Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamics and mitigation of six pesticides in a “Wet” forest buffer zone

  • Crop protection : new strategies for sustainable development
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pesticide pollution is one of the main current threats on water quality. This paper presents the potential and functioning principles of a “Wet” forest buffer zone for reducing concentrations and loads of glyphosate, isoproturon, metazachlor, azoxystrobin, epoxiconazole, and cyproconazole. A tracer injection experiment was conducted in the field in a forest buffer zone at Bray (France). A fine time-scale sampling enabled to illustrate that interactions between pesticides and forest buffer substrates (soil and organic-rich litter layer), had a retarding effect on molecule transfer. Low concentrations were observed for all pesticides at the forest buffer outlet thus demonstrating the efficiency of “Wet” forest buffer zone for pesticide dissipation. Pesticide masses injected in the forest buffer inlet directly determined concentration peaks observed at the outlet. Rapid and partially reversible adsorption was likely the major process affecting pesticide transfer for short retention times (a few hours to a few days). Remobilization of metazachlor, isoproturon, desmethylisoproturon, and AMPA was observed when non-contaminated water flows passed through the forest buffer. Our data suggest that pesticide sorption properties alone could not explain the complex reaction mechanisms that affected pesticide transfer in the forest buffer. Nevertheless, the thick layer of organic matter litter on the top of the forest soil was a key parameter, which enhanced partially reversible sorption of pesticide, thus retarded their transfer, decreased concentration peaks, and likely increased degradation of the pesticides. Consequently, to limit pesticide pollution transported by surface water, the use of already existing forest areas as buffer zones should be equally considered as the most commonly implemented grass buffer strips.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bending GD, Lincoln SD, Edmondson RN (2006) Spatial variation in the degradation rate of the pesticides isoproturon, azoxystrobin and diflufenican in soil and its relationship with chemical and microbial properties. Environ Pollut 139:279–287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett ER, Moore MT, Cooper CM, Smith S, Shields FD, Drouillard KG, Schulz R (2005) Vegetated agricultural drainage ditches for the mitigation of pyrethroid-associated runoff. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:2121–2127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benoit P, Madrigal I, Preston CM, Chenu C, Barriuso E (2008) Sorption and desorption of non-ionic herbicides onto particulate organic matter from surface soils under different land uses. Eur J Soil Sci 59:178–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carluer N, Tournebize J, Gouy V, Margoum C, Vincent B, Gril JJ (2011) Role of buffer zones in controlling pesticides fluxes to surface waters. Proc Environ Sci 9:21–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CORPEN GZT (2007) Les fonctions environnementales des zones tampons, Les bases scientifiques et techniques des fonctions de protection des eaux. Ministère de l'écologie dlé, du développement durable et de l'aménagement du territoire et Ministère de l'agriculture et de la pêche (Hrsg.), Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • EURACHEM/CITAC (2000) Guide CG 4 Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement - Second Edition. http://www.measurementuncertainty.org/mu/QUAM2000-1.pdf Verified 17 March 2013.

  • FOOTPRINT (2012) Pesticide Properties Database (PPDB) developed by the Agriculture & Environment Research Unit (AERU), University of Hertfordshire, funded by UK national sources and the EU-funded FOOTPRINT project (FP6-SSP-022704). Verified 17 March 2013

  • Gardner DS, Branham BE, Lickfeldt DW (2000) Effect of turfgrass on soil mobility and dissipation of cyproconazole. Crop Sci 40:1333–1339

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gay P, Vellidis G, Delfino JJ (2006) The attenuation of atrazine and its major degradation products in a restored riparian buffer. T ASABE 49:1323–1339

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gevao B, Semple KT, Jones KC (2000) Bound pesticide residues in soils: a review. Environ Pollut 108:3–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh RK, Singh N (2009) Effect of organic manure on sorption and degradation of azoxystrobin in soil. J Agr Food Chem 57:632–636

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kadlec RH, Wallace SD (2008) Treatment wetlands second edition. CRC, Boca Raton, FL

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lacas JG, Voltz M, Gouy V, Carluer N, Gril JJ (2005) Using grassed strips to limit pesticide transfer to surface water: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 25:253–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lowrance R, Vellidis G, Wauchope RD, Gay P, Bosch DD (1997) Herbicide transport in a managed riparian forest buffer system. T ASAE 40:1047–1057

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Madrigal I, Benoit P, Barriuso E, Real B, Dutertre A, Moquet M, Trejo M, Ortiz L (2007) Pesticide degradation in vegetative buffer strips: grassed and tree barriers: case of isoproturon. Agrociencia 41:205–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamy L, Barriuso E (2007) Desorption and time-dependent sorption of herbicides in soils. Eur J Soil Sci 58:174–187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Margoum C, Gouy V, Madrigal I, Benoit P, Smith J, Johnson AC, Williams RJ (2001) Sorption properties of isoproturon and diflufenican on ditch bed sediments and organic matter rich materials from ditches, grassed strip and forest soils. BCPC Symp Ser 78:183–188

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Margoum C, Gouy V, Laillet B, Dramais G (2003) Retention of pesticides by farm ditches. Revue des sciences de l'eau 16:389–405

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Margoum C, Malessard C, Gouy V (2006) Investigation of various physicochemical and environmental parameter influence on pesticide sorption to ditch bed substratum by means of experimental design. Chemosphere 63:1835–1841

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore MT, Bennett ER, Cooper CM, Smith S, Shields FD, Milam CD, Farris JL (2001) Transport and fate of atrazine and lambda-cyhalothrin in an agricultural drainage ditch in the Mississippi Delta, USA. Agr Ecosyst Environ 87:309–314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore MT, Bennett ER, Cooper CM, Smith S, Farris JL, Drouillard KG, Schulz R (2006) Influence of vegetation in mitigation of methyl parathion runoff. Environ Pollut 142:288–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muscutt AD, Harris GL, Bailey SW, Davies DB (1993) Buffer zones to improve water quality: a review of their potential use in UK agriculture. Agr Ecosyst Environ 45:59–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Passeport E, Tournebize J, Jankowfsky S, Proemse B, Chaumont C, Coquet Y, Lange J (2010) Artificial wetland and forest buffer zone: hydraulic and tracer characterization. Vadose Zone J 9:73–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Passeport E, Benoit P, Bergheaud V, Coquet Y, Tournebize J (2011) Selected pesticides adsorption and desorption in substrates from artificial wetland and forest buffer. Environ Toxicol Chem 30:1669–1676

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Passeport E, Tournebize J, Chaumont C, Guenne A, Coquet Y (2013) Pesticide contamination interception strategy and removal efficiency in forest buffer and artificial wetland in a tile-drained agricultural watershed. Chemosphere 91:1289–1296

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinho AP, Matos AT, Morris LA, Costa LM (2007) Atrazine and picloram adsorption in organic horizon forest samples under laboratory conditions. Planta Daninha 25:125–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2005) R: a language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation, Vienna, Austria

  • Reichenberger S, Bach M, Skitschak A, Frede H-G (2007) Mitigation strategies to reduce pesticide inputs into ground- and surface water and their effectiveness: a review. Sci Total Environ 384:1–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roy C, Gaillardon P, Montfort F (2000) The effect of soil moisture content on the sorption of five sterol biosynthesis inhibiting fungicides as a function of their physicochemical properties. Pest Manag Sci 56:795–803

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh N, Singh SB (2010) Effect of moisture and compost on fate of azoxystrobin in soils. J Environ Sci Heal B 45:676–681

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Souiller C, Coquet Y, Pot V, Benoit P, Réal B, Margoum C, Laillet B, Labat C, Vachier P, Dutertre A (2002) Capacités de stockage et d'épuration des sols de dispositifs enherbés vis-à-vis des produits phytosanitaires Première partie: Dissipation des produits phytosanitaires à travers un dispositif enherbé; mise en évidence des processus mis en jeu par simulation de ruissellement et infiltrométrie. Etude et Gestion des Sols 9:269–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Stehle S, Elsaesser D, Gregoire C, Imfeld G, Niehaus E, Passeport E, Payraudeau S, Schaefer RB, Tournebize J, Schulz R (2011) Pesticide risk mitigation by vegetated treatment systems: a meta-analysis. J Environ Qual 40:1068–1080

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • USDA-NRCS (2000) Conservation buffers to reduce pesticide losses. USEPA, Washington D.C., USA

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (1972) Clean Water Act (CWA), National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). USEPA, Washington D.C., USA http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/cwa.cfm?program_id=45, Verified 17 March 2013

  • Vellidis G, Lowrance R, Gay P, Wauchope RD (2002) Herbicide transport in a restored riparian forest buffer system. T ASAE 45:89–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was financially supported by the French National Research Institute of Science and Technology for Environment and Agriculture (Irstea), the French Ministère de l’Alimentation, de l’Agriculture et de la Pêche and the Direction Générale des Politiques Agricole, Agroalimentaire, et des Territoires, as well as the European LIFE project ArtWET (06/ENV/F/000133). The authors would like to thank Prof Yves Coquet for his helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper and Sylvain Moreau for his help in data analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elodie Passeport.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Hongwen Sun

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 166 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Passeport, E., Richard, B., Chaumont, C. et al. Dynamics and mitigation of six pesticides in a “Wet” forest buffer zone. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21, 4883–4894 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-1724-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-1724-8

Keywords

Navigation