Abstract
The waste seawater discharged in coastal areas from coal-fired power plants equipped with a seawater desulfurization system might carry pollutants such as mercury from the flue gas into the adjacent seas. However, only very limited impact studies have been carried out. Taking a typical plant in Xiamen as an example, the present study targeted the distribution and sea–air transfer flux of volatile mercury in seawater, in order to trace the fate of the discharged mercury other than into the sediments. Samples from 28 sampling sites were collected in the sea area around two discharge outlets of the plant, daily and seasonally. Total mercury, dissolved gaseous mercury and dissolved total mercury in the seawater, as well as gaseous elemental mercury above the sea surface, were investigated. Mean concentrations of dissolved gaseous mercury and gaseous elemental mercury in the area were 183 and 4.48 ng m−3 in summer and 116 and 3.92 ng m−3 in winter, which were significantly higher than those at a reference site. Based on the flux calculation, the transfer of volatile mercury was from the sea surface into the atmosphere, and more than 4.4 kg mercury, accounting for at least 2.2 % of the total discharge amount of the coal-fired power plant in the sampling area (1 km2), was emitted to the air annually. This study strongly suggested that besides being deposited into the sediment and diluted with seawater, emission into the atmosphere was an important fate for the mercury from the waste seawater from coal-fired power plants.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amyot M, Mierle G, Lean D, Mc Queen DJ (1997) Effect of solar radiation on the formation of dissolved gaseous mercury in temperate lakes. Geochim Cosmochim Ac 61:975–987
Andersson ME, Gardfeldt K, Wangberg I, Sprovieri F, Pirrone N, Lindqvist O (2007) Seasonal and daily variation of mercury evasion at coastal and off-shore sites at the Mediterranean Sea. Mar Chem 104:214–226
Andersson ME, Gardfeldt K, Wangberg I, Stromberg D (2008) Determination of Henry’s law constant for elemental mercury. Chemosphere 73:587–592
Andersson ME, Sommar J, Gardfeldt K, Jutterstrom S (2011) Air-sea exchange of volatile mercury in the North Atlantic Ocean. Mar Chem 125:1–7
Bose-O’Reilly S, McCarty KM, Steckling N, Lettmeier B (2010) Mercury exposure and children’s health. Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care 40:186–215
Bouchet S, Tessier E, Monperrus M, Bridou R, Clavier J, Thouzeau G, Amouroux D (2011) Measurements of gaseous mercury exchanges at the sediment-water, water-atmosphere and sediment-atmosphere interfaces of a tidal environment (Arcachon Bay, France). J Environ Monit 13:1351–1359
Brosset C (1987) The behavior of mercury in the physical environment. Water Air Soil Pollut 34:145–166
Castelle S, Schäfer J, Blanc G, Dabrin A, Lanceleur L, Masson M (2009) Gaseous mercury at the air–water interface of a highly turbid estuary (Gironde Estuary, France). Mar Chem 117:42–51
Deng L, Fu DF, Deng NS (2009) Photo-induced transformations of mercury(II) species in the presence of algae, Chlorella vulgaris. J Hazard Mater 164:798–805
Fantozzi L, Ferrara R, Frontini FP, Dini F (2007) Factors influencing the daily behaviour of dissolved gaseous mercury concentration in the Mediterranean Sea. Mar Chem 107:4–12
Gardfeldt K, Horvat M, Sommar J, Kotnik J, Fajon V, Wangberg I, Lindqvist O (2002) Comparison of procedures for measurements of dissolved gaseous mercury in seawater performed on a Mediterranean cruise. Anal Bioanal Chem 374:1002–1008
Granite EJ, King WP, Stanko DC, Pennline HW (2008) Implications of mercury interactions with band-gap semiconductor oxides. Main Group Chem 7:227–237
Guzmán HM, Garcia EM (2002) Mercury levels in coral reefs along the Caribbean coast of Central America. Mar Pollut Bull 44:1415–1420
Jaffe D, Strode S (2008) Sources, fate and transport of atmospheric mercury from Asia. Environ Chem 5:121–126
Kuss J, Holzmann J, Ludwig R (2009) An elemental mercury diffusion coefficient for natural waters determined by molecular dynamics simulation. Environ Sci Technol 43:3183–3186
Liss PS, Slater PG (1974) Flux of gases across the air-sea interface. Nature 247:181–184
Liu X, Sun L, Yuan D, Yin L, Chen J, Liu Y, Liu C, Liang Y, Lin F (2011) Mercury distribution in seawater discharged from a coal-fired power plant equipped with a seawater flue gas desulfurization system. Environ Sci Pollut Res 18:1324–1332
Macdonald RW, Wang F, Stern G, Outridge P (2008) The overlooked role of the ocean in mercury cycling in the Arctic. Mar Pollut Bull 56:1963–1965
Mason RP, Fitzgerald WF (1996) Sources, sinks and biogeochemical cycling of mercury in the ocean. Nato Asi 2(21):249–272
Nightingale PD, Malin G, Law CS, Watson AJ, Liss PS, Liddicoat MI, Boutin J, Upstill-Goddard RC (2000) In situ evaluation of air–sea gas exchange parameterizations using novel conservative and volatile tracers. Glob Biogeochem Cycle 14:373–387
Pacyna EG, Pacyna JM, Steenhuisen F, Wilson S (2006) Global anthropogenic mercury emission inventory for 2000. Atmos Environ 40:4048–4063
Pacyna EG, Pacyna JM, Sundseth K, Munthe J, Kindbom K, Wilson S, Steenhuisen F, Maxson P (2010) Global emission of mercury to the atmosphere from anthropogenic sources in 2005 and projections to 2020. Atmos Environ 44:2487–2499
Park J-S, Oh S, Shin M-Y, Kim M-K, Yi S-M, Zoh K-D (2008) Seasonal variation in dissolved gaseous mercury and total mercury concentrations in Juam Reservoir, Korea. Environ Pollut 154:12–20
Presto AA, Granite EJ (2006) Survey of catalysts for oxidation of mercury in flue gas. Environ Sci Technol 40:5601–5609
Rallo M, Lopez-Anton MA, Contreras ML, Maroto-Valer MM (2012) Mercury policy and regulations for coal-fired power plants. Environ Sci Pollut Res 19:1084–1096
Schroeder WH, Keeler G, Kock H, Roussel P, Schneeberger D, Schaedlich F (1995) International field intercomparison of atmospheric mercury measurement methods. Water Air Soil Pollut 80:611–620
Schroeder WH, Munthe J (1998) Atmospheric mercury—an overview. Atmos Environ 32:809–822
Schwarzenbach RP, Gschwend PM, Imboden DM (1992) Environmental organic chemistry. Wiley, New York
Shi N, Zhang X, Lei L (2009) Sulfite oxidation in seawater flue gas desulfurization by a pulsed corona discharge process. Sep Purif Technol 70:212–218
Sprovieri F, Pirrone N, Gardfeldt K, Sommar J (2003) Mercury speciation in the marine boundary layer along a 6000 km cruise path around the Mediterranean Sea. Atmos Environ 37:S63–S71
State Environmental Protection Administration of China (2007) GB 17378. The Specification for Marine Monitoring. State Environmental Protection Administration of China, P. R. China
Tokumura M, Baba M, Znad HT, Kawase Y, Yongsiri C, Takeda K (2006) Neutralization of the acidified seawater effluent from the flue gas desulfurization process: experimental investigation, dynamic modeling, and simulation. Ind Eng Chem Res 45:6339–6348
US Environmental Protection Agency (2002). Method 1631, revision E mercury in water by oxidation, purge and trap, and cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry. Office of Water, US EPA, Washington, DC
Vidal F, Ollero P, Ortiz FJG, Villanueva A (2007) Catalytic Seawater flue gas desulfurization process: an experimental pilot plant study. Environ Sci Technol 41:7114–7119
Wanninkhof R (1992) Relationship between wind speed and gas exchange over the ocean. J Geophys Res 97:7373–7382
Wu Y, Wang SX, Streets DG, Hao JM, Chan M, Jiang JK (2006) Trends in anthropogenic mercury emissions in China from 1995 to 2003. Environ Sci Technol 40:5312–5318
Acknowledgments
This research was financed by the Natural Science Foundation of China (20777063 and 40976070). Professor John Hodgkiss is thanked for his help in preparing this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Céline Guéguen
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, L., Lin, S., Feng, L. et al. The distribution and sea–air transfer of volatile mercury in waste post-desulfurization seawater discharged from a coal-fired power plant. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20, 6191–6200 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-1662-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-1662-5