Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 1606–1616 | Cite as

Sewage-exposed marine invertebrates: survival rates and microbiological accumulation

  • Loredana StabiliEmail author
  • Antonio Terlizzi
  • Rosa Anna Cavallo
Research Article


A large number of bacteria, including agents responsible for diseases, characterise sewage-polluted seawaters. Apart from standards for bathing waters and bivalve aquaculture waters, there are no general microbiological standards applicable to seawaters to help decide if bacterial pollution is within acceptable ranges. This study represents an attempt towards the issue of comparing the susceptibility of different marine invertebrates subjected to polluted seawater with a high microbial contamination. We explored the survival rates and the microbiological accumulation of mollusc bivalves, echinoderms and crustaceans species exposed to sewage-polluted seawaters. Microbiological analyses were performed on the polluted seawater and on the homogenates of exposed and unexposed specimens. Culturable bacteria (22 °C and 37 °C) and microbial pollution indicators (total coliforms, Escherichia coli and intestinal enterococci) were measured. When exposed to the sewage-polluted seawater, the examined invertebrates showed different survival rates. In the filter feeders, bacterial densities at 22 °C and 37 °C rose after 96 h of exposure to sewage. The highest concentrations of total coliforms and intestinal enterococci were found in exposed bivalve Mytilus galloprovincialis. The concentrations of bacteria growing at 37 °C were lower in the exposed deposit feeders compared to the polluted seawater. Some yeasts were absent in several exposed species although these yeasts were present in the polluted seawater. Our data suggest that the examined filter feeders, given their capability to survive and accumulate bacteria, may counteract the effects of sewage and restore seawater quality.


Sewage pollution Microbial pollution indicators Yeasts Deposit feeders Filter feeders Bioremediation 


  1. American Public Health Association (APHA) (1992) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 18th ed. APHA, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson MJ, Willis TJ (2003) Canonical analysis of principal coordinates: a useful method of constrained ordination for ecology. Ecology 84:511–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson MJ, Gorley RN, Clarke KR (2008) PERMANOVA+ for PRIMER: guide to software and statistical methods. PRIMER-E, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  4. Beleneva IA, Zhukova NV, Maslennikova EF (2003) Comparative study of microbial communities from cultured and natural populations of the mussel Mytilus trossulus in Peter the Great Bay. Microbiology 72(4):472–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Birkbeck TH, McHenery JG (1982) Degradation of bacteria by Mytilus edulis. Mar Biol 72:7–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bouchard N, Pelletier E, Fournier M (1999) Effects of butyltin compounds on phagocytic activity of hemocytes form three marine bivalves. Environ Toxicol Chem 18(3):519–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brinkman NE, Haugland RA, Wymer LJ, Byappanahalli M, Whitman RL, Vesper SJ (2003) Evaluation of a rapid, quantitative real-time PCR method for enumeration of pathogenic Candida cells in water. Appl Environ Microbiol 69 N°3:1775–1782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cabelli VJ (1983) Health effects criteria for marine waters. EPA-600/1-80-031. US Environmental Protection Agency, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  9. Caroppo C, Stabili L, Aresta M, Corinaldesi C, Danovaro R (2006) Impact of heavy metals and PCBs on marine picoplankton. Environ Toxicol 21(6):541–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cavallo RA, Stabili L (2002) Presence of vibrios in seawater and Mytilus galloprovincialis (Lam.) from the Mar Piccolo of Taranto (Ionian Sea). Water Res 36:3719–3726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chan SS, Ho KW (1993) Bacterial contamination of the Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) cultured in Deep Bay, Hong Kong. Environ Technol 14:861–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cima F, Ballarin L, Bressa G, Martinucci G, Burighel P (1996) Toxicity of organotin compounds on embryos of a marine invertebrate (Styela plicata; Tunicata). Ecotox Environ Safe 35:174–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clarke KR, Gorley RN (2006) PRIMER V6: user manual/tutorial. PRIMER-E, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  14. Colwell RR (1994) Vibrios in the marine and estuarine environment. In: 3rd International Marine Biotechnology Conference, 7–12 August, Tromso, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  15. Coulon P, Jangoux M (1993) Feeding rate and sediment reworking by the holothuroid Holothuria tubulosa (Echinodermata) in a Mediterranean seagrass bed off Ischia Island. Italy Mar Ecol Prog Ser 92:201–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Council Directive 2006/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 February (2006) concerning the management of bathing water quality and repealing Directive 76/160/EEC. Official Journal of the European Union, 4.3.2006, L64/37.Google Scholar
  17. Council Directive 2006/113/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the quality required of shellfish watersGoogle Scholar
  18. De Guise S, Maratea J, Perkins C (2004) Malathion immunotoxicity in the American lobster (Homarus americanus) upon experimental exposure. Aquat Toxicol 66(4):419–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Drewa G, Zbytniewski Z, Palgan K (1988) Influence of an anionic detergent (alkylbenzene sulphonate) on enzymes, moulting cycle and survival in the shrimp Crangon crangon L. Kieler Meeresforsch Sonderheft 6:454–462Google Scholar
  20. Duchene JC, Imbaud P, Delille D (1998) Associated bacteria microflora of a subantarctic polychaete worm Thelepus setosus. Arch Hydrobiol 112:221–231Google Scholar
  21. Dufour AP (1984) Health effects criteria for fresh recreational waters. EPA-600/1-84-004. US Environmental Protection Agency, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  22. Dupont J, Jehl-Pietri C, Herve C, Menard D (1992) Comparative study of bacterial and viral faecal contamination in shellfish: demonstration of seasonal variations. Biomed Lett 47:329–335Google Scholar
  23. Ek H, Dave G, Sturve J, Almroth BC, Stephensen E, Förlin L, Birgersson G (2005) Tentative biomarkers for 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) in fish (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquat Toxicol 72(3):221–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. EPA/600/R-06/021 (2005) Detecting and mitigating the environmental impact of fecal pathogens originating from confined animal feeding operations: review.
  25. EPA/USACE (1994) Evaluation of dredged material proposed for discharge in waters of the U.S. Testing manual (draft). EPA 823-F-94-002-Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  26. European Water Framework Commission (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community actions in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities L327, Scholar
  27. Fernandez P, Valls M, Bayona JM, Albaiges J (1991) Occurrence of cationic surfactants and related products in urban coastal environments. Environ Sci Technol 25:547–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fewtrell L, Bartram J (2001) Water quality: guidelines, standards and health, World Health Organization Water Series. IWA, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Geldreiche EE, Kenner BA (1969) Concepts of fecal Streptococci in stream pollution. J Water Pollut Control Fed 41:335–352Google Scholar
  30. Gifford S, Dunstan RH, O’Connor W, Roberts T, Toia R (2004) Pearl aquaculture—profitable environmental remediation. Sci Total Environ 319:27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gleeson C, Gray NF (2002) The coliform index and waterborne disease: problems of microbial drinking water assessment. Taylor and Francis, London, p 210, eBookGoogle Scholar
  32. Granmo A, Kollberg S, Berggren M, Ekelund R, Magnusson K, Renberg L, Wahlberg O (1991) Bioaccumulation of nonylphenol in caged mussels in an industrial coastal area of a Swedish coast. In: Angeletti G. (ed) Organic micropollutants in the aquatic environment. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 71–79Google Scholar
  33. Hardina CM, Fujitoka RS (1991) Soil: the environmental source of Escherichia coli and Enterococci in Hawaii streams. Environ Toxicol Water Qual 6:185–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hodson PV (2002) Biomarkers and bioindicators in monitoring and assessment: the state of the art. In: Adams SM (ed) Biological indicators of aquatic ecosystem stress. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, p 644Google Scholar
  35. Huertas M, Gisbert E, Rodríguez A, Cardona L, Williot P, Castelló-Orvay F (2002) Acute exposure of Siberian sturgeon (Acipenser baeri, Brandt) yearlings to nitrite: median-lethal concentration (LC50) determination, haematological changes and nitrite accumulation in selected tissues. Aquat Toxicol 57(4):257–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. ISO (International Organization for Standardization) (1998) Water quality determination of the inhibitory effect of water samples on the light emission of Vibrio fischeri (luminescence bacteria test). ISO 11348-3, 48ppGoogle Scholar
  37. Jangoux M (1987) Diseases of Echinodermata. I. Agents microorganisms and protistans. Dis Aquat Org 2:147–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kartasheva NV, Ostroumov SA (1998) Tretradecyltrimethylammonium bromide (tetradetziltrimetilammonij bromid). Toxicol Bull 5:30–32Google Scholar
  39. Koop K, Hutchins P (1996) Disposal of sewage to the ocean—a sustainable solution? Mar Poll Bull 33:121–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Leclerc H, Mossel DAA, Edberg SC, Struij CB (2001) Advances in the bacteriology of the coliform group: their suitability as markers of microbial water safety. Ann Rev Microbiol 55:201–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Licciano M, Stabili L, Giangrande A, Cavallo RA (2007) Bacterial accumulation by Branchiomma luctuosum (Annelida: Polychaeta): a tool for biomonitoring marine systems and restoring polluted waters. Mar Environ Res 63:291–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Longo C, Corriero G, Licciano M, Stabili L (2010) Bacterial accumulation by the Demospongiae Hymeniacidon perlevis: a tool for the bioremediation of polluted seawater. Mar Poll Bull 6:1182–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mansilha CR, Coelho CA, Heitor AM, Amado J, Martins JP, Gameiro P (2009) Bathing waters: new directive, new standards, new quality approach. Mar Poll Bull 58:1562–1565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Marshall R (2001) Washington State Department of Ecology: laboratory guidance and whole effluent toxicity text review criteria. Publication number WW-R-95-80Google Scholar
  45. Neil M (2004) Microbiological indices for total coliform and E. coli bacteria in estuarine waters. Mar Poll Bull 49:752–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ormond RFG, Gage JD, Angel MV (1997) Marine biodiversity: patterns and processes. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ostroumov SA (1994) Some aspects of ecotoxicology and biochemical ecology of surfactants. Proceedings of the 6th International Congress of Ecology (21–26 August 1994, Manchester), 127Google Scholar
  48. Ostroumov SA (2002) Inhibitory analysis of top-down control: new keys to studying eutrophication, algal blooms, and water self-purification. Hydrobiologia 469:117–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ostroumov SA (2003) Studying effects of some surfactants and detergents on filter-feeding bivalves. Hydrobiologia 500:341–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ostroumov SA (2005) Some aspects of water filtering activity of filter-feeders. Hydrobiologia 542:275–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ostroumov SA, Widdows J (2006) Inhibition of mussel suspension feeding by surfactants of three classes. Hydrobiologia 556(1):381–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pagliara P, Montinari MR, Giangrande E, Canicattì C (1992) Protective antifungal factors in Echinoderms. Fifth International Colloquium on Pathology in Marine Aquaculture. 2–4 April, Montpellier, FranceGoogle Scholar
  53. Pastore M (1993) Mar Piccolo. Nuova Apulia (Ed.), Martima Franca (Ta), ItalyGoogle Scholar
  54. Petersen JK, Riisgård HU (1992) Filtration capacity of the ascidian Ciona intestinalis and its grazing impact in a shallow fjord. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 88:9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Plante CJ, Shriver A (1998) Differential lysis of sedimentary bacteria by Arenicola marina: examination of cell wall structure and exopolimeric capsules as correlates. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 229:35–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Segretain G, Droubet E, Mariat F (1979) Diagnostic de Laboratoire en Mycologie Mèdicale. S. A. Malonie (Ed.), Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  57. Sinton LW, Donnison AM (1994) Characterization of faecal Streptococci from some New Zealand effluents and receiving water. N Z J Mar Fresh Res 28:145–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Spacie A, McCarty LS, Rand GM (1995) Bioaccumulation and bioavailability in multiphase systems. In: Rand GM (ed) Fundamentals of aquatic toxicology, 2nd edn. Taylor and Francis, Washington, DC, pp 493–521, Chapter 16Google Scholar
  59. Spencer JFT, Spencer DM (1997) Ecology: where yeasts are. In: Spencer JFT, Spencer DM (eds) Yeasts in natural and artificial habitats. Springer, Berlin, pp 48–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stabili L, Canicattì C (1994) Antibacterial activity of the seminal plasma of Paracentrotus lividus. Can J Zool 72:1211–1216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stabili L, Licciano M, Pagliara P (1994) Evidence of antibacterial and lysozyme-like activity in different planktonic larval stages of Paracentrotus lividus. Mar Biol 119:501–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stabili L, Pagliara P, Roch P (1996a) Antibacterial activity in the coelomocytes of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus. Comp Biochem Physiol 113(B 3):639–644Google Scholar
  63. Stabili L, Lassagues M, Pastore M (1996b) Preliminary study on antibacterial capabilities of eggs of Paracentrotus lividus (Echinodermata: Echinoidea). J Invertebr Pathol 67:180–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stabili L, Acquaviva MI, Cavallo RA (2005) Mytilus galloprovincialis filter feeling on the bacterial community in a Mediterranean coastal area (Northern Ionian Sea—Italy). Water Res 39(2–3):469–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stabili L, Licciano M, Giangande A, Fanelli G, Cavallo RA (2006a) Sabella spallanzanii filter-feeding on bacterial community: ecological implications and applications. Mar Environ Res 61:74–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stabili L, Licciano M, Giangrande A, Longo C, Mercurio M, Nonnis MC, Corriero G (2006b) Filtering activity of Spongia officinalis var. adriatica (Schmidt) (Porifera, Demospongiae) on bacterioplankton: implications for bioremediation of polluted seawater. Water Res 40:3083–3090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stabili L, Licciano M, Longo C, Corriero G, Mercurio M (2008) Evaluation of microbiological accumulation capability of the commercial sponge Spongia officinalis var. adriatica (Schmidt) (Porifera, Demospongiae). Water Res 42:2499–2506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stabili L, Schirosi R, Licciano M, Giangrande A (2010) Bioremediation of bacteria in aquaculture waste using the polychaete Sabella spallanzanii. N Biotechnol 27(6):774–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Terlizzi A, Fraschetti S, Guidetti P, Boero F (2002) The effects of sewage discharge on shallow hard bottom sessile assemblage. Mar Poll Bull 44:542–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. USEPA (2002) Methods for measuring the acute toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater and marine organisms. 5th Edition. EPA 821-R-02-012Google Scholar
  71. USEPA (2004) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Compliance Inspection Manual. EPA 305-X-03Google Scholar
  72. Vezzulli L, Pruzzo C, Fabiano M (2004) Response of the bacterial community to in situ bioremediation of organic-rich sediments. Mar Poll Bull 49:740–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Widdows J (2001) Bivalve clearance rates: inaccurate measurements or inaccurate reviews and misrepresentation? Mar Ecol Prog Ser 221:303–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Widdows J, Donkin P, Brinsley MD, Evans SV, Salkeld PN, Franklin A, Law RJ, Waldock M (1995) Scope for growth and contaminant levels in North Sea mussels Mytilus edulis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 127:131–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Widdows J, Brinsley MD, Salkeld PN, Elliott M (1998) Use of annular flumes to determine the influence of current velocity and bivalves on material flux at the sediment–water interface. Estuaries 21:552–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Yablokov AV, Ostroumov SA (1991) Conservation of living nature and resources: problems, trends, prospect. Springer, New York, p 271CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Loredana Stabili
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Antonio Terlizzi
    • 2
  • Rosa Anna Cavallo
    • 1
  1. 1.Istituto per l’Ambiente Marino Costiero Sezione di Taranto “A. Cerruti”—CNRTarantoItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Biologiche ed AmbientaliUniversità del Salento, CoNISMaLecceItaly

Personalised recommendations