Experimental Mechanics

, Volume 54, Issue 5, pp 743–752 | Cite as

Characterization of Laser Generated Lamb Wave Modes after Interaction with a Thickness Reduction Discontinuity Using Ray Tracing Theory

Article

Abstract

The effect that a circular discontinuity (due to thickness reduction) in an Aluminum plate has on the direction of Lamb wave propagation was experimentally and theoretically studied. Broadband Lamb waves were generated by a pulsed Nd:YAG laser and optically detected with a photo-EMF detector to increase spatial resolution. The experimental results show that thickness reduction modifies the time of flight (TOF) for S0 and A0 vibration modes and generates a change in direction of the ultrasonic Lamb wave. The change in the TOF as a function of distance and thickness reduction was numerically determined using ray theory and then compared to experimental results. It is shown that the change in the direction of propagation depends on the vibrational mode and frequency of the Lamb waves and this can affect the detection and characterization of a hidden discontinuity.

Keywords

Lamb waves Laser-generated ultrasound Photo-EMF detection Ray tracing theory 

References

  1. 1.
    Cawley P, Lowe MDJ, Alleyn DN, Pavlakovic B, Wilcox P (2003) Practical long range guided wave testing: application to pipes and rail. Mater Eval 61:66–74Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    KunduT (2004) Ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation: engineering and biological material characterization. CRC pressGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rose JL (1999) Ultrasonic waves in solid media. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rose JL (2004) Ultrasonic guided waves in structural health monitoring. Adv Nondestruct Eval 270:14–21Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alleyne D, Cawley P (1996) The use of Lamb waves for the long range inspection of large structures. Ultrasonics 34:287–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tua PS, Quek ST, Wang Q (2004) Detection of cracks in plates using piezo-actuated Lamb waves. Smart Mater Struct 13:643–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dalton RP, Cawley P, Lowe MJS (2001) The Potential of Guided Waves for Monitoring Large Areas of Metallic Aircraft Fuselage Structure. J Nondestruct Eval 20:29–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Balvantin A, Baltazar A, Kim JY (2010) Ultrasonic lamb wave tomography of non‐uniform interfacial stiffness between contacting solid bodies. In AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol., 1211, pp 1463-1470Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Connolly GD, Lowe MJS, Temple JAG, Rokhlin SI (2010) Correction of ultrasonic array images to improve reflector sizing and location in inhomogeneous materials using a ray-tracing model. J Acoust Soc Am 127:2802–2812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leonard KR, Malyarenko EV, Hinders MK (2002) Ultrasonic lamb wave tomography. Inverse Problems 18:1795–1808CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Malyarenko EV, Hinders MK (2001) Ultrasonic Lamb wave diffraction tomography. Ultrasonics 39:269–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McKeon JC, Hinders MK (1999) Parallel projection and crosshole Lamb wave contact scanning tomography. J Acoust Soc Am 106:2568–2577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lowe MJS, Cawley P, Kao J-Y, Diligent O (2002) The low frequency reflection characteristics of the fundamental antisymmetric Lamb wave a0 from a rectangular notch in a plate. J Acoust Soc Am 112:2612–2622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Diligent O, Grahn T, Boström A, Cawley P, Lowe L (2002) The low-frequency reflection and scattering of the S0 Lamb mode from a circular through-thickness hole in a plate: Finite Element, analytical and experimental studies. J Acoust Soc Am 112:2589–2601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fromme P, Wilcox P, Lowe MJS, Cawley P (2004) On the scattering and mode conversion of the A0 lamb wave mode at circular defects in plates. In AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol 700. pp 142-149Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Andersen AH (1990) Ray tracing for reconstructive tomography in the presence of object discontinuity boundaries: a comparative analysis of recursive schemes. J Acoust Soc Am 89:574–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Andersen AH, Kak AC (1982) Digital ray tracing in two-dimensional refractive fields. J Acoust Soc Am 72:1593–1606CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pereyra V (2000) Ray tracing methods for inverse problems. Inverse Probl 16:R1–R35CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang B, Takatsubo J, Toyama N, Akimune Y, Zhao M (2006) An improved ray tracing algorithm for ultrasonic CT in nondestructive inspections. ICSP Proc 1:5–8Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Scruby CB, Drain LE (1990) Laser ultrasonics: techniques and applications. Adam Hilger, BristolGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Benz R, Niethammer M, Hurlebaus S, Jacobs L (2003) Localization of notches with Lamb waves. J Acoust Soc Am 114:677–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Birnbaum G, White G (1984) Laser techniques in NDE, vol 7, Research techniques in nondestructive testing. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kim DY, Lee SJ, Lee JH (2008) Application of laser-generated ultrasound for evaluation of wall-thinning in carbon steel elbow. In 17th World Conference on Nondestructive Testing, pp 25–28Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Park JH, Lee JH, Seo GC, Choi SW (2006) Application of laser-generated ultrasound for evaluation of thickness reduction in carbon steel pipes. Key Eng Mater 321:743–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wu CH, Yang CH (2011) Laser ultrasound technique for ray tracing investigation of Lamb wave tomography. In SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring. International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp 79833L–79833LGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cohen L (1995) Time frequency analysis, Prentice Hall. Upper Saddle River, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Flandrin P (1999) Time-frequency/time-scale analysis, wavelet analysis and its applications, vol 10. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mallat S (1999) A wavelet tour of signal processing. Academic Press, CAMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cheeke JDN (2002) Fundamentals and applications of ultrasonic waves. CRC PressGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Berryman JG (1989) Fermat’s principle and nonlinear traveltime tomography. Phys Rev Lett 62:2953–2956CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Denis F, Basset O, Gimenez G (1995) Ultrasonic transmission tomography in refracting media: reduction of refraction artifacts by curved-ray techniques. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 14:173–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rodriguez P, Stepanov S, Wang CC, Trivedi S (2006) Laser ultrasound detection by CdTe:V monopolar photo-EMF detector with responsivity close to theoretical limit. Nondestruct Test Eval 21:95–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Alleyne D, Cawley P (1991) Two-dimensional Fourier transform method for the measurement of propagating multimode signals. J Acoust Soc Am 89:1159–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Experimental Mechanics 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Robotics and Advanced Manufacturing Program, CINVESTAV, Unidad-SaltilloRamos ArizpeMéxico
  2. 2.INAOE, A.P.51PueblaMéxico

Personalised recommendations