Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Shear Strain Measurement Techniques in Composite V-Notch Shear Testing

  • Research paper
  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

V-notch shear testing is a common method for measuring shear properties of fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP) composites. While bonded gauges have traditionally been used to measure shear strain in V-notch specimens (ASTM D5379), digital image correlation (DIC) is attracting interest due to its full-field, multiaxial measurement capability. Standard practices for using DIC to measure shear strain of a D5379 specimen have not been established.

Objective

The objectives of the current investigation are to characterize shear moduli of unidirectional IM7/8552 carbon/epoxy composite and to explore best practices of using DIC to measure shear strain in D5379 specimens with different material orientations.

Methods

Quasi-static experiments involving standard D5379 specimens were performed, and shear strain was measured using bonded, resistance-based strain gages as well as several different areas of interest in DIC. Finite Element (FE) modeling of the specimens was used to evaluate different areas of shear strain averaging and for comparison to the DIC measurements.

Results

FE models confirmed that only considering a small area between the notch tips was the optimal method for strain averaging while other sub-optimal areas led to 3–18% error. DIC measurements produced comparable errors. Erroneous DIC data near the notch tips complicated post-processing, and two methodologies to remove the erroneous data were implemented using an automated statistical approach and a manual selection approach; the latter was slightly more accurate.

Conclusions

The results of this investigation can be used in future shear test method standardization with DIC strain measurement by definitively showing the optimal procedures and the challenges associated with DIC measurements on D5379 specimens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ASTM International (2019) ASTM D5379–19 Standard test method for shear properties of composite materials by the V-notched beam method. West Conshohocken, PA, USA. https://doi.org/10.1520/D5379_D5379M-19E01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barnes JA, Kumosa M, Hull D (1987) Theoretical and experimental evaluation of the Iosipescu shear test. Compos Sci Technol 28:251–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-3538(87)90024-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Adams DF, Walrath DE (1987) Further development of the Iosipescu shear test method. Exp Mech 27:113–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02319461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Spigel BS (1984) An experimental and analytical investigation of the Iosipescu shear test for composite materials. Master’s Thesis, Old Dominion University. https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1205&context=mae_etds

  5. Stojcevski F, Hilditch T, Henderson LC (2018) A modern account of Iosipescu testing. Compos Part Appl Sci Manuf 107:545–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.02.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Walrath DE, Adams DF (1983) The Iosipescu shear test as applied to composite materials. Exp Mech 23:105–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02328688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ho H, Morton J, Farley GL (1994) Non-linear numerical analysis of the Iosipescu specimen for composite materials. Compos Sci Technol 50:355–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-3538(94)90023-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Balakrishnan MV, Bansal B, Kumosa M (1997) Biaxial testing of unidirectional carbon-epoxy composite using biaxial Iosipescu test fixture. J Compos Mater 31:486–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199839703100503

  9. Kumosa M, Odegard G, Armentrout D, Kumosa L, Seales K, Sutter JK (2002) Comparison of the ±45 tensile and Iosipescu shear tests for woven fabric composite materials. J Compos Technol Res 24:3–16. https://doi.org/10.1520/CTR10892J

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pierron F, Vautrin A (1994) Accurate comparative determination of the in-plane shear modulus of T300/914 by the Iosipescu and 45° off-axis tests. Compos Sci Technol 52:61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-3538(94)90008-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Abdallah MG, Gascoigne HE (1989) The influence of test fixture design on the Iosipescu shear test for fiber composite materials. In: Chamis C (ed.) Test methods and design allowables for fibrous composites, 2nd volume. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA. https://doi.org/10.1520/STP10030S

  12. Adams DF, Lewis EQ (1997) Experimental assessment of four composite material shear test methods. J Test Eval 25:174–181. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE11475J

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Slepetz JM, Zagaeski TF, Novello RF (1978) In-plane shear test for composite materials. Report AMMRC_TR_78–30, Army Mater Mech Res Center. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA062830.pdf

  14. Krishnan A, Xu LR (2011) A short-beam shear fracture approach to measure the mode II fracture toughness of materials with preferred interfaces. Int J Fract 169:15–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-010-9579-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Melin LG, Neumeister JM, Pettersson KB, Johansson H, Asp LE (2000) Evaluation of four composite shear test methods by digital speckle strain mapping and fractographic analysis. J Compos Technol Res 22:161–172. https://doi.org/10.1520/CTR10636J

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. ASTM International (2020) ASTM D4255M Standard test method for in-plane shear properties of polymer matrix composite materials by the rail shear method. West Conshohocken, PA, USA. https://doi.org/10.1520/D4255_D4255M-20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen Z, Shao Y, Sun Q, Zhou G, Xu H, Zeng D, Su X (2018) A comparative study of two ASTM shear test standards for chopped carbon fiber SMC. SAE Int J Mater Manuf 11:277–284. https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. ASTM International (2019) ASTM D7078 Standard test method for shear properties of composite materials by V-notched rail shear method. West Conshohocken, PA, USA. https://doi.org/10.1520/D5379_D5379M-19E01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pagano NJ, Whitney JM (1970) Geometric design of composite cylindrical characterization specimens. J Compos Mater 4:360–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199837000400307

  20. Chiao CC, Moore RL, Chiao TT (1977) Measurement of shear properties of fibre composites: Part 1. Evaluation of test methods Composites 8:161–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(77)90011-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bell JM, Odom EM (2007) An experimentally-based analytical model of the stress field in an Iosipescu composite test specimen. J Test Eval 35:381–386. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE100543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wilson DW (1990) Evaluation of the V-notched beam shear test through an interlaboratory study. J Compos Technol Res 12:131–138. https://doi.org/10.1520/CTR10189J

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Broughton WR, Kumosa M, Hull D (1990) Analysis of the Iosipescu shear test as applied to unidirectional carbon-fibre reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol 38:299–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-3538(90)90018-Z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee S, Munro M (1990) Evaluation of testing techniques for the Iosipescu shear test for advanced composite materials. J Compos Mater 24:419–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199839002400404

  25. Melin LN, Neumeister JM (2006) Measuring constitutive shear behavior of orthotropic composites and evaluation of the modified Iosipescu test. Compos Struct 76:106–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.06.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ho H, Tsai MY, Morton J, Farley GL (1993) Numerical analysis of the Iosipescu specimen for composite materials. Compos Sci Technol 46:115–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-3538(93)90167-F

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pierron F (1998) Saint-Venant effects in the Iosipescu specimen. J Compos Mater 32:1986–2015. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199839903302202

  28. Kumosa M, Hull D (1987) Mixed-mode fracture of composites using Iosipescu shear test. Int J Fract 35:83–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00019793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pindera MJ, Ifju P, Post D (1990) Iosipescu shear characterization of polymeric and metal matrix composites. Exp Mech 30:101–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02322710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ho H, Tsai MY, Morton J, Farley GL (1991) An experimental investigation of Iosipescu specimen for composite materials. Exp Mech 31:328–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02325989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Morton J, Ho H, Tsai MY, Farley GL (1992) An evaluation of the Iosipescu specimen for composite materials shear property measurement. J Compos Mater 26:708–750. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199839202600505

  32. Oh JH, Kim JK, Lee DG, Jeong KS (1999) Interlaminar shear behavior of thick carbon/epoxy composite materials. J Compos Mater 33:2080–2115. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199839903302202

  33. Pindera M-J, Choksi G, Hidde JS, Herakovich CT (1987) A methodology for accurate shear characterization of unidirectional composites. J Compos Mater 21:1164–1184. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199838702101205

  34. Adams DF, Doner DR (1967) Longitudinal shear loading of a unidirectional composite. J Compos Mater 1:4–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199836700100102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Chu TC, Ranson WF, Sutton MA (1985) Applications of digital-image-correlation techniques to experimental mechanics. Exp Mech 25:232–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02325092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Brown EN, Liu C (2007) Applying digital image correlation to unidirectional composite Iosipescu shear test specimens. Report LA-UR-07–2334, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA. https://permalink.lanl.gov/object/tr?what=info:lanl-repo/lareport/LA-UR-07-2334

  37. Bru T, Hellström P, Gutkin R, Ramantani D, Peterson G (2016) Characterisation of the mechanical and fracture properties of a uni-weave carbon fibre/epoxy non-crimp fabric composite. Data Brief 6:680–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2016.01.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Codolini A, Li QM, Wilkinson A (2018) Mechanical characterization of thin injection-moulded polypropylene specimens under large in-plane shear deformations. Polym Test 69:485–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.06.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Daiyan H, Andreassen E, Grytten F, Osnes H, Gaarder RH (2012) Shear testing of polypropylene materials analysed by digital image correlation and numerical simulations. Exp Mech 52:1355–1369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-012-9591-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Harrell TM, Thomsen OT, Dulieu-Barton JM, Madsen SF (2019) Damage in CFRP composites subjected to simulated lighting strikes - assessment of thermal and mechanical responses. Compos Part B Eng 176:107298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. He Y (2010) Matrix-dominated constitutive laws for composite materials. Doctoral Thesis, Georgia Inst Technol. https://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/34666

  42. Khaled B, Shyamsunder L, Hoffarth C, Rajan SD, Goldberg RK, Carney KS, DuBois P, Blankenhorn G (2018) Experimental characterization of composites to support an orthotropic plasticity material model. J Compos Mater 52:1847–1872. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998317733319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Makeev A, Seon G, Nikishkov Y, Nguyen D, Mathews P, Robeson M (2019) Analysis methods for improving confidence in material qualification for laminated composites. J Am Helicopter Soc. https://doi.org/10.4050/jahs.64.012006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mistou S, Fazzini M, Karama M (2010) Shear test on CFRP full-field measurement and finite element analysis. Adv Mater Res 112:49–62. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.112.49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Tabrizi IT (2020) Understanding failure mechanisms in hybrid fiber reinforced laminates through the combined usage of DIC, AE, thermography and optic based systems. Doctoral Thesis, Sabanci University. https://research.sabanciuniv.edu/41426/1/10222508_Tabrizi_Isa_Emami.pdf

  46. Pierron F, Vautrin A (1998) Measurement of the in-plane shear strengths of unidirectional composites with the Iosipescu test. Compos Sci Technol 57:1653–1660. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00099-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Bru T, Olsson R, Gutkin R, Vyas GM (2017) Use of the Iosipescu test for the identification of shear damage evolution laws of an orthotropic composite. Compos Struct 174:319–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.04.068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Odegard G, Searles K, Kumosa M (1999) Critical examination of the Iosipescu shear test as applied to 0degrees unidirectional composite materials. Mech Compos Mater Struct 6:229–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/107594199305548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Odegard G, Kumosa M (1999) Elasto-plastic analysis of the Iosipescu shear test. J Compos Mater 33:1981–2001. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199839903302102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Marlett K (2011) Hexcel 8552 IM7 unidirectional prepreg 190 gsm & 35%RC qualification material property data report. NCAMP Test Report Number: CAM-RP-2009–015 Rev A, 2011, National Institute for Aviation Research, Wichita, KS, USA. https://thyme.ornl.gov/CFCrush/materials/uou/CAM-RP-2009-015_Rev_A_April_22_2011_Hexcel_8552_IM7_Uni_Data_Report.pdf

  51. Walrath DE, Adams DF (1983) Analysis of the Stress State in an Iosipescu Shear Test Specimen. Report UWME-DR-301–102–1, National Aeronautics and Space Administration Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA301851.pdf

  52. Haluza RT, Koudela K, Bakis C, Adams DO, Perl MA, Pereira JM (2020) Out-of-plane shear properties of IM7/8552 carbon/epoxy by V-notched shear testing. In: Proceedings of AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston VA, USA. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2020-1212

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Mark Perl from the University of Utah for manufacturing the specimen panel. The authors also acknowledge Clark Moose, Christopher Rachau, Jeremy Peck, Matthew Weldon, and David Reich of the Pennsylvania State University Applied Research Laboratory for their assistance with experimental testing and DIC measurement.

Funding

The lead author received funding from the Pennsylvania State University Applied Research Laboratory Walker Assistantship Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics, Pennsylvania State University, 212 Earth and Engineering Sciences Building, University Park, Pennsylvania, PA, 16802, USA

    R. T. Haluza & C. E. Bakis

  2. Composite Materials Division, Pennsylvania State University Applied Research Laboratory, 4000D Applied Sciences Building, University Park, Pennsylvania, PA, 16802, USA

    K. L. Koudela

  3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Utah, 2465 Rio Tinto Kennecott Mechanical Engineering Building, Salt Lake City, UT, 84102, USA

    D. O. Adams

  4. Structural Dynamics Branch, NASA John H. Glenn Research Center, 21000 Brook Park Rd, Cleveland, OH, 44135, USA

    J. M. Pereira

Authors
  1. R. T. Haluza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. L. Koudela
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. E. Bakis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. D. O. Adams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J. M. Pereira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. T. Haluza.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haluza, R.T., Koudela, K.L., Bakis, C.E. et al. Shear Strain Measurement Techniques in Composite V-Notch Shear Testing. Exp Mech 62, 1655–1671 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-022-00897-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-022-00897-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation