Skip to main content
Log in

Stability and Resolution of a Conventional Displacement Measuring Heterodyne Interferometer Using a Single Phase-Locked Loop

  • Research paper
  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Heterodyne interferometry offers an exciting solution for achieving sub-nanometer or ten-picometer-order mechanical displacement measurements because of its high resolution and noise immunity.

Objective

In this paper, we investigate the stability and resolution of a conventional displacement-measuring heterodyne interferometer using a single phase-locked loop (PLL) at a sub-nanometer or 10-pm level over an µm-scale measurement regime in normal air.

Methods

In the experiment, we perform the beat frequency reduction of the heterodyne signals to take advantage of a low-cost frequency sampling data acquisition (DAQ). The primary calculations of the single phase-locked loop (PLL) algorithm are implemented in a point-by-point (pt-pt) construction, providing pt–pt low-pass filters (LPFs) with high noise suppression. The output is appended into an array of N points and averaged to reduce the noise of the outgoing signal again. Using the PLL phase meter with the beat frequency reduction can ensure a mdeg-order phase measurement with Allan deviation stability of ~ 10 µdeg over 1000 s. We consider a combination of the miniaturization of optical paths in air and the PLL phase meter integrated with low-cost devices while ensuring mdeg-order measurement stability to achieve the interferometer's pm-order measurement resolution and stability.

Results

The measurement results show that the interferometer can achieve a resolution of 26 pm over a 5 μm-range mechanical displacement measurement. The Allan deviation stability of the interferometer reaches ~ 10 pm over a sampling time of 30 s, and the displacement noise floor is 10 pm/Hz1/2 above 1 Hz.

Conclusions

The new signal-processing PLL phase meter provides higher noise reduction than the old one presented in our previous work. With low cost but high resolution and stability, the PLL phase meter is incredibly suitable for pm-order displacement-measuring heterodyne interferometry. Combining a well-reduced PLL phase meter and a conventional heterodyne interferometer with a stable, isolated configuration and the minimization of optical paths in the air can give the measurement system a high resolution and stability. The measurement system can have a more significantly improved resolution of a few tens of pm than interferometers presented in previous publications and stability comparable to the modified heterodyne interferometers shown in earlier works over the sampling time of 30 s (possibly up to 100 s). A conventional heterodyne interferometer with a single PLL is expected to perform large-range displacement measurements with resolution at ten picometer levels in air.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gatzen HH, Saile V, Leuthold J (2015) Micro and nano fabrication. Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, Tools and processes), Springer

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Schmidt R-HM (2012) Ultra-precision engineering in lithographic exposure equipment for the semiconductor industry. Phil Trans R Soc A 370:3950–3972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schneider F, Das J, Kirsch B, Linke B, Aurich JC (2019) Sustainability in ultra-precision and micromachining: A review. Int J Precis Eng Manuf Green Tech 6601–610

  4. Gao W, Haitjema H, Fang FZ, Leach RK, Cheung CF, Savio E, Linares JM (2019) On-machine and in-process surface metrology for precision manufacturing. CIRP Ann 68:843–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yoon J-S, Baek R-H (2020) Device Design Guideline of 5-nm-Node FinFETs and Nanosheet FETs for Analog/RF Applications. IEEE Access 8:89395–189403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Camenzind TN, Elsayed A, Mohiyaddin FA, Li R, Kubicek S, Jussot J, Dorpe PV, Govoreanu B, Radu I, Zumbühl DM (2021) High mobility SiMOSFETs fabricated in a full 300mm CMOS process. Mater Quantum Technol 1:041001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shi WH, Lv WM, Sun TY, Zhang BS (2019) Optoelectronic platform and technology. Front Inf Technol Electronic Eng 20:439–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. IRDS Systems and Architectures Team (2020) International Roadmap for Devices and Systems: Executive Summary. IEEE Adv Technol Human 63. https://irds.ieee.org/images/files/pdf/2020/2020IRDS_ES.pdf

  9. Cao QK, Xie HM (2018) Application of Moiré interferometry to the characterization of orthotropic materials in the antisymmetric configuration using the virtual fields method. Exp Mech 58:783–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nathamgari SSP, Dong S, Hosseinian E, Lauhon LJ, Espinosa HD (2019) An experimental setup for combined in-vacuo Raman spectroscopy and cavity-interferometry measurements on TMDC nano-resonators. Exp Mech 59:349–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Luiz JO, Viotti MR, Albertazzi A (2022) Residual stress characterization in cross-sections of small parts by combining the contour method and scanning white-light interferometry. Exp Mech 62:1333–1348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gao SW, Kim H, Bosse H, Haitjema YL, Chen XD, Lu W, Knapp A, Weckenmann WT, Estler H (2015) Kunzmann, Measurement technologies for precision positioning. CIRP Ann 64:773–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Onur YA (2016) Experimental and theoretical investigation of prestressing steel strand subjected to tensile load. Int J Mech Sci 118:91–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hori Y, Gonda S, Bitou Y, Watanabe A, Nakamura K (2018) Periodic error evaluation system for linear encoders using a homodyne laser interferometer with 10 picometer uncertainty. Precis Eng 51:388–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Badami VG, Groot PJD (2013) Displacement measuring interferometry, in Handbook of optical dimensional metrology. A Taylor and Francis book: US pp 157–236

  16. Hao H, Lin H, Chen J, Xia W, Guo D, Wang M (2021) Enhanced laser self-mixing interferometry based on tunable Fabry-Perot Filter. Opt Laser Technol 135:106666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Alonso-Murias M, Monzón-Hernández D, Antonio-Lopez E, Schülzgen A, Amezcua-Correa R, Villatoro J (2022) Hybrid optical fiber Fabry-Perot interferometer for nano-displacement sensing. Opt Laser Technol 155:108426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pisani M (2009) A homodyne Michelson interferometer with sub-picometer resolution. Meas Sci Technol 20:084008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Farrar CR, Darling TW, Migliori A, Baker WE (1999) Microwave interferometers for non-contact vibration measurements on large structures. Mech Syst Signal Process 13:241–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vu TT, Higuchi M, Aketagawa M (2016) Accurate displacement-measuring interferometer with wide range using an I2 frequency-stabilized laser diode based on sinusoidal frequency modulation. Meas Sci Technol 27:105201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Duong QA, Vu TT, Higuchi M, Wei D, Aketagawa M (2018) Iodine-frequency-stabilized laser diode and displacement-measuring interferometer based on sinusoidal phase modulation Meas. Sci Technol 29:065204

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nguyen T-D, Duong Q-A, Higuchi M, Vu T-T, Wei D, Aketagawa M (2020) 19-picometer mechanical step displacement measurement using heterodyne interferometer with phase-locked loop and piezoelectric driving flexure-stage. Actuators A Phys 304:111880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nguyen T-D, Higuchi M, Vu T-T, Wei D, Aketagawa M (2020) 10-pm-order mechanical displacement measurements using heterodyne interferometry. Appl Optic 59:8478–8485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nanami M, Kobayashi I, Miyagi K, Taniguchi A (1995) High resolution optical heterodyne interferometry using a two-frequency light module. Opt Laser Technol 27:xii

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Armano M, Audley H, Baird J, Binetruy P, Born M, Bortoluzzi D, Brandt N, Castelli E, Cavalleri A, Cesarini A, Cruise AM et al (2021) Sensor noise in LISA Pathfinder: In-flight performance of the optical test mass readout. Phys Rev Lett 126:131103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ming M, Luo Y, Liang Y-R, Zhang J-Y, Duan H-Z, Yan H, Jiang Y-Z, Lu L-F, Xiao Q, Zhou Z, Yeh H-C (2020) Ultraprecision intersatellite laser interferometry. Int J Extrem Manuf 2:022003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rahm S, Loth C, Dabas A, Elouragini S (1994) Improvement of heterodyne detection with optical amplifier and pulsed coherent Doppler, Lidar. J Mod Opt 41:2145–2151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wu CM (2004) Heterodyne interferometric system with subnanometer accuracy for measurement of straightness. Appl Opt 43:3812–3816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee JY, Chen HY, Hsu CC, Wu CC (2007) Optical heterodyne grating interferometry for displacement measurement with subnanometric resolution. Sens Actuator A Phys 13:185–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chandrahalim H, Bhave SA, Polcawich RG, Pulskamp J, Pourat B, Boedecker S, Rembe C (2009) Heterodyne laser-Doppler interferometric characterization of contour-mode resonators above 1 GHz. IEEE Int Ultrason Symp 1044–1049

  31. Leonhardt V, Camp JB (2006) Space interferometry application of laser frequency stabilization with molecular iodine. Appl Opt 45:4142–4146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. National Instruments, Digitizer adapter module for FlexRIO. https://www.ni.com/en-au/shop/hardware/products/digitizer-adapter-module-for-flexrio.html. Accessed 1 Apr 2023

  33. Entegra, XA-160M dual 160 MSPS 16 bit ADC, dual 615 MSPS 16 bit DAC. https://www.entegra.co.uk/ii-products/xa-160m/. Accessed 1 Apr 2023

  34. Birch KP, Downs MJ (1993) An updated Edlén equation for the refractive index of air. Metrologia 30:155–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bönsch G, Potulski E (1998) Measurement of the refractive index of air and comparison with modified Edlén’s formulae. Metrologia 35:133–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ciddor PE (1996) Refractive index of air: new equations for the visible and near infrared. Appl Opt 35:1566–1573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Jang Y-S, Kim S-W (2017) Compensation of the refractive index of air in laser interferometer for distance measurement: A review. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 18:1881–1890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yin Y, Liu Z, Jiang S, Wang W, Yu H, Li W, Jiri G (2021) Grating-based 2D displacement measurement with quadruple optical subdivision of a single incident beam. Opt Exp 29:24169–24181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yin Y, Liu Z, Jiang S, Wang W, Yu H, Jiri G, Hao Q, Li W (2022) High-precision 2D grating displacement measurement system based on double-spatial heterodyne optical path interleaving. Opt Lasers Eng 158:107167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhu J, Wang G, Wang S, Li X (2022) A reflective-type heterodyne grating interferometer for three-degree-of-freedom subnanometer measurement. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 71:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Xu X, Dai Z, Tan Y (2022) A dual-beam differential method based on feedback interferometry for noncontact measurement of linear and angular displacement. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 1–10

  42. Joo K-N, Clark E, Zhang Y, Ellis JD, Guzmán F (2020) A compact high-precision periodic-error-free heterodyne interferometer. J Opt Soc Am A 37:B11–B18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhang Y, Guzman F (2022) Quasi-monolithic heterodyne laser interferometer for inertial sensing. Opt Lett 47:5120–5123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. NF Corporation, Lock-in Amplifier Frequency Extender 5571. https://www.nfcorp.co.jp/pro/mi/lb/lockin/5571/. Accessed 1 Apr 2023

  45. Keysight, Agilent 10897B High Resolution Laser Axis Board. https://www.keysight.com/us/en/product/10897B/highresolution-vmebus-laser-axis-board.html. Accessed 1 Apr 2023

  46. Tanaka M, Yamagami T, Nakayama K (1989) Linear interpolation of periodic error in a heterodyne laser interferometer at sub-nanometer levels. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 38:552–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research is funded by Hanoi University of Science and Technology (HUST) under project number T2022-TT-003.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dinh Gia Ninh.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

There are no individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nguyen, T.D., Dinh, G.N. Stability and Resolution of a Conventional Displacement Measuring Heterodyne Interferometer Using a Single Phase-Locked Loop. Exp Mech 63, 1015–1032 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-023-00970-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-023-00970-x

Keywords

Navigation