Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dynamic Response and Identification of Critical Points in the Superstructure of a Vehicle Using a Combination of Numerical and Experimental Methods

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work, a systematic methodology is applied, leading to an accurate prediction of the dynamic response of a complex vehicle, carrying a superstructure. This methodology helps in locating areas of the superstructure exhibiting a large stress concentration, for given loading conditions, without requiring any knowledge of the dynamic characteristics of the vehicle suspension subsystem. The basic idea is to first measure the acceleration time histories at the connection points of the vehicle superstructure with its suspension system and use them subsequently as a base excitation in a finite element model of the superstructure. More specifically, the vehicle superstructure is first discretized by appropriate finite elements. The resulting model is linear and is then updated through an experimental measurement of its dynamic response, yielding all the elements of the corresponding frequency response matrix of the superstructure. Then, a series of experimental trials is performed in real operating conditions, aimed at recording the acceleration time histories at the connection points of the superstructure with the chassis. These time histories are subsequently used as a ground excitation for the finite element model of the superstructure and the stresses developed under the specific loading conditions are evaluated. In this way, the critical points of the superstructure can be identified by numerical means. Finally, the reliability of the methodology applied was tested by two numerical examples as well as by placing strain gauges at the critical points of the superstructure and performing a new set of measurements for the vehicle under similar loading conditions. Direct comparison of the numerical and experimental data obtained in this manner verified the reliability and accuracy of the hybrid methodology applied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Craig RR Jr (1981) Structural Dynamics—An Introduction to Computer Methods. J Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Craig RR Jr (1987) A review of time-domain and frequency domain component mode synthesis methods. Int J Anal Exp Modal Anal 2:59–72

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vermot des Roches G, Bianchi JP, Balmes E, Lemaire R and Pasquet T (2010) Using component mode in a system design process, Proceedings of the IMAC-XXVIII 2010, Jacksonville, Florida, USA

  4. Papalukopoulos C, Natsiavas S (2007) Dynamics of large scale mechanical models using multi-level substructuring. ASME J Comput Nonlinear Dyn 2:40–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Verros G, Natsiavas S (2002) Ride dynamics of nonlinear vehicle models using component mode synthesis. ASME J Vib Acoust 124:427–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Craig RR Jr (1977) Methods of component mode synthesis. Shock Vib Dig J 9:3–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Klosterman A (1972) A combined experimental and analytical procedure for improving automotive system dynamics. SAE Tech Pap 720093

  8. Craig Jr RR and Chang CJ (1977) Substructure coupling for dynamic analysis and testing, Technical report CR2781. NASA

  9. MacNeal RH (1971) A hybrid method of component mode synthesis. J Comput Struct 1:581–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bennighof JK, Kaplan MF (1998) Frequency window implementation of adaptive multi-level substructuring. ASME J Vib Acoust 120:409–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Farhat C, Geradin M (1994) On a component mode synthesis method and its application to incompatible structures. Comput Struct 51:459–473

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Cuppens K, Sas P, Hermans L (2000) Evaluation of FRF based substructuring and modal synthesis technique applied to vehicle FE data, ISMA 2000. K.U. Leuven, Belgium, pp 1143–1150

    Google Scholar 

  13. Huizinga ATMJM, van Campen DH, Kraker A (1997) Application of hybrid frequency domain substructuring for modelling an automotive engine suspension. ASME J Vib Acoust 119:304–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jetmundsen B, Bielawa RL, Flannelly WG (1988) Generalized frequency domain substructure synthesis. J Am Helicopter Soc 85:55–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ren Y, Beards CF (1995) On substructure synthesis with FRF data. J Sound Vib 185:845–866

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Giagopoulos D, Natsiavas S (2007) Hybrid (numerical-experimental) modeling of complex structures with linear and nonlinear components. Nonlinear Dyn 47:193–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Giagopoulos D and Natsiavas S (2013) Dynamic analysis and identification of critical points in the superstructure of a vehicle through FE modeling and mobility tests, Proceedings of the ASME IDETC/CIE 2013, Portland, Oregon, USA

  18. Chen C, Ricles JM, Karavasilis TL, Chae YY, Sause R (2012) Evaluation of a real-time hybrid simulation system for performance evaluation of structures with rate dependent devices subjected to seismic loading. Eng Struct 35:71–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gao X, Castaneda N, Dyke SJ (2013) Real time hybrid simulation: from dynamic system, motion control to experimental error. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 42:815–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Papadimitriou C, Ntotsios E, Giagopoulos D, Natsiavas S (2012) Variability of updated finite element models and their predictions consistent with vibration measurements. Struct Control Health Monit 19:630–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Giagopoulos D, Papadioti D-Ch, Papadimitriou C and Natsiavas S (2013) Bayesian uncertainty quantification and propagation in nonlinear structural dynamics, Proceedings of the IMAC-XXXI 2013, Garden Grove, California, USA

  22. DYNAMIS 3.1.1, Solver Reference Guide, DTECH, Thessaloniki, Greece, 2013

  23. MSC.NASTRAN (2008) Quick Reference Guide, MSC.SOFTWARE, 2008.

  24. Mottershead JE, Friswell MI (1997) Model updating in structural dynamics: a survey. J Sound Vib 167:347–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ewins DJ (1984) Modal Testing: Theory and Practice. Research Studies Press, Somerset

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mohanty P, Rixen DJ (2005) Identifying mode shapes and modal frequencies by operational modal analysis in the presence of harmonic excitation. Exp Mech 45:213–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Spottswood SM, Allemang RJ (2007) On the investigation of some parameter identification and experimental modal filtering issues for nonlinear reduced order models. Exp Mech 47:511–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Richardson MH and Formenti DL (1985) Global curve fitting of frequency response measurements using the rational fraction polynomial method, Third IMAC Conference, Orlando, Florida

  29. Kerschen G, Golinval JC, Hemez FM (2003) Bayesian model selection for the identification of nonlinear mechanical structures. ASME J Vib Acoust 125:389–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. National Instruments Corporation, http://www.ni.com

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from the Hellenic Vehicle Industry (ELVO S.A.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Western Macedonia, 50100, Kozani, Greece

    D. Giagopoulos

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aristotle University, 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece

    S. Natsiavas

Authors
  1. D. Giagopoulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Natsiavas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Giagopoulos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giagopoulos, D., Natsiavas, S. Dynamic Response and Identification of Critical Points in the Superstructure of a Vehicle Using a Combination of Numerical and Experimental Methods. Exp Mech 55, 529–542 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-014-9966-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-014-9966-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation