Abstract
Background, aim, and scope
Alqueva Reservoir is the biggest artificial freshwater reservoir in Europe and is an important water supply for human and agricultural consumption in the Alentejo region (Portugal). Pollution can impair environmental and human health status, and to assure water quality and ecological balance, it is crucial to frequently monitor water supplies. In this study, we used an ecotoxicological test battery to identify the potential toxicity of water from this reservoir.
Materials and methods
Water samples from the Alqueva aquatic system were collected bimonthly in 2006 from 11 different water points within the reservoir. Several bioassays were carried out: a 72-h growth test with Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, a 6-day growth test with Chironomus riparius larvae, and the luminescence inhibition test with Vibrio fischeri (Microtox®).
Results and discussion
Algae growth was significantly inhibited in several sampling points and periods throughout the year, mainly due to the presence of pesticides. Although in some sampling points pesticide concentrations (single and sum) were still below the maximum permissible concentrations, water samples showed high toxicities to algae, especially during the summer months. In addition, several sampling points showed pesticide concentrations above the permissible level which can pose a significant risk to humans and the environment. Chironomids showed less sensitivity to the water samples, possibly due to the low concentrations of insecticides present. V. fischeri showed no sensitivity when exposed to all the water samples collected throughout the year of 2006.
Conclusions
Standardized laboratory bioassays can be useful tools to assess water quality from aquatic systems and can valuably complement chemical analysis evaluation. The results obtained in this study demonstrated that the most sensitive species used in this test battery was the microalgae P. subcapitata. The growth of C. riparius was less affected, which is probably due to the fact that low insecticide concentrations were measured and, furthermore, since this species lives in the sediment and not in the water column and is, therefore, usually more resistant to pollutants.
Recommendations and perspectives
On its own, chemical analysis is not enough to derive conclusions on the water quality and/or status, which can be valuably complemented by laboratory bioassays. Single chemical, maximum permissible values, and the sum of pesticide concentrations do not take into account possible patterns of synergism, antagonism, dose level dependencies, or even the dominance of several chemicals within a mixture. In addition, several species from different levels in trophic chains are recommended due to differences in species’ sensitivities to chemical compounds that are present.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson TD, Lydy MJ (2002) Increased toxicity to invertebrates associated with a mixture of atrazine and organophosphate insecticides. Environ Toxicol Chem 21:1507–1514
ASTM (1980) Standard practice for conducting acute toxicity tests with fishes, macroinvertebrates and amphibians, Rep. E-729-80. American Standards for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA
Belden JB, Lydy MJ (2000) Impact of atrazine on organophosphate insecticides toxicity. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:2266–2274
Bierkens J, Klein G, Corbisier P, Van Den Heuvel R, Verschaeve L, Weltens R, Schoeters G (1998) Comparative sensitivity of 20 bioassays for soil quality. Chemosphere 37:2935–2947
Carvalho F, Guilhermino L, Ribeiro R, Gonçalves F, Soares AMVM (1995) METIER (modular ecotoxicity tests incorporating ecological relevance). II. Ecotoxicity of poorly water-soluble compounds: concentration versus dose. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 29:431–434
Clesceri LS, Greenberg AE, Eaton AD (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. Water Environment Federation, Alexandria, VA
Fairchild JF, Ruessler DS, Haverland PS, Carlson AR (1997) Comparative sensitivity of Selenastrum capricornutum and Lemna minor to sixteen herbicides. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 32:353–357
Faria MS, Lopes RJ, Malcato J, Nogueira AJA, Soares AMVM (2008) In situ bioassays with Chironomus riparius larvae to biomonitor metal pollution in rivers and to evaluate the efficiency of restoration measures in mine areas. Environ Pollut 151:213–221
Hernando MD, De Vettori S, Martínez Bueno MJ, Fernández-Alba AR (2007) Toxicity evaluation with Vibrio fischeri test of organic chemicals used in aquaculture. Chemosphere 68:724–730
Isooma B, Lilius H (1995) The urgent need for in vitro tests in ecotoxicology. Toxicol In Vitro 9:821–825
Leps J, Smilauer P (2003) Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Lydy MJ, Linck SL (2003) Assessing the impact of triazine herbicides on organophosphate insecticide toxicity to the earthworm Eisenia fetida. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 45:343–349
Lydy MJ, Austin KR (2004) Toxicity assessment of pesticide mixtures typical of the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta using Chironomus tentans. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 48:49–55
MicrobicsCorporation (1992) Microtox, manual: a toxicity testing handbook. MicrobicsCorporation, Carlsbad, CA
Munkegaard M, Abbaspoor M, Cedergreen N (2008) Organophosphorous insecticides as herbicide synergists on the green algae Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata and the aquatic plant Lemna minor. Ecotoxicology 17:29–35
OECD (2004) OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals, guideline 219: sediment–water chironomid toxicity test using spiked water, adopted April 2004
OECD (2006) OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals. guideline 201: freshwater alga and cyanobacteria, growth inhibition test, adopted March 2006
Palma P, Palma V, Fernandes R, Soares A, Barbosa I (2008) Acute toxicity of atrazine, endosulfan sulphate and chlorpyrifos to Vibrio fischeri, Thamnocephalus platyurus and Daphnia magna, relative to their concentrations in surface waters from the Alentejo region of Portugal. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 81:485–489
Palma P, Kuster M, Alvarenga P, Palma VL, Fernandes RM, Soares AMVM, López de Alda MJ, Barceló D, Barbosa IR (2009) Risk assessment of representative and priority pesticides, in surface water of the Alqueva reservoir (South of Portugal) using on-line solid phase extraction-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Environ Int 35:545–551
Pape-Lindstrom PA, Lydy MJ (1997) Synergistic toxicity of atrazine and organophosphate insecticides contravenes the response addiction mixture model. Environ Toxicol Chem 16:2415–2420
Repetto G, Jos A, Hazen MJ, Molero ML, del Peso A, Salguero M, Pd C, Rodríguez-Vicente MC, Repetto M (2001) A test battery for the ecotoxicological evaluation of pentachlorophenol. Toxicol In Vitro 15:503–509
SPSS (1995) SigmaStat for Windows (version 2.03). SPSS, Chicago, IL
terBraak CJF, Smilauer P (2002) CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user’s guide: software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY 500 pp
Wacksman M, Maul J, Lydy M (2006) Impact of atrazine on chlorpyrifos toxicity in four aquatic vertebrates. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 51:681–689
Ward S, Arthington AH, Pusey BJ (1995) The effects of a chronic application of chlorpyrifos on the macroinvertebrate fauna in an outdoor artificial stream system: species responses. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 30:2–23
Zar JH (1996) Biostatistical analysis, 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology through the project “Recursos hídricos da Albufeira do Alqueva no âmbito da política europeia de desenvolvimento sustentável: uma abordagem interdisciplinar na avaliação da qualidade da água”—POCI 2010, Project GG/GGP/ME621-0167/05.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pérez, J.R., Loureiro, S., Menezes, S. et al. Assessment of water quality in the Alqueva Reservoir (Portugal) using bioassays. Environ Sci Pollut Res 17, 688–702 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-009-0174-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-009-0174-9