Loading Orientation Effects on the Strength Anisotropy of Additively-Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Alloys under Dynamic Compression
- 227 Downloads
The microstructure of additively-manufactured metals depends on the direction of build, and is distinctly different from those of conventional metals. This work examines the effect of strain rate, heat treatment, and loading orientation relative to the build direction of Ti-6Al-4V samples that have been additively manufactured by direct metal laser melting to determine how the microstructure affects overall mechanical properties. The effect of rate dependence on additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V was investigated by compressing cylinders of the material both quasi-statically in a screw-driven load frame (10−4 s−1 to 10−1 s−1), and dynamically in a split Hopkinson (Kolsky) pressure bar system (375 s−1 to 6000 s−1). The yield strength of the additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V was observed to monotonically increase with increasing strain rates and the samples failed along a 45° direction through the thickness regardless of loading orientation. As in the case of traditionally forged metals, annealed additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V samples exhibited lower yield strengths than their non-annealed counterparts at similar strain rates. For quasi-static loads, a clear dependence of response on loading orientation angle with respect to the material layering direction was seen, with the yield strength being greatest when loading was applied parallel to the build direction – a notable contrast to what is observed in tensile results in which the yield strength is lowest when tension is applied along the build direction. No clear relationship between the yield strength and loading orientation was observed in the dynamic tests, likely because the differences were within the measurement uncertainty of the method.
KeywordsDynamic compression Material anisotropy Annealing Split Hopkinson (Kolsky) pressure bar
This work was supported by the UIUC Research Board through grant number RB16134. The authors thank Dr. David Farrow for his support with the quasi-static experiments, Raeann Vansickle for help with the EBSD plots, and David Foehring for acquiring the SEM images, carried out in the Frederick Seitz Materials Research Laboratory Central Research Facilities, University of Illinois. The authors also thank Greg Milner, Lee Booher, and Stephen Mathine for preparing the samples.
- 2.Veiga C, Davim JP, Loureiro AJR (2012) Properties and applications of titanium alloys: a brief review. Rev Adv Mater Sci 32(2):133–148Google Scholar
- 4.Zhou W, Chew KG The Rate Dependent Response of a Titanium Alloy Subjected to Quasi-Static Loading in Ambient Environment, p. 7Google Scholar
- 6.Follansbee PS, Gray GT An Analysis of the Low Temperature, Low and High Strain-Rate Deformation of Ti-6AI-4V, Metall. Trans. A, p. 12Google Scholar
- 7.Yatnalkar RS (2010) Experimental Investigation of Plastic Deformation of Ti-6al-4v under Various Loading Conditions, The Ohio State UniversityGoogle Scholar
- 8.Lee WS, Lin MT Deformation Behaviour of Ti-6A1-4V Alloy, p. 12Google Scholar
- 36.ISO/ASTM 5291 (2013) Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing -- Coordinate Systems and Test MethodologiesGoogle Scholar
- 38.Boyer R, Welsch G, Collings EW (1994) Materials Properties Handbook: Titanium Alloys, ASM International, Materials Park, OhioGoogle Scholar
- 40.Subhash G, Ravichandran G (2000) Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Testing of Ceramics, ASM Handbook on Mechanical Testing and Evaluation, ASM International, pp. 497–504Google Scholar
- 48.Foehring D (2018) Characterizing the Tensile Behavior of Additively Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Using Multiscale Digital Image Correlation, University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignGoogle Scholar