Abstract
Background
During the laser additive manufacturing (LAM) process large temperature gradients can form, generating a mismatch in deformation that can lead to high level of residual stress. The stress can have irreversible effects such as warping and cracking of parts during and post manufacturing.
Objective
One of the most important LAM parameters that should be controlled carefully in order to effectively manage residual stress is the scanning strategy. This study presents an evaluation of six different scanning strategies, namely reciprocating, 90° reciprocating, line, screwing, reciprocating overlapping and island scanning strategies with respect to their effect on residual stress.
Methods
Laser ultrasound technology, as an advanced nondestructive testing method, is applied to measure the residual stress distribution under different scanning strategies for the first time. The surface wave generated by laser is used to evaluate the plane stress state within the surface layer of the specimen.
Results
The results show that the island scanning strategy is found to contribute to the least average residual stress, and lowered residual stress by up to 45% relative to the line scanning strategy. The overall stress level is island < reciprocation overlapping < screwing < 90° reciprocating < reciprocating < line. Further to this, the effect of inspection path on the results of residual stress measurement is discussed and the concept of optimal inspection path is proposed for the first time.
Conclusions
Laser ultrasound method can effectively measure the residual stress in laser additive manufacturing, and the research can serve as useful guidelines for engineers and designers to restrain and evaluate residual stress in LAM.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gusarov AV, Grigoriev SN, Volosova MA, Melnik YA, Laskin A, Kotoban DV, Okunkova AA (2018) On productivity of laser additive manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol 261(10):213–232
Yan Q, Song B, Shi YS (2020) Comparative study of performance comparison of AlSi10Mg alloy prepared by selective laser melting and casting. J Mater Sci Technol 41:199–208
Bastian B, Florian K, Maximilian L, Roman T, Tilmann B (2020) Determination of the influence of a stress-relief heat treatment and additively manufactured surface on the fatigue behavior of selectively laser melted AISI 316L by using efficient short-time procedures. Int J Fatigue 131:105301
Denlinger ER, Heigel JC, Michaleris P, Palmer TA (2015) Effect of inter-layer dwell time on distortion and residual stress in additive manufacturing of titanium and nickel alloys. J Mater Process Technol 215:123–131
Strantza M, Vrancken B, Prime MB, Truman CE, Rombouts M, Brown DW, Guillaume P, Van HD (2019) Directional and oscillating residual stress on the mesoscale in additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V. Acta Mater 168:299–308
Paul S, Singh R, Yan WY, Samajdar I, Paradowska A, Thool K, Reid M (2018) Critical deposition height for sustainable restoration via laser additive manufacturing. Sci Rep 8:14726
Khouzani MG, Peng H, Rogge R, Attardo R, Ostiguy P, Neidig J, Billo R, Hoelzle D, Shankar MR (2017) Experimental measurement of residual stress and distortion in additively manufactured stainless steel components with various dimensions. Mater Sci Eng A 707:689–700
Brown DW, Bernardin JD, Carpenter JS, Clausen B, Spernjak D, Thompson JM (2016) Neutron diffraction measurements of residual stress in additively manufactured stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 678:291–298
Zhang YJ, Wang XC, Yang Q, Dong F, Du XZ, Yin AM (2018) Characterization of mean grain size of interstitial-free steel based on laser ultrasonic. J Mater Sci 53(11):8510–8522
Chang Y, Yang DX, Guo YN (2018) Laser ultrasonic damage detection in coating-substrate structure via Pearson correlation coefficient. Surf Coat Technol 353:339–345
Yi DC, Pei CX, Liu TH, Chen ZM (2019) Inspection of cracks with focused angle beam laser ultrasonic wave. Appl Acoust 145:1–6
Hossam S, Miguel DP, Jose T, Ruben P, Luis R, Crina C (2020) Defect reconstruction by non-destructive testing with laser induced ultrasonic detection. Ultrasonics 101:106000
Zhan Y, Liu CS, Kong XW, Lin ZY (2017) Experiment and numerical simulation for laser ultrasonic measurement of residual stress. Ultrasonics 73:271–276
Sanderson RM, Shen YC (2010) Measurement of residual stress using laser-generated ultrasound. Int J Press Vessel Pip 87:762–765
Ruiz AM, Nagy PB (2002) Diffraction correction for precision surface acoustic wave velocity measurements. J Acoust Soc Am 112(3):835–842
Huan HT, Mandelis A, Lashkari B, Liu LX (2017) Frequency-domain laser ultrasound (FDLU) non-destructive evaluation of stress-strain behavior in an aluminum alloy. Int J Thermophys 38(4):1–11
Karabutov A, Devichensky A, Ivochkin A, Lyamshev M, Pelivanov I, Rohadgi U, Solomatin V, Subudhi M (2008) Laser ultrasonic diagnostics of residual stress. Ultrasonics 48(6):631–635
Bescond C, Monchalin JP, Gilbert A, Talbot R, Ochiai M (2005) Determination of residual stresses using laser-generated surface skimming longitudinal waves. Proc SPIE 5767:175–186
Levesque D, Dubourg L, Blouin A (2011) Laser ultrasonics for defect detection and residual stress measurement of friction stir welds. Nondestruct Test Evaluation 26(3):319–333
Cheng B, Shrestha S, Chou K (2016) Stress and deformation evaluations of scanning strategy effect in selective laser melting. Addit Manuf 12:240–251
Woo W, Kim DK, Kingston E, Luzin V, Salvemini F, Hill MR (2019) Effect of interlayers and scanning strategies on through-thickness residual stress distributions in additive manufactured ferritic-austenitic steel structure. Mater Sci Eng A 744:618–629
Parry L, Ashcroft IA, Wildman RD (2016) Understanding the effect of laser scan strategy on residual stress in selective laser melting through thermo-mechanical simulation. Addit Manuf 12:1–15
Mercelis P, Kruth JP (2006) Residual stresses in selective laser sintering and selective laser melting. Rapid Prototyp J 12(5):254–265
Ali H, Ghadbeigi H, Mumtaz K (2018) Effect of scanning strategies on residual stress and mechanical properties of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V. Mater Sci Eng A 712:175–187
Mugwagwa L, Dimitrov D, Matope S (2019) Evaluation of the impact of scanning strategies on residual stresses in selective laser melting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 102:2441–2450
Salman OO, Brenne F, Niendorf T, Eckert J, Prashanth KG, He T, Scudino S (2019) Impact of the scanning strategy on the mechanical behavior of 316L steel synthesized by selective laser melting. J Manuf Process 45:255–261
Patcharapit P, Chune Y (2020) Influence of scanning length and energy input on residual stress reduction in metal additive manufacturing: Numerical and experimental studies. J Manuf Process 49:247–259
Pao YH, Sachse W, Fukuoka H (1984) Acoustoelasticity and ultrasonic measurement of residual stress. Academic Press, New York, pp 61–143
Ya M, Marquette P, Belahcene F, Lu J (2004) Residual stresses in laser welded aluminum plate by use of ultrasonic and optical methods. Mater Sci Eng A 382:257–264
Acknowledgements
This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China Project (Grant No. 51771051), the Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province Project (Grant No. 2021-MS-102) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. N2105021). Meanwhile, the authors would like to thank senior engineer Su and Li of AVIC 601 Institute for helping us to complete the laser additive manufacturing experiment.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interests
The authors do not have any conflicts of interest to disclose and this work did not involve human or animal participants.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhan, Y., Xu, H., Du, W. et al. Study on the Effect of Scanning Strategy on Residual Stress in Laser Additive Manufacturing with the Laser Ultrasound Technique. Exp Mech 62, 563–572 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-021-00795-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-021-00795-6