Skip to main content
Log in

Two methods for detecting landscape associations based on a landscape map

  • Report
  • Published:
Landscape and Ecological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Landscape association refers to relations among landscape elements. Two methods, landscape juxtaposition and landscape region, for detecting landscape associations are described. Sampling transects across a landscape map were used to collect data. A series of equidistant points is located along each transect, and the landscape element in which each point falls is identified and recorded. These data are easy to collect and analyze by the two techniques. The first method considers the frequency of juxtaposition of landscape elements and tests whether this frequency is significantly greater than or less than a random expectation. The second method divides each transect into regions and tests whether the number of occurrences of each landscape element within the regions of occurrence of each other element is significantly greater than or less than that outside those regions. These two methods were applied to the analysis of landscape associations for Shaanxi vegetation landscape, and they provided rational and meaningful results. These methods made detecting landscape associations considerably easier.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achard P, De Schutter E (2006) Complex parameter landscape for a complex neuron model. PLoS Comp Biol 2(7):794–804

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blayo F, Demartines P (1991) Data analysis: how to compare Kohonen neural networks to other techniques? In: Prieto A (ed) Artificial neural networks. Springer, Germany, pp 469–475

  • De Aparajita (2007) Patterns of plant species diversity in the forest corridor of Rajaji-Corbett National Parks, Uttaranchal, India. Curr Sci (Bangalore) 92(1):90–93

  • Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2007) Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis. Global Ecol Biogeol 16(3):265–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT (1995) Land mosaics, the ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT, Godron M (1986) Landscape ecology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner RH, Urban DL (2007) Neutral models for testing landscape hypotheses. Landscape Ecol 22(1):15–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodin DG, Koch DE, Owen RD, Chu YK, Hutchinson JMS, Jonsson CB (2006) Land cover associated with hantavirus presence in Paraguay. Global Ecol Biogeol 15:519–527

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman LA (1964) Simultaneous confidence limits for cross-product ratios in contingency tables. J R Stat Soc Ser B 26:86–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Greig-Smith P (1983) Quantitative plant ecology, 3rd edn. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford

  • Haberman SJ (1973) C-TAB analysis of multidimensional contingency tables by log-linear models. National Educational Resources, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberman SJ (1974) The analysis of frequency data. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Lei M (2001) Vegetation of Shaanxi province. Science Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloret F, Vila M (2003) Diversity patterns of plant functional types in relation to fire regime and previous land use in Mediterranean woodlands. J Veg Sci 14(3):387–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry JN, Liebhold AM, Rosenberg MS, Dungan J, Miriti M, Jakomulska A, Citron-Pousty S (2002) Illustrations and guidelines for selecting statistical methods for quantifying spatial pattern in ecological data. Ecography 25(5):578–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pielou EC (1967) A test for random mingling of the phases of a mosaic. Biometrics 23:657–670

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pielou EC (1975) Ecological diversity. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford GN, Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2007) Evaluating sampling strategies and logistic regression methods for modelling complex land cover changes. J Appl Ecol 44(2):414–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stowe LG, Wade MJ (1979) The detection of small-scale patterns in vegetation. J Ecol 67(3):1047–1064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tischendorf L, Fahrig L (2000) On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity. Oikos 90:7–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang LM, Zhang J-T, Ni WD (2005) Emergy evaluation of eco-industrial park with power plant. Ecol Model 189(1–2):233–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • With KA (1997) Landscape connectivity and population distributions in heterogeneous environments. OIKOS 78:151–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J-T (2002) A study on relations of vegetation, climate and soils in Shanxi province, China. Plant Ecol 162(1):23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J-T (2003) An alterative method to analyze landscape mosaic diversity. J Shanxi Univ (Nat Sci Ed) 26(1):5–8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J-T (2004) Quantitative ecology. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J-T (2005) Succession analysis of plant communities in abandoned croplands in the Eastern Loess Plateau of China. J Arid Environ 63(2):458–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J-T, Chen T (2007) Effects of mixed Hippophae rhamnoides on community and soil in planted forests in the Eastern Loess Plateau. Chin Ecol Eng 31:115–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J-T, Zhang F (2007) Diversity and composition of plant functional groups in mountain forests of the Lishan Nature Reserve, North China. Bot Stud 48:339–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J-T, Ru WM, Li B (2006) Relationships between vegetation and climate on the Loess Plateau in China. Folia Geobot 41:151–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zonneveld IS, Forman RTT (1990) Changing landscapes: an ecological perspective. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation (Grant no. 30870399) and the Teachers’ Foundation of the Education Ministry of China.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jin-Tun Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, JT., Dai, Z. & Zhang, Q. Two methods for detecting landscape associations based on a landscape map. Landscape Ecol Eng 7, 145–151 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-010-0112-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-010-0112-5

Keywords

Navigation