Monitoring Countries in a Changing World: A New Look at DIF in International Surveys
- 496 Downloads
This paper discusses the issue of differential item functioning (DIF) in international surveys. DIF is likely to occur in international surveys. What is needed is a statistical approach that takes DIF into account, while at the same time allowing for meaningful comparisons between countries. Some existing approaches are discussed and an alternative is provided. The core of this alternative approach is to define the construct as a large set of items, and to report in terms of summary statistics. Since the data are incomplete, measurement models are used to complete the incomplete data. For that purpose, different models can be used across countries. The method is illustrated with PISA’s reading literacy data. The results indicate that this approach fits the data better than the current PISA methodology; however, the league tables are nearly identical. The implications for monitoring changes over time are discussed.
Keywordsdifferential item functioning DIF ranking robustness educational testing programme for international student assessment PISA Rasch models reading literacy
- Adams, R. (2011, 19 April). Comments on Kreiner 2011: Is the foundation under PISA solid? A critical look at the scaling model underlying international comparisons of student attainment. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/47681954.
- American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washinton, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
- Andersen, E. B. (1973). Conditional inference and models for measuring. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Mentalhygiejnisk Forskningsinstitut.Google Scholar
- Bechger, T.M., Maris, G., & Verstralen, H.H.F.M. (2010). A different view on DIF (Measurement and Research Department Reports No. 2010-4). Cito.Google Scholar
- Béguin, A. A., & Wools, S. (2015). Vertical comparison using reference sets. In R. E. Millsap, D. M. Bolt, L. A. van der Ark, & W. C. Wang (Eds.), Quantitative psychology research (Vol. 89, pp. 195–211). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
- Council of Europe. (2012). First european survey on language competences: Technical report. Retrieved from http://www.surveylang.org/.
- Dieterich, C. (2013, March). In or out, DJIA companies reflect changing times. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424127887324678604578342113520798752.
- Holland, P., & Wainer, H. (Eds.). (1993). Differential item functioning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Kreiner, S. (2011). Is the foundation under PISA solid? A critical look at the scaling model underlying international comparisons of student attainment. (Tech. Rep.). Dept. of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
- Le, L. T. (2007). Effects of item positions on their difficulty and discrimination: A study in PISA science data across test language and countries. Paper presented at the 72nd Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Tokyo, Japan. Retrieved from http://research.acer.edu.au/pisa/2/.
- Linthorne, N. (2014, August). Wind assistance in the 100m sprint. Retrieved from http://www.brunel.ac.uk/~spstnpl/Publications/.
- Lord, F., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- Mazzeo, J., Kulick, E., Tay-Lim, B., & Perie, M. (2006). Technical report for the 2000 market-basket study in mathematics (Tech. Rep.). ETS.Google Scholar
- Mislevy, R. J. (1998). Implications of market-basket reporting for achievement-level setting. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11(1), 49–63.Google Scholar
- National Research Council. (2001). Naep reporting practices: Investigating district-level and market-basket reporting. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10049.
- NCES. (1997, October). NAEP reconfigured: An integrated redesign of the national assessment of educational progress (Tech. Rep. No. 97-31). National Center For Educational Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs97/9731.
- OECD. (2004). Learning for tomorrows world: First results from PISA 2003. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/dataoecd/1/60/34002216.
- OECD. (2007). PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrows world: Volume 1: Analysis.Google Scholar
- OECD. (2009a). PISA 2006 technical report.Google Scholar
- OECD. (2009b) PISA data analysis manual.Google Scholar
- OECD. (2012). The policy impact of PISA: An exploration of the normative effects of international benchmarking in school system performance (OECD Education Working Paper No. 71). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
- Oliveri, M. E., & Von Davier, M. (2011). Investigation of model fit and score scale comparability in international assessments. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 53(3), 315–333.Google Scholar
- Sandilands, D., Oliveri, M. E., Zumbo, B. D., & Ercikan, K. (2013). Investigating sources of differential item functioning in international large-scale assessments using a confirmatory approach. International Journal of Testing, 13(2), 152–174. doi: 10.1080/15305058.2012.690140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Verhelst, N. D., Glas, C. A. W., & Verstralen, H. H. F. M. (1993). OPLM: One parameter logistic model. Computer program and manual. Arnhem: Cito.Google Scholar