Advertisement

Experimental Mechanics

, Volume 55, Issue 3, pp 635–640 | Cite as

Determination of Precise Optimal Cyclic Strain for Tenogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Using a Non-uniform Deformation Field

  • Y. Morita
  • T. Sato
  • S. Watanabe
  • Y. Ju
Brief Technical Note

Abstract

Although there have been a number of studies regarding tenogenic differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (hBMSCs) using uniaxial cyclic stretching stimulation with a homogeneous strain field, it has been difficult to determine the optimal normal strain in the stretch direction for differentiation. We have developed a non-uniform strain field system that in principle would allow determination of the optimal normal strain in a single experiment. As a result, the optimal normal strains of the membrane were clarified as 7.9 and 8.5 % for tenogenic differentiation marker proteins, type I collagen (Col I) and tenascin-C (Tnc), respectively. The non-uniform strain field proposed here represents a powerful tool to determine the optimal normal strain in the stretch direction for hBMSC-to-tenocyte differentiation. Furthermore, we found that the dependence of protein expression level on the normal strain of the membrane differed between proteins, which would be crucial in the field of embryology and regenerative medicine.

Keywords

Digital image correlation (DIC) Strain field Optimal strain Mechanical stimulation Tenogenic differentiation Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) Tenocyte Collagen Tenascin 

References

  1. 1.
    Bullough R, Finnigan T, Kay A et al (2008) Tendon repair through stem cell intervention: cellular and molecular approaches. Disabil Rehabil 30:1746–1751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC et al (1999) Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 284:143–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Awad H, Butler DL, Boivin GP et al (1999) Autologous mesenchymal stem cell-mediated repair of tendon. Tissue Eng 5:267–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kuo CK, Tuan RS (2008) Mechanoactive tenogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng A 14:1615–1627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Haddad-Weber M, Prager P, Kunz M et al (2010) BMP12 and BMP13 gene transfer induce ligamentogenic differentiation in mesenchymal progenitor and anterior cruciate ligament cells. Cytotherapy 12:505–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yin Z, Chen X, Chen JL et al (2010) The regulation of tendon stem cell differentiation by the alignment of nanofibers. Biomaterials 31:2163–2175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Luo Q, Song G, Song Y et al (2009) Indirect co-culture with tenocytes promotes proliferation and mRNA expression of tendon/ligament related genes in rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Cytotechnology 61:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lui PPY, Rui YF, Ni M, Chan KM (2011) Tenogenic differentiation of stem cells for tendon repair—what is the current evidence? J Tissue Eng Regen Med 5:e144–e163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Morita Y, Watanabe S, Ju Y, Xu B (2013) Determination of optimal cyclic uniaxial stretches for stem cell-to-tenocyte differentiation under a wide range of mechanical stretch conditions by evaluating gene expression and protein synthesis levels. Acta Bioeng Biomech 15:71–79Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Morita Y, Suzuki S, Ju Y, Kawase N (2014) Differences between protein expression and extracellular matrix state on uniaxial stretching for tenogenic differentiation. J Mech Med Biol 14:1450025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Song G, Ju Y, Soyama H et al (2007) Regulation of cyclic longitudinal mechanical stretch on proliferation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Mol Cell Biomech 4:201–210Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen YJ, Huang CH, Lee IC et al (2008) Effects of cyclic mechanical stretching on the mRNA expression of tendon/ligament-related and osteoblast-specific genes in human mesenchymal stem cells. Connect Tissue Res 49:7–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Morita Y, Watanabe S, Ju Y, Yamamoto S (2013) In vitro experimental study for the determination of cellular axial strain threshold and preferential axial strain from cell orientation behavior in a non-uniform deformation field. Cell Biochem Biophys 67:1249–1259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Balestrini JL, Skorinko JK, Hera A et al (2010) Applying controlled non-uniform deformation for in-vitro studies of cell mechanobiology. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 9:329–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Richardson WJ, Metz RP, Moreno MR et al (2011) A device to study the effects of stretch gradients on cell behavior. J Biomech Eng Trans ASME 133:101008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sutton MA (2008) Digital image correlation for shape and deformation measurements. In: Sharpe WN (ed) Springer handbook of experimental solid mechanics. Springer, New York, pp 565–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Inoh H, Ishiguro N, Sawazaki SI et al (2002) Uni-axial cyclic stretch induces the activation of transcription factor nuclear factor B in human fibroblast cells. FASEB J 16:405Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Eyre DR, Paz MA, Gallop PM (1984) Cross-linking in collagen and elastin. Annu Rev Biochem 53:717–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lejard V, Brideau G, Blasis F et al (2007) Scleraxis and NFATc regulate the expression of the pro-alpha1(I) collagen gene in tendon fibroblasts. J Biol Chem 282:17665–17675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Elefteriou F, Exposito JY, Garrone R, Lethias C (2001) Binding of tenascin-X to decorin. FEBS Lett 495:44–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Apte MV, Haber PS, Darby SJ et al (1999) Pancreatic stellate cells are activated by proinflammatory cytokines: implications for pancreatic fibrogenesis. Gut 44:534–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Experimental Mechanics 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Science & Engineering, Graduate School of EngineeringNagoya UniversityNagoyaJapan

Personalised recommendations