Skip to main content
Log in

Acoustic Emission Source Localization with Generalized Regression Neural Network Based on Time Difference Mapping Method

  • Research paper
  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Acoustic emission (AE) source localization is a powerful detection method. Time Difference Mapping (TDM) method is an effective method for detecting defects in complex structures. The core of this method is to search for a point with the minimum distance away from the verification point in the time difference database. In Traditional Time Difference Mapping (T-TDM) method and Improved Time Difference Mapping (I-TDM) method, the larger database and denser grids allow the higher localization accuracy. If the location points are not included in the database, the localization accuracy of the T-TDM and I-TDM methods will be greatly affected. To solve the above problems, a new AE source localization method, Generalized Regression Neural Network Based on Time Difference Mapping (GRNN-TDM), is proposed to improve the localization accuracy in the study. In the proposed method, the time difference data of the sensor path on all nodes in the time difference mapping are used as the training input data and the coordinates of grid nodes are used as the training output data. After continuous learning and training, the neural network model predicts its possible source location with the time difference data collected from the verification point. In this paper, the localization of AE sources with T-TDM, I-TDM and GRNN-TDM methods was studied in four composite plates with different fiber layers and an aluminum plate with holes. The localization results showed that the localization accuracy of the GRNN-TDM method was higher than that of T-TDM and I-TDM methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Achenbach JD (2009) Structural health monitoring–what is the prescription. Mech Res Commun 36(2):137–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Farrar CR, Worden K (2007) An introduction to structural health monitoring. Philosophical Trans Royal Soc London A: Mathematical, Phys Eng Sci 365(1851):303–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sohn H, Farrar CR, Hemez FM, Shunk DD, Stinemates DW, Nadler BR. A review of structural health monitoring literature: 1996-2001. Los Alamos National Laboratory Report, 2004

  4. Kaphle Manindra (2012) Analysis of acoustic emission data for accurate damage assessment for structural health monitoring applications. Ph.D. dissertation of Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane

  5. Miller RK, Hill EK, Moore PO (2005) Non-destructive testing handbook, 3rd edn, vol. 6, Acoustic emission testing. American Society for Nondestructive Testing, Ohio

  6. Baxter MG, Pullin R, Holford KM et al (2007) Delta T source location for acoustic emission. Mech Syst Signal Process 21(3):1512–1520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kundu T (2014) Acoustic source localization. Ultrasonics 54:25–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tobias A (1976) Acoustic-emission source location in two dimensions by an array of three sensors. Non-Destructive Testing 9(1):9–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mhamdi L, Schumacher T (2015) A comparison between time-of-arrival and novel phased array approaches to estimate acoustic emission source locations in a steel plate. J Nondestruct Eval 34(4):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kundu T, Nakatani H, Takeda N (2012) Acoustic source localization in anisotropic plates. Ultrasonics 52(6):740–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nakatani H, Kundu T, Takeda N (2014) Improving accuracy of acoustic source localization in anisotropic plates. Ultrasonics 54(7):1776–1788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kundu T, Yang X, Nakatani H, Takeda N (2015) A two-step hybrid technique for accurately localizing acoustic source in anisotropic structures without knowing their material properties. Ultrasonics 56:271–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Park WH, Packo P, Kundu T (2017) Acoustic source localization in an anisotropic plate without knowing its material properties–a new approach. Ultrasonics 79:9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sen N, Kundu T (2018) A new wave front shape-based approach for acoustic source localization in an anisotropic plate without knowing its material properties. Ultrasonics 87:20–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sen N, Gawroński M, Packo P, Uhl T, Kundu T. Acoustic source localization in anisotropic plates without knowing their material properties: An experimental investigation. Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, 2019, 10972: 1097224-1-19. Health Monitoring of Structural and Biological Systems XIII 2019, March 4, 2019 - March 7, 2019

  16. Simone MED, Ciampa F, Boccardi S, MeoImpact M (2017) Source localisation in aerospace composite structures. Smart Mater Struct 26(12):125026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ebrahimkhanlou A, Salamone S (2017) Acoustic emission source localization in thin metallic plates: a single-sensor approach based on multimodal edge reflections. Ultrasonics 78:134–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ebrahimkhanlou A, Dubuc B, Salamone S (2019) A generalizable deep learning framework for localizing and characterizing acoustic emission sources in riveted metallic panels. Mech Syst Signal Process 130:248–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu ZH, Dong TC, Peng QL, He CF, Li QF, Wu B (2018) AE source localization in a steel plate with the dispersive A0 mode based on the cross-correlation technique and time reversal principle. Mater Eval 76(3):371–382

  20. James C, John L, Mark S (1998) Neural network approach to locating acoustic emission sources in nondestructive evaluation. Proc Am Control Conference, Philadelphia:68–72

  21. Eaton MJ, Pullin R, Holford KM (2012) Acoustic emission source location in composite materials using Delta T mapping. Composites Part A 43(6):856–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hsu NN, Breckenridge FR (1981) Characterization and calibration of acoustic emission sensors. Mater Eval 39:60–68

  23. Scholey JW, Wisnom PD, Friswell MR, Pavier MI, Alika MJ (2009) MR, a generic technique for acoustic emission source location. J Acoust Emiss 27:291–298

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFC0809003) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11772014).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Z. H. Liu.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Z.H., Peng, Q.L., Li, X. et al. Acoustic Emission Source Localization with Generalized Regression Neural Network Based on Time Difference Mapping Method. Exp Mech 60, 679–694 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-020-00591-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-020-00591-8

Keywords

Navigation