Skip to main content
Log in

Digital Image Correlation for Specimens with Multiple Growing Cracks

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Measuring the surface displacements of specimens having multiple, growing cracks is difficult with most implementations of the digital image correlation (DIC) method. This difficulty arises from the need to exclude the cracked area from the analysis, a process that oftentimes requires significant and time-consuming user input to achieve successful results. This work presents a set of modifications to the Newton–Raphson based DIC process that allows the method to automatically analyze specimens with multiple growing cracks. The modifications combine a relatively simple crack identification process that takes advantage of the consistency of quasi-regular speckle patterns with a method to reestablish the analysis in areas segregated by the crack growth. The use of a regular dot pattern does, however, introduce a greater chance for registration error in the correlation process. A method to minimize possible registration problems is also presented. Finally, the effectiveness of the method is demonstrated using images of concrete specimens with a complex and growing crack pattern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rethore J, Hild F, Roux S (2007) Extended digital image correlation with crack shape optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 73:248–272.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Sutton MA, McNeill SR, Helm JD, Chao YJ (2000) Computer vision applied to shape and deformation measurement. In: Rastogi PK, Inaudi D (eds) Trends in optical non-destructive testing and inspection. Springer, New York, pp 323–368.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang D, Eggleton DC, Arola DD (2002) Evaluating the mechanical behavior of arterial tissue using digital image correlation. Exp Mech 42:409–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. LeBlanc MM, Florando JN, Lassila DH, Schmidt T, Tyson J (2006) Image correlation applied to single crystal plasticity experiments and comparison to strain gage data. Exp Tech 30:33–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bruck HA, McNeill SR, Sutton MA, Peters WH (1989) Digital image correlation using Newton–Raphson method of partial differential corrections. Exp Mech 29:261–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Helm JD, McNeill SR, Sutton MA (1996) Improved three-dimensional image correlation for surface displacement measurements. Opt Eng 35:1911–1920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (1992) Numerical recipes in Fortran, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, p 372.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Foley J, vanDam A, Feiner S, Hughes J (1990) Computer graphics: principles and practice, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, pp 979–982.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. D. Helm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Helm, J.D. Digital Image Correlation for Specimens with Multiple Growing Cracks. Exp Mech 48, 753–762 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-007-9120-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-007-9120-2

Keywords

Navigation