Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 20, Issue 11, pp 7863–7877 | Cite as

Co-treatment of acid mine drainage with municipal wastewater: performance evaluation

Mining and the Environment - Understanding Processes, Assessing Impacts and Developing Remediation

Abstract

Co-treatment of acid mine drainage (AMD) with municipal wastewater (MWW) using the activated sludge process is a novel treatment technology offering potential savings over alternative systems in materials, proprietary chemicals and energy inputs. The impacts of AMD on laboratory-scale activated sludge units (plug-flow and sequencing batch reactors) treating synthetic MWW were investigated. Synthetic AMD containing Al, Cu, Fe, Mn, Pb, Zn and SO4 at a range of concentrations and pH values was formulated to simulate three possible co-treatment processes, i.e., (1) adding raw AMD to the activated sludge aeration tank, (2) pre-treating AMD prior to adding to the aeration tank by mixing with digested sludge and (3) pre-treating AMD by mixing with screened MWW. Continuous AMD loading to the activated sludge reactors during co-treatment did not cause a significant decrease in chemical oxygen demand (COD), 5-day biochemical oxygen demand, or total organic carbon removal; average COD removal rates ranged from 87–93 %. Enhanced phosphate removal was observed in reactors loaded with Fe- and Al-rich AMD, with final effluent TP concentrations <2 mg/L. Removal rates for dissolved Al, Cu, Fe and Pb were 52–84 %, 47–61 %, 74–86 % and 100 %, respectively, in both systems. Manganese and Zn removal were strongly linked to acidity; removal from net-acidic AMD was <10 % for both metals, whereas removal from circum-neutral AMD averaged 93–95 % for Mn and 58–90 % for Zn. Pre-mixing with screened MWW was the best process option in terms of AMD neutralization and metal removal. However, significant MWW alkalinity was consumed, suggesting an alkali supplement may be necessary.

Keywords

Acid mine drainage Activated sludge Co-treatment Metals Neutralization Sewage Remediation Wastewater treatment plant 

Abbreviations

AMD

Acid mine drainage

BOD5

Five-day biochemical oxygen demand

COD

Chemical oxygen demand

DO

Dissolved oxygen

f/m

Food-to-microorganism

HRT

Hydraulic retention time

MLSS

Mixed liquor suspended solids

MWW

Municipal wastewater

SBR

Sequencing batch reactor

SRT

Solids retention time

SS

Suspended solids

SVI

Sludge volume index

TN

Total nitrogen

TOC

Total organic carbon

TP

Total phosphorus

WWTP

Wastewater treatment plant

Supplementary material

11356_2012_1303_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (18 kb)
ESM 1(PDF 18 kb)
11356_2012_1303_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (25 kb)
ESM 2(PDF 25 kb)
11356_2012_1303_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (265 kb)
ESM 3(PDF 264 kb)

References

  1. Acheampong MA, Meulepas RJW, Lens PNL (2010) Removal of heavy metals and cyanide from gold mine wastewater. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 85:590–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andreadakis A (1993) Physical and chemical properties of activated sludge floc. Water Sci Technol 27(12):1707–1714Google Scholar
  3. APHA, AWWA, WEF (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  4. Azzam AM, Elatrash AM, Ghattas NK (1969) The co-precipitation of manganese by iron(III) hydroxide. J Radioanal Chem 2:255–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berg UT, Nyholm N (1996) Biodegradability simulation studies in semicontinuous activated sludge reactors with low (μg/L range) and standard (ppm range) chemical concentrations. Chemosphere 33(4):711–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boon AG (1995) Septicity in sewers: causes, consequences, and containment. Water Sci Technol 31(7):237–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brezonik PL (1994) Chemical kinetics and process dynamics in aquatic systems. Lewis Publishers, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown MJ, Lester JN (1979) Metal removal in activated sludge: the role of bacterial extracellular polymers. Water Res 13:817–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown MJ, Lester JN (1982) Role of bacterial extracellular polymers in metal uptake in pure bacterial culture and activated sludge—I: effects of metal concentration. Water Res 16:1539–1548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burgess JE, Stuetz RM (2002) Activated sludge for the treatment of sulphur-rich wastewaters. Miner Eng 15:839–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burgos WD, Borch T, Troyer LD, Luan F, Larson LN, Brown JF, Lambson J, Shimizu M (2012) Schwertmannite and Fe oxides formed by biological low-pH Fe(II) oxidation versus abiotic neutralization: Impact on trace metal sequesterization. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 76:29–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buzier R, Tusseau-Vuillemin M-H, dit Meriadec CM, Rousselot O, Mouchel JM (2006) Trace metal speciation and fluxes within a major French wastewater treatment plant: impact of the successive treatments stages. Chemosphere 65:2419–2426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Caravelli AH, Contreras EM, Zaritzky NE (2010) Phosphorous removal in batch systems using ferric chloride in the presence of activated sludges. J Hazard Mater 177:199–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cecen F, Gursoy G (2001) Biosorption of heavy metals from landfill leachate onto activated sludge. J Environ Sci Health A 36(6):987–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chang W-C, Hsu C-H, Chiang S-M, Su M-C (2007) Equilibrium and kinetics of metal biosorption by sludge from a biological nutrient removal system. Environ Technol 28(4):453–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cheng MH, Patterson JW, Minear RA (1975) Heavy metals uptake by activated sludge. J Water Pollut Control Fed 47(2):362–376Google Scholar
  17. Chipasa KB (2003) Accumulation and fate of selected heavy metals in a biological wastewater treatment system. Waste Manage 23:135–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Christofi N, Aspichueta E, Dalzell DJB, De la Sota A, Etxebarria J, Fernandes T, Gutiérrez M, Morton J, Obst U, Schmellenkamp P (2003) Congruence in the performance of model nitrifying activated sludge plants located in Germany, Scotland and Spain. Water Res 37:177–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chua H, Yu PHF, Sin SN, Cheung MWL (1999) Sub-lethal effects of heavy metals on activated sludge microorganisms. Chemosphere 39(15):2681–2692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Clark T, Stephenson T, Arnold-Smith AK (1999) The impact of aluminium-based co-precipitants on the activated sludge process. Trans Inst Chem Eng 77:31–36Google Scholar
  21. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) (2006) Secondary treatment regulation, 40 CFR §133.102(c). U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  22. Comeau Y (2008) Microbial metabolism. In: Henze M, van Loosdrecht MCM, Ekama GA, Brdjanovic D (eds) Biological wastewater treatment: principles, modelling, and design. IWA Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Cravotta III CA, Brightbill RA, Langland MJ (2010) Abandoned mine drainage in the Swatara Creek Basin, Southern Anthracite Coalfield, Pennsylvania, USA: 1. Stream water quality trends coinciding with the return of fish. Mine Water Environ 29:200-216Google Scholar
  24. Demin OA, Dudeney AWL (2003) Nitrification in constructed wetlands treating ochreous mine water. Mine Water Environ 22(1):15–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dobbie KE, Heal KV, Aumônier J, Smith KA, Johnston A, Younger PL (2009) Evaluation of iron ochre from mine drainage treatment for removal of phosphorus from wastewater. Chemosphere 75:795–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dubber D, Gray NF (2009) Enumeration of protozoan ciliates in activated sludge: determination of replicate number using probability. Water Res 43(14):3443–3452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dubber D, Gray NF (2010) Replacement of chemical oxygen demand (COD) with total organic carbon (TOC) for monitoring wastewater treatment performance to minimize disposal of toxic analytical waste. J Environ Sci Health A 45(12):1595–1600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dubber D, Gray NF (2011) The effect of anoxia and anaerobia on ciliate community in biological nutrient removal systems using laboratory-scale sequencing batch reactors (SBRs). Water Res 45(6):2213–2226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Edenborn HM, Brickett LA (2002) Determination of manganese stability in a constructed wetland sediment using redox gel probes. Geomicrobiol J 19:485–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ekama GA, Wentzel MC (2008) Nitrogen removal. In: Henze M, Van Loosdrecht MCM, Ekama GA, Brdjanovic D (eds) Biological wastewater treatment: principles, modelling, and design. IWA Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2009) Urban waste water discharges in Ireland for population equivalents greater than 500 persons: a report for the years 2006 and 2007. EPA, WexfordGoogle Scholar
  32. Evangelou VP (1998) Environmental soil and water chemistry: principles and applications. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Garcia Orozco JH (2008) Toxicity. In: Henze M, Van Loosdrecht MCM, Ekama GA, Brdjanovic D (eds) Biological wastewater treatment: principles, modelling, and design. IWA Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Gerardi MH (2002) Nitrification and denitrification in the activated sludge process. Wiley Interscience, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gibert O, de Pablo J, Cortina JL, Ayora C (2005) Municipal compost-based mixture for acid mine drainage bioremediation: metal retention mechanisms. Appl Geochem 20:1648–1657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Goldstone ME, Kirk PWW, Lester JN (1990) The behaviour of heavy metals during wastewater treatment II. Lead, nickel and zinc. Sci Total Environ 95:253–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gray NF (1990) Activated sludge: theory and practice. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  38. Gray NF (1998) Acid mine drainage composition and the implications for its impact on lotic systems. Water Res 32(7):2122–2134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gray NF (2004) Biology of wastewater treatment. Series on environmental science and management, vol 4, 2nd edn. Imperial College Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Gray NF, O'Neill C (1995) Artificial acid mine drainage for use in laboratory simulation studies. Fresenius Environ Bull 4:481–484Google Scholar
  41. HACH Company (2007) Oxygen demand, chemical. USEPA reactor digestion method: method 8000. DOC 316.53.01099Google Scholar
  42. Hammaini A, Ballester A, Blázquez ML, González F, Muñoz JA (2002) Effect of the presence of lead on the biosorption of copper, cadmium and zinc by activated sludge. Hydrometallurgy 67:109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hammaini A, González F, Ballester A, Blásquez ML, Muñoz JA (2007) Biosorption of heavy metals by activated sludge and their desorption characteristics. J Environ Manage 84:419–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hammaini A, González F, Ballester A, Blázquez ML, Muñoz JA (2003) Simultaneous uptake of metals by activated sludge. Miner Eng 16:723–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hedin RS (2004) The use of measured and calculated acidity values to improve the quality of AMD data sets. In: Barnhisel RI (ed) Proceedings of the American Society for Mining and Reclamation, Morgantown, WVGoogle Scholar
  46. Hedin RS, Nairn RW (1992) Designing and sizing passive mine drainage treatment systems. In: Thirteenth West Virginia Surface Mine Drainage Task Force Symposium, Morgantown, WVGoogle Scholar
  47. Hedin RS, Nairn RW, Kleinmann RLP (1994) Information circular IC 9389: passive treatment of coal mine drainage. Bureau of Mines, United States Department of the InteriorGoogle Scholar
  48. Henze M, Comeau Y (2008) Wastewater characterization. In: Henze M, van Loosdrecht MCM, Ekama GA, Brdjanovic D (eds) Biological wastewater treatment: principles, modelling, and design. IWA Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  49. Hughes TA, Gray NF (2012) Acute and chronic toxicity of acid mine drainage to the activated sludge process. Mine Water Environ 31(1):40–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hughes TA, Gray NF (2013) Removal of metals and acidity from acid mine drainage using municipal wastewater and activated sludge. Mine Water EnvironGoogle Scholar
  51. Hughes TA, Gray NF, Sánchez Guillamón O (2013) Removal of metals and acidity from acid mine drainage using liquid and dried digested sewage sludge and cattle slurry. Mine Water EnvironGoogle Scholar
  52. ISO (1989) ISO 6060: 1989. Water quality: determination of the chemical oxygen demand. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  53. ISO (2003) Water quality: determination of biochemical oxygen demand after n days (BODn), part 1: dilution and seeding method with allylthiourea addition. ISO 5815–1:2003. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  54. Jenkins D, Richard MG, Daigger GT (2004) Manual on the causes and control of activated sludge bulking, foaming, and other solids separation problems, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  55. Jiménez-Rodríguez AM, Durán-Barrantes MM, Borja R, Sánchez E, Colmenarejo MF, Raposo F (2009) Heavy metals removal from acid mine drainage water using biogenic hydrogen sulphide and effluent from anaerobic treatment: effect of pH. J Hazard Mater 165:759–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Jin B, Wilén B-M, Lant P (2003) A comprehensive insight into floc characteristics and their impact on compressibility and settleability of activated sludge. Chem Eng J (Amsterdam, Neth) 95:221–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Johnson KL, Younger PL (2006) The co-treatment of sewage and mine waters in aerobic wetlands. Eng Geol (Amsterdam, Neth) 85:53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Jönsson K, Grunditz C, Dalhammar G, Jansen JL (2000) Occurrence of nitrification inhibition in Swedish municipal wastewaters. Water Res 34(9):2455–2462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Katsou E, Malamis S, Haralambous K (2010) Examination of zinc uptake in a combined system using sludge, minerals and ultrafiltration membranes. J Hazard Mater 182:27–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Katsou E, Malamis S, Loizidou M (2011) Performance of a membrane bioreactor used for the treatment of wastewater contaminated with heavy metals. Bioresour Technol 102:4325–4332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kempton S, Sterritt RM, Lester JN (1983) Factors affecting the fate and behaviour of toxic elements in the activated sludge process. Environ Pollut, Ser A 32:51–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Kirby CS, Cravotta CA III (2005) Net alkalinity and net acidity 1: theoretical considerations. Appl Geochem 20(10):1920–1940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kjeldsen KU, Joulian C, Ingvorsen K (2004) Oxygen tolerance of sulfate-reducing bacteria in activated sludge. Environ Sci Technol 38(7):2038–2043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lei Z, Yu T, Ai-zhong D, Jin-sheng W (2008) Adsorption of Cd(II), Zn(II) by extracellular polymeric substances extracted from waste activated sludge. Water Sci Technol 58:195–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lew B, Cochva M, Lahav O (2009) Potential effects of desalinated water quality on the operation stability of wastewater treatment plants. Sci Total Environ 407:2404–2410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Marandi R, Ardejani FD, Marandi A (2007) Biotreatment of acid mine drainage using sequencing batch reactors (SBRs) in the Sarcheshmeh porphyry copper mine. In: Cidu R, Frau F (eds) IMWA Symposium 2007: water in mining environments, Cagliari, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  67. McKinney RE (2004) Environmental pollution control microbiology. Marcel Dekker Incorporated, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Meriç S, Eremektar G, Ciner F, Tünay O (2003) An OUR-based approach to determine the toxic effects of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in activated sludge. J Hazard Mater B101:147–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Minitab (2007) Minitab 15 statistical software. Minitab, Inc., State CollegeGoogle Scholar
  70. Munk L, Faure G, Pride DE, Bigham JM (2002) Sorption of trace metals to an aluminum precipitate in a stream receiving acid rock-drainage; Snake River, Summit County, Colorado. Appl Geochem 17:421–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Neto RR, Crocetta MS, Souza MGR, Rocha E, Zanuz M, Gomes CJB (2010) Combined treatment of acid mine drainage and sewage in the State of Santa Catarina-Brazil. In: Wolkersdorfer C, Freund A (eds) Mine water and innovative thinking, Sydney, Nova ScotiaGoogle Scholar
  72. Neufeld RD, Hermann ER (1975) Heavy metal removal by acclimated activated sludge. J Water Pollut Control Fed 47(2):310–329Google Scholar
  73. Nielsen AH, Lens P, Vollertsen J, Hvitved-Jacobsen T (2005) Sulfide–iron interactions in domestic wastewater from a gravity sewer. Water Res 39:2747–2755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Nielsen JS, Hrudey SE (1983) Metal loadings and removal at a municipal activated sludge plant. Water Res 17(9):1041–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Nielsen PH, Keiding K (1998) Disintegration of activated sludge flocs in presence of sulfide. Water Res 32(2):313–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Nordstrom DK, Alpers CN (1999) Negative pH, efflorescent mineralogy, and consequences for environmental restoration at the Iron Mountain Superfund site, California. Proc Natl Acad Sci 96:3455–3462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. OECD (1984) OECD guidelines for testing of chemicals, method 209: activated sludge, respiration inhibition test. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, ParisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Oliver BG, Cosgrove EG (1974) The efficiency of heavy metal removal by a conventional activated sludge treatment plant. Water Res 8:869–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Omoike AI, Vanloon GW (1999) Removal of phosphorus and organic matter removal by alum during wastewater treatment. Water Res 33(17):3617–3627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Pagnanelli F, Mainelli S, Bornoroni L, Dionisi D, Toro L (2009) Mechanisms of heavy-metal removal by activated sludge. Chemosphere 75:1028–1034Google Scholar
  81. Pamukoglu MY, Kargi F (2007) Copper(II) ion toxicity in activated sludge processes as function of operating parameters. Enzyme Microb Technol 40:1228–1233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Principi P, Villa F, Bernasconi M, Zanardini E (2006) Metal toxicity in municipal wastewater activated sludge investigated by multivariate analysis and in situ hybridization. Water Res 40(1):99–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Rao SR, Gehr R, Riendeau M, Lu D, Finch JA (1992) Acid mine drainage as a coagulant. Miner Eng 5(9):1011–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Reisman DJ, Sundaram V, Al-Abed SR, Allen D (2007) Statistical validation of sulfate quantification methods used for analysis of acid mine drainage. Talanta 71:303–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Reuschenbach P, Pagga U, Strotmann U (2003) A critical comparison of respirometric biodegradation tests based on OECD 301 and related test methods. Water Res 37(7):1571–1582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Rose AW, Cravotta CA III (1998) Geochemistry of coal mine drainage. In: Smith MW, Brady KBC (eds) The prediction and prevention of acid drainage from surface coal mines in Pennsylvania. Department of Environmental Protection, HarrisburgGoogle Scholar
  87. Rötting TS, Thomas RC, Ayora C, Carrera J (2008) Passive treatment of acid mine drainage with high metal concentrations using dispersed alkaline substrate. J Environ Qual 37:1741–1751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Rozada F, Otero M, Morán A, García AI (2008) Adsorption of heavy metals onto sewage sludge-derived materials. Bioresour Technol 99:6332–6338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Sánchez España J, López Pamo E, Santofimia Pastor E, Reyes Andrés J, Martín Rubí JA (2006) The removal of dissolved metals by hydroxysulphate precipitates during oxidation and neutralization of acid mine waters, Iberian Pyrite Belt. Aquat Geochem 12:269–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Sandström Å, Mattsson E (2001) Bacterial ferrous iron oxidation of acid mine drainage as pre-treatment for subsequent metal recovery. Int J Miner Process 62:309–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Santos A, Judd S (2010) The fate of metals in wastewater treated by the activated sludge process and membrane bioreactors: a brief review. J Environ Monit 12:110–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Sibrell PL, Montgomery GA, Ritenour KL, Tucker TW (2009) Removal of phosphorus from agricultural wastewaters using adsorption media prepared from acid mine drainage sludge. Water Res 43:2240–2250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Sirianuntapiboon S, Ungkaprasatcha O (2007) Removal of Pb2+ and Ni2+ by bio-sludge in sequencing batch reactor (SBR) and granular activated carbon-SBR (GAC-SBR) systems. Bioresour Technol 98:2749–2757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Skousen JG, Rose AW, Geidel G, Foreman J, Evans R, Hellier W (1998) Handbook of technologies for avoidance and remediation of acid mine drainage. National Mine Land Reclamation Center, MorgantownGoogle Scholar
  95. Stephenson T, Lester JN (1987) Heavy metal behaviour during the activated sludge process: I. Extent of soluble and insoluble metal removal. Sci Total Environ 63:199–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Sterritt RM, Brown MJ, Lester JN (1981) Metal removal by adsorption and precipitation in the activated sludge process. Environ Pollut, Ser A 24(4):313–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Strosnider WH, Nairn RW (2010) Effective passive treatment of high-strength acid mine drainage and raw municipal wastewater in Potosi, Bolivia, using simple mutual incubations and limestone. J Geochem Explor 105:34–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Strosnider WH, Winfrey BK, Nairn RW (2011a) Alkalinity generation in a novel multi-stage high-strength acid mine drainage and municipal wastewater passive co-treatment system. Mine Water Environ 30(1):47–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Strosnider WH, Winfrey BK, Nairn RW (2011b) Biochemical oxygen demand and nutrient processing in a novel multi-stage raw municipal wastewater and acid mine drainage passive co-treatment system. Water Res 45(3):1079–1086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Strosnider WH, Winfrey BK, Nairn RW (2011c) Novel passive co-treatment of acid mine drainage and municipal wastewater. J Environ Qual 40:206–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Stumm W, Morgan JJ (1981) Aquatic chemistry: an introduction emphasizing chemical equilibria in natural waters, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  102. US EPA (2000) Abandoned mine site characterization and cleanup handbook. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  103. US EPA (2004) Reference notebook. Abandoned Mine Lands Team, US EPA, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  104. Watzlaf GR, Schroeder KT, Kleinmann RL, Kairies CL, Nairn RW (2004) The passive treatment of coal mine drainage, U. S. Department of Energy Report, DOE/NETL–2004/1202. National Technical Information Service, SpringfieldGoogle Scholar
  105. Webster JG, Swedlund PJ, Webster KS (1998) Trace metal adsorption onto an acid mine drainage iron(III) oxy hydroxy sulfate. Environ Sci Technol 32:1361–1368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Wei X, Viadero RC Jr, Bhojappa S (2008) Phosphorus removal by acid mine drainage sludge from secondary effluents of municipal wastewater treatment plants. Water Res 42:3275–3284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Winfrey BK, Strosnider WH, Nairn RW, Strevett KA (2010) Highly effective reduction of fecal indicator bacteria counts in an ecologically engineered municipal wastewater and acid mine drainage passive co-treatment system. Ecol Eng 36(12):1620–1626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Wolkersdorfer C, Bowell R (2004) Contemporary reviews of mine water studies in Europe, part 1. Mine Water Environ 23:162–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Yeoman S, Lester JN, Perry R (1992) Phosphorus removal and its influence on particle size and heavy metal distribution during wastewater treatment. Environ Technol 13(10):901–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Zhang M (2011) Adsorption study of Pb(II), Cu(II), and Zn(II) from simulated acid mine drainage using dairy manure compost. Chem Eng J (Amsterdam, Neth) 172(1):361–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Zipper CE, Skousen JG (2010) Influent water quality affects performance of passive treatment systems for acid mine drainage. Mine Water Environ 29:135-143Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Water Technology Research Group, Centre for the EnvironmentTrinity College DublinDublin 2Ireland

Personalised recommendations