Landscape and Ecological Engineering

, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp 143–157 | Cite as

Analyzing urban green space pattern and eco-network in Hanoi, Vietnam

Original Paper

Abstract

In Hanoi, the capital city of Vietnam, there has recently been a growing awareness about the roles and benefits of greening in urbanized areas. As a result, planners and decision-makers propose a combination of water bodies and green areas, using cultural as well as historic values, in a strategic concept for city planning in Hanoi. This study aims at quantifying the landscape patterns and ecological processes or clearly linking pattern to process to identify green space changes and their driving forces, based on gradient analysis combined with landscape metrics, GIS support, and FRAGSTATS 3.3, from 1996 to 2003. The results of gradient analysis taken four directions show that green spaces have been become more fragmented in this period, especially in the south and west directions. These changes could be caused by land use change, economic growth, population increase, urbanization, and weakness in planning and managing the urban development. From this context, graph theory was also applied to find any eco-networking, by mitigating the fragmentation and enhancing the green space connectivity, as a biodiversity conservation strategy for the city. Analyzing the green network based on graph theory indicates that among six different network scenarios which were produced from several models (Traveling Salesman, Paul Revere, Least Cost to User), network F with 37 links, and gamma (0.07), beta (0.62), cost ratio (0.606), circuitry (0.098) and connectivity (0.398) is the best option for ecological restoration in the Hanoi city. This will be a basis for the 2020 Green Space Planning in Hanoi.

Keywords

Urban green spaces Gradient analysis Graph theory Connectivity Landscape metrics 

References

  1. Bunn AG, Urban DL, Keitt TH (2000) Landscape connectivity: A conservation application of graph theory. J Environ Manage 59:265–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Circular No 20/2005/TT-BXD (2005) Instruction on managing plants in urban areas (in Vietnamese). Ministry of Construction, VietnamGoogle Scholar
  3. Decision 108/1998/QĐ-TTg (1998) Decision of Prime Minister about the approval on adjustments of Hanoi Master Plan up to 2020 (in Vietnamese). Hanoi, VietnamGoogle Scholar
  4. Forman RTT, Godron M (1986) Landscape ecology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Gross J, Yellen J (1999) Graph theory and its application. CRC, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  6. Hagget P, Cliff AD, Fry A (1977) Locational analysis in human geography, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, p 454Google Scholar
  7. Hanoi Government (2005) The 2020 Hanoi Master Plan. This is available at http://www.hanoi.gov.vn/hnportal/render.userLayoutRootNode.uP
  8. Kong F, Nakagoshi N (2006) Spatial and temporal gradient analysis of urban green spaces in Jinan, China. Landsc Urban Plan 78:147–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Linehan J, Meir G, John F (1995) Greenway planning: developing a landscape ecological network approach. Landsc Urban Plan 33:179–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Luck M, Wu J (2002) A gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern: a case study from the Phoenix metropolitan region, Arizona, USA. Landsc Ecol 17:327–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ma K, Zhou L, Niu S, Nakagoshi N (2005) Beijing urbanization in the past 18 years. J Int Dev Cooper Hiroshima Univ 11:87–96Google Scholar
  12. McGarigal K, Ene E, Holmes C (2002) FRAGSTATS (version 3): FRAGSTATS Metrics. University of Massachusetts-produced program. Available at the following website: http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/documents/Metrics/Metrics%20TOC.htm
  13. O’Brien D, Micheline M, Andrew F, Fortin M-J (2006) Testing the importance of spatial configuration of winter habitat for woodland caribou: an application of graph theory. Biol Conserv 130:70–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rudd H, Jamie V, Valentin S (2002) Importance of backyard habitat in a comprehensive biodiversity conservation strategy: a connectivity analysis of urban green spaces. Restor Ecol 10:368–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. TCXDVN 362: 2005 (2005) Vietnamese construction standard: Greenery planning for public utilities in urban areas-Design standards (in Vietnamese)Google Scholar
  16. Yu XJ, Ng CN (2007) Spatial and temporal dynamics of urban sprawl along two urban-rural transects: a case study of Guangzhou, China. Landsc Urban Plan 79:69–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Yen MD (2005) Inventory and evaluation of biodiversity in Hanoi—Enhancing awareness of community and proposing the solutions for conservation (in Vietnamese). Summary report, Hanoi Biological AssociationGoogle Scholar
  18. Zhang L, Wang H (2006) Planning an ecological network of Xiamen Island (China) using landscape metrics and network analysis. Landsc Urban Plan 78:449–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zhu M, Xu J, Jiang N, Li J, Fan Y (2006) Impacts of road corridors on urban landscape pattern: a gradient analysis with changing grain size in Shanghai, China. Landsc Ecol 21:723–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Consortium of Landscape and Ecological Engineering and Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School for International Development and CooperationHiroshima UniversityHigashi-HiroshimaJapan

Personalised recommendations