Skip to main content
Log in

Book Review

  • Book Review
  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • American Psychological Association, American Educational Research Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1954). Technical recommendations for psychological tests and diagnostic techniques (Vol. 51). American Psychological Association.

  • Borsboom, D., Cramer, A. O., Kievit, R. A., Zand Scholten, A., & Franic, S. (2009). The end of construct validity. In R. W. Lissitz (Ed.), The concept of validity: Revisions, new directions, and applications (pp. 135–170). Charlotte, NC, USA: IAP Information Age Publishing.

  • Cronbach, L., & Meehl, P. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. doi:10.1037/h0040957.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Driver-Linn, E. (2003). Where is the psychology going? Structural fault lines revealed by psychologists’ use of Kuhn. American Psychologist, 58(4), 269–278. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.58.4.269.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flake, J. K., Pek, J., & Hehman, E. (2017). Construct validation in social and personality research: Current practice and recommendations. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 370–378. doi:10.1177/1948550617693063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leahey, T. H. (1992). The mythical revolutions of American psychology. American Psychologist, 47(2), 308–318. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.47.2.308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCorquodale, K., & Meehl, P. E. (1948). On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables. Psychological Review, 55(2), 95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maraun, M. D., & Gabriel, S. M. (2013). Illegitimate concept equating in the partial fusion of construct validation theory and latent variable modeling. New Ideas in Psychology, 31(1), 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maraun, M. D., & Halpin, P. F. (2008). Manifest and latent variates. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 6, 113–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, K. A., & Borsboom, D. (2013). Frontiers of test validity theory: Measurement, causation, and meaning. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). New York, NY: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michell, J. (1999). Measurement in psychology: A critical history of a methodological concept (Vol. 53). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Newton, P., & Shaw, S. (2014). Validity in educational and psychological assessment. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peak, H. (1953). Problems of objective observation. In L. Festinger & D. Katz (Eds.), Research methods in behavioral sciences (pp. 243–299). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J. (2008). General introduction and overview: The Raven Progressive Matrices Tests: Their theoretical basis and measurement model. In J. Raven & J. Raven (Eds.), Uses and abuses of intelligence: Studies advancing Spearman and Raven’s quest for non-arbitrary metrics (pp. 17–68). Unionville, NY, USA: Royal Fireworks Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitely, S. E. (1983). Construct validity: Construct representation versus nomothetic span. Psychological Bulletin, 93(1), 179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian James Davidson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Davidson, I.J. Book Review. Psychometrika 83, 272–274 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-017-9589-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-017-9589-2

Navigation