Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic Behavior and High Speed Machining of Ti-6246 and Alloy 625 Superalloys: Experimental and Modeling Approaches

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Titanium alloys and nickel based superalloys are used in various demanding applications because of their excellent high temperature properties, especially high strength and good corrosion and fatigue resistance. However, the high strength and hardness at high temperatures combined with strong strain hardening can lead to difficulties in machining of these alloys. Finite element simulations can be used to optimize the cutting conditions and to reduce the machining costs. However, simulations of machining operations require accurate material models that can only be built on reliable experimental data. Also, the mechanical properties of materials can only be measured in a limited range of strain and strain rate at the laboratory scale, from which the material behavior has to be extrapolated to the actual machining range. In this work, the mechanical behavior of Titanium-6246 and a nickel based superalloy, similar to Inconel 625, has been studied in details. The Johnson-Cook material model parameters were obtained from the experimental data and the model was used to describe the plastic behavior of the studied alloys in simulations of orthogonal cutting of the material. The model for the Ni- based superalloy was improved by introducing an additional strain softening term that allows decreasing of the strain hardening rate at large deformations. The preliminary simulation results have also been verified experimentally by comparing the simulation results with machining experiments, and the results of the simulations are briefly presented and discussed. The material models are able to reproduce the serrated chips with split shear bands, but the cutting stresses obtained from the simulations are somewhat higher than those obtained from the cutting experiments. Also, some differences were observed in the chip shape, and further development of the material model and simulations is needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ezugwu EO, Bonney J, Yamane Y (2003) An overview of the machinability of aeroengine alloys. J Mater Process Technol 134:223–252

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ezugwu EO, Wang ZM, Machado AR (1999) The machinability of nickel-based alloys: a review. J Mater Process Technol 86:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fang N, Wu Q (2009) A comparative study on the cutting forces in high speed machining of Ti-6Al-4V and Inconel 718 with a round cutting edge tool. J Mater Process Technol 209:4385–4389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Costes JP (2007) Tool-life an wear mechanisms of CBN tools in machining of Inconel 718. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 47:1081–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dudzinski D, Devillez A, Moufki A, Larrouquere D, Zerrouki V, Vigneau J (2004) A review of developments towards dry and high speed machining of Inconel 718. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 44:439–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang ZY, Rajurkar KP, Fan J, Lei S, Shin YC, Petrescu G (2003) Hybrid machining of Inconel 718. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 43:1391–1396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mitrofanov AV, Ahmed N, Babitsky VI, Silberschmidt VV (2005) Effect of lubrication and cutting parameters on ultrasonically assisted turning of inconel 718. J Mater Process Technol 162–163:649–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ahmed N, Mitrofanov AV, Babitsky VI, Silberschmidt VV (2006) Analysis of material response to ultrasonic loading in turning Inconel 718. Mater Sci Eng A 424:318–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dong G, Zhaopeng H, Rongdi H, Yanli C, Muguthu J (2011) Study of cutting deformation in machining nickel-based alloy Inconel 718. Int J Mach Tool Manufacture 51:520–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ulhmann E, Graf von der Schulenburg M, Zettier R (2007) Finite element modeling and cutting simulations of Inconel 718. Ann CIRP 56:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ortiz M, Quigley JJ (1991) Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 90:781–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Marusich T, Ortiz M (1995) Int J Numer Methods Eng 38:3675–3694

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Sima M, Özel T (2010) Int J Mach Tool Manuf 50:943–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Calamaz M, Coupard D, Girot F (2008) Int J Mach Tool Manuf 48:275–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Calamaz M, Coupard D, Girot F (2010) Mater Sci Technol 14:244–257

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vaz M, Owen DR, Kalhori V, Lundblad M, Lindgren L (2007) Arch Comput Methods Eng 14(2):173–204

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson G, Cook W (1983) In the Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Ballistics

  18. Johnson G, Cook W (1985) Int. J. Eng Fract Mech

  19. Lodygowski T, Rusinek A, Jankowiak T, Sumelka W (2012) Eng Trans 60:69–96

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rusinek A, Klepaczko J (2001) Int J Plast 17:87–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Perzyna P (2008) Mechanics 27:25–42

    Google Scholar 

  22. Apostol M (2007) Ph.D. thesis, Tampere University of Technology

  23. Apostol M, Kuokkala V-T, Vuoristo T (2004) In: Papalettere C (ed) Advances in Experimental Mechanics. McGraw-Hill, Bari Italy

    Google Scholar 

  24. Apostol M, Vuoristo T, Kuokkala V-T (2003) J de Phys IV 110

  25. Gorham D (1983) J Phys E: Scientific Instruments, 16.

  26. Hokka M, Kuokkala V-T, Curtze S, Vuoristo T, Apostol M (2006) J de Phys 134

  27. Hokka M, Leemet T, Shrot A, Baeker M, Kuokkala V-T (2012) Mater Sci Eng A 550:350–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Vuoristo T (2004) Ph.D. thesis, Tampere University of Technology

  29. Meyers M (1994) Dynamic Material Behavior. John Wiley and Sons, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Shrot A, Bäker M (2012) Determination of Johnson-Cook parameters from machining simulations. Comput Mater Sci 52:298–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement No. PITN-GA-2008-211536, project MaMiNa.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Hokka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hokka, M., Gomon, D., Shrot, A. et al. Dynamic Behavior and High Speed Machining of Ti-6246 and Alloy 625 Superalloys: Experimental and Modeling Approaches. Exp Mech 54, 199–210 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-013-9793-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-013-9793-7

Keywords

Navigation