Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Performance evaluation of various stormwater best management practices

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many best management practices have been developed and implemented to treat the nonpoint source pollution of the aquatic environment in Korea's four major river basins. The performance and cost of these facilities were evaluated and compared using broad categories, including grassed swales, constructed wetlands, vegetated filter strips, hydrodynamic separators, media filters, and infiltration trenches, based on the monitoring and maintenance work undertaken between 2005 and 2012. Constructed wetlands, media filters, and infiltration trenches generally performed better in removing pollutants than other types of facilities, while media filters were the most expensive factor in terms of construction and operational costs. In addition, constructed wetlands incurred the least operational cost, as well as helping to control the quantity of runoff. This illustrates that a high cost facility does not necessarily give a better performance. A slightly more expensive facility, such as wetland, could prove to be a reasonably effective treatment. The selection of the most appropriate treatment for stormwater runoff should be based on an overall analysis of performance and cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andoh RYG, Saul AJ (2003) The use of hydrodynamic 1111vortex separators and screening systems to improve water quality. Water Sci Technol 47:175–183

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • APHA, AWWA and WEF (1995) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 19th edn. APHA/AWWA/WEF, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Backstrom M (2002) Sediment transport in grassed swales during simulated runoff events. Water Sci Technol 45(7):41–49

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Braskerud BC (2003) Clay particle removal in small constructed wetlands. Water Res 37:3793–3802

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borin M, Bigon E, Zanin G, Fava L (2004) Performance of a narrow buffer strip in abating agricultural pollutants in the shallow subsurface water flux. Environ Pollut 131:313–321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borin M, Vianello M, Morari F, Zanin G (2005) Effectiveness of a buffer strip in removing runoff pollutants from a cultivated field in northeast Italy. Agric Ecosyst Environ 105:101–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boving TB, Neary K (2007) Attenuation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from urban stormwater runoff by wood filter. J Contam Hydrol 91:43–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Datry T, Malard F, Vitry L, Hervant F, Gibert J (2003) Solute dynamics in the bed sediments of a stormwater infiltration basin. J Hydrol 273:217–233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davis AP, Stagge JH, Jamil E, Kim H (2011) Hydraulic performance of grass swales for managing highway runoff. Water Res 46(20):6775–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dechesne M, Barrud S, Bardin JP (2004) Spatial distribution of pollution in an urban stormwater infiltration basin. J Contam Hydrol 72:189–205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deletic A, Fletcher TM (2006) Performance of grass filters used for stormwater treatment—a field and modeling study. J Hydrol 317:261–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1999) Storm Water Technology Fact Sheet: Hydrodynamic Separators, EPA 832-F-99-017, USEPA

  • Fuerhacker M, Haile TM, Monai B, Mentler A (2011) Performance of a filtration system equipped with filter media for parking lot runoff treatment. Desalination 275:118–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fink DF, Mitsch WJ (2004) Seasonal and storm event nutrient removal by a created wetland in an agricultural watershed. Ecolo Engin 23:313–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goss CD, Gorczyca B (2011) Removal of natural organic matter fractions by two potable water treatment systems: dual membrane filtration and conventional lime soda softening, 4th Annual IWA Specialty Conference on Natural Organic Matter: From Source to Tap and Beyond. Costa Mesa, California

    Google Scholar 

  • International stormwater BMP data base (BMP data base) (2008) http://www.bmpdatabase.org/BMPPerformance.htm

  • Jung YJ, Stenstrom MK, Jung DI, Kim LH, Min KS (2008) National pilot projects for management of diffuse pollution in Korea. Desalination 226:97–105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kadlec RH, Wallace S (2009) Treatment Wetlands. CRC Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Deletic A, Fletcher TD (2007) Modeling wet weather sediment removal by stormwater constructed wetlands: Insights from a laboratory study. J Hydrol 338:285–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd SD, Fletcher TD, Wong THF, Wootton R (2001) Assessment of pollutant removal in a newly constructed bioretention system, second South Pacific Stormwater Conference. New Zealand Water and Wastewater Association, Auckland

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm RL, Kennedy VC (1970) Variation of cation exchange capacity and rate with particle size in stream sediment. J Water Pollut Control Fed 2:153–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazer G, Booth D, Ewing K (2001) Limitations to vegetation establishment and growth in biofiltration swales. Ecolo Engin 17:429–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore A, Hicks M (2004) Nutrient criteria development in Washington state-phosphorus. Department of Ecology Publications Distribution Center

  • Otto S, Vianello M, Infantino A, Zanin G, Guardo AD (2008) Effect of full-grown vegetative filter strip on herbicide runoff: Maintaining of filter capacity over time. Chemospher 71:74–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rankins JA, Shaw DR (2001) Perennial grass filter strips for reducing herbicides losses. Weed Sci 49:647–651

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rao NS, Easton ZM, Schneiderman EM, Zion MS, Lee DR, Steenhuis TS (2009) Modeling watershed scale effectiveness of agricultural best management practices to reduce phosphorus loading. J Environ Manage 90:1385–1395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinelt LE, Horner RR (1995) Pollutant removal from stormwater runoff by palustrine wetlands based on comprehensive budgets. Ecol Eng 4:77–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson CJ (1985) Mechanisms controlling phosphorus retention capacity in freshwater wetlands. Sci 228:1424–1427

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JA, Sievers M, Huang S, Yu SL (2000) Occurrence and phase distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urban storm-water runoff. Water Sci Technol 42:383–388

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Surface water quality standards, New Jersey Administrative Code (NJAC) 2011

  • Stagge JH, Davis AP, Jamil E, Kim H (2012) Performance of grass swales for improving water quality from highway runoff. Water Res 46(20):6731–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stormwater best management practice manual, North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) (2007)

  • Vymazal J (2010) Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Water 2:530–549

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wyoming department of environmental quality (WDEQ) (2008) Wyoming nutrient criteria development plan

  • Yi Q, Lu W, Yu J, Kim Y (2010) Characteristics of nutrient retention in a stormwater wetland during dry and wet days. Water Sci Technol 61:1535–1545

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu J, Yi Q, Kim Y, Tateda M (2010) Analysis of hydrocyclone behaviors in the separation of particulates from highway rainfall runoff. Water Sci Technol 62:532–540

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The preparation of this paper was supported by the Scientific Research Foundation of Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.: 51002196 and 51009156). The authors thank Professor Youngchul Kim from Hanseo University in Korea.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haixia Yu.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Hailong Wang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yu, J., Yu, H. & Xu, L. Performance evaluation of various stormwater best management practices. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20, 6160–6171 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-1655-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-1655-4

Keywords