Skip to main content
Log in

Measurement of Orthopedic Cortical Bone Screw Insertion Performance in Cadaver Bone and Model Materials

Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article


In this study, a method was developed for distinguishing insertion and driving performance between different self-tapping bone screw designs. To measure screw starting load, torque and displacements, a test apparatus was developed utilizing a modified drill press with the capability to measure in-line torque, axial compression load, and axial displacement. Specimens were inserted into cadaver bone to measure a baseline response and a bone analog was developed to mimic the bicortical application of screws in the cadaver model. Recorded data could be used to measure a distinguishable screw starting load and the torque for the insertion of bone screws. The results were similar between the cadaver bone and the bone analog. The average insertion load ranged from 5.4 to 64.5 N in cadaver tests and 9.0–41.0 N in the construct tests. Average first cortex insertion torques ranged from 0.53 to 0.66 N-m in the cadaver tests and 0.29–0.32 N-m in the construct test. Average second cortex insertion torques ranged from 0.70 to 1.03 N-m in the cadaver tests and 0.60–0.63 N-m in the construct tests. This method successfully illuminated differences between several different self-tapping screw designs and was also successfully employed to determine the impact of design and manufacturing methods on screw performance. An interesting finding in this study is that axial starting load is very sensitive to screw tip design whereas insertion torque is not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13


  1. Installing technician, Peter Van Skoyk, 727-409-4403,


  1. ASTM F543 (2002) Standard specification and test method for metallic medical bone screws. American Society for Testing & Materials (ASTM), West Conshohocken, PA.

  2. Hsu CC, Chao CK, Wang JL, Hou SM, Tsai YT, Lin J (2005) Increase of pullout strength of spinal pedicle screws with conical core: biomechanical tests and finite element analyses. J Orthop Res 23(4):788–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bredbenner TL, Haug RH (2000) Substitutes for human cadaveric bone in maxillofacial rigid fixation research. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endo 90(5):574–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pitzen T, Franta F, Barbier D, Steudel WI (2004) Insertion torque and pullout force of rescue screws for anterior cervical plate fixation in a fatigued initial pilot hole. J Neurosurg Spine 1(2):198–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Buhler DW, Berlemann U, Oxland TR, Nolte LP (1998) Moments and forces during pedicle screw insertion. In vitro and in vivo measurements. Spine 23(11):1220–1227; discussion 1228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Glauser CR, Oden ZM, Ambrose CG, Willits MB, Coupe KJ (2003) Mechanical testing of small fracture implants for comparison of insertion and failure torques. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 123(8):388–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lawson KJ, Brems J (2001) Effect of insertion torque on bone screw pullout strength. Orthopedics 24(5):451–454.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yerby S, Scott CC, Evans NJ, Messing KL, Carter DR (2001) Effect of cutting flute design on cortical bone screw insertion torque and pullout strength. J Orthop Trauma 15(3):216–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Reitman CA, Nguyen L, Fogel GR (2004) Biomechanical evaluation of relationship of screw pullout strength, insertional torque, and bone mineral density in the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 17(4):306–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Koistinen A, Santavirta SS, Kroger H, Lappalainen R (2005) Effect of bone mineral density and amorphous diamond coatings on insertion torque of bone screws. Biomaterials 26(28):5687–5694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Koistinen A, Santavirta S, Lappalainen R (2003) Apparatus to test insertion and removal torque of bone screws. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 217(6):503–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hughes AN, Jordan BA (1972) The mechanical properties of surgical bone screws and some aspects of insertion practice. Injury 4(1):25–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. McGuire RA, St John KR, Agnew SG (1995) “Analysis of the torque applied to bone screws by trauma surgeons. Comparisons based on years of experience and material of implant construction.” Am J Orthop 24(3):254–256.

    Google Scholar 

  14. You ZH, Bell WH, Schneiderman ED, Ashman RB (1994) Biomechanical properties of small bone screws. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 52(12):1293–1302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ansell RH, Scales JT (1968) “A study of some factors which affect the strength of screws and their insertion and holding power in bone.” J Biomech 1(4):279–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ryken TC, Clausen JD, Traynelis VC, Goel VK (1995) Biomechanical analysis of bone mineral density, insertion technique, screw torque, and holding strength of anterior cervical plate screws. J Neurosurg 83(2):325–329.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Trader JE, Johnson RP, Kalbfleisch JH (1979) Bone-mineral content, surface hardness, and mechanical fixation in the human radius: A correlative study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 61(8):1217–1220.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nunamaker DM, Perren SM (1976) Force measurements in screw fixation. J Biomech 9(11):669–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Weaver JK (1966) The microscopic hardness of bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am 48(2):273–288.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zimmer, Inc. (2004–2006) Sales Data on file at Zimmer, Inc.

  21. CELCON® (M25 Grade) (2004) Material Properties Datasheet, Ticona, Florence, KY.

  22. Hobatho MC, Rho JY, Ashman RB (1991) Atlas of mechanical properties of human cortical and cancellous bone. In: Van Der Perre G, Lowet G, Borgwardt-Christensen A (eds) Proceedings COMAC-BME 11.2.6 meeting. Durham, UK, pp 11–13.

  23. Cowin S (1989) Bone mechanics, Chapter 6. CRC Press, New York, pp 97–158.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Calvert K, Kirkpatrick LA, Blakemore DM, Johnson TS (2005) Poster #366—Femoral cortical wall thickness and hardness evaluation. In: Society for Biomaterials 2005 Annual Meeting, April 27–30.

  25. FR 3720 (2004) Material properties datasheet. General Plastics Manufacturing Co., Tacoma, WA.

  26. ASTM F1839 (2004) Specification for rigid polyurethane foam for use as a standard material for testing orthopaedic devices and instruments. American Society for Testing & Materials (ASTM), West Conshohocken, PA.

Download references


The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge Dr. Clifford Jones, MD for his professional opinions and assistance in conducting portions of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Kincaid.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kincaid, B., Schroder, L. & Mason, J. Measurement of Orthopedic Cortical Bone Screw Insertion Performance in Cadaver Bone and Model Materials. Exp Mech 47, 595–607 (2007).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: