Experimental Mechanics

, Volume 56, Issue 1, pp 59–68 | Cite as

Influence of Water Uptake on Dynamic Fracture Behavior of Poly(Methyl Methacrylate)

Article

Abstract

A study was completed to assess the effects of various humidity levels and amount of sorbed water on the fracture behavior of notched poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) samples subjected to stress pulses generated by the impact of a projectile launched from an air gun. Impact experiments were performed on six sets of samples conditioned in different environments: dry samples; samples exposed to three different relative humidity environments (11 %, 60 %, and 98 %) using saturated salt solutions (Lithium Chloride, Sodium Bromide, and Potassium Sulfate, respectively); and distilled water- and seawater-exposed samples. Experiments varied by immersion time and water content, while loading conditions were kept constant. The main goal of this study was to understand the effects of sorbed water on the fracture behavior of PMMA when subjected to high strain rate impacts. It was observed that when PMMA is subjected to strain rates of 102 s −1, the effect of water content is not a dominant mechanism on the crack initiation and crack-tip speed of PMMA.

Keywords

PMMA Dynamic loading Caustics Humidity Crack propagation 

References

  1. 1.
    Zukas JA (1982) Impact dynamics. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Asay JR, Shahinpoor M (1993) High-pressure shock compression of solids. Springer-Verlag, New YorkCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ishiyama C, Sakuma T, Shimojo M , Higo Y (2002) Effects of humidity on environmental stress cracking behavior in poly(methyl methacrylate). J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 40:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ishiyama C, Higo Y (2002) Effects of humidity on Young’s modulus in poly(methyl methacrylate). J Polym Sci Part B: 40:460–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hamouda AMS (2002) The influence of humidity on the deformation and fracture behaviour of PMMA. J Mater Process Technol 124:238–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shen J, Chen CC, Sauer JA (1985) Effects of sorbed water on properties of low and high molecular weight PMMA: 1. Deformation and fracture behaviour. Polymer 26:511–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Josserand L, Schirrer R , Davies P (1995) Influence of water on crack propagation in poly methyl methacrylate: craze stress and craze fibril lifetime. J Mater Sci 30:1772–1780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Arnold JC (1998) The effects of diffusion on environmental stress crack initiation in PMMA. J Mater Sci 33 (21):5193–5204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bokoi Y, Ishiyama C, Shimojo M, Shiraishi Y, Higo Y (2000) Effects of sorbed water on crack propagation in poly(methyl methacrylate) under static tensile stress. J Mater Sci 35:5001–5011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen CC, Shen J, Sauer JA (1985) Effects of sorbed water on properties of low and high molecular weight PMMA: 11. Fatigue performance. Polymer 26(1):89–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Burchill PJ (1989) Effect of absorbed water, temperature and strain rate on the yield strength of two methylmethacrylate-based plastics. J Mater Sci 24:1936–1940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Krevelen DWv, Nijenhuis Kt (2009) Properties of polymers: their correlation with chemical structure; their numerical estimation and prediction from additive group contributions. Elsevier, AmsterdamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lakes RS (1999) Viscoelastic solids. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Williams JG (1987) Fracture mechanics of polymers. Halsted Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Andrews EH (1979) Developments in polymer fracture. Applied Science Publishers, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shukla A (2005) Practical fracture mechanics in design. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Theocaris PS, Katsamanis P (1978) Response of cracks to impact by caustics. Eng Fract Mech 10:197–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Greenspan L (1977) Humidity fixed points of binary saturated aqueous solutions. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards - A. Physics and Chemistry, 81AGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang C, Eliasson V (2012) Shock wave focusing in water inside convergent structures. Int J Multiphys 6:267–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Delpino Gonzales O, Eliasson V (2015) Effect of water content on dynamic fracture initiation of vinyl ester. Exp Mech 1–8. doi:10.1007/s11340-015-0028-y
  21. 21.
    Beinert J, Kalthoff JF Experimental determination of dynamic stress intensity factors by shadow patterns. In: Mechanics of Fracture, Volume 7: Experimental Evaluation of Etress Concentration and Intensity Factors. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hauge, 1981Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Konsta-Gdoutos M, Gdoutos EE (1992) Some remarks on caustics in mode I stress intensity factor evaluation. Theor Appl Fract Mech 17(1):47–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cheng L, Rosakis AJ, Freund LB (1993) The interpretation of optical caustics in the presence of dynamic non-uniform crack-tip motion histories: A study based on a higher order transient crack-tip expansion. Int J Solids Struct 30(7): 875–897CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Experimental Mechanics 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aerospace and Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations