherme
  • M. A. Santos
  • I. Gaivão
  • M. Pacheco
Research Article

Abstract

The assessment of the direct impact of breakdown products of pesticide components on aquatic wildlife is ecotoxicologically relevant, but frequently disregarded. In this context, the evaluation of the genotoxic hazard posed by aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA—the major natural degradation product of glyphosate) to fish emerges as a critical but unexplored issue. Hence, the main goal of the present research was to assess the AMPA genotoxic potential to fish following short-term exposures (1 and 3 days) to environmentally realistic concentrations (11.8 and 23.6 μg L−1), using the comet and erythrocytic nuclear abnormalities (ENA) assays, as reflecting different levels of damage, i.e. DNA and chromosomal damage, respectively. Overall, the present findings pointed out the genotoxic hazard of AMPA to fish and, subsequently, the importance of including it in future studies concerning the risk assessment of glyphosate-based herbicides in the water systems.

Keywords

AMPA Glyphosate Genotoxicity DNA lesion-specific repair enzymes Fish 

References

  1. Al-Rajab A, Amellal S, Schiavon M (2008) Sorption and leaching of 14C-glyphosate in agricultural soils. Agron Sustain Dev 28:419–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrade V, Silva J, Silva F, Heuser V, Dias J, Lu M (2004) Fish as bioindicators to assess the effects of pollution in two southern Brazilian rivers using the comet assay and micronucleus test. Environ Mol Mutagen 468:459–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayllon F, Garcia-Vazquez E (2001) Micronuclei and other nuclear lesions as genotoxicity indicators in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 225:221–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Azqueta A, Shaposhnikov S, Collins A (2009) DNA oxidation: investigating its key role in environmental mutagenesis with the comet assay. Mutat Res 674:101–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Battaglin WA, Kolpin DW, Scribner EA, Kuivila KM, Sandstrom MW (2005) Glyphosate, other herbicides, and transformation products in midwestern streams, 2002: agricultural hydrology and water quality. American Water Resources Association, Middleburg, VA, ETATS-UNISGoogle Scholar
  6. Björklund E, Styrishave B, Anskjær GG, Hansen M, Halling-Sørensen B (2011) Dichlobenil and 2,6-dichlorobenzamide (BAM) in the environment: What are the risks to humans and biota? Sci Total Environ 409:3732–3739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bolognesi C, Buschini A, Branchi E, Carboni P, Furlini M, Martino A, Monteverde M, Poli P, Rossi C (2004) Comet and micronucleus assays in zebra mussel cells for genotoxicity assessment of surface drinking water treated with three different disinfectants. Sci Total Environ 333:127–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Borggaard O, Gimsing A (2008) Fate of glyphosate in soil and the possibility of leaching to ground and surface waters: a review. Pest Manag Sci 64:441–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cavalcante M, Martinez R, Sofia S (2008) Genotoxic effects of Roundup on the fish Prochilodus lineatus. Mutat Res 655(1–2):41–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Çavas T, Könen S (2007) Detection of cytogenetic and DNA damage in peripheral erythrocytes of goldfish (Carassius auratus) exposed to a glyphosate formulation using the micronucleus test and the comet assay. Mutagenesis 22:263–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collins A (2004) The comet assay for DNA damage and repair. Mol Biotechnol 26:249–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. E.U. (2002) Glyphosate, Endpoints and related information 1.Toxicology and metabolism. European commission health and consumer protection directorate general. Appendix IGoogle Scholar
  13. Fenech M (2000) The in vitro micronucleus technique. Mutat Res 455:81–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Feng JC, Thompson DG, Reynolds PE (1990) Fate of glyphosate in a Canadian forest watershed. 2. Persistence in foliage and soils. J Agric Food Chem 38:1118–1125Google Scholar
  15. Giesy J, Dobson S, Solomon K (2000) Ecotoxicological risk assessment for Roundup herbicide. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 167:35–120Google Scholar
  16. Gimsing AL, Borggaard OK, Bang M (2004) Influence of soil composition on adsorption of glyphosate and phosphate by contrasting Danish surface soils. Eur J Soil Sci 55:183–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guilherme S, Válega M, Pereira ME, Santos MA, Pacheco M (2008) Erythrocytic nuclear abnormalities in wild and caged fish (Liza aurata) along an environmental mercury contamination gradient. Ecotoxivol Environ Saf 70:411–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guilherme S, Gaivão I, Santos MA, Pacheco M (2010) European eel (Anguilla anguilla) genotoxic and pro-oxidant responses following short-term exposure to Roundup®—a glyphosate-based herbicide. Mutagenesis 25:523–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guilherme S, Gaivão I, Santos MA, Pacheco M (2012a) DNA damage in fish (Anguilla anguilla) exposed to a glyphosate-based herbicide—elucidation of organ-specificity and the role of oxidative stress. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ 743:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guilherme S, Santos M, Barroso C, Gaivão I, Pacheco M (2012b) Differential genotoxicity of Roundup® formulation and its constituents in blood cells of fish (Anguilla anguilla): considerations on chemical interactions and DNA damaging mechanisms. Ecotoxicology 21:1381–1390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoang TC, Rand GM, Gardinali PR, Castro J (2011) Bioconcentration and depuration of endosulfan sulfate in mosquito fish (Gambusia affinis). Chemosphere 84:538–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kolpin DW, Thurman EM, Lee EA, Meyer MT, Furlong ET, Glassmeyer ST (2006) Urban contributions of glyphosate and its degradate AMPA to streams in the United States. Sci Total Environ 354:191–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Landry D, Dousset S, Fournier J-C, Andreux F (2005) Leaching of glyphosate and AMPA under two soil management practices in Burgundy vineyards (Vosne-Romanée, 21-France). Environ Pollut 138:191–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee R, Steinert S (2003) Use of the single cell gel electrophoresis/comet assay for detecting DNA damage in aquatic (marine and freshwater) animals. Mutat Res 544:43–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mallat E, Barceló D (1998) Analysis and degradation study of glyphosate and of aminomethylphosphonic acid in natural waters by means of polymeric and ion-exchange solid-phase extraction columns followed by ion chromatography–post-column derivatization with fluorescence detection. J Chromatogr A 823:129–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mañas F, Peralta L, Raviolo J, García Ovando H, Weyers A, Ugnia L, Gonzalez Cid M, Larripa I, Gorla N (2009) Genotoxicity of AMPA, the environmental metabolite of glyphosate, assessed by the comet assay and cytogenetic tests. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 72:834–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mottier A, Kientz-Bouchart V, Serpentini A, Lebel JM, Jha AN, Costil K (2013) Effects of glyphosate-based herbicides on embryo-larval development and metamorphosis in the Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas. Aquat Toxicol 128:67–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pacheco M, Santos MA (1996) Induction of micronuclei and nuclear abnormalities in the erythrocytes of Anguilla anguilla L. exposed either to cyclophosphamide or to bleached kraft pulp mill effluent. Fresenius Environ Bull 5:746–751Google Scholar
  29. Pacheco M, Santos MA (1997) Induction of EROD activity and genotoxic effects by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and resin acids on juvenile eel Anguilla anguilla L. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 252–259Google Scholar
  30. Pacheco M, Santos M (1998) Induction of liver EROD and erythrocytic nuclear abnormalities by cyclophosphamide and PAHs in Anguilla anguilla L. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 40:71–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pacheco M, Santos MA (2002) Biotransformation, genotoxic, and histopathological effects of environmental contaminants in European eel (Anguilla anguilla L.). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 53:331–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Palus J, Dziubaltowska E, Rydzynski K (1999) DNA damage detected by the comet assay in the white blood cells of workers in a wooden furniture plant. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ 444:61–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rueppel ML, Brightwell BB, Schaefer J, Marvel JT (1977) Metabolism and degradation of glyphosate in soil and water. J Agric Food Chem 25:517–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Saleha Banu B, Danadevi K, Rahman MF, Ahuja YR, Kaiser J (2001) Genotoxic effect of monocrotophos to sentinel species using comet assay. Food Chem Toxicol 39:361–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Scalon MCS, Rechenmacher C, Siebel AM, Kayser ML, Rodrigues MT, Maluf SW, Rodrigues MAS, Silva LB (2010) Evaluation of Sinos River water genotoxicity using the comet assay in fish. Braz J Biol 70:1217–1222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shaposhnikov S, Azqueta A, Henriksson S, Meier S, Gaivão I, Huskisson NH, Smart A, Brunborg G, Nilsson M, Collins AR (2010) Twelve-gel slide format optimised for comet assay and fluorescent in situ hybridisation. Toxicol Lett 195:31–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stoiber T, Bonacker D, Bohm K, Bolt H, Thier R, Degen G, Unger E (2004) Disturbed microtubule function and induction of micronuclei by chelate complexes of mercury (II). Mutat Res 563:97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Struger J, Thompson D, Staznik B, Martin P, McDaniel T, Marvin C (2008) Occurrence of glyphosate in surface waters of southern Ontario. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 80:378–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Udroiu I (2006) The micronucleus test in piscine erythrocytes. Aquat Toxicol 79:201–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. USEPA (1993) Environmental Protection Agency. Re-registration Eligibility Decision (RED): Glyphosate. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  41. Williams GM, Kroes R, Munro IC (2000) Safety evaluation and risk assessment of the herbicide Roundup and its active ingredient, glyphosate, for humans. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 31:117–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wirzinger G, Weltje L, Gercken J, Sordyl H (2007) Genotoxic damage in field-collected three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.): a suitable biomonitoring tool? Mutat Res 628:19–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zar J (1996) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall International Inc, USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Guilherme
    • 1
  • M. A. Santos
    • 1
  • I. Gaivão
    • 2
  • M. Pacheco
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biology and CESAMUniversity of AveiroAveiroPortugal
  2. 2.CECAV and Department of Genetics and BiotechnologyUniversity of Trás-os-Montes and Alto DouroVila RealPortugal

Personalised recommendations