Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic Tensile Characterization of a 4330-V Steel with Kolsky Bar Techniques

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dynamic tensile experimental techniques of high-strength alloys using a Kolsky tension bar implemented with pulse shaping and advanced analytical and diagnostic techniques have been developed. The issues that include minimizing abnormal stress peak, determining strain in specimen gage section, evaluating uniform deformation, as well as developing pulse shaping for constant strain rate and stress equilibrium have been addressed in this study to ensure valid experimental conditions and obtainment of reliable high-rate tensile stress–strain response of alloys with a Kolsky tension bar. The techniques were applied to characterize the tensile stress–strain response of a 4330-V steel at two high strain rates. Comparing these high-rate results with quasi-static data, the strain rate effect on the tensile stress–strain response of the 4330-V steel was determined. The 4330-V steel exhibits slight work-hardening behavior in tension and the tensile flow stress is significantly sensitive to strain rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kolsky H (1949) An investigation of the mechanical properties of materials at very high rates of loading. Proc Phys Soc Lond B62:676–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen W, Song B (2011) Split Hopkinson (Kolsky) Bar: Design, Testing and Applications. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Harding J, Wood EO, Campbell JD (1960) Tensile testing of materials at impact rates of strain. J Mech Eng Sci 2:88–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hauser FE (1966) Techniques for measuring stress–strain relations at high strain rates. Exp Mech 6:395–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lindholm US, Yeakley LM (1968) High strain rate testing: tension and compression. Exp Mech 8:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kawata K, Hashimoto S, Kurokawa K, Kanayama N (1979) A New Testing Method for the Characterization of Materials in High-Velocity Tension. In: Harding J (ed) Mechanical Properties at High Rates of Strain, Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. 47:71–80, Oxford

  7. Nicholas T (1981) Tensile testing of materials at high rates of strain. Exp Mech 21:177–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Staab GH, Gilat A (1991) A direct-tension split Hopkinson Bar for high strain-rate testing. Exp Mech 31:232–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nemat-Nasser S (2000) Introduction to High Strain Rate Testing, vol 8, ASM handbook. Mechanical Testing and Evaluation, Materials Park, pp 427–446

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nemat-Nasser S, Isaacs JB, Starrett JE (1991) Hopkinson techniques for dynamic recovery experiments. Proc Roy Soc London 435:371–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brown EN, Rae PJ, Gray GT (2006) The influence of temperature and strain rate on the tensile and compression constitutive response of four fluoropolymers. J Phys IV 134:935–940

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rajendran AM, Bless SJ (1986) Determination of tensile flow stress beyond necking at very high strain rate. Exp Mech 26:319–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Børvik T, Hopperstad OS, Dey S, Pizzinato EV, Langseth M, Albertini C (2005) Strength and ductility of weldox 460 E steel at high strain rates, elevated temperatures and various stress triaxialities. Eng Fract Mech 72:1071–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Arthington MR, Siviour CR, Petrinic N (2012) Improved materials characterisation through the application of geometry reconstruction to quasi-static and high-strain-rate tension tests. Int J Impact Eng 46:86–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Curtze S, Kuokkala V-T, Hokka M, Peura P (2009) Deformation behavior of TRIP and DP steels in tension at different temperatures over a wide range of strain rates. Mater Sci Eng A507:124–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gilat A, Schmidt TE, Walker AL (2009) Full field strain measurement in compression and tensile split Hopkinson Bar experiments. Exp Mech 49:291–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rusinek A, Klepaczko JR (2003) Impact tension of sheet metals – effect of initial specimen length. J Phys IV France 110:329–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kuroda M, Uenishi A, Yoshida H, Igarashi A (2006) Ductility of interstitial-free steel under high strain rate tension: experiments and macroscopic modeling with a physically-based consideration. Int J Solids Struct 43:4465–4483

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee D, Tippur HV, Jensen BJ, Bogert PB (2011) Tensile and fracture characterization of PETI-5 and IM7/PETI-5 grphite/epoxy composites under quasi-static and dynamic loading conditions. Trans ASME J Eng Mater Tech 133:021015, 11 pp

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nie X, Song B, Ge Y, Chen W, Weerasooriya T (2009) A split Hopkinson tension bar for extra-soft specimens. Exp Mech 49:451–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Frew DJ, Forrestal MJ, Chen W (2005) Pulse shaping techniques for testing elastic–plastic materials with a split Hopkinson pressure Bar. Exp Mech 45:186–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Song B, Antoun BR, Connelly K, Korellis J, Lu W-Y (2011) Improved Kolsky tension bar for high-rate tensile characterization of materials. Meas Sci Technol 22:045704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rusinek A, Zaera R, Klepaczko JR, Cheriguene R (2005) Analysis of inertia and scale effects on dynamic neck formation during tension of sheet steel. Acta Mater 53:5387–5400

    Google Scholar 

  24. Song B, Antoun BR (2012) Pseudo stress response in kolsky tension bar experiments. Exp Mech 52:525–528

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ravichandran G, Subhash G (1994) Critical appraisal of limiting strain rates for compression testing of ceramics in a split Hopkinson Pressure Bar. J Am Ceram Soc 77:263–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tarigopula V, Hopperstad OS, Langseth M, Clausen AH, Hild F (2008) A study of localisation in dual-phase high-strength steels under dynamic loading using digital image correlation and FE analysis. Int J Solids Struct 45:601–619

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Li Y, Ramesh KT (2007) An optical technique for measurement of material properties in the tension Kolsky bar. Int J Impact Eng 34:784–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Song B, Forrestal MJ, Chen W (2006) Dynamic and quasi-static propagation of compaction waves in a Low-density epoxy foam. Exp Mech 46:127–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Wei-Yang Lu for the valuable discussion about this work. Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Song.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Song, B., Antoun, B.R. & Jin, H. Dynamic Tensile Characterization of a 4330-V Steel with Kolsky Bar Techniques. Exp Mech 53, 1519–1529 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-013-9721-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-013-9721-x

Keywords

Navigation