Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Identification of Crack Initiation in Aluminum Alloys using Acoustic Emission

Experimental Mechanics volume 55, pages 837–850 (2015)Cite this article

Abstract

This paper uses multiple specimens, mechanical loading setups and nondestructive evaluation (NDE) techniques to reliably identify crack initiation in aluminum alloy specimens and quantify the associated Acoustic Emission (AE) activity. Compact Tension (CT) and Middle Tension (MT) specimens were tested until crack initiation was verified using optical methods while simultaneously recording AE, Infrared Thermography (IRT) and Digital Image Correlation (DIC). The specimens were loaded under tension and fatigue loading conditions with the prime focus being on identifying, in these controlled experiments, the most sensitive AE features to crack initiation. The changes of such AE features at the time instance of crack initiation was cross-validated by the complementary optical metrology data. In addition to the load drop accompanying the ductile failure process, the synchronous use of the optical NDE techniques provided the opportunity to associate the mechanical behavior of the material to the AE recordings observed during testing. The identified changes in AE features were combined with extensive signal processing which revealed trends that provide strong evidence on the existence of a dominant and quantifiable trend of AE activity which was noted to be directly associated with crack initiation. The onset of cracking in both types of aluminum specimen tested was noted with an increase in the peak frequency and partial powers which was used to define a novel AE damage parameter and shown to robustly identify crack initiation in both tensile and fatigue loading.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

References

  1. Ritchie RO (1999) Mechanisms of fatigue-crack propagation in ductile and brittle solids. Int J Fract 100(1):55–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hanlon T, Kwon YN, Suresh S (2003) Grain size effects on the fatigue response of nanocrystalline metals. Scr Mater 49(7):675–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chan KS (2010) Roles of microstructure in fatigue crack initiation. Int J Fatigue 32(9):1428–1447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang X et al (2009) Fail-safe design of integral metallic aircraft structures reinforced by bonded crack retarders. Eng Fract Mech 76(1):114–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fromme P, Sayir MB (2002) Detection of cracks at rivet holes using guided waves. Ultrasonics 40(1):199–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ihn J-B, Chang F-K (2004) Detection and monitoring of hidden fatigue crack growth using a built-in piezoelectric sensor/actuator network: I. Diagnostics. Smart Mater Struct 13(3):609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gui Yun T et al (2005) Multiple sensors on pulsed eddy-current detection for 3-D subsurface crack assessment. Sensors J IEEE 5(1):90–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chady T, Enokizono M, Sikora R (1999) Crack detection and recognition using an eddy current differential probe. Magn IEEE Trans on 35(3):1849–1852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Klepka A et al (2012) Nonlinear acoustics for fatigue crack detection–experimental investigations of vibro-acoustic wave modulations. Struct Health Monit 11(2):197–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Parsons Z, Staszewski W (2006) Nonlinear acoustics with low-profile piezoceramic excitation for crack detection in metallic structures. Smart Mater Struct 15(4):1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zoughi R, Kharkovsky S (2008) Microwave and millimetre wave sensors for crack detection. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 31(8):695–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chin-Yung Y, Zoughi R (1994) A novel microwave method for detection of long surface cracks in metals. Instrum Meas IEEE Trans on 43(5):719–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang Y (2006) In situ fatigue crack detection using piezoelectric paint sensor. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 17(10):843–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wever M (1997) Listening to the sound of materials: acoustic emission for the analysis of material behavior. NDT E Int 30(2):99–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mba D, Rao RB (2006) Development of Acoustic Emission Technology for Condition Monitoring and Diagnosis of Rotating Machines; Bearings, Pumps, Gearboxes, Engines and Rotating Structures

  16. Finlayson RD et al (2001) Health monitoring of aerospace structures with acoustic emission and acousto-ultrasonics. Insight-Wigston then Northampton- 43(3):155–158

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hazeli K et al (2013) In situ identification of twin-related bands near yielding in a magnesium alloy. Scr Mater 68(1):83–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Meriaux J et al (2010) Identification of fretting fatigue crack propagation mechanisms using acoustic emission. Tribol Int 43(11):2166–2174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chang H et al (2009) Acoustic emission study of fatigue crack closure of physical short and long cracks for aluminum alloy LY12CZ. Int J Fatigue 31(3):403–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kohn DH, Ducheyne P, Awerbuch J (1992) Acoustic emission during fatigue of Ti-6Al-4V: incipient fatigue crack detection limits and generalized data analysis methodology. J Mater Sci 27:3133–3142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Roberts TM, Talebzadeh M (2003) Acoustic emission monitoring of fatigue crack propagation. J Constr Steel Res 59:695–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Roberts TM, Talebzadeh M (2003) Fatigue life prediction based on crack propagation and acoustic emission count rates. J Constr Steel Res 59:679–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ohtsu M, Okamoto T, Yuyama S (1998) Moment tensor analysis of acoustic emission for cracking mechanisms in concrete. ACI Struct J 95(2):87–95

    Google Scholar 

  24. Aggelis DG, Kordatos EZ, Matikas TE (2011) Acoustic emission for fatigue damage characterization in metal plates. Mech Res Commun 38(2):106–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dassios KG et al (2014) Crack growth monitoring in ceramic matrix composites by combined infrared thermography and acoustic emission. J Am Ceram Soc 97(1):251–257

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Gutkin R et al (2011) On acoustic emission for failure investigation in CFRP: pattern recognition and peak frequency analyses. Mech Syst Signal Process 25(4):1393–1407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Huguet S et al (2002) Use of acoustic emission to identify damage modes in glass fibre reinforced polyester. Compos Sci Technol 62(10):1433–1444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sause M et al (2012) Pattern recognition approach to identify natural clusters of acoustic emission signals. Pattern Recogn Lett 33(1):17–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Aggelis D, Philippidis T (2004) Ultrasonic wave dispersion and attenuation in fresh mortar. NDT E Int 37(8):617–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Qi G et al (1997) Discrete wavelet decomposition of acoustic emission signals from carbon-fiber-reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol 57(4):389–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yang M et al (2003) Data fusion of distributed AE sensors for the detection of friction sources during press forming. J Mater Process Technol 139(1–3):368–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Murasawa G et al. (2014) Inhomogeneous deformation twinning measurement using digital image correlation and acoustic emission. Exp Mech, p. 1–12

  33. Cuadra J et al (2013) Damage quantification in polymer composites using a hybrid NDT approach. Compos Sci Technol 83:11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sause MGR et al (2012) Quantification of failure mechanisms in mode-I loading of fiber reinforced plastics utilizing acoustic emission analysis. Compos Sci Technol 72(2):167–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the Office of Naval Research for the financial support (Award number N00014-13-1-0143) provided for the research reported in this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Department, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA

    P. A. Vanniamparambil, U. Guclu & A. Kontsos

Authors
  1. P. A. Vanniamparambil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. U. Guclu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Kontsos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Kontsos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vanniamparambil, P.A., Guclu, U. & Kontsos, A. Identification of Crack Initiation in Aluminum Alloys using Acoustic Emission. Exp Mech 55, 837–850 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-015-9984-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-015-9984-5

Keywords

search

Navigation