Skip to main content
Log in

A Universal Method for Acquiring the Constitutive Behaviors of API -5 L X90 Welds

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The uniform elongation, which is the key factor to the constitutive behavior, is generally calculated by the Considère criterion, i.e., the uniform elongation equates the work-hardening exponent. However, it is found in this study that the widely used Considère criterion is not applicable to metals when the materials are subjected to the maximum load, as the first derivative of the fitted constitutive behavior is not zero which is the basic assumption in Considère criterion. To acquire the whole constitutive behaviors, an accurate and universal method is proposed, based on the work-hardening exponent and yield strength, to calculate the uniform elongation beforehand. With the yield strength obtained via the DIC data, and the work-hardening exponent determined by fitted Ramberg-Osgood model, the uniform elongation can be calculated by the new proposed method. The accuracy of the new method is validated by the conventional load method, indicating that the proposed method is applicable and feasible. With the uniform elongation calculated by the proposed method, the whole constitutive behavior of API 5 L X90 welds can be easily obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fagerholt E, Østby E, Børvik T, Hoppersta OS (2012) Investigation of fracture in small-scale SENT tests of a welded X80 pipeline steel using digital image correlation with node splitting. Eng Fract Mech 96:276–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Østby E, Thaulow C, Nyhusa B (2007) A new approach to ductile tearing assessment of pipelines under large-scale yielding. Int Int J Pres Ves Pip 84:337–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berg E, Østby E, Thaulow C, Skallerud B (2008) Ultimate fracture capacity of pressurised pipes with defects – Comparisons of large scale testing and numerical simulations. Eng Fract Mech 75:2352–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lockwood WD, Tomaz B, Reynolds AP (2002) Mechanical response of friction stir welded AA2024: experiment and modeling. Mater Sci Eng A 323:348–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sato YS, Yamanoi H, Kokawaa H, Furuhara T (2007) Microstructural evolution of ultrahigh carbon steel during friction stir welding. Scripta Mater 27:557–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Molak RM, Paradowski K, Brynk T, Ciupinski L, Pakiela Z, Kurzydlowski KJ (2009) Measurement of mechanical properties in a 316 L stainless steel welded joint. Int J Press Vessels Pip 86:43–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bleck W, Reisgen U, Mokrov O, Rossiter E, Rieger T (2010) Methodology for thermomechanical simulation and validation of mechanical weld-seam properties. Adv Eng Mater 12:147–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lemmen HJK, Alderliesten RC, Benedictus R, Hofstede JCJ, Rodi R (2008) The power of digital image correlation for detailed elastic–plastic strain measurements. In: WSEAS international conference on engineering mechanics, structures, engineering geology. Crate Island, Greece

  9. Xavier J, Avril S, Pierron F, Morais J (2009) Variation of transverse and shear stiffness properties of wood in a tree. Compos Part A 40:1953–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pereira J, Xaier J, Morais J, Losada J (2014) Assessing wood quality by spatial variation of elastic properties within the stem: case study of Pinus pinaster in the transverse plane. Can J For Res 44(2):107–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Xavier J, Belini U, Pierron F, Morais J, Lousada J, Tomazello M (2013) Characterisation of the bending stiffness components of MDF panels from full-field slope measurements. Wood Sci Technol 47:423–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Le Magoroua L, Bosa F, Rougerb F (2002) Identification of constitutive laws for wood-based panels by means of an inverse method. Compos Sci Technol 62:591–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xavier J, Avril S, Pierron F, Morais J (2007) Novel experimental approach for longitudinal-radial stiffness characterisation for clear wood by a single test. Holzforschung 61(5):573–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Majano-Majano A, Fernandez-Cabo JL, Hoheisel S, Klein M (2011) A test method for characterizing clear wood using a single Specimen. Exp Mech 52:1079–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Devivier C, Pierron F, Wisnom MR (2013) Impact damage detection in composite plates using deflectometry and the virtual fields method. Compos Part A 48:201–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lockwood WD, Reynolds AP (2003) Simulation of the global response of a friction stir weld using local constitutive behavior. Mater Sci Eng A 339:35–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Brown R, Tang W, Reynolds AP (2009) Multi-pass friction stir welding in alloy 7050-T7451: effects on weld response variables and on weld properties. Mater Sci Eng A 513–514:115–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Scintilla LD, Tricarico L, Brandizzi M, Satriano AA (2010) Nd:YAG laser weldability and mechanical properties of AZ31 magnesium alloy butt joints. J Mater Process Technol 210:2206–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Boyce B, Reu P, Robino C (2006) The constitutive behavior of laser welds in 304 L stainless steel determined by digital image correlation. Metall Mater Trans A 37:2481–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sutton MA, Yan JH, Avril S, Pierron F, Adeeb SM (2008) Identification of heterogeneous constitutive parameters in a welded specimen: uniform stress and virtual fields methods for material property estimation. Exp Mech 48:451–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Genevois C, Deschamps A, Vacher P (2006) Comparative study on local and global mechanical properties of 2024 T351, 2024 T6 and 5251 O friction stir welds. Mater Sci Eng A 415:162–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Leitao C, Leal RM, Rodrigues DM, Loureiro A, Vilaça P (2009) Mechanical behaviour of similar and dissimilar AA5182-H111 and AA6016-T4 thin friction stir welds. Mater Des 30:101–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang ZL, Hauge M, Thaulow C, Ødegard J (2002) A notched cross weld tensile testing method for determining true stress–strain curves for weldments. Eng Mech Fract 69:353–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang ZL, Hauge M, Odegard J, Thaulow C (1999) Determining material true stress strain curve from tensile specimens with rectangular cross-section. Int J Solids Struct 36:3497–3516

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. ISO 6892-1-2009 (2009) Metallic materials -tensile testing - part 1: method of test at room temperature. ISO, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  26. GB/T 228–2002 (2002) Metallic Materials - Tensile Testing at Ambient Temperature, State Quality Supervision and Inspection & Quarantine Bureau of P.R.C, China

  27. <www.mathworks.com>

  28. <www.correlatedsolutions.com>

  29. Chu TC, Ranson WF, Sutton MA (1985) Applications of digital-image-correlation techniques to experimental mechanics. Exp Mech 25(3):232–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sutton MA, Orteu JJ, Schreier HW (2009) Image correlation for shape motion and deformation measurements. Springer

  31. William DC (2001) Fundamentals of Materials Science and Engineering-An introduction. Fifth Edition

  32. Anderson TL (2005) Fracture mechanics: fundaments and applications. 3rd ed. CRC Press

  33. Dowling NE (1999) Mechanical behavior of materials: engineering methods for deformation, fracture and Fatigue, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  34. Paredes M, Ruggieri C (2015) Engineering approach for circumferential flaws in girth weld pipes subjected to bending load. Int J Pres Ves Pip 125:49–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sarzosa DFB, Souza RF, Ruggieri C (2015) J–CTOD relations in clamped SE(T) fracture specimens including 3-D stationary and growth analysis. Eng Fract Mech online

  36. API standard 1104 (2013) Welding of pipelines and related facilities. API, USA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the sponsorship of this work by the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (Grant No. 20100007110006).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Kong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kong, L., Shuai, J., Zhou, X. et al. A Universal Method for Acquiring the Constitutive Behaviors of API -5 L X90 Welds. Exp Mech 56, 165–176 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-015-0088-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-015-0088-z

Keywords

Navigation