Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Field demonstration and evaluation of the Passive Flux Meter on a CAH groundwater plume

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study comprises the first application of the Passive Flux Meter (PFM) for the measurement of chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbon (CAH) mass fluxes and Darcy water fluxes in groundwater at a European field site. The PFM was originally developed and applied to measurements near source zones. The focus of the PFM is extended from near source to plume zones. For this purpose, 48 PFMs of 1.4 m length were constructed and installed in eight different monitoring wells in the source and plume zone of a CAH-contaminated field site located in France. The PFMs were retrieved, sampled, and analyzed after 3 to 11 weeks of exposure time, depending on the expected contaminant flux. PFM evaluation criteria include analytical, technical, and practical aspects as well as conditions and applicability. PFM flux data were compared with so-called traditional soil and groundwater concentration data obtained using active sampling methods. The PFMs deliver reasonable results for source as well as plume zones. The limiting factor in the PFM applicability is the exposure time together with the groundwater flux. Measured groundwater velocities at the field site range from 2 to 41 cm/day. Measured contaminant flux data raise up to 13 g/m2/day for perchloroethylene in the plume zone. Calculated PFM flux averaged concentration data and traditional concentration data were of similar magnitude for most wells. However, both datasets need to be compared with reservation because of the different sampling nature and time. Two important issues are the PFM tracer loss during installation/extraction and the deviation of the groundwater flow field when passing the monitoring well and PFM. The demonstration of the PFM at a CAH-contaminated field site in Europe confirmed the efficiency of the flux measurement technique for source as well as plume zones. The PFM can be applied without concerns in monitoring wells with European standards. The acquired flux data are of great value for the purpose of site characterization and mass discharge modeling, and can be used in combination with traditional soil and groundwater sampling methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Annable, M.D. 2008. Mass flux as a remedial performance metric at NAPL contaminated sites. In: Methods and techniques for cleaning up contaminated sites. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C—Environmental Security, 177–186

  • Annable MD, Hatfield K, Cho J, Klammler H, Parker BL, Cherry JA, Rao PSC (2005) Field-scale evaluation of the passive flux meter for simultaneous measurement of groundwater and contaminant fluxes. Environ Sci Technol 39(18):7194–7201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Appelo CAJ, Postma D (2007) Geochemistry, groundwater and pollution, Secondth edn. Balkema, Amsterdam, Reprint with corrections

    Google Scholar 

  • Basmadjian D (2004) Mass transfer: principles and applications. CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu NB, Rao PSC, Poyer IC, Annable MD, Hatfield K (2006) Flux-based assessment at a manufacturing site contaminated with trichloroethylene. J Contam Hydrol 86:105–127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Basu NB, Rao S, Poyer I, Nandy S, Mallavarapu M, Naidu R, Davis G, Patterson B, Annable MD, Hatfield K (2009) Integration of traditional and innovative characterization techniques for flux-based assessment of dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) sites. J Contam Hydrol 105:161–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bear J (1988) Dynamics of fluids in porous media. Dover edition. Originally published: New York: American Elsevier, 1972. Reprint with corrections. New York: Dover

  • Bear J, Verruijt A (1998) Modeling groundwater flow and pollution. First published 1987. Reprinted with corrections. Reidel, Dordrecht

  • Bondehagen D (2010) Measuring groundwater and contaminant flux: passive flux meter field applications and issues with alcohol degradability. Air Soil Water Res 3:23–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Börke P (2007) Untersuchungen zur Quantifizierung der Grundwasserimmisson von Polyzyklischen Aromatischen Kohlenwasserstoffen mithilfe von Passiven Probennahmesystemen. Ph.D. Diss., Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany (In German)

  • Brooks MC, Wood AL, Annable MD, Hatfield K, Cho J, Holbert C, Rao RSC, Enfield CG, Lynch K, Smith RE (2008) Changes in contaminant mass discharge from DNAPL source mass depletion: evaluation at two field sites. J Contam Hydrol 102(1–2):140–153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brouyère S, Jamin P, Dolle F, Chisala B, Orban PH, Popescu IC, Hérivaux C, Dassargues A (2010) A regional flux-based risk assessment approach of contaminated sites on groundwater bodies. GQ10: Groundwater Quality Management in a Rapidly Changing World (Proc. 7th International Groundwater Quality Conference held in Zurich, Switzerland, 13–18 June 2010)

  • Brusseau ML, Carroll KC, Allen T, Baker J, DiGuiseppi W, Hatton J, Morrison C, Russo A, Berkompas J (2011) Impact of in situ chemical oxidation on contaminant mass discharge: linking source-zone and plume-scale characterizations of remediation performance. Environ Sci Technol 45(12):5352–5358

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caterina D, Brouyère S, Jamin P, Batlle-Aguilar J, Dassargues A, Dejonghe W, Diels L, Crèvecoeur S, Thomé JP, Dujardin J, Batelaan O, Canters F, Hérivaux C (2009) Flux-based risk assessment of the impact of contaminants on water resources and ecosystems “FRAC-WECO”. Final Report. Brussels: Belgian Science Policy 2009—59 p. (Research Programme Science for a Sustainable Development)

  • Darcy H (1856) Détermination des lois d’écoulement de l’eau à travers le sable. pp. 590–594. In: Les Fontaines Publiques de la Ville de Dijon. Dalmont, Paris

  • Drost W, Klotz D, Koch A, Moser J, Neumaier F, Rauert W (1968) Point dilution method measuring groundwater flow by means of radioisotopes. Water Resour Res 4:125–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goltz MN, Kim S, Yoon H, Park J (2007) Review of groundwater contaminant mass flux measurement. Environ Eng Res 12:176–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eijkelkamp (2008) Operating Instructions 09.02 Laboratory permeameter. M1.09.02.E

  • Hatfield K, Annable M, Cho J, Rao PSC, Klammler H (2004) A direct passive method for measuring water and contaminant fluxes in porous media. J Contam Hydrol 75:155–181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huckins JN, K Booij, WL Cranor, DA Alvarez, RW Gale, Bartkow ME, Robertson GL, Clark RC, Stewart RE (2005) Fundamentals of the use of performance reference compounds (PRCs) in passive samplers. In: Proceedings of SETAC North America 26th Annual Meeting, November 13–17, 2005, 1–24. Pensacola, USA: SETAC

  • ITRC (Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council) (2010) Use and measurement of mass flux and mass discharge. MASSFLUX-1. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, Integrated DNAPL Site Strategy Team. http://www.itrcweb.org

  • Kaskassian S, Gleize T, Chastanet J, Côme JM (2012). Projet ATTENA 2—Module 3 Démonstration, Tâche 3.1.2 : Mise en œuvre du protocole MACAOH par BURGEAP sur le Site 1bis (solvants chlorés). Rapport Final confidentiel ADEME (ADEME confidential final report for project ATTENA 2) (in French)

  • Klammler H, Hatfield K, Annable MD, Agyei E, Parker BL, Cherry JA, Rao PSC (2007) General analytical treatment of the flow field relevant to the interpretation of passive fluxmeter measurements. Water Resour Res 43. doi:10.1029/2005WR004718,W04407

  • Klammler H, Hatfield K, Luz J, Annable M, Newman M, Cho J, Peacock A, Stucker V, Ranville J, Cabaniss S, Rao PSC (2012) Contaminant discharge and uncertainty estimates from passive flux meter measurements. Water Resour Res 48, W02512, doi:10.1029/2011WR010535

  • Klute A (1986) Methods of soil analysis, part 1: physical and mineralogical methods. SSSA Book Series: 5

  • Lamontagne S, Dighton J, Ullman W (2002) Estimates of groundwater velocity in riparian zones using point dilution tests. CISRO Technical Report 14/02, pp. 16

  • Marsman A, Valstar J, ter Meer J (2006) Risk analysis of groundwater contamination at the megasite port of Rotterdam. (Proceedings of ModelCARE’2005, held at The Hague, The Netherlands, June 2005) IAHS Publication 304, pp. 309

  • Massey AJ, Friesz PJ, Carlson CS (2007) Borehole-dilution tests to measure natural flushing of screens in wells monitored with passive diffusion sampling. USGS. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs 39(1):101

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell CJ, Farhat SK, Adamson DT, Looney BB (2011) Contaminant plume classification system based on mass discharge. Ground Water 46(6):914–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman M, Hatfield K, Hayworth J, Rao PSC, Stauffer T (2005) A hybrid method for inverse characterization of subsurface contaminant flux. J Contam Hydrol 81:34–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson B, Luckner L, Schirmer M (1995) Field trials of active and multiport sock samplers in gravel-packed wells. J Hydrol 171:259–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schirmer M, Jones I, Teutch G, Lerner DN (1995) Development and testing of multi sock samplers for groundwater. J Hydrol 171:239–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SNRL (Savannah River National Laboratory) (2006) Passive fluxmeters: application as a characterization/monitoring tool for monitored natural attenuation of chlorinated solvents. Washington Savannah River Company, Washington D.C., WSRC-STI-2006-00315 http://www.osti.gov

  • Triplett Kingston JL, Dahlen PR, Johnson PC (2012) Assessment of groundwater quality improvements and mass discharge reductions at five in situ electrical resistance heating remediation sites. Ground Water Monit Remediat. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6592.2011.01389.x

  • Verreydt G, Bronders J, Van Keer I, Diels L, Vanderauwera P (2010) Passive samplers for monitoring VOCs in groundwater and the prospects related to mass flux measurements. Ground Water Monit Remediat 30(2):114–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Verreydt G, Van Keer I, Bronders J, Diels L, Vanderauwera P (2012) Flux-based risk management strategy of groundwater pollutions: the CMF approach. Environ Geochem Health. Special issue on SEGH2011. doi: 10.1007/s10653-012-9491-x

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is part of the PhD research of Goedele Verreydt and funded through the Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO NV). Dr. Hansjörg Weiss (Innovative Messtechnik Dr. Weiss) is gratefully acknowledged for his free provision of the MPLS technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Boeretang 200, 2400, Mol, Belgium

    G. Verreydt, I. Van Keer, J. Bronders & L. Diels

  2. University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium

    G. Verreydt & L. Diels

  3. Artesis University College of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium

    G. Verreydt & P. Vanderauwera

  4. University of Florida, 2500 Southwest 2nd Avenue, Gainesville, FL, 32607, USA

    M. D. Annable

  5. Burgeap, 13 Rue du Parc, 67205, Oberhausbergen, France

    S. Kaskassian

Authors
  1. G. Verreydt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. D. Annable
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Kaskassian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. I. Van Keer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J. Bronders
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. L. Diels
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. P. Vanderauwera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Verreydt.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Hailong Wang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Verreydt, G., Annable, M.D., Kaskassian, S. et al. Field demonstration and evaluation of the Passive Flux Meter on a CAH groundwater plume. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20, 4621–4634 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-1417-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-1417-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation