Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Book Review

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. To identify whether Bayesian methods were mentioned, PDF versions of each article were searched using the keywords “Bayes,” “Posterior,” “Prior Probability,” “Prior Distribution,” “Markov Chain,” and “MCMC,” Any article that mentioned at least one of these terms in the context of Bayesian statistics was coded as having mentioned Bayesian methods.

References

  • Andrews, M., & Baguley, T. (2013). Prior approval: The growth of Bayesian methods in psychology. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 66, 1–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cowles, M. K., & Carlin, B. P. (1996). Markov chain Monte Carlo convergence diagnostics: A comparative review. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 883–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2014). Bayesian data analysis (Vol. 2). Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G., & Marewski, J. N. (2015). Surrogate science: The idol of a universal method for scientific inference. Journal of Management, 41(2), 421–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruschke, J. K., Aguinis, H., & Joo, H. (2012). The time has come Bayesian methods for data analysis in the organizational sciences. Organizational Research Methods, 15(4), 722–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKee, R. A., & Miller, C. C. (2015). Institutionalizing Bayesianism within the organizational sciences: A practical guide featuring comments from eminent scholars. Journal of Management, 41(2), 471–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2011). Bayesian SEM: A more flexible representation of substantive theory. Psychological Methods, 17, 313–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1977). Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(5), 529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Quantitative/Psychometric Methods (QPM), Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, N658 Elliott Hall, 75 East River Road, Minneapolis, MN, 55455 , USA

    Chun Wang

  2. Industrial/Organizational Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 75 East River Road, Minneapolis, MN, 55455 , USA

    Jack Kostal

Authors
  1. Chun Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jack Kostal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chun Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, C., Kostal, J. Book Review. Psychometrika 82, 267–272 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-016-9548-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-016-9548-3

Search

Navigation