Skip to main content

Predicting regional space–time variation of PM2.5 with land-use regression model and MODIS data

Abstract

Purpose

Existing land-use regression (LUR) models use land use/cover, population, and traffic information to predict long-term intra-urban variation of air pollution. These models are limited to explaining spatial variation of air pollutants, and few of them are capable of addressing temporal variability. This article proposes a space–time LUR model at a regional scale by incorporating aerosol optical depth (AOD) data from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS).

Methods

A multivariate regression model was established to predict the distribution of particle matters less than 2.5 μm in aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5) in Florida, USA. Monthly PM2.5 averages at 34 monitoring sites in the year 2005 were used as the dependent variable, while independent variables include land-use patterns, population, traffic, and topographic characteristics. In addition, a monthly AOD variable derived from the MODIS data was integrated into the regression as a space–time predictor. Cross-validation procedures were conducted to validate this AOD-enhanced LUR model.

Results

The final regression model yields a coefficient of determination (R 2) of 0.63, which is comparable to other studies that employ aerodynamic/meteorological models. The cross validation indicated a good agreement between the observed and predicted PM2.5 with a mean residual of 0.02 μg/m3. The distance to heavy-traffic roads is negatively associated with the concentrations of PM2.5, while agricultural land use is positively correlated. PM2.5 tends to concentrate in high-latitude areas of Florida and during summer/fall seasons. The monthly AOD has a significant contribution to explaining the variation of PM2.5 and remarkably enhances the model performance.

Conclusions

This research is the first attempt to improve current LUR models by integrating remote sensing technologies. The integrative model approach offers an effective means to estimate air pollution over time and space, and could be an alternative to the classic meteorological approach. The model results would provide adequate measurements for epidemiological studies, particularly for chronic health effects in large populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  • Abu-Allaban M, Gertler AW, Lowenthal DH (2002) A preliminary apportionment of the sources of ambient PM10, PM2.5, and VOCs in Cairo. Atmos Environ 36(35):5549–5557

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Adams HS, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Colvile RN, McMullen MA, Khandelwal P (2001) Fine particle (PM2.5) personal exposure levels in transport microenvironments, London, UK. Sci Total Environ 279(1–3):29–44

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs DJ, Collins S, Elliott P, Fischer P, Kingham S, Lebret E, Pryl K, Reeuwijk HV, Smallbone K, Van Der Veen A (1997) Mapping urban air pollution using GIS: a regression-based approach. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 11(7):699–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher SA, Gupta P (2010) Satellite remote sensing of particulate matter air quality: The cloud-cover problem. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 60(5):596–602

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clougherty JE, Wright RJ, Baxter LK, Levy JI (2008) Land use regression modeling of intra-urban residential variability in multiple traffic-related air pollutants. Environ Health 7:17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J, Cook R, Bailey C, Carr E (2005) Relationship between motor vehicle emissions of hazardous pollutants, roadway proximity, and ambient concentrations in Portland, Oregon. Environ Model Softw 20(1):7–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darrow L, Klein M, Strickland M, Mulholland J, Tolbert P (2010) Ambient air pollution and birth weight in full-term infants in Atlanta, 1994–2004. Environ Health Perspect 119:731–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dockery DW, Pope CA 3rd, Xu X, Spengler JD, Ware JH, Fay ME, Ferris BG Jr, Speizer FE (1993) An association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities. N Engl J Med 329(24):1753–1759

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Engel-Cox JA, Holloman CH, Coutant BW, Hoff RM (2004) Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of MODIS satellite sensor data for regional and urban scale air quality. Atmos Environ 38(16):2495–2509

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EPA (2005) Air Quality System. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/. Accessed Oct 2010

  • Florida Department Of Transportation (2005). Traffic information. http://www.dot.state.fl.us/planning/statistics/trafficdata/. Accessed Oct 2010

  • Florida Geographic Data Library (2010) GeoPlan Center, University of Florida. http://www.fgdl.org/. Accessed Oct 2010

  • Gertler AW, Gillies JA, Pierson WR (2000) An assessment of the mobile source contribution to PM10 and PM2.5 in the United States. Water Air Soil Poll 123(1–4):203–214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilliland F, Avol E, Kinney P, Jerrett M, Dvonch T, Lurmann F, Buckley T, Breysse P, Keeler G, de Villiers T, McConnell R (2005) Air pollution exposure assessment for epidemiologic studies of pregnant women and children: lessons learned from the Centers for Children’s Environmental Health and Disease Prevention Research. Environ Health Perspect 113(10):1447–1454

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Perales JE, Colvile RN, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Fernandez-Bremauntz A, Gutierrez-Avedoy VJ, Paramo-Figueroa VH, Blanco-Jimenez S, Bueno-Lopez E, Mandujano F, Bernabe-Cabanillas R, Ortiz-Segovia E (2004) Commuters’ exposure to PM2.5, CO, and benzene in public transport in the metropolitan area of Mexico City. Atmos Environ 38(8):1219–1229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta P, Christopher S (2008) Seven year particulate matter air quality assessment from surface and satellite measurements. Atmos Chem Phys 8:3311–3324

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoff RM, Christopher SA (2009) Remote sensing of particulate pollution from space: have we reached the promised land. J Air & Waste Manage Assoc 59:645–675

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jerrett M, Arain M, Kanaroglou P, Beckerman B, Crouse D, Gilbert N, Brook J, Finkelstein N, Finkelstein M (2007) Modeling the intraurban variability of ambient traffic pollution in Toronto, Canada. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A 70(3):200–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar N (2010) What can affect AOD–PM2.5 association? Environ Health Perspect 118(3):A109–A110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurvits T, Marta T (1998) Agricultural NH3 and NOx emissions in Canada. Environ Pollut 102:187–194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li CC, Lau AKH, Mao JT, Chu DA (2005) Retrieval, validation, and application of the 1-km aerosol optical depth from MODIS measurements over Hong Kong. Ieee T Geosci Remote 43(11):2650–2658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Sarnat JA, Kilaru A, Jacob DJ, Koutrakis P (2005) Estimating ground-level PM2.5 in the eastern united states using satellite remote sensing. Environ Sci Technol 39(9):3269–3278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Franklin M, Kahn R, Koutrakis P (2007) Using aerosol optical thickness to predict ground-level PM2. 5 concentrations in the St. Louis area: a comparison between MISR and MODIS. Remote Sens Environ 107(1–2):33–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarty JL, Justice CO, Korontzi S (2007) Agricultural burning in the Southeastern United States detected by MODIS. Remote Sens Environ 108(2):151–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller KA, Siscovick DS, Sheppard L, Shepherd K, Sullivan JH, Anderson GL, Kaufman JD (2007) Long-term exposure to air pollution and incidence of cardiovascular events in women. N Engl J Med 356(5):447–458

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore D, Jerrett M, Mack W, Künzli N (2007) A land use regression model for predicting ambient fine particulate matter across Los Angeles, CA. J Environ Monit 9(3):246–252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • NASA (2005) LAADS web. http://ladsweb.nascom.nasa.gov/. Accessed Oct 2010

  • Park SK, Auchincloss AH, O’Neill MS, Prineas R, Correa JC, Keeler J, Barr RG, Kaufman JD, Diez Roux AV (2010) Particulate air pollution, metabolic syndrome, and heart rate variability: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA). Environ Health Perspect 118(10):1406–1411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prospero JM, Olmez I, Ames M (2001) Al and Fe in PM 2.5 and PM 10 suspended particles in south-central Florida: the impact of the long range transport of African mineral dust. Water Air Soil Poll 125(1–4):291–317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan PH, LeMasters GK (2007) A review of land-use regression models for characterizing intraurban air pollution exposure. Inhal Toxicol 19(Suppl 1):127–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz J, Litonjua A, Suh H, Verrier M, Zanobetti A, Syring M, Nearing B, Verrier R, Stone P, MacCallum G, Speizer FE, Gold DR (2005) Traffic related pollution and heart rate variability in a panel of elderly subjects. Thorax 60(6):455–461

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • US Census Bureau (2000) Census block summary file. http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/DownloadDatasetServlet?_lang=en. Accessed October, 2010

  • van Donkelaar A, Martin RV, Brauer M, Kahn R, Levy R, Verduzco C, Villeneuve PJ (2010) Global estimates of ambient fine particulate matter concentrations from satellite-based aerosol optical depth: development and application. Environ Health Persp 118(6):847–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villeneuve PJ, Goldberg MS, Krewski D, Burnett RT, Chen Y (2002) Fine particulate air pollution and all-cause mortality within the Harvard Six-Cities Study: variations in risk by period of exposure. Ann Epidemiol 12(8):568–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Christopher SA (2003) Intercomparison between satellite-derived aerosol optical thickness and PM2.5 mass: implications for air quality studies. Geophys Res Lett 30(21):2095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanobetti A, Franklin M, Koutrakis P, Schwartz J (2009) Fine particulate air pollution and its components in association with cause-specific emergency admissions. Environ Health 8:58–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Hecobian A, Zheng M, Frank N, Weber R (2010) Biomass burning impact on PM2.5 over the southeastern US during 2007: integrating chemically speciated FRM filter measurements, MODIS fire counts and PMF analysis. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 10(14):6839–6853

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng M, Cass GR, Schauer JJ, Edgerton ES (2002) Source apportionment of PM2. 5 in the southeastern United States using solvent-extractable organic compounds as tracers. Environ Sci Technol 36(11):2361–2371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zou B, Wilson JG, Zhan FB, Zeng Y (2009) Air pollution exposure assessment methods utilized in epidemiological studies. J Environ Monit 11(3):475–490

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaohui Xu.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Euripides Stephanou

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 14 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mao, L., Qiu, Y., Kusano, C. et al. Predicting regional space–time variation of PM2.5 with land-use regression model and MODIS data. Environ Sci Pollut Res 19, 128–138 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-011-0546-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-011-0546-9

Keywords

  • Air pollution
  • Fine particulate matter
  • PM2.5
  • Land-use regression model
  • MODIS image