Psychometrika

, Volume 81, Issue 1, pp 33–38

Improving the Conduct and Reporting of Statistical Analysis in Psychology

  • Klaas Sijtsma
  • Coosje L. S. Veldkamp
  • Jelte M. Wicherts
Article

DOI: 10.1007/s11336-015-9444-2

Cite this article as:
Sijtsma, K., Veldkamp, C.L.S. & Wicherts, J.M. Psychometrika (2016) 81: 33. doi:10.1007/s11336-015-9444-2

Abstract

We respond to the commentaries Waldman and Lilienfeld (Psychometrika, 2015) and Wigboldus and Dotch (Psychometrika, 2015) provided in response to Sijtsma’s (Sijtsma in Psychometrika, 2015) discussion article on questionable research practices. Specifically, we discuss the fear of an increased dichotomy between substantive and statistical aspects of research that may arise when the latter aspects are laid entirely in the hands of a statistician, remedies for false positives and replication failure, and the status of data exploration, and we provide a re-definition of the concept of questionable research practices.

Keywords

data exploration questionable research practices remedies for false positives replication failure 

Copyright information

© The Psychometric Society 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Klaas Sijtsma
    • 1
  • Coosje L. S. Veldkamp
    • 1
  • Jelte M. Wicherts
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral SciencesTilburg UniversityTilburgThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations