Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 763–771 | Cite as

Performance of Eleocharis macrostachya and its importance for arsenic retention in constructed wetlands

  • Mario Alberto Olmos-Márquez
  • Maria Teresa Alarcón-Herrera
  • Ignacio Ramiro Martín-Domínguez
Research Article



Arsenic (As) can be removed from water via rhizofiltration using phytostabilizing plants. The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of Eleocharis macrostachya in constructed wetland prototypes, as well as the plant's arsenic mass retention and the distribution of As along the wetland flow gradient and the soil in the wetland mesocosmos.

Materials and methods

Experiments were carried out in laboratory-scale wetland prototypes, two planted with E. macrostachya and one without plants. Samples of water were taken at the inlet and outlet of the wetlands during the 33-week test period. At the end of the experiment, plants and soil (silty-sand) from each prototype were divided in three equal segments (entrance, middle and exit) and analyzed for their arsenic content. Results revealed that the planted wetlands have a higher As-mass retention capacity (87–90% of the total As inflow) than prototypes without plants (27%).


As mass balance in the planted wetlands revealed that 78% of the total inflowing As was retained in the soil bed. Nearly 2% was absorbed in the plant roots, 11% was flushed as outflow, and the fate of the remaining 9% is unknown. In the prototype without plants, the soil retained 16% of As mass, 72% of the arsenic was accounted for in the outflow, and 12% was considered unknown. Although E. macrostachya retained only 2% of the total arsenic mass in their roots, its presence was a determining factor for arsenic retention in the wetland soil medium.


Hence, planted wetlands might be a suitable option for treating As-contaminated water.


Arsenic Constructed wetlands Eleocharis macrostachya Mass balance 


  1. Bundschuh J, Litter M, Ciminelli VST, Morgada ME, Cornejo L, Garrido Hoyos S, Hoinkis J, Alarcón-Herrera MT, Armienta MA, Bhattacharya P (2010) Emerging mitigation needs and sustainable options for solving the arsenic problems of rural and isolated urban areas in Latin America: A critical analysis. Water Res 44:5828–5845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cheng S, Grosse W, Karrenbrock F, Thoennessen M (2002) Efficiency of constructed wetlands in decontamination of water polluted by heavy metals. Ecol Eng 18:317–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Deng H, Ye ZH, Wong MH (2004) Accumulation of lead, zinc, copper and cadmium by 12 wetland plant species thriving in metal-contaminated sites in China. Environ Pollut 132:29–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Doyle MO, Otte ML (1997) Organism-induced accumulation of iron, zinc and arsenic in wetland soil. Eviron Pollut 96:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fang Y, Shen GX, Li XL, Li hz, Hua h, Ni WZ (2011) A comparative study on the potential of oxygen release by roots of selected wetland plants. Phys Chem Earth 36:475–478Google Scholar
  6. Flores TE, Alarcón Herrera MT, González Elizondo S, Olguin EJ (2003) Arsenic tolerating plants from mine sites and hot sprongs in the semi-arid region of Chihuahua, Mexico. Acta Biotechnol 23(2–3):113–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Frohne T, Rinklebe J, Diaz-Bone R, Du Laing G (2011) Controlled variation of redox conditions in a floodplain soil: impact on metal mobilization and biomethylation of arsenic and antimony. Geoderma 160:414–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Galleti A, Verlicchi P, Ranieri E (2010) Removal and accumulation of Cu, Ni and Zn in horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands: contribution of vegetation and filling medium. Sci Total Environ 408:5097–5105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Greipsson S, Crowder AA (1992) Amelioration of copper and nickel toxicity by iron plaque on roots of rice (Oryza sativa). Can J Bot 70:824–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jacob DL, Otte ML (2004) Long-term effects of submergence and wetland vegetation on metals in a 90-year old abandoned Pb-Zn mine tailings pond. Eviron Pollut 130:337–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Johnson BB, Derosa CT (1970) Arsenic–phosphorus interaction in corn. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 1:85–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kadlec RH, Knight RL (1996) Treatment wetlands. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, p 893Google Scholar
  13. Kidd P, Barcelo J, Pilar Bernal M, Navari-Izzo F, Poschenrieder C, Shilev S, Clemente R, Monterroso C (2009) Trace element behaviour at the root–soil interface: implications in phytoremediation. Environ Exp Bot 67:243–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Koottatep T, Polprasert C, Koanh NT, Heinss U, Montangero A, Strauss M (2001) Septage dewatering in vertical-flow constructed wetlands located in the tropics. Water Sci Technol 44(2–3):181–188Google Scholar
  15. Kosopolov VD, Kuschk P, Vainsthein MB, Vatsourina AV, Wiebner M, Kastner M (2004) Microbial processes of heavy metal removal from carbon-deficit effluents in constructed wetlands. Eng Life Sci 4:403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li H, Ye ZH, Wei ZJ, Wong MH (2011) Root porosity and radial oxygen loss related to arsenic tolerance and uptake in wetland plants. Environ Pollut 159:30–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lu LL, Tian SK, Yang XE, Li TQ, He ZL (2009) Cadmium uptake and xylem loading are active processes in the hyperaccumulator Sedum alfredii. J Plant Physiol 166:579–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Núñez-Montoya OG, Alarcón-Herrera MT, Melgoza-Castillo A, Rodríguez-Almeida FA, Royo-Márquez MH (2007) Evaluation of three native species from Chihuahua desert for use in phytoremediation. Terra Latinoam 25:35Google Scholar
  19. Otte ML, Kearns CC, Doyle MO (1995) Accumulation of arsenic and zinc in the rhizosphere of wetland plants. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 55:154–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Overesch M, Rinklebe J, Broll G, Neue HU (2007) Metals and arsenic in soils and corresponding vegetation at Central Elbe river floodplains (Germany). Environ Pollut 145:800–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rahman MA, Hasegawa H, Ueda K, Maki T, Rahman MM (2008) Arsenic uptake by aquatic macrophyte Spirodela polyrhiza L.: interactions with phosphate and iron. J Hazard Mater 160(23):356–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rahman KZ, Wiessner A, Kuschk P, Afferden M (2011) Fate and distribution of arsenic in laboratory-scale subsurface horizontal-flow constructed wetlands treating an artificial wastewater. Ecol Eng, in pressGoogle Scholar
  23. Robinson B, Duwig C, Bolan N, Kannathasan M, Saravanan A (2003) Uptake of arsenic by New Zealand water cress (Lepidium sativum). Sci Total Environ 301:67–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shanker AK, Cervantes C, Loza-Tavera H, Avudainayagam S (2005) Chromium toxicity in plants. Environ Int 31:739–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Singhakant C, Koottatep T, Satayavivad J (2009) Enhanced arsenic removals through plant interactions in subsurface-flow constructed wetlands. J Environ Sci Health (Part A) 44:163–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sobolewsky A (1999) A review of processes responsible for metal removal in wetlands treating contaminated mine drainage. Int J Phytoremediat 1:19–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stottmeister U, Wießner A, Kuschk P, Kappelmeyer U, Kästner M, Bederski O, Müller RA, Moormann H (2003) Effects of plants and micro-organisms in constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Biotechnol Adv 22:93–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ujang Z, Soedjono E, Shutes RB (2005) Landfill leachate treatment by an experimental subsurface constructed wetland in tropical climate countries. Water Sci Technol 52:243Google Scholar
  29. Vymazal J (2005) Removal of heavy metals in a horizontal sub-surface flow constructed wetland. J Environ Sci Health Part A 40:1369–1379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Xu XY, McGrath SP, Zhao FJ (2007) Rapid reduction of arsenate in the medium mediated by plant roots. New Phytol 176:590–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ye ZH, Lin ZQ, Whiting SN, De Souza MP, Terry N (2003) Possible use of con- structed wetland to remove selenocyanate, arsenic, and boron from electric utility wastewater. Chemosphere 52:1571–1579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yong RN (1995) The fate of toxic pollutants in contaminated sediments. In: Demars KR, Richardson GN, Yong RN, Chaney RC (eds) Dredging, remediation, and containment of contaminated sediments. ASTM STP, vol. 1293. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, pp. 13–39Google Scholar
  33. Zhao FJ, Ma JF, Mehargand AA, McGrath SP (2009) Arsenic uptake and metabolism in plants. New Phytol 181:777–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mario Alberto Olmos-Márquez
    • 1
  • Maria Teresa Alarcón-Herrera
    • 1
  • Ignacio Ramiro Martín-Domínguez
    • 1
  1. 1.Renewable Energy and Environmental Protection DepartmentAdvanced Materials Research Center (CIMAV)ChihuahuaMexico

Personalised recommendations