Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Static and Dynamic Characteristics of an Artificial Wing Mimicking an Allomyrina Dichotoma Beetle’s Hind Wing for Flapping-Wing Micro Air Vehicles

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of flapping-wing micro air vehicles for many applications, such as hazardous environment exploration, reconnaissance, and search and rescue, demands properly designed, biologically inspired wings to produce enough lift force for their operation. To compare an artificial wing with a natural wing in terms of mechanical properties, overall flexural stiffness is frequently measured with a static loading test setup. However, a dynamic testing method to determine wing deformation patterns has not been developed, even though wing deformation patterns may provide more information about the characteristics of artificial wings. A reliable dynamic testing method is crucial to the development of a high-performance artificial wing. Moreover, the relationship between static and dynamic characteristics of the artificial wing is rare in literature. Therefore, in this study, we present a complete analysis of an artificial wing mimicking an Allomyrina Dichotoma beetle’s hind wing by investigating its static and dynamic characteristics separately, as well as the relationship between them. The dynamic characteristics such as natural frequency, mode shape, and damping ratio of two basic vibration modes (first bending and first torsion) in the operating frequency range were determined using a Bruel & Kjaer (B&K) fast Fourier transform analyzer. To verify experimental results, the natural frequencies were calculated by measuring the flexural and torsional stiffness of an artificial wing and solving the respective governing differential equations. The experimental results from the B&K fast Fourier transform analyzer were consistent with the calculated results. Even though natural frequency is important in the design of an artificial wing, mode shapes, which can be determined only by dynamic testing, can provide reliable guidelines for the biomimetic design of insect-scale artificial wings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mahardika N, Nguyen QV, Park HC (2011) Effect of outer wing separation on lift and thrust generation in a flapping wing system. Bioinsp Biomim 6:036006–036016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ratti J, Vachtsevanos G (2012) Inventing a biologically inspired, energy efficient micro aerial vehicle. J Intell Robot Syst 64:437–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mukherjee S, Ganguli R (2010) Non-linear dynamic analysis of a piezoelectrically actuated flapping wing. J Intel Mat Syst Str 21:1157–1167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Khan ZA, Agrawal SK (2011) Study of biologically inspired flapping mechanism for micro air vehicles. AIAA J 49:1354–1365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ratti J, Vachtsevanos G (2010) A biologically-inspired micro aerial vehicle. J Intell Robot Syst 60:153–178

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Shyy W, Aono H, Chimakurthi SK, Trizila P, Kang CK, Cesnik CES, Liu H (2010) Recent progress in flapping wing aerodynamics and aeroelasticity. Prog Aerosp Sci 46:284–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mukherjee S, Ganguli R (2010) Ionic polymer metal composite flapping actuator mimicking dragonflies. CMC-Comput Mater Con 19:105–133

    Google Scholar 

  8. Truong QT, Nguyen QV, Park HC, Byun DY, Goo NS (2011) Modification of a four-bar linkage system for a higher optimal flapping frequency. J Intel Mat Syst Str 22:59–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ramasamy M, Leishman JG, Lee TE (2007) Flow field of a rotating-wing micro air vehicle. J Aircr 44:1236–1244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ellington CP (1984) The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 305:1–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dickinson MH, Gotz KG (1993) Unsteady aerodynamic performance of model wings at low Reynolds numbers. J Exp Biol 174:45–64

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dickinson MH (1994) The effects of wing rotation on unsteady aerodynamic performance at low Reynolds number. J Exp Biol 192:179–206

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dickinson MH, Lehmann FO, Sane SP (1999) Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. Science 284:1954–1960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ellington CP, van den Berg C, Will Mott A, Thomas A (1996) Leading-edge vortices in insect flight. Nature 384:626–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sane SP, Dickinson MH (2001) The control of flight force by a flapping wing: lift and drag production. J Exp Biol 204:2607–2626

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sane SP, Dickinson MH (2002) The aerodynamic effects of wing rotation and a revised quasi-steady model of flapping flight. J Exp Biol 205:1087–1096

    Google Scholar 

  17. Walker SM, Thomas ALR, Taylor GK (2009) Deformable wing kinematics in the desert locust: how and why do camber, twist and topography vary through the stroke? J R Soc Interface 6:735–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tanaka H, Whitney JP, Wood RJ (2011) Effect of flexural and torsional wing flexibility on lift generation in hoverfly flight. Integr Comp Biol 1–9

  19. Newman DJS, Wootton RJ (1986) An approach to the mechanics of pleating in dragonfly wings. J Exp Biol 125:361–372

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wootton RJ, Evans KE, Herbert RC, Smith CW (2000) The hind wing of the desert locust (Schistocerca gregaria Forskal) I. Functional morphology and mode of operation. J Exp Biol 203:2921–2931

    Google Scholar 

  21. Steppan SJ (2000) Flexural stiffness patterns of butterfly wings (Papilionoidea). J Res Lepid 35:61–77

    Google Scholar 

  22. Combes SA, Daniel TL (2003) Flexural stiffness in insect wings I. Scaling and the influence of wing venation. J Exp Biol 206:2979–2987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ennos AR (1988) The importance of torsion in the design of insect wings. J Exp Biol 140:137–160

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shang JK, Combes SA, Finio BM, Wood RJ (2009) Artificial insect wings of diverse morphology for flapping-wing micro air vehicles. Bioinsp Biomim 4:036002–036008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tanaka H, Wood RJ (2010) Fabrication of corrugated artificial insect wings using laser micromachined molds. J Micromech Microeng 20:075008–075016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen JS, Chen JY, Chou YF (2008) On the natural frequencies and mode shapes of dragonfly wings. J Sound Vib 313:643–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wootton RJ, Herbert RC, Young PG, Evans KE (2003) Approaches to the structural modelling of insect wings. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 358:1577–1587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Darvizeh M, Darvizeh A, Rajabi H, Rezaei A (2009) Free vibration analysis of dragonfly wings using finite element method. Int J Multiphysics 3:101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jongerius SR, Lentink D (2010) Structural analysis of a dragonfly wing. Exp Mech 50:1323–1334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rajabi H, Moghadami M, Darvizeh A (2011) Investigation of microstructure, natural frequencies and vibration modes of dragonfly wing. J Bionic Eng 8:165–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Song F, Lee KL, Soh AK, Zhu F, Bai YL (2004) Experimental studies of the material properties of the forewing of cicada (Homoptera, Cicadidae). J Exp Biol 207:3035–3042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mengesha TE, Vallance RR, Mittal R (2011) Stiffness of desiccating insect wings. Bioinsp Biomim 6:014001–014009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zeng L, Matsumoto H, Sunada S, Ohnuki T, Kawachi K (1995) Two dimensional, non-contact measurement of the natural frequencies of dragonfly wings using a quadrant position sensor. Opt Eng 34:1226–1231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sudo S, Takagi K, Tsuyuki K, Yano T (2008) Dynamic behavior of dragonfly wings. J JSEM 8:163–168

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sims TW, Palazotto AN, Norris A (2010) A structural dynamic analysis of a Manduca Sexta forewing. Int J MAV 2:119–140

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ganguli R, Gorb S, Lehmann F-O, Mukherjee S (2010) An experimental and numerical study of Calliphora wing structure. Exp Mech 50:1183–1197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ha NS, Jin TL, Goo NS, Park HC (2011) Anisotropy and non-homogeneity of an Allomyrina Dichotoma beetle hind wing membrane. Bioinsp Biomim 6:046003–046018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Truong QT, Nguyen QV, Truong VT, Park HC, Byun DY, Goo NS (2011) A modified blade element theory for estimation of forces generated by a beetle-mimicking flapping wing system. Bioinsp Biomim 6:036008–036019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mohammad A, Park HC, Hwang DY, Byun DY, Goo NS (2009) Mimicking unfolding motion of a beetle hind wing. Chin Sci Bull 54:2416–2424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Haas F, Gorb S, Blickhan R (2000) The function of resilin in beetle wings. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:1375–1381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sato H, Berry CW, Peeri Y, Baghoomian E, Casey BE, Lavella G, VandenBrooks JM, Harrison JF, Maharbiz MM (2009) Remote radio control of insect flight. Front Integr Neurosci 3:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sato H, Maharbiz MM (2010) Recent developments in the remote radio control of insect flight. Front Neurosci 4:199

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Nguyen QV, Park HC, Goo NS, Byun DY (2010) Characteristics of a beetle’s free flight and a flapping-wing system that mimics beetle flight. J Bionic Eng 7:77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Jin T, Goo NS, Park HC (2010) Finite element modeling of a beetle wing. J Bionic Eng 7:S145–S149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Bhayu PR, Nguyen QV, Park HC, Goo NS, Byun DY (2010) Artificial cambered-wing for a beetle-mimicking flapper. J Bionic Eng 7:S130–S136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Nguyen QV, Truong QT, Park HC, Goo NS, Byun DY (2010) Measurement of force produced by an insect-mimicking flapping-wing system. J Bionic Eng 7:S94–S102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Vincent JFV, Wegst UGK (2004) Design and mechanical properties of insect cuticle. Arthropod Struct Dev 33:187–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Marks LS (1951) Mechanical engineers’ handbook, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  49. Sunada S, Zeng L, Kawachi K (1998) The relationship between dragonfly wing structure and torsional deformation. J Theor Biol 193:39–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Beliveau JG, Vigneron FR, Soucy Y, Draisey S (1986) Modal parameter estimation from base excitation. J Sound Vib 107:435–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Wu Z, Wright MT, Ma X (2010) The experimental evaluation of the dynamics of fluid-loaded microplates. J Micromech Microeng 20:075034–075044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Chou YF, Wang LC (2001) On the modal testing of microstructures: its theoretical approach and experimental setup. J Vib Acoust 123:104–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Ozdoganlar OB, Hansche BD, Carne TG (2005) Experimental modal analysis for microelectromechanical systems. Exp Mech 45:498–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Lehmann FO, Gorb S, Nasir N, Schutzner P (2011) Elastic deformation and energy loss of flapping fly wings. J Exp Biol 214:2949–2961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Combes SA, Daniel TL (2001) Shape, flapping and flexion: wing and fin design for forward flight. J Exp Biol 204:2073–2085

    Google Scholar 

  56. Wegst UGK, Ashby MF (2004) The mechanical efficiency of natural materials. Phil Mag 84:2167–2186

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Basic Science Research Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea, which is funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (Grant No. 2010-0018884). We are very grateful for the financial support received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biomimetics and Intelligent Microsystem Laboratory, Department of Advanced Technology Fusion, Konkuk University, Seoul, 143-701, Republic of Korea

    N. S. Ha, Q. V. Nguyen, N. S. Goo & H. C. Park

Authors
  1. N. S. Ha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Q. V. Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. N. S. Goo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. H. C. Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. S. Goo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ha, N.S., Nguyen, Q.V., Goo, N.S. et al. Static and Dynamic Characteristics of an Artificial Wing Mimicking an Allomyrina Dichotoma Beetle’s Hind Wing for Flapping-Wing Micro Air Vehicles. Exp Mech 52, 1535–1549 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-012-9611-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-012-9611-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation