Phytoremediation to remove nutrients and improve eutrophic stormwaters using water lettuce (Pistia stratiotes L.)

Abstract

Background, aim, and scope

Water quality impairment by nutrient enrichment from agricultural activities has been a concern worldwide. Phytoremediation technology using aquatic plants in constructed wetlands and stormwater detention ponds is increasingly applied to remediate eutrophic waters. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effectiveness and potential of water lettuce (Pistia stratiotes L.) in removing nutrients including nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) from stormwater in the constructed water detention systems before it is discharged into the St. Lucie Estuary, an important surface water system in Florida, using phytoremediation technologies.

Materials and methods

In this study, water lettuce (P. stratiotes) was planted in the treatment plots of two stormwater detention ponds (East and West Ponds) in 2005–2007 and water samples from both treatment and control plots were weekly collected and analyzed for water quality properties including pH, electrical conductivity, turbidity, suspended solids, and nutrients (N and P). Optimum plant density was maintained and plant samples were collected monthly and analyzed for nutrient contents.

Results

Water quality in both ponds was improved, as evidenced by decreases in water turbidity, suspended solids, and nutrient concentrations. Water turbidity was decreased by more than 60%. Inorganic N (NH4 + and NO3 ) concentrations in treatment plots were more than 50% lower than those in control plots (without plant). Reductions in both PO4 3− and total P were approximately 14–31%, as compared to the control plots. Water lettuce contained average N and P concentrations of 17 and 3.0 g kg−1, respectively, and removed 190–329 kg N ha−1 and 25–34 kg P ha−1 annually.

Discussion

Many aquatic plants have been used to remove nutrients from eutrophic waters but water lettuce proved superior to most other plants in nutrient removal efficiency, owing to its rapid growth and high biomass yield potential. However, the growth and nutrient removal potential are affected by many factors such as temperature, water salinity, and physiological limitations of the plant. Low temperature, high concentration of salts, and low concentration of nutrients may reduce the performance of this plant in removing nutrients.

Conclusions

The results from this study indicate that water lettuce has a great potential in removing N and P from eutrophic stormwaters and improving other water quality properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

References

  1. Aoi T, Hayashi T (1996) Nutrient removal by water lettuce (Pistia stratiotes). Water Sci Tech 34(7/8):407–412

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Boyd CE (1970) Vascular aquatic plants for mineral nutrient removal from polluted waters. Econ Bot 23:95–103

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brix H (1997) Do macrophytes play a role in constructed treatment wetlands. Water Sci Tech 35(5):11–17

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Capece JC, Campbell KL, Bohlen PJ, Graetz DA, Portier KM (2007) Soil phosphorus, cattle stocking rates, and water quality in subtropical pastures in Florida, USA. Range Ecol Manage 60(1):19–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carpenter SR, Caraco NF, Correll DL, Howarth RW, Sharpley AN, Smith VH (1998) Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen. Ecol Appl 8:559–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. El-Gendy AS, Biswas N, Bewtra JK (2005) A floating aquatic system employing water hyacinth for municipal landfill leachate treatment: effect of leachate characteristics on the plant growth. J Environ Eng Sci 4(4):227–240

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Graves GA, Strom DA (eds) (1992) Bessey Creek and the greater St. Lucie Estuary. Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Southeast District, West Palm Beach, FL

  8. Gumbricht T (1993) Nutrient removal processes in freshwater submersed macrophyte systems. Ecol Eng 2:1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Haller WT, Sutton DL, Barlowe WC (1974) Effects of salinity on growth of several aquatic macrophytes. Ecology 55(4):891–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. He ZL, Stoffella PJ, Yang XE, Yu S, Chen G, Banks DJ, Yang YG, Yang JY, Calvert DV (2005) Assessment and evaluation of nitrogen, phosphorus, and heavy metals in surface runoff from citrus groves and vegetable fields in the Indian River area. Project Final Report, Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Tallahassee, FL

  11. He ZL, Zhang MK, Stoffella PJ, Yang XE, Banks DJ (2006) Phosphorus concentrations and loads in runoff water under crop production. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:1807–1816

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Karpiscak MM, Foster KE, Hopf SB, Bancroft JM, Warshall PJ (1994) Using water hyacinth to treat municipal wastewater in the desert southwest. Water Resour Bull 30:219–227

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kowalik P, Toczylowska I, Scalenghe R, Boero V, Ambrosoli R, Zanini E, Vola G, Edwards AC (1998) Phytoremediation by constructed wetlands: assessment of biopedological techniques for resource-efficient farming with livestock. Acta Horticulturae 457:187–194

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lindsey K, Hirt HM (1999) Use water hyacinth! (A practical handbook of uses for the water hyacinth from across the world). Anamed, Winnenden

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mahujchariyawong J, Ikeda S (2001) Modelling of environmental phytoremediation in eutrophic river—the case of water hyacinth harvest in Tha-Chin River, Thailand. Ecol Model 142(1/2):121–134

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Reddy KR (1983) Fate of nitrogen and phosphorus in a waste-water retention reservoir containing aquatic macrophytes. J Environ Qual 12(1):137–141

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Reddy KR, Sutton DL (1984) Waterhyacinths for water quality improvement and biomass production. J Environ Qual 13(1):1–9

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Reddy KR, Tucker JC (1983) Productivity and nutrient uptake of water hyacinth, Eichhornia crassipes I. effect of nitrogen source. Econ Bot 37(2):237–247

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Reddy KR, Tucker JC, Debusk WF (1987) The role of Egeria in removing nitrogen and phosphorus from nutrient enriched waters. J Aquat Plant Manage 25:14–19

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ritter A, Munoz Carpena R, Bosch DD, Schaffer B, Potter TL (2007) Agricultural land use and hydrology affect variability of shallow groundwater nitrate concentration in south Florida. Hydrol Process 21(18):2464–2473

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rogers HH, Davis DE (1972) Nutrient removal by waterhyacinth. Weed Sci 20(5):423–428

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sheffield CW (1967) Water hyacinth for nutrient removal. Hyacinth Control J 6:27–30

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shimada N, Yajima S, Watanabe Y (1988) Improvement of water quality using Salvinia molesta (1). Absorption of nitrogen and phosphorus by Salvinia molesta. Technical Bulletin, Faculty of Horticulture, Chiba University, pp 15–21

  24. Smith DR, Owens PR, Leytem AB, Warnemuende EA (2007) Nutrient losses from manure and fertilizer applications as impacted by time to first runoff event. Environ Pollut 147:131–137

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. SFWMD (South Florida Water Management District), SJRWMD (St. Johns River Water Management District) (1994) Indian River Lagoon surface water improvement and management (SWIM) plan

  26. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (1976) Quality criteria for water. USEPA Rep 440:19–76–023

    Google Scholar 

  27. Woodward-Clyde Consultants (1994) Loading assessment of the Indian River Lagoon. Final report to Indian River Lagoon National Estuary Program. Melbourne, FL

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Mr. Diangao Zhang for his assistance in water sampling and processing, and thank Drs. G.C. Chen, J.Y. Yang, Y.G. Yang, and W.R. Chen, Mr. D. Banks and Mr. B. Pereira, and Miss J.H. Fan for their help in lab analysis. This project was in part supported by a grant (contract# 4600000498) from South Florida Water Management District.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhenli L. He.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Lee Young

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lu, Q., He, Z.L., Graetz, D.A. et al. Phytoremediation to remove nutrients and improve eutrophic stormwaters using water lettuce (Pistia stratiotes L.). Environ Sci Pollut Res 17, 84–96 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-008-0094-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Phytoremediation
  • Water Hyacinth
  • Treatment Plot
  • Indian River Lagoon
  • Detention Pond