Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of park management based on "Installation-Management Permission" in TEN-SHIBA, Tennoji Park, Osaka City: focus on park users and financial effects

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Landscape and Ecological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The park management (PM) that evolved from the park-renewal project based on Installation-Management Permission (IMP) in Tennoji Park, a major urban park in Osaka City, Japan is evaluated herein. The PM of Tennoji Park is composed of 'hard' and 'soft' tasks. The process and characteristics of the hard tasks, i.e., the park-renewal project including the construction of a significant landmark, the lawn plaza (named 'TEN-SHIBA') and convenience facilities with various service functions are analyzed. The details and outcomes of the soft tasks including cleaning, security, and lawn/planting management plus events held on the TEN-SHIBA plaza are also clarified. The PM results and financial effects of the introduction of IMP in TEN-SHIBA are evaluated based on both the park users' characteristics obtained by a questionnaire, an observation survey of the park users, and a data analysis of the track record. Based on a comparison with Sumiyoshi Park, an urban park similar to TEN-SHIBA but without the introduction of IMP, it was found that young females were the predominant users of TEN-SHIBA, and the average staying time on the lawn plaza was 2 min. longer than that in Sumiyoshi park. Together these results suggest the effectiveness of IMP for PM based on the TEN-SHIBA experience. It also appears that placing a plaza in the center of a park and providing facilities and various events by private business operators can generate profits; this might be effective for future PM hard tasks, while various and continuous soft task efforts remain essential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akazawa H, Fujimoto M, Takeda S, Nakase I (2011) Study of park management by community-based council in Nishimuko Park, Hyogo. J Jpn Inst Landsc Arch 74(5):799–804 ((in Japanese))

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funabiki T (2016) The study of development and structure of the private sector participation system in City Park. Papers on environmental information science 30 (the 30th conference on environmental information science), pp 213–218 (in Japanese)

  • Hill MR (1984) Stalking the urban pedestrian: a comparison of questionnaire and tracking methodologies for behavioral mapping in large-scale environments. Environ Behav 16(5):539–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916584165001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirata F, Tachibana T (2019) About the whole process structure of urban park renovation projects by analyzing of the projects which are introduced as good practices in urban area of large cities. J Jpn Inst Landsc Arch 82(5):493–498 ((in Japanese))

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao H (2020) Park management evolved from project agreement based on installation-management permission: case of Tenshiba, Entrance Area of Tennoji Park. AIJ J Technol Des 26(62):353–358 ((in Japanese))

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inbe R, Sakai A, Koshizawa A (2010) Study on PFI initiative applied on developments of urban parks. J City Plan Inst Japan 45(3):799–804 ((in Japanese))

    Google Scholar 

  • Izumiyama R, Akiyama H, Kobayashi M (2015) Study on the application and management of “privately owned public spaces” in the urban central area—through research and analysis to community management organization registration system. The "Tokyo Municipal Ordinance on promoting the creation SYARETA-MACHINAMI of Tokyo. J Arch Plan (Trans AIJ) 80(710):915–922 ((in Japanese))

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaneko T (1990) Fundamental study on transition of management institution for public parks. J Jpn Inst Landsc Arch 54(5):317–322 ((in Japanese))

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneko T (1999) Study on characteristic of urban parks management by cost analysis. J Jpn Inst Landsc Arch 63(5):671–674 ((in Japanese))

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawakami J, Terada T (2019) A discussion on the spatial features and management systems in allotment gardens in urban park. J Jpn Inst Landsc Arch 82(5):543–546 ((in Japanese))

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maeda H (2008) The consideration on appropriateness of adopting results of user satisfaction surveys for evaluation of the city park management. J City Plan Inst Japan 43(3):283–288 ((in Japanese))

    Google Scholar 

  • Maeda H, Shinji I (2008) A study on the significance of introducing designated manager system in urban park administration history. J Agric Sci Tokyo Univ Agric 53(3):274–282 ((in Japanese))

    Google Scholar 

  • Masuda N (2014) Disaster refuge and relief urban park system in Japan. Landsc Archit Front 2(4):52–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Miwa N, Kinoshita I, Nakanishi M (2017) A Study on park management by the utilization for nursery facilities. J City Plan Inst Japan 52(3):747–753 ((in Japanese))

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyaji S, Ichimura K, Kanaoka S (2017) The current state of child care support services utilizing the urban parks. J Jpn Inst Landsc Arch 80(5):627–630 ((in Japanese))

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohtaki H, Miyake S (2007) The realities and ideal way of collaboration the city park management by designated manager’s system. J City Plan Inst Japan 42(3):181–186 ((in Japanese))

    Google Scholar 

  • Osaka City (2015) About TEN-SHIBA of Tennoji Park. https://www.city.osaka.lg.jp/keizaisenryaku/page/0000324921.html(in Japanese)

  • Shimomura Y (2013) Amendment of Urban Park Act, Article 5 and park facilities set up by non-governmental sectors. J Jpn Inst Landsc Arch 76(5):697–702 ((in Japanese))

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiomi I, Nakagawa H, Komatsu A, Kanaoka S, Ichimura K (2019) The possibility of development of “businesses utilizing urban parks” from the viewpoint of private enterprise. J Jpn Inst Landsc Arch 82(5):527–532 ((in Japanese))

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song J, Yamazaki T, Izumiyama R (2018) A study on involvement characteristics of private-sector for park management using installation-management permission system. J City Plan Inst Japan 53(3):1289–1296 ((in Japanese))

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeda K, Takeda S, Kaga H, Masuda N (2015) Study on evaluation items of annual evaluation on designated administrators of prefectural public parks. J City Plan Inst Japan 50(3):1106–1113 ((in Japanese))

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeyama H, Nakase I (2007) Research on the realities of business practice in city park. J City Plan Inst Japan 42(1):118–123 ((in Japanese))

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsukada S, Yuzawa A (2008) Analysis of the evaluation structure in designated manager system of urban park. J Arch Plan (Trans AIJ) 73(631):1923–1928 ((in Japanese))

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki T, Song J, Izumiyama R, Yokohari M (2019) The relationship between locational factors and characteristics of profit-making park facilities managed by the private sector. J City Plan Inst Japan 54(2):136–143 ((in Japanese))

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This article is supported in part by a grant (no.: 19K15174) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS). I am also grateful for the support from Osaka City and the Kintetsu Group.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongwei Hsiao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author has no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hsiao, H. Evaluation of park management based on "Installation-Management Permission" in TEN-SHIBA, Tennoji Park, Osaka City: focus on park users and financial effects. Landscape Ecol Eng 17, 119–133 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-020-00441-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-020-00441-8

Keywords

Navigation